He has a five-year contract.

If the Chiefs don't have a playoff win or a franchise quarterback by the end of 2013, why should he be retained?

I'd rather read XFactor's article.

There's nothing worse than a mentral A.B.C.D.E Wendler after a loss.

Yeah, like Clark is going to let him go.

Get ****ing real.

His contract expires at the end of five years.

If the Chiefs have accomplished nothing by the end of that term, why would Clark retain him?

What have you been a fan for 5 years? His father kept renewing Carl Peterson until the cows come home.

Pioli is going to be here 10+ years.

I have to have some kind of faith that Clark won't make the same kind of mistake, I guess.

;)Jesus Christ.

Just pick a side you bi-polar moron.

Where have you been? Do you not remember the 2010 frauds?

KC wins this weekend all this crazy talk goes away. At least for a week.

Would is very different to should.

Skywalker here is exactly right. Five ****ing years is plenty of time for a GM to lay forth and execute a plan. If the Chiefs aren't WAY (-YYYYYYYYYYx9999999999) further along than the current embarrassment of a team, Hunt friggin' well should be finding Pioli's replacement.

We'll see, though. Pioli might have an April lottery ticket burning in his pocket due to the turd he's ultimately responsible for fielding.

You're a good guy, and I love the gifs you post, but why do you change opinions so completely and quickly?

The Chiefs were not frauds last year. They earned the division. I get sick of the easy schedule argument, like in the NFL you get to play division II teams or something. There are more good pieces to this team than bad. A really good core of young players. You know that, you'd have to to study and find all the gif you post.

I don't.

I thought the Chiefs were frauds last year and I haven't wavered from that belief.

There are more good pieces than bad on ANY winning team.

Doesn't mean it's a legit threat for a championship.

because he is an attention whore who will say/do whatever he can to get people to give him attention. Just like a 3 year old child, it doesn't matter if it's positive or negative attention. It probably stems from an insecurity complex from being a fatty,fatty 2X4 most of his life.

He tries to make himself feel better by saying that he is generating traffic by creating controversy but it's really just sad.

Maybe he is Whitlock's bastard child since they seem to have much the same pathetic personality.

No