![]() |
Quote:
Enough with the trade down talk. It's not going to happen. We need the best QB in the draft far more than we need the extra draft picks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But what if Reid and Dorsey have done their evaluations and feel they have a 99% of getting their target player a few spots down. They could easily pick up another 1st next year as well as a 2nd and 3rd this year. Would the fan base not be fired up in that case ?? We could stock pile 1st round picks waiting for Johnny Football. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2. NOTHING in the NFL draft should make you 99% confident, especially when it comes to projecting where top QBs will fall. If you're not taking a QB at your pick, there is nothing that people can point to that would predict with any kind of accuracy where he'll fall. Teams want QBs, and they WILL trade up to get their guy. |
Quote:
What do you mean Johnny Football sucks ! You ever seen a white guy run like that ?????? |
My goal would be to lock up Albert and either franchise or sign Bowe and take a QB. If we can't lock up Albert (or don't believe we can do it if we franchise him), I'll take Joeckel and get my QB some other way.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's awesome. |
Quote:
And what about the Browns? Julio Jones? Or all their draft picks? You can make a pretty good case for both the Rams and Browns being better off staying put and taking RGIII and Jones. |
Quote:
Well you couldnt find a better franchise full of more fail than the Chiefs... |
people sometimes forget that it takes TWO to tango for a trade up or down
what ****ing piece of shit player would a team even want to trade up for at #1 in the first place and give up that much of a ransom? Luke Joeckel? LOL. And there are no Andrew Lucks or RGIIIs in the draft, so theres no trade up value even in place for the Chiefs to trade down with someone |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.