ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Screw you Cassel (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219831)

Coach 12-20-2009 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6365631)
Honestly though why are we all arguing over Cassel tonight he didn't lose this game the career day D did.
Well, you're right. He didn't lose this game. The defense and the special teams did.

If one of those two showed up, the Chiefs would have most likely have this game in the bag.

SAUTO 12-20-2009 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6365629)
During the game, Gannon criticized the throw, said it was behind the receiver. That's how I'm remembering it, too.

But I will definitely consult the DVR when I get a chance.
Posted via Mobile Device

Mecca 12-20-2009 08:45 PM
Well it would be nice if Todd Haley realized to not kick the ball to the Browns 1 playmaker but no...

SAUTO 12-20-2009 08:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6365629)
During the game, Gannon criticized the throw, said it was behind the receiver. That's how I'm remembering it, too.

But I will definitely consult the DVR when I get a chance.
just watched the play. gannon said it bit his back shoulder.

nope it hit him in the face. watch the game with the sound off lol
Posted via Mobile Device

Tribal Warfare 12-20-2009 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6365631)
Honestly though why are we all arguing over Cassel tonight he didn't lose this game the career day D did.
The whole issue some believe that this game is a breakout game that will put Cassel on the right path as a successful QB, while others have noted that he went against the worst passing defense in the league and his results should be taken into context.

doomy3 12-20-2009 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6365594)
Just did....well thrown right to him. Other than the locked arm, any TE in the league catches that.
Posted via Mobile Device
Yep.

doomy3 12-20-2009 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6365664)
The whole issue some believe that this game is a breakout game that will put Cassel on the right path as a successful QB, while others have noted that he went against the worst passing defense in the league and his results should be taken into context.
Who has said this was Cassel's breakout game? I don't think I have seen that posted once.

SAUTO 12-20-2009 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6365664)
The whole issue some believe that this game is a breakout game that will put Cassel on the right path as a successful QB, while others have noted that he went against the worst passing defense in the league and his results should be taken into context.
no the real issue is that some refuse to acknowledge that maybe the problem isnt all cassell.
Posted via Mobile Device

dirk digler 12-20-2009 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6365644)
Well, you're right. He didn't lose this game. The defense and the special teams did.

If one of those two showed up, the Chiefs would have most likely have this game in the bag.
Agreed. It was an embarrassing display on both the D and ST.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6365664)
The whole issue some believe that this game is a breakout game that will put Cassel on the right path as a successful QB, while others have noted that he went against the worst passing defense in the league and his results should be taken into context.
I almost posted this same thing about Barry Richardson. How can we really judge him since they were playing the Browns? Let me see him play well against the Bengals and the Donkeys then I will start believing.

I imagine that Harrison guy isn't going to become the best back in the NFL because he ran all over the shitty Chiefs D.

milkman 12-20-2009 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRR (Post 6365625)
Never said it was perfectly thrown. It was a catchable ball. I was wrong in saying it was a drop because of his one arm being restrained. Otherwise, a catchable ball.
Posted via Mobile Device
I said it was a perfectly thrown ball.

It was thrown exactly where it needed to be.

OnTheWarpath15 12-20-2009 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6365690)
I almost posted this same thing about Barry Richardson. How can we really judge him since they were playing the Browns?
Oh, I don't know, Dirk.

The Browns only sacked Roethlisberger EIGHT times last week.

Cassel was sacked once.

DeezNutz 12-20-2009 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6365659)
just watched the play. gannon said it bit his back shoulder.

nope it hit him in the face. watch the game with the sound off lol
Posted via Mobile Device
I will watch it again. Seems as though I could be very wrong.

milkman 12-20-2009 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6365694)
Oh, I don't know, Dirk.

The Browns only sacked Roethlisberger EIGHT times last week.

Cassel was sacked once.
And the fact is, it didn't matter who we were playing, while O'Callaghan did a servicable job, he still showed on more than a couple of occassions that he simply can not contend with speed around the corner.

Richardson did a good job of sealing in pass protect, and was every bit as good as in run blocking.

O'Callaghan is a solid scrub.
Richardson has the size and athleticism to own the position.

dirk digler 12-20-2009 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6365694)
Oh, I don't know, Dirk.

The Browns only sacked Roethlisberger EIGHT times last week.

Cassel was sacked once.

I want him to succeed and work out but I just want to see him perform against a team ranked higher than 31st in D.

doomy3 12-20-2009 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6365694)
Oh, I don't know, Dirk.

The Browns only sacked Roethlisberger EIGHT times last week.

Cassel was sacked once.
And as was pointed out earlier that Cassel is much of the problem when the line looks like shit, he also did a much better job today with pocket awareness, IMO.

morphius 12-20-2009 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6365415)
That's true, but at the same time, Cassel had made several very "questionable" decision making. That INT that Brown LB had right in his hands, and he just had the "I can't believe he threw it to me" look before dropping it.

Cassel had thrown good passes, but at the same time, he was way behind of some of his passes as well.
What were the other of the several?

RustShack 12-20-2009 09:20 PM
You can get by with a QB like Cassel if you have a defense.

OnTheWarpath15 12-20-2009 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomy3 (Post 6365745)
And as was pointed out earlier that Cassel is much of the problem when the line looks like shit, he also did a much better job today with pocket awareness, IMO.
He also had more time than any other game this year, IMO.

OnTheWarpath15 12-20-2009 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6365789)
You can get by with a QB like Cassel if you have a defense.
Yeah, the words "get by" don't belong anywhere near the words, "franchise quarterback."

SAUTO 12-20-2009 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6365700)
I will watch it again. Seems as though I could be very wrong.
like i said turn down the volume, and the dropped td by bowe was a good pass too.
Posted via Mobile Device

SAUTO 12-20-2009 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6365790)
He also had more time than any other game this year, IMO.
yep
Posted via Mobile Device

'Hamas' Jenkins 12-20-2009 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6365789)
You can get by with a QB like Cassel if you have a defense.
http://i33.tinypic.com/1tah06.jpg

RustShack 12-20-2009 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6365794)
Yeah, the words "get by" don't belong anywhere near the words, "franchise quarterback."
Thats if he keeps playing the way he is. Odds are hes going to improve as he plays more and gets more help around him.

doomy3 12-20-2009 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6365810)
I wonder if that's what Todd Haley looked like after the game.

Amnorix 12-21-2009 09:53 AM
So...just so I'm clear on this -- Cribbs runs back not just one, but TWO kickoffs for TDs. Not only 14 points, but 14 tremendously demoralizing points.

And your defense allows something like 800 yards of rushing. (a slight exaggeration I know)

And someone started a "Cassell sucks" thread as a result of this? Yeah, uhh....Unless he threw 4 picks I'm finding it tough to take this thread seriously.

OnTheWarpath15 12-21-2009 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6366758)
So...just so I'm clear on this -- Cribbs runs back not just one, but TWO kickoffs for TDs. Not only 14 points, but 14 tremendously demoralizing points.

And your defense allows something like 800 yards of rushing. (a slight exaggeration I know)

And someone started a "Cassell sucks" thread as a result of this? Yeah, uhh....Unless he threw 4 picks I'm finding it tough to take this thread seriously.
Look at the date.

Bunit 12-21-2009 10:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6365409)
Green had absolute shit for receivers. Other than Gonzalez and Holmes, he had nobody to throw to.
Your funny. Other than Gonzalez and holmes, ha ha ha ha ROFLROFLROFLROFL. Cassel has Bowe and he's been so ****ing consistent and never dropped shit ever this year. Horay!

Fish 12-21-2009 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6365813)
Thats if he keeps playing the way he is. Odds are hes going to improve as he plays more and gets more help around him.
My question is why hasn't he improved at all over the course of this season? I'd be more willing to give him time if he'd show any kind of improvement at all. The line protection has improved some. The running game has greatly improved. And while these factors should promote improvement on his part, Cassel has mostly regressed. The most he's shown me is a decent drive here, a good series there. But never consistently through an entire game. Good franchise QBs elevate the play of those around him. Seems that we're mostly holding out hope that we improve those around him so Cassel looks competent. That doesn't indicate "Franchise QB" to me....

Brock 12-21-2009 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunit (Post 6366826)
Your funny. Other than Gonzalez and holmes, ha ha ha ha ROFLROFLROFLROFL. Cassel has Bowe and he's been so ****ing consistent and never dropped shit ever this year. Horay!
Are you too stupid to understand a WR comparison? Bowe and Chambers are miles better than Snoop Minnis and Chris Thomas or whoever those ****ing nobodies were.

DaneMcCloud 12-21-2009 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6366758)
So...just so I'm clear on this -- Cribbs runs back not just one, but TWO kickoffs for TDs. Not only 14 points, but 14 tremendously demoralizing points.

And your defense allows something like 800 yards of rushing. (a slight exaggeration I know)

And someone started a "Cassell sucks" thread as a result of this? Yeah, uhh....Unless he threw 4 picks I'm finding it tough to take this thread seriously.
Uh, the fact that the special teams sucked yesterday along with the defense does not negate the fact that for two straight weeks, Matt Cassel had a QB rating of less than 35.

Amnorix 12-21-2009 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6367120)
Uh, the fact that the special teams sucked yesterday along with the defense does not negate the fact that for two straight weeks, Matt Cassel had a QB rating of less than 35.
This is what, two straight weeks prior to yesterday? Yesterday it seems he had a rating of 99.1.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=291220012

I see now that this thread was started BEFORE yesterday, so I understand perfectly. As I noted in my assessment of him here immediately after the trade, he has serious trouble with the deep ball, and if you can't hit Randy Moss on the deep ball, then you pretty much can't hit anybody. I see that that continues to be a problem for him.

OTOH, they used to say Brady couldn't hit the deep ball either. I think the deep ball is often one of the last things that a QB needs to develop, and certainly having better WRs and more time to develop his timing with them should help.

Mecca 12-21-2009 12:41 PM
I'm sure he'll develop it by the time he's 42.

And hey of course Cribbs ran kickoffs back, Todd Haley is a moron that doesn't realize not kicking to the other teams best player is a good idea.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6367174)
I'm sure he'll develop it by the time he's 42.
ROFL

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6367163)
This is what, two straight weeks prior to yesterday? Yesterday it seems he had a rating of 99.1.
Against the worse passing defense in the NFL, real big accomplishment

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by morphius (Post 6365782)
What were the other of the several?
even on that throw the TE got held up at the LOS and cassel threw the ball to a spot. the TE never made it to the spot. trent green is now getting a pass for doing the exact same thing his first year, why isnt cassel?

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367249)
Against the worse passing defense in the NFL, real big accomplishment
what would it have been had he not had 8 dropped passes?

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367252)
what would it have been had he not had 8 dropped passes?
Or what would it have been when two or three of those babies could've been intercepted, and ****ed with Cassel's confidence.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367261)
Or what would it have been when two or three of those babies could've been intercepted, and ****ed with Cassel's confidence.
which three? enlighten me, i already said what actually happened at the goal line when it hit the browns player in the hands. give me some more

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 01:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367275)
which three? enlighten me, i already said what actually happened at the goal line when it hit the browns player in the hands. give me some more
first deep pass to Chambers, bad pass to Bowe in the middle of field ball popped up for grabs at the end of the 3rd, and that one gift basket to the Browns LB that got dropped.

Fish 12-21-2009 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367275)
which three? enlighten me, i already said what actually happened at the goal line when it hit the browns player in the hands. give me some more
Are you serious? Cassel had at least 5 or 6 throws that could/should have been intercepted.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6367289)
Are you serious? Cassel had at least 5 or 6 throws that could/should have been intercepted.
COME THE **** on man, 5 or 6??? tell me where they were in the game and i'll go watch the dvr. time to back up what you are saying

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367282)
first deep pass to Chambers, bad pass to Bowe in the middle of field ball popped up for grabs at the end of the 3rd, and that one gift basket to the Browns LB that got dropped.
chambers was an underthrown ball, bowe should have caught that ball his feet never left the ground, he half assed reached for it, the one to the browns lb i already talked about. the TE got jammed just off the line and cassel threw it to a spot, the TE never got where he wasz supposed to be.

Fish 12-21-2009 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367440)
COME THE **** on man, 5 or 6??? tell me where they were in the game and i'll go watch the dvr. time to back up what you are saying
Arguing with you is a fruitless endeavor. Others have already pointed out plays, which you completely ignored. If you can't remember what you saw, and feel the need to watch the DVR, then I suggest you do it. Because I know what I saw.

Mecca 12-21-2009 01:52 PM
I still think Jason is like a WPI poster come to try to turn us.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6367463)
Arguing with you is a fruitless endeavor. Others have already pointed out plays, which you completely ignored. If you can't remember what you saw, and feel the need to watch the DVR, then I suggest you do it. Because I know what I saw.
i ignored them? i already talked about the three he said, where are the others, you said 5 or 6. Back it up. one funny thing is that most you are talking about were on the other end of the field from you i'm sure you saw them with great clarity though.


like i said: you said 5 or 6 now its time to back it up or shut up

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367452)
chambers was an underthrown ball, bowe should have caught that ball his feet never left the ground,
Like I said because of Cassel's inaccurate throws he was teetering on getting an INTs due to his diligence in throwing into coverage and any pass beyond 10 yards.

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6367467)
I still think Jason is like a WPI poster come to try to turn us.
Well, Tyler Thigpen has the potential to be a franchise QB you know

Fish 12-21-2009 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367476)
i ignored them? i already talked about the three he said, where are the others, you said 5 or 6. Back it up. one funny thing is that most you are talking about were on the other end of the field from you i'm sure you saw them with great clarity though.


like i said: you said 5 or 6 now its time to back it up or shut up
I'm quite confident in what I saw. Thanks. Plus, your grammar makes my head hurt. 5 or 6 that could have been intercepted. You've already admitted to at least 3. He was forcing throws into double coverage all day.

Brock 12-21-2009 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367488)
Well, Tyler Thigpen has the potential to be a franchise QB you know
It's sort of like you and Brodie Croyle.

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6367532)
It's sort of like you and Brodie Croyle.
Noone has questioned Brodie's ability, it's a durability issue. Cassel on the other hand has serious concerns with his capabilities as a potential franchise QB.

Chiefspants 12-21-2009 02:15 PM
You bounced back from two bad games so how tough is this homestand for you? “It’s interesting you say I had two bad games. But against Buffalo I felt like I threw the ball really well. We had some turnovers in Buffalo and that’s part of the game as well."

God, he is so delusional, it does not take a high level of intelligence to realize that he played like absolute dogshit against buffalo.

Brock 12-21-2009 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367551)
Noone has questioned Brodie's ability, it's a durability issue. Cassel on the other hand has serious concerns with his capabilities as a potential franchise QB.
Making Brodie Croyle as useless as Cassel.

DeezNutz 12-21-2009 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 6367551)
Noone has questioned Brodie's ability, it's a durability issue. Cassel on the other hand has serious concerns with his capabilities as a potential franchise QB.
Redundant here--multiple connotations of ability.

-to perform
-to stay on the field

I've said numerous times that Croyle isn't an NFL player, and I stand by this statement. Doesn't mean he's not a talented QB, because he is.

Tribal Warfare 12-21-2009 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6367584)
Making Brodie Croyle as useless as Cassel.
He survived the barrage of hard hits in Baltimore, and took some against Denver. The kid can play

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 02:22 PM
Now, after interviewing him just a few days ago, Keitzman is saying the anger should be directed at Pioli.

AND he's defending his unwillingness to ask Pioli tough questions during that interview. I hate KC Sports Radio.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6367527)
I'm quite confident in what I saw. Thanks. Plus, your grammar makes my head hurt. 5 or 6 that could have been intercepted. You've already admitted to at least 3. He was forcing throws into double coverage all day.
funny that when you cant come up with something tangible you bring up grammar.

and if you want to say that 5-6 could have been intercepted then every pass any qb throws could dbe intercepted. the only one that tribal talked about that actually could have been intercepted was the one that hit their LB when the TE didnt get where he was supposed to be.

The others? no defensive player was even close to getting a hand on.

googlegoogle 12-21-2009 03:47 PM
Cassel is good as what you saw in New England.

Brock 12-21-2009 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by googlegoogle (Post 6367848)
Cassel is good as what you saw in New England.

so we should just expect 40+ sacks every year?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by googlegoogle (Post 6367848)
Cassel is good as what you saw in New England.
I can't WAIT for Moss, Welker, and Belichick to come to KC!!! ELEVENTY!!1111

chiefs1111 12-21-2009 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6367877)
I can't WAIT for Moss, Welker, and Belichick to come to KC!!! ELEVENTY!!1111
Are they going too bring Brady with them???

Fish 12-21-2009 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367795)
funny that when you cant come up with something tangible you bring up grammar.

and if you want to say that 5-6 could have been intercepted then every pass any qb throws could dbe intercepted. the only one that tribal talked about that actually could have been intercepted was the one that hit their LB when the TE didnt get where he was supposed to be.
You have an excuse for everything don't you? "When the TE didn't get where he was supposed to be"? Really? LMAO

If only those damn WR and TEs would just be where they were supposed to be....

If only somebody could have caught the 26 yard hail mary that hit the crossbar. Why wasn't anybody where they were supposed to be... you know.. sitting up on the crossbar where they could have a chance at Cassel's ever so accurate pass. Where they were supposed to be....

Good ****ing grief.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6367795)
The others? no defensive player was even close to getting a hand on.
That's funny too, seeing as how for most of those passes no offensive player was even close to getting a hand on it either. Or how about when Cassel throws to Charles when he's busy picking up a blitz? 10 feet away engaged in a block, and Cassel chucks it that direction for an intentional grounding penalty. Too bad Charles wasn't where he was supposed to be huh?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 6367896)
Are they going too bring Brady with them???
Only if we all say five "Hail Tebows" a day and renounce our evil, rational thoughts!

SAUTO 12-21-2009 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6367930)
You have an excuse for everything don't you? "When the TE didn't get where he was supposed to be"? Really? LMAO

If only those damn WR and TEs would just be where they were supposed to be....

If only somebody could have caught the 26 yard hail mary that hit the crossbar. Why wasn't anybody where they were supposed to be... you know.. sitting up on the crossbar where they could have a chance at Cassel's ever so accurate pass. Where they were supposed to be....

Good ****ing grief.....



That's funny too, seeing as how for most of those passes no offensive player was even close to getting a hand on it either. Or how about when Cassel throws to Charles when he's busy picking up a blitz? 10 feet away engaged in a block, and Cassel chucks it that direction for an intentional grounding penalty. Too bad Charles wasn't where he was supposed to be huh?
look at the game you would see that the TE got held up at the line and cassel was pressured quickly. he threw to a spot and the TE didnt get there.


which passes yesterday did he throw that no o player was close to getting a hand on? the overthrow to charles in the endzone. what others? you act as thought it was a common theme yesterday. thats just wrong, flat out wrong.

OnTheWarpath15 12-21-2009 05:18 PM
[QUOTE=JASONSAUTO;6368183]look at the game you would see that the TE got held up at the line and cassel was pressured quickly. he threw to a spot and the TE didnt get there.

Jason, that's the thing:

He cannot make that throw. It's a terrible decision.

Neither screen was open, he panicked, and threw the ball hoping Cottam would be there, and dodged a bullet. He should have thrown the ball into the crowd.

Even Gannon said it was a horrible decision to make that throw.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 05:27 PM
[QUOTE=OnTheWarpath58;6368191]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6368183)
look at the game you would see that the TE got held up at the line and cassel was pressured quickly. he threw to a spot and the TE didnt get there.

Jason, that's the thing:

He cannot make that throw. It's a terrible decision.

Neither screen was open, he panicked, and threw the ball hoping Cottam would be there, and dodged a bullet. He should have thrown the ball into the crowd.

Even Gannon said it was a horrible decision to make that throw.
i understand that otwp, i said as much somewhere yesterday. but there was a reason the ball went there. he didnt just throw where no one was supposed to be, and gannon said some really stupid shit during the game also.

he said the pass to bowe that was dropped in the end zone was a bad pass: wrong
he said he threw the ball off pope's back shoulder: wrong it hit him in the face, AND never mentioned the obvious pass interference. like i told deeznuts last night: watch the game with the volume off

Fish 12-21-2009 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6368218)
i understand that otwp, i said as much somewhere yesterday. but there was a reason the ball went there. he didnt just throw where no one was supposed to be, and gannon said some really stupid shit during the game also.

he said the pass to bowe that was dropped in the end zone was a bad pass: wrong
he said he threw the ball off pope's back shoulder: wrong it hit him in the face, AND never mentioned the obvious pass interference. like i told deeznuts last night: watch the game with the volume off
So I'm wrong, OTWP is wrong, and even Gannon the 2 time probowl MVP, Superbowl MVP QB who gets paid millions to accurately describe the play on the field is wrong, but the guy who can't even find the Shift key got it all figured out watching the game with the volume off? The players just weren't where they were supposed to be?

OK then. I don't know what else to say.

SAUTO 12-21-2009 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6368298)
So I'm wrong, OTWP is wrong, and even Gannon the 2 time probowl MVP, Superbowl MVP QB who gets paid millions to accurately describe the play on the field is wrong, but the guy who can't even find the Shift key got it all figured out watching the game with the volume off? The players just weren't where they were supposed to be?

OK then. I don't know what else to say.
look man i know where the shift key is, and i didnt watch the game with the volume off i was there just like you, the only difference is the plays i am talking about happened right in front of me and on the other end of the field from you and otwp.


i lol'ed at gannon making MILLIONS as a broadcaster. and gannon was flat out wrong about some of the things he said during yesterday's game, sorry.

Pablo 12-21-2009 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6367596)
Redundant here--multiple connotations of ability.

-to perform
-to stay on the field

I've said numerous times that Croyle isn't an NFL player, and I stand by this statement. Doesn't mean he's not a talented QB, because he is.
No shit. Your most important ability is your availability.

Croyle is essentially an arm and long hair held together with q-tips.

Bunit 12-21-2009 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6367041)
Are you too stupid to understand a WR comparison? Bowe and Chambers are miles better than Snoop Minnis and Chris Thomas or whoever those ****ing nobodies were.
Whoa Brock, why the hostility homie. I said your funny, not anything about your mom. You are right about the wide outs but not overall weapons. Priest, Tony, Eddie Kennison and O line = better than what Cassel has.

Bowe does awesome shit but then drops easy shit. Chambers inconsistent as well. I hope that I am wrong and am sure that I am but you can still tell me.

Reerun_KC 12-21-2009 09:40 PM
So how many drops do we have on the year now?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6368862)
So how many drops do we have on the year now?

Aw, man; are you going to "drop city" on Bowe too?

Reerun_KC 12-21-2009 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6368884)
Aw, man; are you going to "drop city" on Bowe too?
:spock:

Not following you here.... I just wanted to know how many drops? Last I saw it was 48....

Tiger's Fan 12-21-2009 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6368884)
Aw, man; are you going to "drop city" on Bowe too?
Are you blind as well as ignorant? The dude can't catch a cold, and doesn't seem to care about it. I hope we move the POS.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6368966)
:spock:

Not following you here.... I just wanted to know how many drops? Last I saw it was 48....
# of drops for everyone? Don't know. Ask Warpath, he knows. He went all over the carousel with SAUTO about that very subject for three pages not too long ago.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster Hymen (Post 6368974)
Are you blind as well as ignorant? The dude can't catch a cold, and doesn't seem to care about it. I hope we move the POS.
I only WISH I was blind when your dumb ass starts typing a post while beating yourself in the head with a giant double-donger.

Reerun_KC 12-21-2009 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6368976)
# of drops for everyone? Don't know. Ask Warpath, he knows. He went all over the carousel with SAUTO about that very subject for three pages not too long ago.
I am just wondering how those games would of been different if we didnt drop 48+ ****ing passes....

Yes some werent always perfect, some were ****ing money, YET, we dropped almost 50 ****ing passes this year...

Cassel is not the answer, but the ****ing trash we have at WR isnt helping this team much... They ****ing suck ass... Every ****ing one of them...

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-21-2009 11:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6369030)
I am just wondering how those games would of been different if we didnt drop 48+ ****ing passes....

Yes some werent always perfect, some were ****ing money, YET, we dropped almost 50 ****ing passes this year...

Cassel is not the answer, but the ****ing trash we have at WR isnt helping this team much... They ****ing suck ass... Every ****ing one of them...
Well, coach Haley has publicly discounted chemistry between the QB and his receivers, and there's no consistency in the starting lineup because this guy or that guy landed in the dog house.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.