ChiefsPlanet - Mock (2/4)

Page 4 of 4

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)

- - Mock (2/4) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=281252)

Direckshun

02-05-2014 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 10415487)

This. How do you justify passing McCluster that kind of Jack?

I figure that'll be the going price if we retain him.

OldSchool

02-05-2014 10:56 AM

I would let McCluster walk, he can easily be upgraded in the draft. I don't see any team trading their 2nd round pick for Flowers who was terrible in coverage last year.

Chief Roundup

02-05-2014 11:15 AM

If we trade Flowers won't we have to eat the rest of his signing bonus this year? If that is so it would cost us 7 mil on the cap to cut him this year.
According to over the cap we still have 3 million in 2014, 3 million in 2015, and 1 million in 2016 left of his signing bonus that has to go towards our cap.

Direckshun

02-05-2014 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10415650)

According to Over the Cap, he would cost us $3m in 2014 if we traded him away.

Chief Roundup

02-05-2014 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 10415654)

According to Over the Cap, he would cost us $3m in 2014 if we traded him away.

The way I read that is it would save us 3.5 million on the cap this year if he was traded or cut. He is due 10.5 mil in base salary.

Chief Roundup

02-05-2014 11:25 AM

Not much savings for a premium position in this league. A rookie is going to have a steep learning curve.

Direckshun

02-05-2014 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10415669)

The way I read that is it would save us 3.5 million on the cap this year if he was traded or cut. He is due 10.5 mil in base salary.

hmmmmm...

htismaqe

02-06-2014 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 10415487)

This. How do you justify passing McCluster that kind of Jack?

That's about what the Chiefs would give him, maybe more.

I said it a week ago - people are gonna be pissed when McCluster signs.

patteeu

02-06-2014 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 10414390)

This is the first I've ever heard of anybody suggesting cutting Derrick Johnson. He has shown zero signs of slowing down, has no injury concerns, is a Pro Bowler, still only 30 years old, and his cap number is decent.

You're only cutting him to save cash. That makes zero sense.

Direckshun doesn't care about winning. He just wants to play us for suckers and line his pockets.

patteeu

02-06-2014 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10414614)

If we traded Flowers, I woulnd't turn around and spend a 1st rounder on his replacement.

Especially a replacement he describes as the next Brandon Flowers, i.e. the guy he trades because he's not a scheme fit.

Direckshun

02-06-2014 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 10417160)

Direckshun doesn't care about winning. He just wants to play us for suckers and line his pockets.

Egggggsellent.

Halfcan

02-06-2014 10:56 AM

Cut DJ? Our most consistent D player-not likely.

He will be here next year to break the Chiefs tackle record and many years after that. He will be in the Ring of Fame for the Chiefs.

OldSchool

02-06-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 10417162)

Especially a replacement he describes as the next Brandon Flowers, i.e. the guy he trades because he's not a scheme fit.

Verrett is much faster and more athletic than Flowers. He's closer to Lardarius Webb and Tim Jennings than he is to being Flowers.

Halfcan

02-06-2014 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10417049)

That's about what the Chiefs would give him, maybe more.

I said it a week ago - people are gonna be pissed when McCluster signs.

We have the Canadian midget now-so we might let him walk. :hmmm:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Page 4 of 4

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page