ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Position Battles to Watch During Week 3 of the Pre-Season (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275506)

jspchief 08-22-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 9906886)
Moeaki isn't a burner either, but is athletic enough to not only get open but make the catch.

Fasano might just be the more reliable football player, but i don't think he has the same set of tools that Moe has, i would call him more... workman-like.

Honestly I think Moeaki should be ahead of Kelce at this point. The kid got his chance, and if Moeaki gets hurt he can get another chance. But at this point Moeaki is the better TE.

Easy 6 08-22-2013 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9906900)
Honestly I think Moeaki should be ahead of Kelce at this point. The kid got his chance, and if Moeaki gets hurt he can get another chance. But at this point Moeaki is the better TE.

Agreed.

Based on preseason, i'd be shocked if Kelce is anything but #3... wowed in camp but proved wanting in games, he needs more seasoning.

Hog's Gone Fishin 08-22-2013 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clayton Bibsby (Post 9906322)
:facepalm: Just stop. We don't need Clowney that bad.

Ummm...... We'll see bout that

Hog's Gone Fishin 08-22-2013 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 9906764)
I've come to the conclusion that he was brought in much more for his "football intelligence" than he was his physical skill... a questionable choice.

Starting to make me think of Trent Dilfer, he'll give you all the right answers on blackboard tests, but cant execute the play physically.

I don't think you'd give somebody that much money for their good brains and mediocre performance expectations

Easy 6 08-22-2013 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 9906927)
I don't think you'd give somebody that much money for their good brains and mediocre performance expectations

I damn well DO believe these guys are damn good, but not infallible.

There will be intermittent mistakes...

lcarus 08-22-2013 05:50 PM

Our receivers suck. Wish we would have signed Jennings or something. Christ we need an upgrade at that position.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 08-22-2013 05:54 PM

Bray could be the next Tony ROmo. Let's just cut him now, I'm tired of the UFA QB crap.

jd1020 08-22-2013 05:55 PM

The tranny from Iowa didn't even make it on the field last week. I doubt you'll be seeing him on the field this week. The 3rd string QB position is all but officially locked up.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus (Post 9906935)
Our receivers suck. Wish we would have signed Jennings or something. Christ we need an upgrade at that position.

Not looking good, but maybe Bowe and Avery will be solid enough to get this pass offense out of the gutter. It's isn't as if Alex was spoiled with excellent WR play.. until Crabtree turned it up a notch in recent times. There is always the 3-headed TE group and JC should be a big addition to the pass game.

Mr. Laz 08-22-2013 06:20 PM

How good can our offense really be if we just traded our #2 WR because he sucked so bad?

NFL defenses are going to take all of about 1 game to learn to stuff every defender within 10 yards of the LOS to shut down all the dink/dunk crap.

Safety over-the-top on Bowe ... extra coverage focus on Charles

Our stretch running game can only do so much with 10 in the box

jspchief 08-22-2013 06:23 PM

It's really disappointing that we spent the last 2 years thinking that Baldwin represented improvent in the WR group.

O.city 08-22-2013 06:25 PM

I'm not sure Baldwin was ever in the plans as the #2 WR. Seems he was being showcased or they were just trying to see what they had in him.

Avery at the 2 spot made more sense all along.

Mr. Laz 08-22-2013 06:29 PM

Our defense was supposed to be a aggressive/blitzing type scheme yet against the 49ers we struggled to handle the blitz because (according to Reid) we hadn't seen the blitzes before.

So our blitzing defense didn't blitz in training camp?


Something doesn't fit.

Hog's Gone Fishin 08-22-2013 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9906979)
How good can our offense really be if we just traded our #2 WR because he sucked so bad?

NFL defenses are going to take all of about 1 game to learn to stuff every defender within 10 yards of the LOS to shut down all the dink/dunk crap.

Safety over-the-top on Bowe ... extra coverage focus on Charles

Our stretch running game can only do so much with 10 in the box


We have 14 Te's to cover too.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 9906979)
How good can our offense really be if we just traded our #2 WR because he sucked so bad?

NFL defenses are going to take all of about 1 game to learn to stuff every defender within 10 yards of the LOS to shut down all the dink/dunk crap.

Safety over-the-top on Bowe ... extra coverage focus on Charles

Our stretch running game can only do so much with 10 in the box

Yet somehow, Alex was efficient regardless of teams that tried this type of defensive approach. If that's all it took, he'd have been useless and out on his ass years ago. Sure, KC doesn't have VD, but I think they can make up for much of that with Fasano and Kelce (if he steps up soon).. plus JC is far more dangerous as a pass option than Frank Gore.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.