![]() |
We've had enough retread QBs.
|
Quote:
|
FTR... If drafting a quality rookie is out of the question, then I wouldn't mind a trade for far less than two 1st rounders. A second (2012) and a third(2013) would be fair compensation in my opinion.
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
A lot of responses don’t make sense. There’s no F-ing way Indy gets 2 firsts for Peyton. At this point it would be like the Montana deal in 93. We gave up, what, a 2nd?
And the team that got him would not trade away any other option at QB (like Sanchez for the Jets), unless they flat-out didn’t want him. You either believe in your guy, or you don't. And the dumbest move mentioned is for the Colts to trade the #1, then look for a QB in 2 years. You don’t pass up franchise QBs when one falls in your lap, just because the timing didn’t PERFECTLY match up. You take the QB that will have you back competing for Super Bowls for the next 15 years, and start getting the ring of honor ready for the old guy. |
Is there a Chiefs rule book for fans that we continue to get retread QBs from other teams????????????????????
:facepalm: |
Quote:
|
I would
|
Quote:
|
I'd give up a 1 and a 2 for Cutler. I think he could have been had for less than that after last season was over
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No thanks.
|
a 2nd and he's proven to be healthy. yes
|
Washington would clearly make this move imo - but i imagine Peyton would rather retire than play for that squad. Other potential players would be Denver or Seattle, but I think Washington would be first in line to trade for Manning.
Personally, I think this is a moot point and the better question is who will trade their team for Luck. The Colts are ridiculously committed to Peyton and I would lay $$$ that they don't trade him, ever. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.