ChiefGator |
03-18-2012 07:15 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
(Post 8467311)
Nothing matters if the Chiefs don't have a QB.
The front office's arrogance lost them the Peyton Manning sweepstakes. And the Chiefs could have cut Cassel and kept Orton for the same exact price.
The QB decision is critical. And they ****ed it up big time. They promised us competition for Cassel. Instead, they got us a backup.
That decision alone turns it from an A- to a D.
|
Manning chose not to come here, despite the efforts of our GM and owner. Maybe we have a history of suckiness and cheapness, but that is hard to blame at the feet of the FA period this year, considering it just started.
Orton got a fat deal from Chicago ( $5 mil this year ). That's overpaying for a backup who was marginally better than Cassel.
Who else is available for competition? There just aren't enough good QBs to go around in the NFL; it's not like we missed some great chance at improving our QB position.
And besides, we have the draft and our draft-pick from last year for this.
I don't like the QB situation anymore than anyone else, but there aren't better alternatives just sitting out there, unless you want to roll the dice on Flynn.
|