ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I kinda hope we don't. Blasphemy, I know. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=257015)

lcarus 03-08-2012 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 8429275)
I'm really unsure of who you are talking about. Are we interested in a QB somewhere?

Chad Henne

Fish 03-08-2012 02:08 PM

Ahhh... thanks. I'm Mad for Chad....

The Bad Guy 03-08-2012 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8429266)
The Chiefs are the problem. They need to find the sexy young thing...

But they won't. They're just not going to do it.

So we're left hanging out at the bar at 2am hoping that some drunk 45-year old is wasted enough to go home with us.

No, the Chiefs are settling on the 280 pound grenede that's friend with the hot blonde that we all would like to go home with.

Rain Man 03-08-2012 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 8429281)
Chad Henne


Welcome to Avis. Do you have a reservation?

Hammock Parties 03-08-2012 02:10 PM

It's two more years of Casshole or two more years of Manning.

I'm going to stick my head in the sand rather than up my butt.

Chiefnj2 03-08-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8429248)
Didn't work with Montana? Signing Joe Montana was the best move this team has made in the last 40 years. We got one game away.

1 game away and 20 years of the same faulty thinking, and failure to go along with it.

HemiEd 03-08-2012 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 8429140)
It worked with Montana. Well sort of worked. We were instant Super Bowl contenders, and Joe got us closer than we've been in the 40 years since we won the damn thing. Just because we came up just short with Joe doesn't mean it was a failure. Not at all.

This is actually better than the Montana situation, we don't have to give up the first round pick now, like we did to the 49ers.

That is the reason I am on board with it now.

Dana Stubblefield turned out to be a pretty good pick for them at our spot.

htismaqe 03-08-2012 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8429297)
1 game away and 20 years of the same faulty thinking, and failure to go along with it.

If there were a legitimate chance of that faulty thinking actually CHANGING, you might have a point.

We're not going to draft and develop our own QB. We're stuck using other teams' cast-offs.

Might as well get the one cast-off that gives us the best chance to win.

Valiant 03-08-2012 02:14 PM

Team is built to win now.
Our tailored offense is below average right now.

Unless you land a tom brady in the draft our support players will be too old.

Another reason I hate cassel because he wastes the talent around him.

suds79 03-08-2012 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8429297)
1 game away and 20 years of the same faulty thinking, and failure to go along with it.

Didn't say it was the best possible senario. That would have been winning it all.

But copy the rest of my post. If you're telling me we could get to the AFC championship game, I'll take it. Like I said. Anything can happen.

And with Peyton, I think we could get there. What are our other options?

Luck? Off the board. RG3? Off the board. Tannahill? Going to spend a 1st on a project guy whose stock is elevated because of a weak QB class? Really? Particularly when next year is much stronger. He might be gone by the time we pick teams are so desperate for QBs.

You want Orton? He'll get us as far as Matt Cassel ever could. 1st round knock out.

What is a better option?

lcarus 03-08-2012 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8429297)
1 game away and 20 years of the same faulty thinking, and failure to go along with it.

20 years of the same faulty thinking? Yeah we figured, Joe worked so well, might as well start Steve Bono, Elvis Grbac, ignore Rich Gannon's success and let him take the Raiders to the promised land, sign Trent Green, draft Brodie Croyle, sign Damon Huard, Matt Cassel, Tyler Palko. All of those are the same thing as signing a HOF QB with a year or two left in the tank.

HemiEd 03-08-2012 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition (Post 8429245)
I'm not sure Pioli or Crennel can groom a QBotF
They couldn't get Stanzi ready to play a single game

I don't think that is accurate at all. IMO Haley had his mind made up that Stanzi was not playing, he had a sick thing for Palko.
Crennel had a better option with Orton, that would help land him the job he was after. He would have played Stanzi if that was the best option IMO.

Chiefnj2 03-08-2012 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 8429304)
If there were a legitimate chance of that faulty thinking actually CHANGING, you might have a point.

We're not going to draft and develop our own QB. We're stuck using other teams' cast-offs.

Might as well get the one cast-off that gives us the best chance to win.

So you now want KC to draft T Richardson (regardless of Manning)?

BossChief 03-08-2012 02:27 PM

A 36 year old Manning and a very young Ricky Stanzi is close to a perfect scenario for our qb situation.

I give us a better than 50% chance of getting the deal done.

If there wasn't a real possibility of this coming to fruition, Denver wouldnt even be in the picture.

Mr. Laz 03-08-2012 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scorp (Post 8429125)
You shut you whore mouth!

this


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.