ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Why people are disappointed: Exhibit A - Talent Evaluation (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=219888)

dirk digler 12-16-2009 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351844)
"Tyler Thigpen should be the starting QB. He's earned that right." /Gonzo

Oh so now what players say doesn't mean anything or is stupid? Gotcha.

Maybe he was doing an impersonation of you by saying stupid stuff and then claim he was being sarcastic. ;)

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:25 PM

I don't care what other players say, if you haven't noticed over the years, players are ****in dumb when it comes to this.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351852)
I know.

You also think that you can evaluate an entire defunct roster by "watching tape".

Yeah, that's what I said. Exactly.

Pioli had no access to seeing these guys in person. None. And game film isn't an important evaluation tool.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351852)
I know.

You also think that you can evaluate an entire defunct roster by "watching tape".

You couldn't have done a worse job in your first year than Pioli has done and here we are with a defense being made, ponder that.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351842)
Well hey Atlanta's GM is from NE, apparently he isn't as incompetent as Pioli as his first draft built a foundation and ours built a pile of shit.

But I guess I should believe that was purely blind luck with the shit I've seen posted in this thread right?

LOL.
His first draft landed him Matt Ryan.

That is the ONLY reason he looks like a damn Genius now.
If Ryan had fell to us, Peterson would be looking good right now.

BossChief 12-16-2009 01:27 PM

I understand Pioli is batting a low percentage right now, but he walked into a crap pile and has a history of building a bad team into a good one and keeping it well stocked for a decade. I am willing to give him a little bigger leash than most, I guess. I hope that doesn't lead to me getting burned as it has in the past.

I have a question.

Who was he supposed to bring in via FA?

If you say Haynesworth or Jason Brown, you have failed.

100 million for AH? NO

having to go over 40 million for a 5 year deal (he signed for 37.5 million/5yrs in stl) for a center that was basically signed within minutes of the opening of free agency? Who has made NO IMPACT.

Canty? I would have liked to have signed him, but who says he would even have taken a call from KC when an offer was on the table from a team like the Giants? I would have topped the winning offer, but how much would we have had to overpay to get him? He signed with a contender for 6/42. If we show to overpay for need, what does that do to our own upcoming free agents?...that they can hold us over the coals and get paid? That isnt the message good teams send.

Igor? I would be willing to bet his opinion of even considering signing with us was laughable. A division rival that wont overpay and only won 2 games the previous year? Child, please. Also, lets say we pay him a moderate contract 4 years 20 million...then what do we do with Dorsey? Do we scrap him altogether? Play him at NT where he has less chance at success? Really...what to do?

I would have loved to have signed both Igor and Chris, but what chance does a 2-14 team have of signing a player that is desired by contending teams? WE WILL NOT OVER PAY FOR FREE AGENTS! EVER! IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE PATRIOT WAY. It is also the correct way of going about it. Good teams are not bought, they are bred.

This shit is gonna take time guys. Get a case of snickers and buckle up, its gonna be a wild ride!

Dont get me wrong, I am not condoning the current regimes actions at all, not taking multiple o linemen in this last draft is inexcusable, taking a corner before a olinemen or other need positions was foolish to say the least. Deciding not to overpay for two 5-tecs but taking one with a top 3 pick doesnt scream confidence at first, but give them time to fail before you declare them failures.

Id also like to add that Pioli brought in a bunch of FAs in 2001 NE and most of them are garbage names as well, but over time he showed he knew what he was doing.

Give these guys time.

But what do I know, I wanted Orakpo...

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351818)
These people are way too smart to have to go through all the things that he's talking about there. It's really simple. Pioli is just a Moron.

Wow, your insight is just invaluable around here

:rolleyes:

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351854)
Oh so now what players say doesn't mean anything or is stupid? Gotcha.

Maybe he was doing an impersonation of you by saying stupid stuff and then claim he was being sarcastic. ;)

Pathetic.

It means something, but just not too much.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:27 PM

It also landed Sam Baker and Curtis Lofton who are better than anything Pioli acquired this year.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:28 PM

Uh how is saying Jason Brown a fail? He signed with the Rams he was going to the highest bidder, I guess the Chiefs have no money to spend eh?

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351832)
Which 1st year GMs are you referring to?

Just curious.

How about Brian Xanders THIS YEAR?

Or Tom Dimitroff in Atlanta?

Need I go on?

Fish 12-16-2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6351843)
You do realize that the vast majority of those players were not given long term contracts and are stop gaps for this season, right?

Stop gaps for what purpose? If we had shit for talent already, why would we need stopgaps for anything? If we have no foundation to speak of, and plenty of money, there is no reason for any stopgaps. There's no reason to wait. Start building already...

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351869)
How about Brian Xanders THIS YEAR?

Or Tom Dimitroff in Atlanta?

Need I go on?

That's obviously just blind luck according to the defenders.

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351861)
LOL.
His first draft landed him Matt Ryan.

That is the ONLY reason he looks like a damn Genius now.
If Ryan had fell to us, Peterson would be looking good right now.


WHAT
?

How about signing Michael Turner, who led the NFL in rushing last year?

How about hiring a first time head coach, who led them to a winning record in his first season with a rookie QB?

How about trading up into the first round to grab LT Sam Baker?

Seriously, you don't know what you're talking about.

Why do people like you that don't know jackshit INSIST on acting as if they do?

Please explain.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:30 PM

Seriously Atlanta's 3rd pick of the draft was better than our first.

philfree 12-16-2009 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351782)
Hey, we don't agree and I respect that. Still, I stand by my comment: if Pioli needed one full season to evaluate the existing talent on this team, he is the most incompetent GM in the league.

Maybe it's the water in KC then because he was pretty good at his job before he was hired by the Chiefs. I think his body of work before he was hired by the Chiefs says more than what has transpired since. What happens the next couple of years will say something though.

PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6351879)
Maybe it's the water in KC then because he was pretty good at his job before he was hired by the Chiefs. I think his body of work before he was hired by the Chiefs says more than what has transpired since. What happens the next couple of years will say something though.

PhilFree:arrow:

You know he wasn't the GM in NE right?

Hammock Parties 12-16-2009 01:33 PM

Quote:

WE WILL NOT OVER PAY FOR FREE AGENTS! EVER! IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE PATRIOT WAY
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2786670

Quote:

The Patriots have reached an agreement in principle with former Baltimore Ravens linebacker Adalius Thomas, among the premier players in the unrestricted free agent pool, and the seven-year veteran appears to be a perfect fit for coach Bill Belichick's trademark 3-4 defensive scheme.

But Thomas, who played for Belichick in the Pro Bowl last month, almost certainly will be one of the highest-paid players in free agency. Rated by ESPN.com as the No. 2 unrestricted player available, Thomas figures to land guarantees totaling at least $15 million. There is speculation the contract will average $10 million per year.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:33 PM

NE has cash and it's saved them because their recent drafts have sucked the serious cock.

philfree 12-16-2009 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351880)
You know he wasn't the GM in NE right?

Yeah.

PhilFree:arrow:

BossChief 12-16-2009 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351868)
Uh how is saying Jason Brown a fail? He signed with the Rams he was going to the highest bidder, I guess the Chiefs have no money to spend eh?

they basically had a boatload of cash on his lawn at 12:01 and really, some of the same "dumb" arguments would be shouted about Pioli if he had signed a center for 8 million/yr. Dont say that isnt accurate, because it is. Just because you need a car and have 20k, doesnt mean you spent 20k on a car worth 10-12k.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:38 PM

It really doesn't matter what I say.
I still have faith in Pioli.
I don't think he has screwed up the way you guys do.
If that makes me an idiot, so be it.
Only time will tell who is wrong or right.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:38 PM

I'm fine with spending money when it's there to spend...especially when you might be about to enter an uncapped year and the league in general being uncapped.

By the time the team is really good his contract is one that could easily come off the books.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6351879)
Maybe it's the water in KC then because he was pretty good at his job before he was hired by the Chiefs. I think his body of work before he was hired by the Chiefs says more than what has transpired since. What happens the next couple of years will say something though.

PhilFree:arrow:

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6351893)
Yeah.

PhilFree:arrow:

So we should demote Pioli and bring in the Hoodie's man sack. Is that what you're advocating?

Reaper16 12-16-2009 01:38 PM

I don't think that patience and logical talent acquisition are mutually exclusive.

dirk digler 12-16-2009 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351866)
Pathetic.

It means something, but just not too much.

Kind of like your posts? :D

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351901)
Kind of like your posts? :D

LMAO.

Yeah, my posts. Or any of the other posts on a ****ing football message board.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351865)
Wow, your insight is just invaluable around here

:rolleyes:

As is yours.

"Pioli ****ed up", and "you are and idiot" can only be said so many times, in so many ways.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:42 PM

Ok, so Pioli has taken a lot of heat from some of the posters in this thread, but let's ask a more specific question to those whose faith is still unwavering:

What has Pioli done well? What are his successes in KC thus far? Please be specific.

philfree 12-16-2009 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351868)
Uh how is saying Jason Brown a fail? He signed with the Rams he was going to the highest bidder, I guess the Chiefs have no money to spend eh?

Obviously paid big dividends for the Rams. I feel like they could have addressed the o line more then the minimal they did but come on man.


PhilFree:arrow:

Hammock Parties 12-16-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351917)
What has Pioli done well? What are his successes in KC thus far? Please be specific.

Fan support for the GM is at a 20-year high.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6351894)
they basically had a boatload of cash on his lawn at 12:01 and really, some of the same "dumb" arguments would be shouted about Pioli if he had signed a center for 8 million/yr. Dont say that isnt accurate, because it is. Just because you need a car and have 20k, doesnt mean you spent 20k on a car worth 10-12k.

Damn. No wonder you wan n00b of the year.


I'm just now getting familiar with you, and I've read more logic in your last 3 posts than the know it all elites have spouted in months.

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351911)
As is yours.

"Pioli ****ed up", and "you are and idiot" can only be said so many times, in so many ways.

Oh, and that's what I've said in this thread?

:rolleyes:

What's wrong with you?

(Besides the obvious).

Rooster 12-16-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6351919)
Fan support for the GM is at a 20-year high.

Noooooo he sucks!!! He sucks!! He sucks!! I heard it on Chiefs Planet...

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6351919)
Fan support for the GM is at a 20-year high.

Because his name isn't Carl Peterson, if they'd take 10 seconds to see the job he's done it's the same shit with a different name.

Hell even Carl had a better first year than this.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rooster (Post 6351925)
Noooooo he sucks!!! He sucks!! He sucks!! I heard it on Chiefs Planet...

What's something good he's done, seriously.

Hammock Parties 12-16-2009 01:46 PM

To date, we have pissed off no players by telling them to STFU and STFD.

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351897)
It really doesn't matter what I say.
I still have faith in Pioli.
I don't think he has screwed up the way you guys do.
If that makes me an idiot, so be it.
Only time will tell who is wrong or right.

Bullshit.

You made claims in this very thread that I have disputed.

Funny how you are unwilling or unable to address them.

dirk digler 12-16-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351917)
Ok, so Pioli has taken a lot of heat from some of the posters in this thread, but let's ask a more specific question to those whose faith is still unwavering:

What has Pioli done well? What are his successes in KC thus far? Please be specific.

He has won more games than last year with 22 guys off the street. :)

Hammock Parties 12-16-2009 01:47 PM

Pioli fired Herm Edwards. Remember how awesome that was?

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6351919)
Fan support for the GM is at a 20-year high.

Good point. But it's a 12-year high.

Through '97, CP had done a pretty solid job. Didn't reach the goal, but he was far from terrible, and most fans were probably pretty positive about the job he had done to that point.

tooge 12-16-2009 01:48 PM

Guys, guys, guys. You are spouting the same crap over and over, both sides. Look, I think everyone here agrees that we saw a crappy year coming. I think everyone agrees that this team was a mess when Pioli got here. I think everyone agrees that Pioli has whiffed on some of the early decisions from what we as outsiders understand. As far as FA goes, could he have made a much bigger splash? Absolutely. Would signing Jason Brown, Albert Haynesworth, or Chris Canty, or all three for that matter made this more than a 6 win team? No chance. It would have cost a fortune though. The point is, Vrabel was brought in because he knows the 3-4 defense and could help out guys like Hali, Studebaker, and Johnson, plus he was essentially free. Let me sum it up this way. If you were the GM, and you felt that you could spend over one hundered million on a few free agents and maybe get this team to 5 or 6 wins, would you have? What would you have done, and how many wins do you think it would translate into this season?

philfree 12-16-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351917)
Ok, so Pioli has taken a lot of heat from some of the posters in this thread, but let's ask a more specific question to those whose faith is still unwavering:

What has Pioli done well? What are his successes in KC thus far? Please be specific.

I don't have blind faith in Pioli but I'm still on board with what I think to be his plan. IMO you can't really judge what Pioli's successes are at this point in his tenure in KC. He's done what he's said he was gonna do. Build it from the bottom up.

PhilFree:arrow:

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351924)
Oh, and that's what I've said in this thread?

:rolleyes:

What's wrong with you?

(Besides the obvious).

It's all you ever say in football related threads.

Rooster 12-16-2009 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351928)
What's something good he's done, seriously.

More wins

dirk digler 12-16-2009 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6351938)
I don't have blind faith in Pioli but I'm still on board with what I think to be his plan. IMO you can't really judge what Pioli's successes are at this point in his tenure in KC. He's done what he's said he was gonna do. Build it from the bottom up.

PhilFree:arrow:

I just don't get all the negative nancy's 11 months into a new regime. I could understand and probably join them if this was year 3 but he inherited a shitty organization and roster it is going to take some time.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 6351938)
I don't have blind faith in Pioli but I'm still on board with what I think to be his plan. IMO you can't really judge what Pioli's successes are at this point in his tenure in KC. He's done what he's said he was gonna do. Build it from the bottom up.

PhilFree:arrow:

Ok, but you really haven't addressed the question.

What has he started to build? Are there any new pieces to the foundation? Does a 5 tech count? The kicker?

The puddle of mud is enough? At least that ugly ass house isn't here any longer?

Hammock Parties 12-16-2009 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 6351936)
If you were the GM, and you felt that you could spend over one hundered million on a few free agents and maybe get this team to 5 or 6 wins, would you have? What would you have done, and how many wins do you think it would translate into this season?

Six wins would have been progress.

Brown, Haynesworth and Canty would have been valuable to the team down the road, too.

Totally worth it.

Chief Faithful 12-16-2009 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351917)
Ok, so Pioli has taken a lot of heat from some of the posters in this thread, but let's ask a more specific question to those whose faith is still unwavering:

What has Pioli done well? What are his successes in KC thus far? Please be specific.

Ok, you guys of faith, stand right here against this wall infront of the painted bulls eye and whatever you do don't move. Here, to show my good intention, have a cigarette.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6351933)
Pioli fired Herm Edwards. Remember how awesome that was?

Then he hired a guy who makes Herm look like a genius.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:53 PM

Would Herm have won 3 games this season?

Have we won because of Haley? Or in spite of him?

beach tribe 12-16-2009 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351931)
Bullshit.

You made claims in this very thread that I have disputed.

Funny how you are unwilling or unable to address them.

I don't have time to read through the thread right now, and I don't know exactly what you are referring to.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:54 PM

Just for the record Chris Canty was significantly cheaper than the guy we took 3rd overall to do the same thing.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351957)
Would Herm have won 3 games this season?

Have we won because of Haley? Or in spite of him?

I don't know how anyone could watch these games and say we upgraded coach, Haley makes Herm look like a game management God.

Rooster 12-16-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351948)
I just don't get all the negative nancy's 11 months into a new regime. I could understand and probably join them if this was year 3 but he inherited a shitty organization and roster it is going to take some time.

I think it is a generation thing. It's an instant reward type world some grew up in. If you can line up a bunch of digital shit on a video game you should be able to do the same in the real world.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful (Post 6351953)
Ok, you guys of faith, stand right here against this wall infront of the painted bulls eye and whatever you do don't move. Here, to show my good intention, have a cigarette.

I think it's a legitimate question, don't you?

What has Pioli done well? That's not fair?

ChiefsCountry 12-16-2009 01:55 PM

Pioli saw all the close games last year thought if I bring in my QB and switch to the 3-4 we could win games.

Chief Faithful 12-16-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6351952)
Six wins would have been progress.

Brown, Haynesworth and Canty would have been valuable to the team down the road, too.

Totally worth it.

What ever it cost for Brown, Haynesworth and Canty add 25% for them to come to KC. Is it still worth it?

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:56 PM

Dude "negative nancies" at least from my point on this is I don't think expecting 1 or even 2 foundation players the first year is asking to much and we got none. I could give 2 shits about the record that wasn't what it was about this year but he acquired nothing to build upon got that, NOTHING.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rooster (Post 6351961)
I think it is a generation thing. It's an instant reward type world some grew up in. If you can line up a bunch of digital shit on a video game you should be able to do the same in the real world.

Because all the posters who have raised serious questions about Pioli (and Haley) are kids or of the "younger generation"?

Fish 12-16-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351957)
Would Herm have won 3 games this season?

Have we won because of Haley? Or in spite of him?

Those are actually pretty legit questions that put this in perspective...

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6351966)
Pioli saw all the close games last year thought if I bring in my QB and switch to the 3-4 we could win games.

I think it's funny to realize his QB is basically Tyler Thigpen's older brother.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6351970)
Those are actually pretty legit questions that put this in perspective...

People might respond with, "The team plays hard for Haley. Solid effort."

Great, they did the same thing for Herm, too.

dirk digler 12-16-2009 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351957)
Would Herm have won 3 games this season?

Have we won because of Haley? Or in spite of him?

No we would have been 0-13 with Herm.

I think your second question is very fair. I think Haley\Pendergast has screwed up a couple of games that we should have won. Raiders and Cowboys at home are 2 that come to mind.

tooge 12-16-2009 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6351960)
I don't know how anyone could watch these games and say we upgraded coach, Haley makes Herm look like a game management God.

Man, you guys are good at dodging questions. Sooooo, would you have signed Canty, Haynesworth, or Brown, or all three? Do you think that would have translated into more than 6 wins?

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351974)
No we would have been 0-13 with Herm.

I think you second question is very fair. I think Haley\Pendergast has screwed up a couple of games that we should have won. Raiders and Cowboys at home are 2 that come to mind.

And I think you are high. Haley has been far away the worst coach in the league this year.

DeezNutz 12-16-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351974)
No we would have been 0-13 with Herm.

I think your second question is very fair. I think Haley\Pendergast has screwed up a couple of games that we should have won. Raiders and Cowboys at home are 2 that come to mind.

Herm ball would have beat the Raiders at home.

Mecca 12-16-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 6351975)
Man, you guys are good at dodging questions. Sooooo, would you have signed Canty, Haynesworth, or Brown, or all three? Do you think that would have translated into more than 6 wins?

Who said you had to sign all 3 of them?

I was just simply asking for SOMETHING, add a foundation piece, we got none. This would be like going man I'm building a house lets get that foundation laid down...then a year later after you put down a cardboard box going..hrm still no foundation I see.

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351958)
I don't have time to read through the thread right now, and I don't know exactly what you are referring to.

Of course you don't. Is that your new excuse? You've used it twice this week alone.

:rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351832)
Which 1st year GMs are you referring to?

Just curious.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351869)
How about Brian Xanders THIS YEAR?

Or Tom Dimitroff in Atlanta?

Need I go on?

You never responded.

Then THIS gem:

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351861)
LOL.
His first draft landed him Matt Ryan.

That is the ONLY reason he looks like a damn Genius now.
If Ryan had fell to us, Peterson would be looking good right now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351874)

WHAT
?

How about signing Michael Turner, who led the NFL in rushing last year?

How about hiring a first time head coach, who led them to a winning record in his first season with a rookie QB?

How about trading up into the first round to grab LT Sam Baker?

Seriously, you don't know what you're talking about.

Why do people like you that don't know jackshit INSIST on acting as if they do?

Please explain.

No response on either.

But I get it: You're just too busy.

LMAO

Mecca 12-16-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351979)
Herm ball would have beat the Raiders at home.

Herm ball also didn't get completely destroyed by the Chargers either, I do not like Herm at all so this should tell you what Haley's coaching skill is.

Fish 12-16-2009 02:00 PM

All offseason, the mantra was "We'll win more games just by coaching alone."

I haven't seen a shit bit of that so far.

dirk digler 12-16-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rooster (Post 6351961)
I think it is a generation thing. It's an instant reward type world some grew up in. If you can line up a bunch of digital shit on a video game you should be able to do the same in the real world.

Yep that is why I give Carl credit for saying a few years ago Chief fans don't have enough patience for a rebuild which is true.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351963)
I think it's a legitimate question, don't you?

What has Pioli done well? That's not fair?

Got rid of LJ.
I believe they will double last years wins.
Secured the kicker position
Picked up Chambers. (yes, he's better than anyone we had, and will contribute.)

That's not much, but I believe the big work happens this off-season. The only FULL off-season they've had.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6351985)
Yep that is why I give Carl credit for saying a few years ago Chief fans don't have enough patience for a rebuild which is true.

Yep.

Mecca 12-16-2009 02:02 PM

Dude no one is bitching about the record, stop trying to spin it into something it's not.

We're bitching that he's done nothing to find foundation players. Our fan base isn't impatient it's just loaded with dipshits who don't even understand simple points.

Mecca 12-16-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6351986)
Got rid of LJ.
I believe they will double last years wins.
Secured the kicker position
Picked up Chambers. (yes, he's better than anyone we had, and will contribute.)

That's not much, but I believe the big work happens this off-season. The only FULL off-season they've had.

LOL yes a kicker!

And they only got rid of LJ after he made them before that they continued to run him out on the field over Charles, that's a glowing endorsement that they know what they're doing.

beach tribe 12-16-2009 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6351982)
Of course you don't. Is that your new excuse? You've used it twice this week alone.

:rolleyes:





You never responded.

Then THIS gem:





No response on either.

But I get it: You're just too busy.

LMAO

Without Matt Ryan it doesn't mean shit.

philfree 12-16-2009 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6351949)
Ok, but you really haven't addressed the question.

What has he started to build? Are there any new pieces to the foundation? Does a 5 tech count? The kicker?

The puddle of mud is enough? At least that ugly ass house isn't here any longer?

That would appear to be part of the foundation of our 34 D. Moving Dorsey to DE and him picking up his game is part of the foundation. Save a NT our D Line has some what of a foundation being laid. That said it's till to early to know or judge. Thsi team isn't being built for 2009 that's just where it started.

PhilFree:arrow:

DaneMcCloud 12-16-2009 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 6351975)
Man, you guys are good at dodging questions. Sooooo, would you have signed Canty, Haynesworth, or Brown, or all three? Do you think that would have translated into more than 6 wins?

If Herm were the coach, there would have been no reason to sign Canty or Haynesworth. Brown would have been a nice signing.

I think the Chiefs would have chosen plenty of offensive lineman, a MLB like Maualuga and would have continued on the path of rebuilding this franchise with youth.

Would that have translated to more wins? Absolutely. Even with Thigpen at QB, a better offensive line and a better defense (along with Tony Gonzalez & Chan Gailey) would have produced at LEAST six wins, if not eight or more.

This defense was not far away from competing. The offensive line could have used a new starting center and right tackle. One more solid draft under Herm would have gone a long way toward respectability.

Now, the Chiefs are an Expansion Franchise. And if you haven't noticed, Cleveland & Houston have not won a playoff game.

Mecca 12-16-2009 02:04 PM

So he can identify a QB and Scott Pioli can't...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.