ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Clark Judge: Rating smartest, boldest, scariest offseason moves (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=207680)

Reaper16 05-15-2009 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 5769099)
You'd know if the time came. I'm quite certain as to what you are. The difference between you and me is anything I say on here I can say to anyones face. You, not so much. And with that, I'm out on friday night!

Have fun at the Eagles club tonight. Play some Joe Diffie over the jukebox for me.

DaneMcCloud 05-15-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769118)
Have fun at the Eagles club tonight. Play some Joe Diffie over the jukebox for me.

He's my new favorite poster.

He's just so tough and cool.

orange 05-15-2009 06:20 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769092)
Look, you'll win if we compare cock sizes. I must say, for an orangutan you have remarkably good English.

There's no evidence he's an orangutan. Leave us out of this.

Reaper16 05-15-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5769136)
There's no evidence he's an orangutan. Leave us out of this.

He's too dumb to even be a Broncos fan. You're right, and I apologize.

His posting is more indicative of an Eastern Lowland Gorilla. My mistake.

Pioli Zombie 05-15-2009 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5765350)
I give anyone that didn't draft Mark Sanchez an F- for the offseason.

Yeah you don't pass on a Heisman winner and holder of as many NCAA passing records as Sanchez has in his unparalled college career.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mecca 05-15-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5769414)
Yeah you don't pass on a Heisman winner and holder of as many NCAA passing records as Sanchez has in his unparalled college career.
Posted via Mobile Device

So you think guys like Colt Brennan and Timmy Chang were great prospects?

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5768935)
In the time I've been here, the "idiots" have been far more insightful and knowledgeable than Hamas seemed to be. I've seen posts where people praised his knowledge, but he surely kept his knowledge well hidden this offseason, at least on this main board.

For the record, given that the team finally canned the leadership that almost everyone here hated, brought in a man considered among the very best to be GM, and brought in a new starting QB, it's absurd for people like Mecca, Hamas and company to be complaining when people want to give that group the benefit of the doubt and really don't want every thread to turn into a buzzkill. They are defying human nature, and they should know better. Hamas with his "strike #", and Mecca seemingly doing his best Eeyore impression about almost everything the team was doing, placed themselves in a position where it was a virtual guarantee that they'd be opposed when they posted. "True Fan", "Jesus" and the rest of the derogatories of that sort were certainly not brought up by others and aimed at them: it was the other way around.

Masterpiece Theater.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5768989)
Where exactly was I crying? I think your reading comprehension needs a tune up, as well as your overall persona.

I disagree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769021)
Nice attempt at sounding tough. Take off the clownshoes.

Hymen is a jizz-lobbing, hit and douche artist like Mikey; utterly pointless, completely useless, and a fine punching bag.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769092)
Look, you'll win if we compare cock sizes. I must say, for an orangutan you have remarkably good English.

ROFL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 5769099)
You'd know if the time came. I'm quite certain as to what you are. The difference between you and me is anything I say on here I can say to anyones face. You, not so much. And with that, I'm out on friday night!

Well, have a good time at 'Missy B's", and don't let the lob hit you in the eye! 4321
http://streetview.merchantcircle.com.../1/5178611.JPG

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5769420)
So you think guys like Colt Brennan and Timmy Chang were great prospects?

Hey Hey!

Welcome back! :toast:

htismaqe 05-15-2009 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5768657)
I'm referring to what's happened over the course of the past few months since Pioli's been hired.

Not the entire history of Chiefsplanet.

And while I agree it's been controlled by the "negative crowd", I think that has more to do with folks being tired of Carl Peterson's never-ending regime than with the actual players and coaches.

So was I. The last few weeks are utterly ironic, considering how this place used to be.

The pendulum swings back and forth - some day soon, negativity will once again rule the day.

Buehler445 05-15-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5769757)
So was I. The last few weeks are utterly ironic, considering how this place used to be.

The pendulum swings back and forth - some day soon, negativity will once again rule the day.

Hopefully not before the organization wins 10 straight super bowls.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5769757)
So was I. The last few weeks are utterly ironic, considering how this place used to be.

The pendulum swings back and forth - some day soon, negativity will once again rule the day.

I just hope that one day a winning football team will again rule the day.

htismaqe 05-15-2009 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5769772)
I just hope that one day a winning football team will again rule the day.

I don't think even a winning football team will cure some people. But I'm sure it will help the rest of us.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5769788)
I don't think even a winning football team will cure some people. But I'm sure it will help the rest of us.

There's always some facet of the teams play to dissect, even after you win the dance.
But hopefully, the tone becomes "this is how we get better, achieve perfection, and stay at the top" instead of "everything sucks".:D

We'll see.

Just Passin' By 05-15-2009 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5769788)
I don't think even a winning football team will cure some people. But I'm sure it will help the rest of us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5769822)
There's always some facet of the teams play to dissect, even after you win the dance.
But hopefully, the tone becomes "this is how we get better, achieve perfection, and stay at the top" instead of "everything sucks".:D

We'll see.

You should go peruse some of the Patriots game threads from the undefeated season. There were people who were saying the team sucked because they were allowing first downs, never mind points.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 5769850)
You should go peruse some of the Patriots game threads from the undefeated season. There were people who were saying the team sucked because they were allowing first downs, never mind points.

Allowing or giving up? There's a difference. :D See, there's always something.

Chaunceythe3rd 05-15-2009 10:02 PM

Matt Cassel will be just fine. All he has to do is kick Todd Haley's ass at the first practice and show him who's boss. Worked just fine for Kurt Warner and the Cardinals.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaunceythe3rd (Post 5769911)
Matt Cassel will be just fine. All he has to do is kick Todd Haley's ass at the first practice and show him who's boss. Worked just fine for Kurt Warner and the Cardinals.

ROFL Rrrrrrrrrright...

Reaper16 05-15-2009 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaunceythe3rd (Post 5769911)
Matt Cassel will be just fine. All he has to do is kick Todd Haley's ass at the first practice and show him who's boss. Worked just fine for Kurt Warner and the Cardinals.

Tip: if you didn't want to be identified as Broncos fan troll, then you shouldn't have used a Denver sports star as your username.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-15-2009 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769932)
Tip: if you didn't want to be identified as Broncos fan troll, then you shouldn't have used a Denver sports star as your username.

Donkey in the house you say?! Where's my mule whip?!

htismaqe 05-16-2009 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5769932)
Tip: if you didn't want to be identified as Broncos fan troll, then you shouldn't have used a Denver sports star as your username.

Search for his posts and read them, they're all hilarious and oddly identical - it's obvious Todd Haley ran over his dog.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770604)
Search for his posts and read them, they're all hilarious and oddly identical - it's obvious Todd Haley ran over his dog.

He's projecting future-hate.


For about the next 10 to 15 years.
It's gonna' be a loooong stretch of misery for Donks in the AFC West. And playing the Chiefs? Fahgedda' about it. Our only competition in this division for the next 3 to 4 years is Sandy Bunghole.

And that too will pass.

milkman 05-16-2009 07:34 AM

As I read through this thread, as I understand it, some people seem to think that those of us in the Sanchez camp were responsible ofr all the aggressive posts and name calling over the last three or four months.

But the fact is, the name calling started with people attacking mecca, who has taken a lot of abuse over the years, and attacking those of us that agreed with defended mecca's position.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770645)
As I read through this thread, as I understand it, some people seem to think that those of us in the Sanchez camp were responsible for all the aggressive posts and name calling over the last three or four months.

But the fact is, the name calling started with people attacking mecca, who has taken a lot of abuse over the years, and attacking those of us that agreed with defended mecca's position.

What REALLY dialed it up was when the people who polled "No" on Cassel began denying they voted that way after Cassel was acquired.

Two-face doesn't play well with ANY honest person, sports fan or not!

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 07:56 AM

ADDENDUM:

Some people just can't WAIT to get their "Follow The Herd" on.

Chiefnj2 05-16-2009 08:01 AM

I like the revisionist history going on in this thread how Mecca, Hamas, OTWP and others are all the victims. That's a complete crock of shit.

For over a month the draft forum became a place where a group of 6 or 7 jumped all over anyone who didn't agree with their take on Sanchez. People were ridden out of the forum if they even wanted to discuss another possible prospect- you're an idiot, true fan syndrome, Chief fans are so browbeaten by Carl they are afraid to take a QB, if you don't want Sanchez you are a fan of 8-8 syndrome, we don't need a LB, we don't need an offensive lineman, you don't understand draft value, etc., etc., etc.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770645)
As I read through this thread, as I understand it, some people seem to think that those of us in the Sanchez camp were responsible ofr all the aggressive posts and name calling over the last three or four months.

But the fact is, the name calling started with people attacking mecca, who has taken a lot of abuse over the years, and attacking those of us that agreed with defended mecca's position.

Dude, come on.

The name-calling came from both sides. The "he started it" stuff is so elementary school.

Mecca's dished out just as much, if not more, abuse over the years as he's taken. He's not a victim.

Some of us here have taken INFINITELY more abuse from the "haters" over the years than Mecca will ever have to endure, so this whole episode is becoming downright comical.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770657)
What REALLY dialed it up was when the people who polled "No" on Cassel began denying they voted that way after Cassel was acquired.

Two-face doesn't play well with ANY honest person, sports fan or not!

Um, I voted "NO" on the Cassel poll. I was absolutely AGAINST trading the #3 overall pick for him, which at that point was part of the discussion. We traded a 2nd round pick for him, which COMPLETELY changes the question.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770668)
Um, I voted "NO" on the Cassel poll. I was absolutely AGAINST trading the #3 overall pick for him, which at that point was part of the discussion. We traded a 2nd round pick for him, which COMPLETELY changes the question.

It may change the question, but it sure as hell doesn't change the PERSON in question, Kimosabbe!

milkman 05-16-2009 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770669)
It may change the question, but it sure as hell doesn't change the PERSON in question, Kimosabbe!

But it does change the value.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770669)
It may change the question, but it sure as hell doesn't change the PERSON in question, Kimosabbe!

What's that supposed to mean?

The difference in value between the #34 and #3 pick is almost an entire draft worth of picks. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being against trading the #3 pick but not being against the trading the #34 pick.

milkman 05-16-2009 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770667)
Dude, come on.

The name-calling came from both sides. The "he started it" stuff is so elementary school.

Mecca's dished out just as much, if not more, abuse over the years as he's taken. He's not a victim.

Some of us here have taken INFINITELY more abuse from the "haters" over the years than Mecca will ever have to endure, so this whole episode is becoming downright comical.

No, you haven't.

mecca has been the target of more insults over the years than any single poster not named KCJohnny or mememe.

And yes, he has dished it out, but not nearly as much as he's taken, and until recently, he never instigated it.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5770664)
I like the revisionist history going on in this thread how Mecca, Hamas, OTWP and others are all the victims. That's a complete crock of shit.

For over a month the draft forum became a place where a group of 6 or 7 jumped all over anyone who didn't agree with their take on Sanchez. People were ridden out of the forum if they even wanted to discuss another possible prospect- you're an idiot, true fan syndrome, Chief fans are so browbeaten by Carl they are afraid to take a QB, if you don't want Sanchez you are a fan of 8-8 syndrome, we don't need a LB, we don't need an offensive lineman, you don't understand draft value, etc., etc., etc.

THE QUESTION was the quarterback position, NOT Mark ****ing Sanchez. The original candidate was Matt Stafford.
And there were a WHOLE HOST of Thigiots who brought the Hammer of the Gods down upon their own heads( and rightly ****ing so! ), then switched gears when Cassel was acquired purely out of spite when they didn't want the mother****er to begin with at all!

You have been served, and your welcome!

Debate...over.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770680)
No, you haven't.

mecca has been the target of more insults over the years than any single poster not named KCJohnny or mememe.

And yes, he has dished it out, but not nearly as much as he's taken, and until recently, he never instigated it.

Mecca started with the "I know more about football than you do" attitude the DAY HE ARRIVED.

Seriously, you should take a long look at what you're talking about here.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770677)
But it does change the value.

Right, but that's not the point I'm making which I will now relay to mage.

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770679)
What's that supposed to mean?

The difference in value between the #34 and #3 pick is almost an entire draft worth of picks. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being against trading the #3 pick but not being against the trading the #34 pick.

It means this:

Cassel is Cassel and Sanchez is Sanchez and Stafford is Stafford.

Who's going to leave this league with the bigger, larger than life legacy?

THAT is both the question AND the crux.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770692)
Right, but that's not the point I'm making which I will now relay to mage.



It means this:

Cassel is Cassel and Sanchez is Sanchez and Stafford is Stafford.

Who's going to leave this league with the bigger, larger than life legacy?

THAT is both the question AND the crux.

And what exactly does that have to do with the poll you referenced? Don't try to obfuscate the issue here by talking cryptically.

Reaper16 05-16-2009 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770686)
Mecca started with the "I know more about football than you do" attitude the DAY HE ARRIVED.

Seriously, you should take a long look at what you're talking about here.

I think he's saying that his attitude with respect to football knowledge wasn't instigating the personal insults. The personal attacks were often started by people other than Mecca.

milkman 05-16-2009 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770686)
Mecca started with the "I know more about football than you do" attitude the DAY HE ARRIVED.

Seriously, you should take a long look at what you're talking about here.

I didn't say his opinions aren't rigid and inflexible, and that he didn't appear arrogant.

As a matter of fact, he and I had some discussions about that very thing a few months ago.

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 08:29 AM

The "reerun" stuff also has much to do with some of the criticism heaped on Mecca. Here we might start to see somewhat of a generational gap on the board b/c, for people who are Mecca's age, calling even one's closest friends ridiculous names is not uncommon. The connotation of the "insult" is different.

I've only been here a little over three years, but has there ever been as much discussion about name calling as there has been on this board over the last 3-4 months?

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5770695)
I think he's saying that his attitude with respect to football knowledge wasn't instigating the personal insults. The personal attacks were often started by people other than Mecca.

Yes, it most certainly was. He's been attacked for his attitude since the day he arrived. And no, it wasn't started by other people. When you're condescending to people, you can expect them to act in a defensive manner, whether you're deliberately attacking them or not.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770703)
I didn't say his opinions aren't rigid and inflexible, and that he didn't appear arrogant.

As a matter of fact, he and I had some discussions about that very thing a few months ago.

If he's arrogant, he CAN'T be innocent. The two are mutually exclusive, sorry.

Reaper16 05-16-2009 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770705)
The "reerun" stuff also has much to do with some of the criticism heaped on Mecca. Here we might start to see somewhat of a generational gap on the board b/c, for people who are Mecca's age, calling even one's closest friends ridiculous names is not uncommon. The connotation of the "insult" is different.

I've only been here a little over three years, but has there ever been as much discussion about name calling as there has been on this board over the last 3-4 months?

That's a good point. I know that I call my friends by terribly insults quite frequently. Contextually, its clear that we're kidding around, being hyperbolic, etc. The same sentiment probably doesn't translate to text very well for my generation, let alone other ones.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770694)
And what exactly does that have to do with the poll you referenced? Don't try to obfuscate the issue here by talking cryptically.

The poll is a different issue altogether.

And there is NOTHING "cryptic" about what I just presented you with, IF you can think outside of draft boards and value charts.

Reaper16 05-16-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770708)
Yes, it most certainly was. He's been attacked for his attitude since the day he arrived. And no, it wasn't started by other people. When you're condescending to people, you can expect them to act in a defensive manner, whether you're deliberately attacking them or not.

So, in essence, we're supposed to be defending people who act like children?

Mecca: [insert arrogant football post here]

others: you're gay, bundle of stickshair, mom's basement, get a job

milkman 05-16-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770711)
If he's arrogant, he CAN'T be innocent. The two are mutually exclusive, sorry.

Again, I am not saying that, which is why I had the disussions with him a few months ago.

Chiefnj2 05-16-2009 08:44 AM

IMHO, the draft board needed some moderator crackdown this past season. Everyone was guilty of name calling, etc. It should be a place for open discussion of prospects and not just "he sucks, and you are stupid. Go walk into a burning aids tree."

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5770730)
Go walk into a burning aids tree.

This might have become trite because of overuse, but one has to admit...it's funny.

Sometimes, and this isn't directed at you, people need to lighten the **** up. It's only an intraweb comment...

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5770730)
IMHO, the draft board needed some moderator crackdown this past season. Everyone was guilty of name calling, etc. It should be a place for open discussion of prospects and not just "he sucks, and you are stupid. Go walk into a burning aids tree."

Go outside in the fall, set up a telescope, and observe a burning AidsMeteor shower.:D

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770714)
The poll is a different issue altogether.

And there is NOTHING "cryptic" about what I just presented you with, IF you can think outside of draft boards and value charts.

It's not me that needs to think "outside" of anything.

You're basically proposing that you were either FOR trading for Cassel or AGAINST trading for Cassel, and that the pick we traded for him is irrelevant.

The world isn't black and white. Your assertion is preposterous.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5770715)
So, in essence, we're supposed to be defending people who act like children?

Mecca: [insert arrogant football post here]

others: you're gay, pillowbiterhair, mom's basement, get a job

If you don't acknowledge the history, sure.

But Mecca was calling people names years ago. This isn't a recent development.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770733)
This might have become trite because of overuse, but one has to admit...it's funny.

Sometimes, and this isn't directed at you, people need to lighten the **** up. It's only an intraweb comment...

But the problem is that people like Dane and Hamas used it to shut down almost any conversation and it was followed by a heaping of insults. If you really step outside of being someone who was in the Sanchez camp and look at most of the conversations, most anyone who threw out a different option for a pick was met with this immediately as well as being called reeruned, true fans, jokes about "Jesus Curry" over and over and over...

To me it's not about the insults necessarily, but more that this place became completely impossible to have an actual football discussion, not because of the n00bs, but because of the intolerance of a few posters to allow ANY other alternatives to their ideas. And most of those threads turned into the same circle jerk where a bunch of people were saying the same dumb phrases over and over again and making each other laugh. It's ironic, because some of the best "football people" according to many on the board, would refuse to actually have a football discussion because of the whole game that was going on all offseason with "true fans."


And with Mecca, come on. He repeatedly would start a thread just FOR controversy. Starting threads like "Someone explain to me what makes Aaron Curry worth the #3 pick," when EVERY thread for the past three months was a debate about that very subject. He would start threads like this and immediately bash anyone who offered up an opinion. What's the point, unless you just like to stir up controversy? That's Mecca's game, and now he is upset because people are playing it? And FWIW, if you look at most of the times he gets sensitive, it's someone disagreeing with him on a take on a certain player, and he says something like, "Are you trying to make me mad." or "Oh, you must just be another person that wants to disagree with me." or a slew of other phrases that we've all seen over and over again when someone simply disagrees with him on a player's value. As if people actually give a shit about making Mecca mad when it comes to liking or disliking a player/prospect. Who does he think he is, really? I'm going to like or dislike a player out of spite for Mecca? The fact is, HE turned every thread into something about him if you really follow it.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770743)
It's not me that needs to think "outside" of anything.

You're basically proposing that you were either FOR trading for Cassel or AGAINST trading for Cassel, and that the pick we traded for him is irrelevant.

The world isn't black and white. Your assertion is preposterous.

I'm not sure how anyone can't understand this. There is a world of difference between trading a number 3 overall and trading a second rounder for Cassel. It absolutely changes the question.

Just like a conversation DeezNutz and I had about Sanchez a while back. I was totally against drafting him at #3 overall simply because of the overwhelming history against him due to his experience, plus his arm strength, size, etc. However, if we would have traded back anywhere past 15 and he was still around, I would have been OK with drafting him because of the value. The value in getting Cassel at #34 and still being able to draft an elite talent at #3 is a million times a better option than trading Cassel for a #3 pick.

SAUTO 05-16-2009 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770680)
No, you haven't.

mecca has been the target of more insults over the years than any single poster not named KCJohnny or mememe.

And yes, he has dished it out, but not nearly as much as he's taken, and until recently, he never instigated it.

I WILL say this: i have NEVER called someone a name here unprovoked, i have been called a reerun, idiot, told i cant read, been threatened MULTIPLE times, slap me choke me with a dictionary(which was the funniest being who it came from) told i was an ignorant grease monkey etc. they put you down while you arent even online then act as though they are a victim when you read through the thread and defend yourself. Maybe thats why you think it's unprovoked

OnTheWarpath15 05-16-2009 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5770730)
IMHO, the draft board needed some moderator crackdown this past season. Everyone was guilty of name calling, etc. It should be a place for open discussion of prospects and not just "he sucks, and you are stupid. Go walk into a burning aids tree."

WTF?

Show me ONE TIME that someone on ANY forum here was banned due to name calling.

Christ, this place is so loosely moderated that people get away with ethnic slurs and racial remarks.

You want moderation, head over to WPI where they ban you for having a differing opinion.

milkman 05-16-2009 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5770758)
I WILL say this: i have NEVER called someone a name here unprovoked, i have been called a reerun, idiot, told i cant read, been threatened MULTIPLE times, slap me choke me with a dictionary(which was the funniest being who it came from) told i was an ignorant grease monkey etc. they put you down while you arent even online then act as though they are a victim when you read through the thread and defend yourself. Maybe thats why you think it's unprovoked

Here's what I'm getting at, the point that I was making that got lost in the discussion about mecca specifically after I posted.

Those of us who agreed with or defended mecca's opinion immediately became the target of insults.

I can give as well as I get, so I'm not moaning about that.

What I am saying is that the people accusing the Sanchez camp of initializing the the aggresiveness are making a blatantly false statement.

OnTheWarpath15 05-16-2009 09:17 AM

Forget the value for a second.

You either think he's capable of leading a team to a Super Bowl, or you don't. There's no in-between, it's a simple yes or no question.

If you think he IS capable, then there's no reason you wouldn't have traded the 3rd overall pick for him. A true franchise QB is INVALUABLE.

So it sounds like many of you think he's incapable, but it's OK because we only spent a 2nd round pick.

That pretty much cover it?

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5770748)
But the problem is that people like Dane and Hamas used it to shut down almost any conversation and it was followed by a heaping of insults. If you really step outside of being someone who was in the Sanchez camp and look at most of the conversations, most anyone who threw out a different option for a pick was met with this immediately as well as being called reeruned, true fans, jokes about "Jesus Curry" over and over and over...

To me it's not about the insults necessarily, but more that this place became completely impossible to have an actual football discussion, not because of the n00bs, but because of the intolerance of a few posters to allow ANY other alternatives to their ideas. And most of those threads turned into the same circle jerk where a bunch of people were saying the same dumb phrases over and over again and making each other laugh. It's ironic, because some of the best "football people" according to many on the board, would refuse to actually have a football discussion because of the whole game that was going on all offseason with "true fans."


And with Mecca, come on. He repeatedly would start a thread just FOR controversy. Starting threads like "Someone explain to me what makes Aaron Curry worth the #3 pick," when EVERY thread for the past three months was a debate about that very subject. He would start threads like this and immediately bash anyone who offered up an opinion. What's the point, unless you just like to stir up controversy? That's Mecca's game, and now he is upset because people are playing it? And FWIW, if you look at most of the times he gets sensitive, it's someone disagreeing with him on a take on a certain player, and he says something like, "Are you trying to make me mad." or "Oh, you must just be another person that wants to disagree with me." or a slew of other phrases that we've all seen over and over again when someone simply disagrees with him on a player's value. As if people actually give a shit about making Mecca mad when it comes to liking or disliking a player/prospect. Who does he think he is, really? I'm going to like or dislike a player out of spite for Mecca? The fact is, HE turned every thread into something about him if you really follow it.

I hear what you're saying, man. I do. And you're right that most of the discussions around draft time degenerated into pissing contests.

To a certain extent,some of that is predicated on the fact that we discussed the shit out of every small detail to the point of exhaustion. People become unnecessarily entrenched in their positions, and thus the insults could fly because, well, there was little else left to do.

I firmly believe--(read: know for a fact) that all of the posters you've mentioned--Dane, Mecca, etc.--are good dudes and willing to engage in high-level argumentation, the kind of stuff that makes this board fun. And they'll be respectful of your disagreement.

But I'm sure we'll disagree on the following, which I do believe is the root problem: Some of the n00bs have changed the overall tenor of this place. And some very strong posters, such as yourself, have accidentally been lumped with those with whom you don't belong. The resulting tension between n00b and vet has been such that knee-jerk reactions have been the norm.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770777)
Here's what I'm getting at, the point that I was making that got lost in the discussion about mecca specifically after I posted.

Those of us who agreed with or defended mecca's opinion immediately became the target of insults.

I can give as well as I get, so I'm not moaning about that.

What I am saying is that the people accusing the Sanchez camp of initializing the the aggresiveness are making a blatantly false statement.

Did anyone EVER insult you, milkman? If they did, I didn't see it. It's because you are actually capable of having a real discussion.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-16-2009 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770743)
It's not me that needs to think "outside" of anything.

You're basically proposing that you were either FOR trading for Cassel or AGAINST trading for Cassel, and that the pick we traded for him is irrelevant.

The world isn't black and white. Your assertion is preposterous.

I'm presenting you with three quarterbacks. You hold no allegiance, strings, or power with the Chiefs. Who are you putting your money on first? Who's going to make it happen first? Who do YOU pick for YOUR TEAM???

How much simpler can I possibly make this question?

I can't. If you can't grasp the concept now, there's no point in continuing.

milkman 05-16-2009 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5770786)
Did anyone EVER insult you, milkman? If they did, I didn't see it. It's because you are actually capable of having a real discussion.

That's the thing, right there.

Even though you and I disagreed strongly in a number of discussions, we were able to have civilized debates.

But, yes, there were some who simply resorted to namecalling simply because I disagreed with them, or agreed with mecca or Hamas.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770800)
That's the thing, right there.

Even though you and I disagreed strongly in a number of discussions, we were able to have civilized debates.

But, yes, there were some who simply resorted to namecalling simply because I disagreed with them, or agreed with mecca or Hamas.

Alright, I never saw those times where someone attacked you for no reason like that. There is a HUGE difference between you and either of the others you mentioned, even though you may have agreed on certain subjects.

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770800)
That's the thing, right there.

Even though you and I disagreed strongly in a number of discussions, we were able to have civilized debates.

But, yes, there were some who simply resorted to namecalling simply because I disagreed with them, or agreed with mecca or Hamas.

Yep. That's what I thought. Just another Mecca ballwasher...

:)

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770785)
I hear what you're saying, man. I do. And you're right that most of the discussions around draft time degenerated into pissing contests.

To a certain extent,some of that is predicated on the fact that we discussed the shit out of every small detail to the point of exhaustion. People become unnecessarily entrenched in their positions, and thus the insults could fly because, well, there was little else left to do.

I firmly believe--(read: know for a fact) that all of the posters you've mentioned--Dane, Mecca, etc.--are good dudes and willing to engage in high-level argumentation, the kind of stuff that makes this board fun. And they'll be respectful of your disagreement.

But I'm sure we'll disagree on the following, which I do believe is the root problem: Some of the n00bs have changed the overall tenor of this place. And some very strong posters, such as yourself, have accidentally been lumped with those with whom you don't belong. The resulting tension between n00b and vet has been such that knee-jerk reactions have been the norm.

I fully agree with this. That's why I mentioned the part about Mecca starting threads about subjects that had been discussed to death and resulted in arguments every time. He repeatedly started those threads for controversy, taking backhanded shots at anyone who didn't share his views in the process, and then acted surprised if anyone took a shot at him. Seriously, now he is some sort of victim? I can't believe smart posters don't see this. I realize many people agreed with his player takes, which is fine, but I don't know how anyone could defend his posting style.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770807)
Yep. That's what I thought. Just another Mecca ballwasher...

:)

And again, has anyone actually ever called you a "Mecca ballwasher?" I have seen others, (many whom probably are), called that, but never you, milkman, OTWP (maybe I saw OTWP a time or two this offseason)

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5770808)
I fully agree with this. That's why I mentioned the part about Mecca starting threads about subjects that had been discussed to death and resulted in arguments every time. He repeatedly started those threads for controversy, taking backhanded shots at anyone who didn't share his views in the process, and then acted surprised if anyone took a shot at him. Seriously, now he is some sort of victim? I can't believe smart posters don't see this. I realize many people agreed with his player takes, which is fine, but I don't know how anyone could defend his posting style.

We don't disagree on anything here.

There are no victims, generally speaking, on CP.

That said, some of the posters put forth more personal information than others, and, inevitably, it's used as ammo against them. That's why you're seeing a bit more defense of Mecca, I believe, because some of the shit he takes hits close to home, literally.

These comments inspire the type of pathos that recipients of comments like, "You're a ****ing moron." something generic, won't get.

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 5770812)
And again, has anyone actually ever called you a "Mecca ballwasher?" I have seen others, (many whom probably are), called that, but never you, milkman, OTWP (maybe I saw OTWP a time or two this offseason)

Nope.

Not sure about milk, but OTWP has caught some shit for some reason. Not sure why, since that dude goes to great lengths to support his assertions, maybe more so than anyone else in the draft forum.

milkman 05-16-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770807)
Yep. That's what I thought. Just another Mecca ballwasher...

:)

Sorry.

Couldn't "wash" what you'd already "cleaned".

:D

htismaqe 05-16-2009 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5770779)
Forget the value for a second.

You either think he's capable of leading a team to a Super Bowl, or you don't. There's no in-between, it's a simple yes or no question.

If you think he IS capable, then there's no reason you wouldn't have traded the 3rd overall pick for him. A true franchise QB is INVALUABLE.

So it sounds like many of you think he's incapable, but it's OK because we only spent a 2nd round pick.

That pretty much cover it?

Not at all. That's so incredibly inflexible it's LAUGHABLE.

He MIGHT be capable. Therefore it's WORTH the risk of the #34 pick, but NOT worth the risk of the #3 overall pick.

htismaqe 05-16-2009 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5770796)
I'm presenting you with three quarterbacks. You hold no allegiance, strings, or power with the Chiefs. Who are you putting your money on first? Who's going to make it happen first? Who do YOU pick for YOUR TEAM???

How much simpler can I possibly make this question?

I can't. If you can't grasp the concept now, there's no point in continuing.

You're attempting to make an ABSOLUTE judgement devoid of mitigating factors. You simply CANNOT do that an maintain any sense of intellectual integrity.

In a perfect world, I take Sanchez. But apparently you're not capably of looking around and seeing that the world isn't perfect.

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770820)
Sorry.

Couldn't "wash" what you'd already "cleaned".

:D

https://proprintwear.com/images/Touc...Shorts%202.jpg

Just Passin' By 05-16-2009 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770814)
We don't disagree on anything here.

There are no victims, generally speaking, on CP.

That said, some of the posters put forth more personal information than others, and, inevitably, it's used as ammo against them. That's why you're seeing a bit more defense of Mecca, I believe, because some of the shit he takes hits close to home, literally.

These comments inspire the type of pathos that recipients of comments like, "You're a ****ing moron." something generic, won't get.

I thought the attacks on Mecca about where he lives and what he does for work were out of bounds and I mentioned that in the thread I saw them made in. I'm with you 100% on this.

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5770826)
You're attempting to make an ABSOLUTE judgement devoid of mitigating factors. You simply CANNOT do that an maintain any sense of intellectual integrity.

In a perfect world, I take Sanchez. But apparently you're not capably of looking around and seeing that the world isn't perfect.

You're going to have to use MUCH smaller words for RoR.

milkman 05-16-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770831)

Do I have a reading comprehension issue?

Every time I see shorts like that, all I read is "Look at my ass".

DeezNutz 05-16-2009 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770843)
Do I have a reading comprehension issue?

Every time I see shorts like that, all I read is "Look at my ass".

No, not at all.

It's actually written in braille, which confuses me when women look offended when I try to read it. WTF, chick?

doomy3 05-16-2009 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770814)
We don't disagree on anything here.

There are no victims, generally speaking, on CP.

That said, some of the posters put forth more personal information than others, and, inevitably, it's used as ammo against them. That's why you're seeing a bit more defense of Mecca, I believe, because some of the shit he takes hits close to home, literally.

These comments inspire the type of pathos that recipients of comments like, "You're a ****ing moron." something generic, won't get.

Yeah, I don't like that shit at all. No need for it. However, Claythan has received that same treatment for years now, and I haven't seen people jumping to his defense. Not to mention, I have seen many, including Dane and Hamas take shots at people like JASONSAUTO about being a mechanic and such. That stuff happens.

milkman 05-16-2009 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770846)
No, not at all.

It's actually written in braille, which confuses me when women look offended when I try to read it. WTF, chick?

LMAO

Buehler445 05-16-2009 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770705)
The "reerun" stuff also has much to do with some of the criticism heaped on Mecca. Here we might start to see somewhat of a generational gap on the board b/c, for people who are Mecca's age, calling even one's closest friends ridiculous names is not uncommon. The connotation of the "insult" is different.

I've only been here a little over three years, but has there ever been as much discussion about name calling as there has been on this board over the last 3-4 months?

Shut up you stupid puke! (It's not too early is it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770800)
That's the thing, right there.

Even though you and I disagreed strongly in a number of discussions, we were able to have civilized debates.

But, yes, there were some who simply resorted to namecalling simply because I disagreed with them, or agreed with mecca or Hamas.

I saw people take shots at milkman before. It confused the HELL out of me. Normally milkman is willing to discuss anything. Even when there were some people still defending Herm (WTF?) He will still engage them civily. He would associate certain inappropriate words associated with Herm, but they wouldn't be pointed at the poster.

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770843)
Do I have a reading comprehension issue?

Every time I see shorts like that, all I read is "Look at my ass".

Nope, that's what I see. You're good.

milkman 05-16-2009 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 5770872)
I saw people take shots at milkman before. It confused the HELL out of me. Normally milkman is willing to discuss anything. Even when there were some people still defending Herm (WTF?) He will still engage them civily. He would associate certain inappropriate words associated with Herm, but they wouldn't be pointed at the poster.

In appropriate words?

You mean like competent and capable?

I know for a fact I never used those kind of inappropriate words when discussing Herman ****ing Edwards.

Buehler445 05-16-2009 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5770885)
In appropriate words?

You mean like competent and capable?

I know for a fact I never used those kind of inappropriate words when discussing Herman ****ing Edwards.

You're right. Poor choice of words. very PROFANE words associated with Herm.

Competent and Capable ROFL

StcChief 05-16-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blaise (Post 5765350)
I give anyone that didn't draft Mark Sanchez an F- for the offseason.

hasn't played a single down in NFL. F- for NOT Failing.

Smed1065 05-16-2009 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5770807)
Yep. That's what I thought. Just another Mecca ballwasher...

:)

You are good!

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.