no one knows what a catch is anymore ...

OBJ must be pissed that the same exact type TD play in the EZ was taken away from him.

It's been downhill since the NFC Championship meltdown against the Hawks. Rodgers has been awful, he will not win another ring with cheeseburger boy in charge.

So if that happens in the middle of the field, anybody think that should be a catch and fumble?

(And I do not).

Haha there's another one.

The NFL just makes bullshit up along the way.

And they wonder what all the answers are for losing viewers.

Nope. It wouldn't be a catch. Just an incomplete pass.

Or if he was falling down, and did not complete the catch all the way to the ground...

I don't think WRs should be punished with a catch and fumble in the field. Obviously this isn't the case in the end zone. But if they are going to do this I think they should change the rules or at least announce the end zone is different.

Under a strict ruling I think that should have been incomplete.

I'm sorry - I know that the Packers have a lot of injuries ... right -

I don't mean to be over critical ... I just want to see the Packers beat the Redskins.

The Packers were doing well at the beginning of the season..

If they had ruled it incomplete live, I really doubt a challenge would have reversed it.

hahaha **** you Norman!

first down was huge there

let's get a TD, now

right up the middle for the TD ...

Yeah, Redskins stopped on the 2 point conversion ...

Love to have a TE like Reed ... awesome move [showing replay]

Going for 2, why? You don't want to take the easy point to go up by more than a FG? Ok.

I agree - perhaps the weather [wind] was playing into their decision to go for 2 points.

Had to be. That is not a go for 2 situation.