ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs buzz: Croyle lacking game action (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=238206)

TheGuardian 12-10-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244476)
Would you be happy with Brodie if he went 10/22 for 68 yards and 1 TD on Sunday?

No, but you quoting stats from opening night when the weather sucked ass is pretty ****ing dumb.

Pants 12-10-2010 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 7244492)
You don't play 2 good games and go 23-4. That's ****ing stupid beyond comprehension.

You probably just have a different definition of 'good'. It seems like to you "not bad" = "good" while to us, "good" = "good". He has 2 really good games, and a pretty good game last Sunday (I'm not counting the practice against Denver in the 2nd half of that game).

ROYC75 12-10-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244491)
It's a pretty self-explanatory question. Which part do you not understand?

I can see things from both sides. I don't get to excited and wrapped up in this crap. The situation is what it is,injuries happens and good teams find ways to work through them, this should make the whole team step it up and rally around Brodie. If they do not, then clearly we do not have the team we need to compete in the NFL.

One player a team make ? Hardly, howbeit, we all know a good QB is a vital part. Was Frank Reich a GREAT starting QB ? No, but when called upon in backup time the team rallied around him and made him look like a saint. There has been many of backup QB's that thought they were # 1 material, finally moving on to find they were not what they thought they were.

We get the chance this weekend to see if this team is really making strides.

Pants 12-10-2010 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 7244494)
No, but you quoting stats from opening night when the weather sucked ass is pretty ****ing dumb.

22/39 298 2TDs
Now, shut the **** up.

Chiefnj2 12-10-2010 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244476)
Would you be happy with Brodie if he went 10/22 for 68 yards and 1 TD on Sunday?

Do the Chiefs win??

TheGuardian 12-10-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244501)
You probably just have a different definition of 'good'. It seems like to you "not bad" = "good" while to us, "good" = "good". He has 2 really good games, and a pretty good game last Sunday (I'm not counting the practice against Denver in the 2nd half of that game).

week 3 against the 9ers he hit 59% of his passes for 250 with 3 TD's and 1 pick in a blow out win

week 5 against the Texas he 20 of 29 for 201 with 3 TD's and no picks including what should have been the game winning drive but the defense folded

62% for 193 and 2 TD's no picks in a blowout win against Zona

69% for 233 with 4 TD's and zero picks on the road in Seattle

55% for for 196 and a TD with no picks last week

It's already been disproved that Denver was NOT playing a prevent or soft zone in that game in the second half where they blitzed 25 times. So there's 6 games at least.

Brodie is 0-9 as a starter. /thread

TheGuardian 12-10-2010 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244510)
22/39 298 2TDs
Now, shut the **** up.

With 94 ****ing yards of that coming on a blown coverage on two plays. Now make me shut the **** up **** rag.

HemiEd 12-10-2010 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 7244492)
You don't play 2 good games and go 23-4. That's ****ing stupid beyond comprehension.

The rest of your shit, wow. If Brodie were that good, he's not 0-9 as a ****ing starter. What part about that don't you get?????


What the **** are you talking about? When has Cassel gone 23 and 4? This year he is 8 and 4. Last year he was 4 and 11 with the same team Brodie was 0 and 1 with.

If you are going to make excuses for Cassel and the Weather, the last time Brodie played, his Offensive Coordinator had just been fired, dumbass. He didn't have the coaching and support that Cassel has had.

That is why I am excited to see what he does, is that so ****ing hard for you dumbass?

No where did I say I was glad Cassel was out, I said I was more excited to see Brodie play, which I am.

Reerun_KC 12-10-2010 09:59 AM

My guess croyle will go 18-26 269 2tds with 1 Int..

Pants 12-10-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 7244515)
With 60 ****ing yards of that coming on a blown coverage. Now make me shut the **** up **** rag.

But, but, the weather?

TheGuardian 12-10-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 7244521)
What the **** are you talking about? When has Cassel gone 23 and 4? This year he is 8 and 4. Last year he was 4 and 11 with the same team Brodie was 0 and 1 with.

If you are going to make excuses for Cassel and the Weather, the last time Brodie played, his Offensive Coordinator had just been fired, dumbass. He didn't have the coaching and support that Cassel has had.

That is why I am excited to see what he does, is that so ****ing hard for you dumbass?

No where did I say I was glad Cassel was out, I said I was more excited to see Brodie play, which I am.

23 touchdowns with 4 picks.

Reerun_KC 12-10-2010 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7244526)
But, but, the weather?

was one of the main reasons SD lost the game. We jumped out early, ran the ball (something they couldnt do) and won the game...

TheGuardian 12-10-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 7244530)
was one of the main reasons SD lost the game. We jumped out early, ran the ball (something they couldnt do) and won the game...

Stop trying to use logic on squirrel nuts there.

Pants 12-10-2010 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian (Post 7244512)
week 3 against the 9ers he hit 59% of his passes for 250 with 3 TD's and 1 pick in a blow out win

week 5 against the Texas he 20 of 29 for 201 with 3 TD's and no picks including what should have been the game winning drive but the defense folded

62% for 193 and 2 TD's no picks in a blowout win against Zona

69% for 233 with 4 TD's and zero picks on the road in Seattle

55% for for 196 and a TD with no picks last week

It's already been disproved that Denver was NOT playing a prevent or soft zone in that game in the second half where they blitzed 25 times. So there's 6 games at least.

Brodie is 0-9 as a starter. /thread

Did you watch the games, dude? I'll repeat, Cassel has had 2 really good games (and by really good games I mean stepping up in the pocket and delivering strikes, avoiding pressure without shitting his pants, making his reads and being accurate). You can post the numbers all day long, I know they're impressive and I'm sure they'll convince all those pundits on TV that don't actually watch the games, but they can't convince me when I saw how Cassel was playing with my own 2 eyes.

Pants 12-10-2010 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 7244530)
was one of the main reasons SD lost the game. We jumped out early, ran the ball (something they couldnt do) and won the game...

We won the game because Dex ran one back for a TD.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.