ChiefsPlanet - News SI goes full reerun: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude in SI shoot.

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

SI goes full reerun: Caitlyn Jenner to pose nude in SI shoot. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=299713)

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 12216436)

It's not to me. Furthermore, if someone wants to switch outie to innie or vice versa it's not really that big of a deal. If someone in my personal life were going through a sex change I would refer to them by whatever name they wanted and use the appropriate pronouns, because I would be interacting with them on a regular basis and it makes sense, and I think it would ease the transition for both of us. I don't feel compelled to do that when referring to a public figure - especially someone who has gone out of their way to make the transition as public as they can.Especially someone who was very well known as one gender and hasn't gone through the biological change to the opposite gender yet. So, to me, this person is going to be Bruce Jenner until he goes through that surgery to make herself Caitlyn Jenner. With all of that being said - I have no interest in seeing pictures of him scantily clad in a sports magazine. It would be the equivalent, to me, of being flashed by a transvestite.

Many trans people never make full transition, either because of finances or because they just don't want to. Doesn't make them less of a person. And what's the harm in using the preferred pronoun simply out of respect for them because they're human beings?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! (Post 12216446)

As I said in my personal life I do. When discussing a public figure, no, I'm not going to censor myself.

So if you have two chairs and one you have to sit on and the other you have to eat...

We used to treat people who have gender identity disorder, now we encourage it.

I only have three things to say, short and sweet

:facepalm:

ROFL

:Lin:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12216386)

Interesting that anyone in their right mind would find this appealing or acceptable.

Certainly don't find it appealing, but don't know why it's any more unacceptable than what is routinely displayed on magazines. I would guess the revealing nature will be more modest than most such covers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12216458)

We used to treat people who have gender identity disorder, now we encourage it.

"treat"

So.....this is the opposite of the swimsuit issue??

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12216458)

We used to treat people who have gender identity disorder, now we encourage it.

We also used to ban interracial marriage, didnt allow women to vote, etc...

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 12216458)

We used to treat people who have gender identity disorder, now we encourage it.

And that worked so well, I wonder why they ever stopped...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 12216508)

So.....this is the opposite of the swimsuit issue??

No,no its not

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagnabit (Post 12216386)

Interesting that anyone in their right mind would find this appealing or acceptable.

I don't find it appealing, but I find it acceptable. Its a free country, and no one is forcing any of us to buy it. Live and let live. It does me no harm at all, or you either for that matter.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 12216246)

I'm sensing a lot of sensationalist headlining going on here. The actual quote from people who know is that she will be wearing "nothing but an American flag and her Olympic medal."

It's Sports Illustrated. We're not going to be seeing tits and...not penis...here.

I bet Big Smoke pencils a penis in