ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs TJ was better than Charles in Cleveland. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233987)

CHENZ A! 09-23-2010 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter (Post 7032188)
Jamal needs more carries, and Cassel (to this point) sucks??? :shrug:

Just sayin.... :hmmm:

eat shit one who sucks the penis.

POND_OF_RED 09-23-2010 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 7031608)
The problem is that Charles isn't as good in pass protection, so of course the opposition keys on him getting the ball. I am hoping that this leads to two RB sets in the future.

I say we run the wishbone. Put Jones right behind Cassel in the FB spot and throw Charles and McCluster behind them. Defenses wouldn't know what to do. It's not like we need a passing formation for anything.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-23-2010 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED (Post 7032268)
I say we run the wishbone. Put Jones right behind Cassel in the FB spot and throw Charles and McCluster behind them. Defenses wouldn't know what to do. It's not like we need a passing formation for anything.

I would be TOTALLY down for some old fashioned wishbone!

CrazyHorse 09-24-2010 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 7031886)
that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 7031886)
that's a false choice. we have both, so its a mute point.

and RBBC is the way it is now in the National Football League.


a question to the Planet whiners - would you rather get 400 carries out of JC this year and then he's done (a la LJ, Eddie George, Jamal Anderson), or limit his carries early, still win, and keep him fresh longer?

False choice? That was dumb. The thread is about one being better than the other so I ask which one would you want

Why does it have to be 400 carries?


If we were 0-2 there would be no debate. Everyone would want our best back getting the carries. Offense is not winning games for us. When it starts losing games I think we will allll be on the same page.

EnviroMatt 09-24-2010 08:10 AM

Anyone else see the resemblance?!?

http://www.footballnewsnow.com/wp-co...s_jones_sm.jpg http://celebrity-pics.movieeye.com/c...ris_939419.jpg

400 carries is no problem for TJ!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.