"It was the New York winds! Those winds are strong! Sanchez had to deal with the wind!"

The idiot corner is all you buddy.

FTR, I supported Sanchez...but I am rooting for him to fail for two reasons: CP entertainment and his awful attempts to speak spanish

I don't have a problem with your criticizing him. I have a problem with the contingency of posters that have said almost nothing positive about Cassel in the preseason, during the season, or now. And most of them have done so because they are obsessed with proving the front office wrong for having passed on Sanchez. While nobody would directly say they want Cassel to fail, there are many posters who have come to the point where they are rooting for Sanchez to be better than Cassel merely as an "I told you so."

I just wish people would stop obsessing so much about a QB that's not on our team and start focusing on the QB that is. I think Cassel has shown some really encouraging things so far. And he's shown some areas he needs to greatly improve. And everyone agrees that he would improve markedly with better talent surrounding him--how much better remains to be seen.

A completely accurate representation that wholly refutes everything I just said.

When was the last time one of these people started a thread about Mark Sanchez?

I'd like to know.

I made a comment about Sanchez maybe having some issues with the conditions and Hamas said it might be true. He's right on this--he hasn't made any excuses for Sanchez in this thread.

Things aren't always black and white. Sometimes they're in between. Just because he says anything nice about Sanchez doesn't mean he's a blind supporter of him.

I understood your point, and I'm as critical of things I don't like when I see them. Going for it on 4th early on the first time, but not going for it again further downfield pissed me off. Thats one example.

But seriously, you guys shit on every single thing the FO, staff, and players ever do. It's an endless stream of bullshit whinning thats all played out, and I'm certainly not the only person on here thats just ****ing sick of it.

Perfect:clap:

All this.............

Again, bullshit, and you know it. I expect that crap from Hootie, but your better than that.

And again, who is it that starts these threads every week?

He needs to be on again off again so we can see these threads every week from opposite angles.

ROFL

1) I also blame idiots who start threads bashing Mark Sanchez too
2) almost every Cassel thread swerves into Sanchez talk. And lots of completely unrelated threads too. And it's usually one of the strong pro/anti-Sanchez posters that does it.

A top 10 Chiefsplanet Post ever.

reerunian is really going a long well to dispute the idiot football player stereotype isn't he?

Sanchez threw 6 picks today because...

a. he sucks and really isn't ready to be a starter

b. locks onto his primary target from the instant he gets the ball

c. he sucks and isn't ready to be a starter

The winds didn't have a ****in thing to do with how he played today.

Same TWO guys. Every time.

It's easy bait. Can you blame them?

The only people who obsess about this are the ones who don't like him, so that begs the question, who's really interested in proving they're right...

Coming from the guy who has had Sanchez' dick in his mouth for a couple of years now. How's that xbox360 madden goin homey?

I don't know about threads starters but I saw at east 20 references to Sanchez in the KC game thread saying Sanchez would have done this or that better.

No need to bring that shit up in a KC thread unless your stirring shit.

About as good as your lobotomized brain.

You apparently can't even properly read a stat listing.

So, anti-Sanchez people swerving talk means that "pro-Sanchez" people, do it?

BS. See my last post. There were plenty of Sanchez comments made in the KC game thread today.

Who made them?

Wasn't me...

FIVE PICKS

He looks a hell of a lot closer to Cry'n Ryan Leaf than Joe Montana.

Bullshit.

There were 2. One by cdcox, one by Coach.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/searc...earchid=318311

This.

Didn't say it was you but it wasn't the Sanchez haters. I don't believe your comment was meant to include only you.

5,6,7,10, interceptions it doesn't really matter. Your'e still just an xbox madden football player wannabe.

How's Sanchez dick snot taste?

and who would know more about developing a 1st round franchise QB than Chiefs fans?

damn, this is golden.

I said that both are guilty of it and it's annoying regardless of who started it.

ROFL

1, 20, what's the difference?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/searc...earchid=318313

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...ez#post6182778


ONCE.

what about when people think it's necessary to bring Cassel into the discussion when defending Sanchez? There's no victim here

There were two, dumbass. TWO

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/searc...earchid=318311

Coach and cdcox.

You tell me you're the expert in dicksnot since anyone not agreeing with you seems to result in you immediately going into a rant a 15 year old would think of.

Actually, one.

Coach quoted the post from cdcox, so it appears in the search.

I wasn't aware the math skills of our forum were so bad, who knew 1 was 20.

**** you, you USC loving, Cassel hating piece of shit. You're really the biggest hypocrite on this board if your trying to say that you're not a Sanchez supporter. You're a USC fan first and foremost and if you say anything different your just a ****ing liar.

"Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms."

Not sure what I said about Sanchez.... :shrug:

You didn't. You quoted a post of cdcox's.

See my post above.

Link is dead but I looked it up myself. I stand corrected.

This bullshit is like the U.S.S. Maine.

Let's invent a story about how we were attacked so that we can launch an attack on someone else.

Oh **** you, go **** yourself in the ass with your wife's dildo that she uses since you can't satisfy her.

Stupid ****in idiot, you deserve a shovel to the face for the idiotic shit you say.

Please.

So pro-Sanchez posters don't constantly bicker about how Pioli ****ed up by taking Cassel over Sanchez? Or trading for a 27 year old instead of a 22 year old? Or never having the balls to draft a QB high? Or talking about how Sanchez has the "it" factor while Cassel doesn't?

The obsessing has gone both ways. Don't pretend that it doesn't happen just because the pro-Sanchez talk has died down since the Jets are on a losing streak. In weeks 1-3, this board was flooded with threads obsessing about what a huge mistake the Chiefs made by taking Cassel over Sanchez. Now that Sanchez has had some rough games, the anti-Sanchez threads have erupted. I can guarantee you that if Sanchez pieces together two consecutive wins and good games, the pro-Sanchez contingency will come out in full force again.

To say that only one side is obsessing is completely off the mark.

Oh sorry. I accidentally used jesus as the search term.

hahahahahahahaha

Really well maybe you should take a look at who is starting threads and begging for this type of convo.

It's ****in stupid, it's trying to invent an attack to have something to complain about.

Ah, I remember now. That nice pass or whatever it was. Couldn't recall.

Sanchez is going through the growing pains now. It appears the NFL defenses have him figured out and adjusted against him.

Now Sanchez is going to have to re-adjust and figure out how to beat the defenses.

Nope, you were the Croyle instigator!!!!

:cuss:

Can you post some of these threads you claim were started by a "pro-Sanchez" person?

Other than RoR?

This thread is sad.... So laughable, yet sad...

I did admit that I was the first one that made the first gunshot the Brodie Croyle/Cassel War.

It's a stalemate right now, or so it appears.

Do a search for "Sanchez" in the thread title.

Look, the largest shit disturbers on this subject are Hootie and RoR. And yet, it takes about 10 posts before everybody has leaped into their respective trench while the artillery gets sighted in.
Seems to me it's no longer even about Sanchez/Cassel. It's personal between several folks.

It's hilarious. If it weren't so ****ing pathetic.

ssssshhhh..this is comedy gold.

He's arguing semantics about stupid shit like how many times the name sanchez was brought up in a thread. The truth is, these same ****ing guys shit all over most Chiefs related threads on this board. It makes them unreadable, but they don't mind because they spend their time mutually masturbating to each other in them.

HOF material, Stevie?

:)

Well, at least you didn't hit anyone important!

coulld be...:hmmm:

Buster Hymen: Where "Because I said so" is all the proof you need.

Shove an umbrella up your ass and open it, you stupid ****.

You've been attacked over and over again about your disdain for the front office not taking Sanchez, admit it asshole. Your fluctuating passive aggressive attitude towards the Chiefs is dependent on how your particular USC slanted draft approach seems to be working out on a week to week basis.

Are you more upset about the Chiefs success this week or the fact you look like an idiot due to your blind support of Mr. Sanchez? Dick.

He was awful, brutal, miserable today...etc, but it is far too early to get a read on whether he'll succeed in the league or not. Heck, Peyton had a 6 INT game a couple years ago and Brady threw like 4 or 5 at Arrowhead one year. One bad game does not make a player horrible.

You know, there was a certain amount of civility being expressed on this board until you slithered back in.

If you really think my feelings on the Chiefs have anything to do with USC you are a reerun. USC produces high caliber draft prospects but to act like I want all SC players or only SC players on the Chiefs is ****ing reeruned.

Show's about how much you know and contribute, if you got hit by a bus tomorrow it would increase the intelligence of the human gene pool.

Heh.......meltdown

http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/denial-and-...a-meltdown.jpg

Yup. The entire degeneration of the board can be directly attributed to me.

Again, priceless logic supported by immutable facts.

I think we should just celebrate stupidity and fear intelligence that seems to be the general idea, but hey why be surprised it's the nature of the world today.

Civility? Where? Get that shit outta here!

I just don't understand the how people see this whole USC draft bias by mecca.

Sure, he soes like a lot of USC players, but they do pump out a lot of NFL talent every year.

During this last draft, however, I can tell you that I liked Rey Mauluga a hell of a lot better than he did.

Ask around, or better yet, make a poll. I bet most would agree.

they'll huff and they'll puff...
and they'll blow their own ego...

Oh cmon now let him keep living in his little made up dream world, it's all he's got at this point.

If you'd like, go right the **** ahead.

With all due respect, I don't have the time to do that. Not a lot of threads have been started on it. But on a basic search, a ton of threads have swerved into discussion on Sanchez for no good reason. Most of them were innocent threads talking about Matt Cassel--criticisms and praises. For some reason, those criticisms were then used to compare him to Sanchez. And I'm sorry, but the "late game" discussions have essentially become sounding boards for people to talk about Sanchez.

Like I said, the pro Sanchez talk has died down because of recent weeks. And the anti Sanchez crowd is starting to dominate discussion. And again, like I said, I think it's equally annoying from either angle.

This thread is priceless.

And completely predictable as well.

When Buster actually provides a credible football take he can say something, all he ever does is post about other posters.

Look ****nut, everyone that has even casually read your posts on this board knows that you're a USC fan first and a Chiefs fan second, it's a simple truth that you should willingly admit.

I forgot that the absence of an attention whoring clown suit and the presence of critical thinking was inimical to being a fan of the team.

Yup. All based on ego. None of us want the team to do well, it's all about being right.