Another situation where I am addressing the absurdity of the post.

Not commenting on these players drafted and how they will be used, or how much.

Oh... I'm sold. They clearly used defective tools at the combine.

And that's the way it should be. The one thing people forget is that difference makers often take time to settle into the NFL. A QB is a great example of a player who doesn't necessarily need to see the field right away.

Any pass rusher we draft is going to have a massive transition from college to the NFL, because most are DEs converting to OLB. Dion Jordan struggled early on but I still think Miami made a great pick and would have gladly taken him over Fisher (even if Fisher had a good rookie year, which he didn't).

I don't particularly care if you're sold. I wasn't trying to persuade you. I was answering a question.

I met him. He wasn't as tall as I am. That convinced me because I'm barely short of six feet myself.

OK, no problem.

It sounded like the Chiefs had a lot of interest in Manziel, and I can't remember who was on the Chiefs' board if they didn't pick Ford (Dorsey mentioned a few names and I'm pretty sure it was receiver or an offensive lineman). So no, I don't buy that we approached this draft force-fitting any picks. Dorsey this year more than ever has been insistent that he treated his board like the end all be all.

All draft picks are replacement picks.

Yeah, I know NFL teams never sell bullshit to their fanbase.

You are a Kool-aid drinking ****ing moron.

Remember when we picked Nico Johnson to be a starter?

[QUOTE=milkman;10622752]There aren't many here that are old enough to have seen either of those guys.
Hmmm, their loss....;)

It was tweeted .That means it has to be true.

Because the draft is only beneficial for the forthcoming season?

LMAO

David Carr 2.0

I'd be willing to bet that Fulton, Tardif, Gaines, and/or Ford get a chance to start this year at some point. And DAT returning and playing slot quite a bit is almost as good as starting.