ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Last nights first rounder. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=258973)

petegz28 04-27-2012 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8573727)
Uhhhhh........Belcher is that guy.

And he's only getting better.

Then if true we didn't need Hightower. Again, I don't know much about Hightower so ...

Munson 04-27-2012 02:52 PM

Hali and Houston don't play every down. Ingram could've given them a few snaps off. Also, in certain situations like 2nd or 3rd and long, he could sub for Dorsey/Jackson to rush the passer. The point is, you find a way to get your best rushers on the field, much like the Giants do.

O.city 04-27-2012 02:55 PM

Stop using the Giants. We run a 34, they run a 43.


Totally different scheme.

petegz28 04-27-2012 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munson (Post 8573738)
Hali and Houston don't play every down. Ingram could've given them a few snaps off. Also, in certain situations like 2nd or 3rd and long, he could sub for Dorsey/Jackson to rush the passer. The point is, you find a way to get your best rushers on the field, much like the Giants do.

So you draft a guy at #11 to play backup?

Direckshun 04-27-2012 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8573724)
Dan Saly, who was the last good NT the Chiefs have had, imo, averaged 3.5 sacks a year with the Chiefs. That is the level I am holding Poe too at this point. It also points out that your NT is not there to get a ton of sacks and tackles but to eat up space, take on 2 blockers and allow the LB's to make the plays.

Different defensive scheme.

milkman 04-27-2012 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8573729)
Where would you have played him? Would you have benched Houston? Just curious, seriously, not being a smartass just wondering where you would have worked him in?

As Munson points out, Hali and Houston don't, or shouldn't, play every down, so he'd rotate in there.

the Chiefs also use sub package schemes about 60% of snaps, and he would be able to play inside with DJ, and either drop in coverage or blitz.

He can also line up at DE in passing situations.

There's a multitude of ways to get him on the field for a majority of snaps.

Holladay 04-27-2012 02:57 PM

I'm pissed, how many more first round picks are we gonna use on the D-line until we get it right??

The defination of insanity/stupidity = doing the same thing while expecting different results!

As to your premise, thinking and reading the above posts, I begrudgedly accept that Poe was the best pick for value and need:(

suds79 04-27-2012 02:57 PM

No other way to spin it.

Yes Ingram would have provided a nice additional, situational pass rush.

But the Chiefs decided to instead draft the rare freak of nature with the ability to play what might be the hardest spot to find on the field outside of QB.

Hard to fault them for that.

milkman 04-27-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8573742)
Stop using the Giants. We run a 34, they run a 43.


Totally different scheme.

Different defenses, same idea.

Direckshun 04-27-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 8573742)
Stop using the Giants. We run a 34, they run a 43.

Totally different scheme.

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 8573745)
So you draft a guy at #11 to play backup?

The Giants utilize a system where they wear down tackles over the course of the game by keeping a fresh, talented trio of devastating passrushers fresh with their ears constantly pinned down.

There is no reason why we couldn't embrace that philosophy here.

Direckshun 04-27-2012 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79 (Post 8573749)
No other way to spin it.

Yes Ingram would have provided a nice additional, situational pass rush.

But the Chiefs decided to instead draft the rare freak of nature with the ability to play what might be the hardest spot to find on the field outside of QB.

Hard to fault them for that.

Ingram was a pipe dream anyway. His arms are too short.

The only short-armed passrusher in the league that has done anything is Tamba Hali, and he had to become a ****ing black belt to pull it off.

Chiefnj2 04-27-2012 02:59 PM

I would have taken Cox or Brockers to play DE.
I would have taken DeCastro.
I would have taken Kirkpatrick.
I would have taken Ingram, McClellin, Mercilus or Jones.
I would have taken Floyd.

suds79 04-27-2012 02:59 PM

This might sound weird but I love swinging for the fences.

If you hit, you have greatness. If you whiff, you suffer greatly for it and draft that QB in the top 5.

Playing it safe IMO is a great way to always be 8-8.

KCDC 04-27-2012 03:00 PM

As much as I hate the Poe pick, the board fell terribly to us because Keuchly and Barron did not fall to us. If they had, we could have taken one or traded back and still gotten a good DT/DE.

There was no one left at our pick that was worth someone jumping up to get except Philly (who wanted a DT). We still could have taken Ingram or Brockers or anyone, I know.

Reaper16 04-27-2012 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 8573713)
He is a damn good football who was the heart & soul of Alabama's defense.

Trust me. Josh Chapman was the heart & soul of that defense. He was that team's emotional leader, especially off-the-field. He set the tone in practice. He set the tone just walking around campus.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.