ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs ESPN: Alex Smith's End Zone Interceptions Ruining a Good Thing for Chiefs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=304575)

TripleThreat 12-20-2016 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12630279)
The defense cost us the TB game. Look at the numbers. They were converting around 70% of 3rd down plays. That's almost twice the league average.

this is absurd..... if alex doesnt throw that one pick into the endzone game is over 110% we win.. The defense didnt play great on 3rd down, but we held them to under 20 points, and if you start nit picking about 3rd down, our offense played like shit alot of plays as well. you cant just pick one and neglect the other... Alex smith single handily lost us the TB game when it was really counting down.

TripleThreat 12-20-2016 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reekfreek (Post 12630288)
So you don't blame Smith for blowing the #1 seed?

Wouldnt blame smith for blowing the #1 seed, but I do blame him for the TB and Titan game...

However, blowing the #1 seed argument is just dumb and theres too many variables to it.. Like i said earlier, alex carried us big time against Denver and won it in OT, and then also everyone was sucking alex's D game 1 week 1 when he rolled San diego and carried us on his back on that 33-27 win where he threw for 350+ yards... So for instance, those 2 games he carried us cancels out the two games he blew for us no? Thats why I dont like playing the "he cost us the #1 seed game".. We could be 8-6 right now even 7-7if alex played like alot of people says he plays, referring to if we lost to Denver/atlanta or san diego this year...

However, he hasnt played like that, hes played better than most say he plays, thats a VARIABLE to why we are 10-4. Could we be 12-2 if alex doesnt throw the bonehead picks? hell yes we could, but I count our blessings that we are even 10-4 at this point with whats happened this season.

Hammock Parties 12-20-2016 12:54 AM

Alex doesn't get credit for "carrying" the Chiefs against SD and Denver. He played like dogshit for 3 quarters in one game, and for 58 minutes in the other.

This team blew the #1 seed because Smith choked in home games. Period.

TripleThreat 12-20-2016 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reekfreek (Post 12630292)
Alex doesn't get credit for "carrying" the Chiefs against SD and Denver. He played like dogshit for 3 quarters in one game, and for 58 minutes in the other.

This team blew the #1 seed because Smith choked in home games. Period.


You need to give credit, where credit is due. Then all these anti-alex points your making about Smith will gain alot more credibility, at least to me. But i doubt you care about that.

BlackOp 12-20-2016 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reekfreek (Post 12630292)
Alex doesn't get credit for "carrying" the Chiefs against SD and Denver. He played like dogshit for 3 quarters in one game, and for 58 minutes in the other.

This team blew the #1 seed because Smith choked in home games. Period.

Why does it take the mods so long...and let you continue posting under a different name?

Everyone knows your shtick...it's kind of frightening...the persistence.

Certainly there is something else in your life you can expend this wasted energy on...go feed the homeless or something. Anything.

ChiefsFanatic 12-20-2016 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12630189)
He also directly won the San Diego and Denver games. Yeah..those two INTs were HORRIBLE plays..especially when they happened but you have to be fair.

He is what he is...an above average QB.

Any pressure during the last 1:00 seals the game...where was Houston or Ford? Those are the moments your $100 million pass rusher has to step up. A sack screws them...they had no time outs.

I dont understand Sutton not using a blitz...knowing they had to throw downfield.

I agree that the pass rush was absent in both home losses. And I agree that Smith's play in the 4th quarter, and in overtime, was the main factor in winning the San Diego game. But the Denver game, no, he was just a small part of the winning equation.

Houston"s sack for the safety, and Hill"s subsequent kick return for a touchdown, had more to do with winning the game than Smith's play. The officials played a huge part in the win, overturning the call on the field that Hill was down prior to crossing the goal line. Remember, the booth called for a review 1 second before time expired. After some of the ridiculously bad officiating this year in the NFL, it's a minor miracle that it was even reviewed at all, much less ruled a touchdown. Smith was 26 for 44 for only 220 yards. That's a 59% completion percentage. He threw the ball 44 times, netting a total of just 190 after adjusting for sack yardage.

Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

Coochie liquor 12-20-2016 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12630275)
why this dysfunctional forum can't grasp this is beyond me. We get a 5 year, $14mil/year contract for a veteran QB who plays smart football and people are here screaming to pay $23 mil a year for the next Flacco.

Bunch of damn fools!

What's Flaccos playoff record, and how many SB rings does he have?

kcxiv 12-20-2016 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12630039)
And we wanted him to throw into the endzone more early in the season.


We deserve this.

And you still want that, but you do not want him to force something and have the other team make the easiest interception they could possibly ask for.

notorious 12-20-2016 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 12630319)
And you still want that, but you do not want him to force something and have the other team make the easiest interception they could possibly ask for.

I know. The irony is amusing, though.

tmax63 12-20-2016 07:13 AM

The Chiefs are doing a good job of winning and losing as a team. Is everybody wanting them to turn into the Donkeys and have the defense at the offense's throat? Yeah, AS has cost them a couple games but in the same breath he's won a couple. The same could be said for the defense. 1 more defensive stop in a couple games and they are tied home field. I'm just hoping the Chiefs learn from their mistakes and keep working. A loss every once in a while can be humbling and refocus them and so far, they haven't come against teams that you'd say are better than the Chiefs, just that they were better on that given day.

Snica 12-20-2016 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reekfreek (Post 12630288)
So you don't blame Smith for blowing the #1 seed?

The Chiefs never had a shot at the 1 seed.

Snica 12-20-2016 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reekfreek (Post 12630292)
Alex doesn't get credit for "carrying" the Chiefs against SD and Denver. He played like dogshit for 3 quarters in one game, and for 58 minutes in the other.

This team blew the #1 seed because Smith choked in home games. Period.

You are delusional if you think New England is losing either one of their last two games. The 1 seed was never in play.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-20-2016 07:23 AM

The slippery slope toward Casselian football advances ever-closer...

Dayze 12-20-2016 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12630120)
How much you all wanna bet Smith stays thru 2017?

oh he absolutely will be here. because the Chiefs are ****ing reeruned.

Palko 4 ever 12-20-2016 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snica (Post 12630331)
The Chiefs never had a shot at the 1 seed.

To be fair, they had a shot until Alex threw that terrible pick against the Bucs.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.