ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 13 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL source: Chiefs facing "abyss" (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=295302)

notorious 10-13-2015 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Smith 4Ever (Post 11798874)

Today 49ers fans would kill to have Alex back.
No bloodshed needed. You can have him, free of charge.

Baby Lee 10-13-2015 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 11798820)
Well it's good to know that once again, we are going to assume there is dysfunction everywhere except the QB position. Maybe if we surround Alex with an all world offensive line and top 5 defense, we can go back to competing. Why do all these damn articles continue to insist he's a victim to the problem when he's the biggest part of the problem?
He's not a victim, the team sucks. It's talented, but soft. I don't care if they're slagging because they are mental midgets, or they're slagging because they're throwing a QB temper tantrum. Manning is great, but playing like shit right now. Know what, the less talented defense of theirs DOESN'T GIVE A ****!! They're wrecking lives like they were paid professionals or something.

Sandy Vagina 10-13-2015 09:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11798871)
True, but this defense has cost us two games by shitting their pants the final drive, been lit up by Ginger, and has given up big plays all year. Including a washed up QB having an awful year a gimpy, dipshit Cutler with no receivers.
Finally, someone else says it. :clap:

... this is not to take away from Alex sucking either. He should be playing better football... but if not for the D shitting themselves at the end of two games... this team would be 3-2 right now.

Baby Lee 10-13-2015 09:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 11798884)
Finally, someone else says it. :clap:

... this is not to take away from Alex sucking either. He should be playing better football... but if not for the D shitting themselves at the end of two games... this team would be 3-2 right now.
But they're dead dog tired from being on the field 22 minutes out of a 60 minute game!!

Pasta Little Brioni 10-13-2015 09:27 AM
The defense fed me to the creature. Already knew Alex was a lost cause.

Sandy Vagina 10-13-2015 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11798888)
But they're dead dog tired from being on the field 22 minutes out of a 60 minute game!!
ROFL !!! yeah, that excuse never had a chance anyway.

Pasta Little Brioni 10-13-2015 09:29 AM
Losing that lead to ****ler was beyond pathetic. It's 32 D level suck...

New World Order 10-13-2015 09:30 AM
Dorsey, Andy, Bob and Alex are the problems.

Get rid of em.

Rasputin 10-13-2015 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by notorious (Post 11798759)
This so-called "Executive" hasn't watched the Chiefs and doesn't know shit about them.


First off, Clark never says anything. Second, Alex is not left naked, he just flat-out sucks.

Watch the games before you comment on something you know nothing about.

Just how in the media has Alex Smith to be absolved of being a terrible quarterback? He sucks but the blame always goes to Oline or WRs. He brings this team down.

DaneMcCloud 10-13-2015 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11798784)
It's obviously a BS source. None of this washes with anything we know about Hunt.
I think it's a former colleague of Reid's, maybe even Joe Banner or Tom Heckert, that's cautioning Hunt from firing him because they're friends.

Clark has fired three head coaches and two GM's since taking over the Chiefs and realizes his friend's job is at stake as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11798784)
Sure, before Clark, ownership never reacted to Carl's failure at all. But Clark sent him on his way, and although it was a year too late, he sent Pioli on his way too.

I don't think we should be imagining that Clark will behave like Lamar when there is plenty of evidence to suggest he's more involved.
Exactly. See above.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11798784)
telling his GM he has to fire his handpicked head coach in the middle of year three does not sound like Clark. He doesn't micromanage the team. He sounds like someone who evaluates the GM year by year.
Reid reports directly to Clark Hunt so if he's fired, it would be Clark, not John Dorsey, dropping the axe.

If this team continues to lose, it's hard for me to believe that Clark Hunt will sit on his hands. That hasn't been his M.O., regardless of how much money it would cost him.

Reerun_KC 10-13-2015 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 11798820)
Well it's good to know that once again, we are going to assume there is dysfunction everywhere except the QB position. Maybe if we surround Alex with an all world offensive line and top 5 defense, we can go back to competing. Why do all these damn articles continue to insist he's a victim to the problem when he's the biggest part of the problem?
Because is Reids HANDPICKED solution at QB... Nobody wants to blame Reid for Alex's regression, so they deflect and place blame anywhere they can to avoid putting it where it belongs...

Rasputin 10-13-2015 09:42 AM
It's really Dorsey's job to get Reid the players other than his hand picked quarterback so I think if anybody is on the hot seat it's Dorsey.


Eric Fisher and Dee Ford don't help his case at all.

The Franchise 10-13-2015 09:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 11798871)
True, but this defense has cost us two games by shitting their pants the final drive, been lit up by Ginger, and has given up big plays all year. Including losing to a washed up QB having an awful year and a gimpy, dipshit Cutler with no receivers.
You mean that defense that held the Bears to ****ing 3 points for a majority of the game. That same defense who was let down by a shit ****ing QB who couldn't score more than 10 ****ing points against a shitty Bears defense that had two rookies at S?

Pasta Little Brioni 10-13-2015 09:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11798936)
You mean that defense that held the Bears to ****ing 3 points for a majority of the game. That same defense who was let down by a shit ****ing QB who couldn't score more than 10 ****ing points against a shitty Bears defense that had two rookies at S?
Oh trust me, I blame them too. But giving up close to 30 PPG and allowing two TD's to a gimpy ****ler with NO receivers in the final 3 minutes is frustrating as all ****. These are just rants of what should be a Top 5 defense failing to even come close to expectations. You absolutely have to put teams like a banged up Bear team away.

Reerun_KC 10-13-2015 09:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 11798936)
You mean that defense that held the Bears to ****ing 3 points for a majority of the game. That same defense who was let down by a shit ****ing QB who couldn't score more than 10 ****ing points against a shitty Bears defense that had two rookies at S?
And yet Reid keeps running him out there on gamedays....

:shake:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 PM.
Page 4 of 13 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.