ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Wins and losses ... you make the call (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=232705)

Mecca 08-31-2010 12:49 AM
Eh I actually like the 49ers Wideouts, Crabtree and Flowers is a solid matchup..I think Carr would have some issues with Josh Morgan though because he has speed.

The 49ers are honestly a pretty hard team to defense these days, they have players all over the field other than QB, I guess they still think Smith will get it now.

BossChief 08-31-2010 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966255)
Eh I actually like the 49ers Wideouts, Crabtree and Flowers is a solid matchup..I think Carr would have some issues with Josh Morgan though because he has speed.

The 49ers are honestly a pretty hard team to defense these days, they have players all over the field other than QB, I guess they still think Smith will get it now.
Carr did fine against Maclin, who is faster (and more talented) than Morgan by a mile.

I think our defense matches up well with their offense, but like I said I dont think as optimistically about the other side of the coin.

Hopefully, Willis doesn't kill DMC and Charles.

Mecca 08-31-2010 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6966264)
Carr did fine against Maclin, who is faster (and more talented) than Morgan by a mile.

I think our defense matches up well with their offense, but like I said I dont think as optimistically about the other side of the coin.

Hopefully, Willis doesn't kill DMC and Charles.
They'll just have Taylor Mays do it.

The difference in the Eagles and the 49ers is the 49ers line is better and they are committed to running the ball.

With that team it's one or the other do you let Gore throw up 150+ yards on you or do you come up in the box and get beat by Davis...this doesn't even factor in that Crabtree who looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie has a full training camp and all that.

I like th 49ers to be an easy playoff team this year.

BossChief 08-31-2010 01:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966270)
They'll just have Taylor Mays do it.

The difference in the Eagles and the 49ers is the 49ers line is better and they are committed to running the ball.

With that team it's one or the other do you let Gore throw up 150+ yards on you or do you come up in the box and get beat by Davis...this doesn't even factor in that Crabtree who looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie has a full training camp and all that.

I like th 49ers to be an easy playoff team this year.
duh, I have them as a possible NFL championship game team if they can get even average production from the quarterback. Should be a no brainer.

That brings up something I have been meaning to ask, when the **** are you gonna trade in that damn avatar? Barkley?

Taylor Mays at 5 FTW!

Rasputin 08-31-2010 01:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966270)
They'll just have Taylor Mays do it.

The difference in the Eagles and the 49ers is the 49ers line is better and they are committed to running the ball.

With that team it's one or the other do you let Gore throw up 150+ yards on you or do you come up in the box and get beat by Davis...this doesn't even factor in that Crabtree who looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie has a full training camp and all that.

I like th 49ers to be an easy playoff team this year.
See, why is it so hard for us to "get it" 9rs sucked and had the number one draft pick and now they are a play off team. What did they do differant than us?

Mecca 08-31-2010 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool han Luke (Post 6966273)
See, why is it so hard for us to "get it" 9rs sucked and had the number one draft pick and now they are a play off team. What did they do differant than us?
They didn't become good till they hired a coach who knew what he was doing, Vernon Davis was a scrub under Mike Nolan.

And their picks on average were lower than ours, think about this...Alex Smith was number 1 overall..I believe Davis went 7th, Crabtree was 10 and Willis was I believe 11..

They don't have multiple top 5 picks.

007 08-31-2010 01:07 AM
Has anyone predicted a loss on the bye week yet?

Mecca 08-31-2010 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6966272)
duh, I have them as a possible NFL championship game team if they can get even average production from the quarterback. Should be a no brainer.

That brings up something I have been meaning to ask, when the **** are you gonna trade in that damn avatar? Barkley?

Taylor Mays at 5 FTW!
LOL, I;m happy for Taylor that he went to the 49ers, it's not far from his home and he'll get good coaching which is what he needs. He's a good guy and pretty smart, if he listens to the staff there and works hard which I'm sure he will, he'll end up as a very good NFL player.

Rasputin 08-31-2010 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966274)
They didn't become good till they hired a coach who knew what he was doing, Vernon Davis was a scrub under Mike Nolan.

And their picks on average were lower than ours, think about this...Alex Smith was number 1 overall..I believe Davis went 7th, Crabtree was 10 and Willis was I believe 11..

They don't have multiple top 5 picks.
I like there coach, and think he made a big impression on his team from the get go. LOL when he mooned them. I agree he is a good coach and I think there developing the guys the drafted and sticking with them. Having guys that stick with each other over a few years to get to know each other, and build trust, and unity goes along ways.

BossChief 08-31-2010 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966278)
LOL, I;m happy for Taylor that he went to the 49ers, it's not far from his home and he'll get good coaching which is what he needs. He's a good guy and pretty smart, if he listens to the staff there and works hard which I'm sure he will, he'll end up as a very good NFL player.
I agree 100%

He couldnt have gone into a better situation IMO.

Just flippin ya shit is all.

But damn, change that avatar already man.

|Zach| 08-31-2010 02:21 AM
1 Sep 13 SD @ KC W
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE W
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC L
4 Bye

5 Oct 10 KC @ IND L
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU L
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC W
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC W
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK W
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN W
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC L
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA L
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC W
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD L
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL W
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC L
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC W

9-7

|Zach| 08-31-2010 02:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965264)

The Chiefs don't have a shot in hell to beat the Steelers with a healthy Polamalu (who didn't play that day) or a healthy Roethlisberger.
Everybody gets excuses but the Chiefs.

Titty Meat 08-31-2010 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966270)
They'll just have Taylor Mays do it.

The difference in the Eagles and the 49ers is the 49ers line is better and they are committed to running the ball.

With that team it's one or the other do you let Gore throw up 150+ yards on you or do you come up in the box and get beat by Davis...this doesn't even factor in that Crabtree who looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie has a full training camp and all that.

I like th 49ers to be an easy playoff team this year.
Alex Smith won't beat the Chiefs. And if you rely on Mays to defend Charles or McCluster the Chiefs will win.

Titty Meat 08-31-2010 02:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6966198)
Okay
Finally Dane doesn't have anything to say.

Seriously I have a friend who writes for the Niners he's even said they are an average team as long as Smith is the QB.

BryanBusby 08-31-2010 02:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cool han Luke (Post 6966273)
See, why is it so hard for us to "get it" 9rs sucked and had the number one draft pick and now they are a play off team. What did they do differant than us?
They have been drafting quality players for years, but Nolan was a completely different coach than Singletary in all the wrong ways. Mike is not only more hands on with the players, but also knows how to push their buttons the right way.

They've lacked offensive coordinator stability. Jimmy Raye isn't a great coordinator, but not having to learn a new system yet again does a lot for a struggling QB like Alex Smith.

I think they've gone from since Smith was a rookie:
2005- Mike McCarthy
2006- Norv Turner
2007- Jim Hostler
2008- Mike Martz
2009-2010 - Jimmy Raye

Any QB would struggle with that much changing at coach. Now picture that with a QB trying to develop into a good starter.

Mecca 08-31-2010 04:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6966316)
Alex Smith won't beat the Chiefs. And if you rely on Mays to defend Charles or McCluster the Chiefs will win.
He won't have to, he has a superior team, and I wasn't even remotely inferring that Mays would cover them, just that he throws killshots and with the hits I've seen McCluster take already..

Actually McCluster facing the team with Pat Willis is a scary thought.

Marcellus 08-31-2010 05:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966209)
The 49ers are a Chiefs true fans wet dream other than Smith was a #1 pick.

3 first round OL, check.
Great RB check.
Great TE check.
Playmakers on the outside check.

Very sold defense that has one of the best players in the league on it..check.

Really Alex Smith should at the very least be average with what's around him, the talent is there so we'll see how he does.

That team is far ahead of the Chiefs, they could beat the Chiefs handing off up the middle every play. Also with the passes Cassel throws with Pat Willis roaming that could be ugly...
So SF built a team exactly the way you have repeatedly said you wouldn't (OL, TE etc...) with the exception of the #1 pick being on a QB (a bad one at that) and yet SF is still miles ahead of KC?

They basically spent 1 draft pick the way you "would do it" on a QB who is the weak link of the team. They spent 4 1st rounders on OL and TE which if the Chiefs had done you would be screaming ratart at the top of your lungs.

So either you are wrong, or you are wrong.

SAUTO 08-31-2010 06:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966209)
The 49ers are a Chiefs true fans wet dream other than Smith was a #1 pick.
so they actually arent a "true fans wet dream" according to your definition?

Ralphy Boy 08-31-2010 06:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6965589)
I've been watching those guys snap for snap. Jackson isn't getting much push, but he's hitting the right gaps which is a huge step forward from last year. Dorsey's drawing a ton of doubles and he's holding his ground. I don't know how good Dorsey will be, so that's a wild card. I know Jackson's not going to be great, but I think he can be increasingly consistently in the right place this season.

As much shit as the D-line has gotten, in the last 2 games, they didn't make a lot of mental mistakes. And that's despite the fact that Romeo hasn't been aggressive with the blitzes. Most of our sacks/hurries the past two games, between Vrabel, Demorrio, Arenas, and even Studebaker were the result of LBs running through enormous holes, which is what our D-line is supposed to be doing.

So the D-linemen are supposed to be "opening holes up front"?

Pasta Little Brioni 08-31-2010 06:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6966383)
so they actually arent a "true fans wet dream" according to your definition?
He pretty much owned himself ROFL

Ralphy Boy 08-31-2010 07:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6965638)
Also, to be fair, Arenas will help our pass rush a lot too. As will adding Berry and Lewis in the secondary.
Seriously? You're counting on a 5'9" nickleback to help our pass rush? Gimmick much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6965643)
It's a complete oversimplification of the facts.

We walked into the offseason with a shitty defense and a shitty offense. In an uncapped year, our best shot at free agents were free agents that we didn't have a shot at and 7 draft picks.

If they chose defense, they would have ignored a shitty offense. If they chose offense, which they did, they would have ignored a shitty defense.

We were going to suck on one side of the ball no matter what our strategy.
We had the 23rd ranked scoring offense and the 30th ranked scoring defense to go with the 2nd worst run defense and 2nd worst pass rush in the league. Perhaps oversimplification would be a good thing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by GoHuge39 (Post 6966104)
Man I must really have drank the kool-Aid!!!! 10-6 which I doubt they go, but when I go through all the games that's what I come out with. Never even thought they could go 10-6, but you look at their schedule and it couldn't get much easier than that for a team.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with you predicting that record. If it gives you hope and makes you attend/watch a game, then it is a good thing. Don't get me wrong, I think your absolutely f-ing nuts and we'll be lucky to finish 6 & 10.
For the life of me I can't figure out why I watch a game I think they'll lose, I shouldn't waste the time but I do.

Windcatcher 08-31-2010 10:02 AM
Based on what I have seen in the off season we have nowhere to go but up especially with a soft division and schedule. My take 6 & 10. Just need to show that we can close out a game or two more than we did last year.

BossChief 08-31-2010 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6966482)
Seriously? You're counting on a 5'9" nickleback to help our pass rush? Gimmick much?
Javier Arenas is a terrific blitzer. He had 5 sacks in 13 games last year and now plays for a coordinator that likes to blitz corners.

Also, one of our major weaknesses last year was the slot guy. It allowed quarterbacks to get out of trouble quite often. Whether it be Richardson, Leggett, Washington or Travis Daniels...they got burnt consistently. Arenas should be solid in that role. If the slot guy was covered in even 1/3 of those third and longs, our defense gets off the field that much more and it gives guys like Hali and Studebaker more time to close on the quarterback and eventually gives the defense more time to rest.

He is also an exciting returner and should help put some butts in the seats, taking us one step closer to getting our home field advantage back and most knowledgeable fans understand how much that also helps the pass rush and the defense overall.

So, call it what you will, but the guy will indeed help the pass rush both directly and indirectly.

Mecca 08-31-2010 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 6966402)
He pretty much owned himself ROFL
They aren't a bowl team so how is that owning yourself?

All they've done is set themselves up to lose in the playoffs and they're better than the shit hole teams. Being light years ahead of the Chiefs means I owned myself eh, well I guess some don't realize the Chiefs are a shithole team.

The 49ers have built to the team that loses in the playoffs to the teams with QB's.

SAUTO 08-31-2010 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6967149)
They aren't a bowl team so how is that owning yourself?

All they've done is set themselves up to lose in the playoffs and they're better than the shit hole teams. Being light years ahead of the Chiefs means I owned myself eh, well I guess some don't realize the Chiefs are a shithole team.

The 49ers have built to the team that loses in the playoffs to the teams with QB's.
but they took a QB #1 so that ****s the "true fans wet dream" theory.


and yeah i thought that would be too complicated for you to figure out

BigMeatballDave 10-03-2010 05:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966270)
They'll just have Taylor Mays do it.

The difference in the Eagles and the 49ers is the 49ers line is better and they are committed to running the ball.

With that team it's one or the other do you let Gore throw up 150+ yards on you or do you come up in the box and get beat by Davis...this doesn't even factor in that Crabtree who looked far better than I thought he would as a rookie has a full training camp and all that.

I like th 49ers to be an easy playoff team this year.
ROFL

Pasta Little Brioni 10-03-2010 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6967149)
They aren't a bowl team so how is that owning yourself?

All they've done is set themselves up to lose in the playoffs and they're better than the shit hole teams. Being light years ahead of the Chiefs means I owned myself eh, well I guess some don't realize the Chiefs are a shithole team.

The 49ers have built to the team that loses in the playoffs to the teams with QB's.
:spock: The point was taking a QB number 1 overall goes against everything that you've pegged as "True Fan"

BTW That "shithole team" just put a hurtin on the team they are lightyears behind ROFL

-King- 10-03-2010 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7056811)
:spock: The point was taking a QB number 1 overall goes against everything that you've pegged as "True Fan"

BTW That "shithole team" just put a hurtin on the team they are lightyears behind ROFL
Well at least Taylor mays delivered some killshots in the game



Errr..... Nevermind
Posted via Mobile Device

BossChief 10-03-2010 12:40 PM
Damn, I had a lot of swing and misses in this thread.

Im glad Im wrong in this instance

JD10367 10-17-2010 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6965106)
1 Sep 13 SD @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 10:15 PM WIN (it's game one, what the hell, why not)
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE Cleveland Browns Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
4 Bye

5 Oct 10 KC @ IND Lucas Oil Stadium 1:00 PM LOSS
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU Reliant Stadium 1:00 PM LOSS
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK Oakland Coliseum 4:15 PM WIN
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN Invesco Field at Mile High 4:05 PM LOSS
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA Qwest Field 4:05 PM WIN
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD Qualcomm Stadium 4:15 PM LOSS
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL Edward Jones Dome 1:00 PM WIN
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN

12-4.

(Hey, what the hell. I bet I'm the only person who'll predict this, and if it happens I'll look like a frickin' GENIUS!) :D
Bump.

I'm right on schedule.

:)

JD10367 11-02-2010 10:32 AM
Bump.

Still on track... but I might have been wrong on the next two games, those might flip (i.e. loss in Oakland, win in Denver).

JD10367 11-15-2010 07:54 AM
They screwed up my prediction by losing to the Raiders. I now back it down to 11-5. Everyone screaming about how bad the Chiefs suck can prepare to jump back on the bandwagon after they win the next three to go to 8-4.

JD10367 11-30-2010 12:06 PM
Bump.

Two more wins puts my prediction back on track. Only wrong call was the Oakland game so far. :)

Frosty 11-30-2010 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 6965000)
Best Case Likely Case
W L
W L
W L
L L
L L
W W
W W
L L
L L
W W
W L
W W
L L
W W
W L
W W

11-5 6-10
Wow! Nostradamus with those "Best Case" picks so far.

Stinger 11-30-2010 12:17 PM
So much WIN in this thread ................

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...et/2wbvtbs.gif

ToxSocks 11-30-2010 12:22 PM
Damn. No wonder Mecca doesn't post anymore.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-30-2010 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 7212634)
Damn. No wonder Mecca doesn't post anymore.
ROFL I remember him posting that the Niners were light years ahead of the Chiefs and would dominate at Arrowhead taking out Chiefs players in the process.

DaneMcCloud 11-30-2010 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7212653)
ROFL I remember him posting that the Niners were light years ahead of the Chiefs and would dominate at Arrowhead taking out Chiefs players in the process.
The 49ers have been a major disappointment this year. They have plenty of talent on their roster but the coaching has been horrendous.

As for swings and misses, I think my predictions were the worst in this thread. I clearly underestimated the Chiefs based on preseason and overestimated their opponents (especially Cleveland and San Fran).

Pasta Little Brioni 11-30-2010 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7212680)
The 49ers have been a major disappointment this year. They have plenty of talent on their roster but the coaching has been horrendous.

As for swings and misses, I think my predictions were the worst in this thread. I clearly underestimated the Chiefs based on preseason and overestimated their opponents (especially Cleveland and San Fran).
I don't think anyone REALLY believed they'd play this well. I was a bit optimistic based off the improved tackling shown in preseason and the offense scoring 22 a game the 2nd half of the year last year after Charles took over.

OnTheWarpath15 11-30-2010 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7212680)
The 49ers have been a major disappointment this year. They have plenty of talent on their roster but the coaching has been horrendous.

As for swings and misses, I think my predictions were the worst in this thread. I clearly underestimated the Chiefs based on preseason and overestimated their opponents (especially Cleveland and San Fran).
In fairness, Cleveland and SF would be MUCH tougher matchups now versus when we played them. Both teams were a complete cluster****.

And you know as well as I, the dipshits who said 10-6 or 11-5 never thought for a second it would happen.

Like PGM said, NO ONE honestly thought they'd play this well.

DaneMcCloud 11-30-2010 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7212839)
In fairness, Cleveland and SF would be MUCH tougher matchups now versus when we played them. Both teams were a complete cluster****.

And you know as well as I, the dipshits who said 10-6 or 11-5 never thought for a second it would happen.

Like PGM said, NO ONE honestly thought they'd play this well.
While I agree, I definitely based my predictions on their preseason performances. Earlier in the year, I thought they were a 6-8 team win and if "lucky", they might win nine.

But preseason was disastrous, IMO, and I placed way too much stock in their poor showings.

I won't be so quick to judge next preseason.

'Hamas' Jenkins 11-30-2010 02:06 PM
I was right about all the teams that we played, save one, but underestimated our own improvement.

I'm cool with that.

BigMeatballDave 11-30-2010 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6966333)
He won't have to, he has a superior team, and I wasn't even remotely inferring that Mays would cover them, just that he throws killshots and with the hits I've seen McCluster take already..

Actually McCluster facing the team with Pat Willis is a scary thought.
:D
With several posts like these this yr, its no wonder he's been a no-show.

Pasta Little Brioni 11-30-2010 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7212839)
In fairness, Cleveland and SF would be MUCH tougher matchups now versus when we played them. Both teams were a complete cluster****.

And you know as well as I, the dipshits who said 10-6 or 11-5 never thought for a second it would happen.

Like PGM said, NO ONE honestly thought they'd play this well.
I'm not too surprised at the record given the teams they've played, but being top 5 in points scored , Bowe going beserk, and Cassel having a 22-4 ratio never came into the head of the looniest of homers.

JD10367 12-05-2010 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 6965106)
1 Sep 13 SD @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 10:15 PM WIN (it's game one, what the hell, why not)
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE Cleveland Browns Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
4 Bye

5 Oct 10 KC @ IND Lucas Oil Stadium 1:00 PM LOSS
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU Reliant Stadium 1:00 PM LOSS
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK Oakland Coliseum 4:15 PM WIN
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN Invesco Field at Mile High 4:05 PM LOSS
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA Qwest Field 4:05 PM WIN
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD Qualcomm Stadium 4:15 PM LOSS
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL Edward Jones Dome 1:00 PM WIN
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC Arrowhead Stadium 1:00 PM WIN

12-4.

(Hey, what the hell. I bet I'm the only person who'll predict this, and if it happens I'll look like a frickin' GENIUS!) :D
Bump. Still only one game off. That damn 11/7 Oakland game ruined it.

JD10367 12-13-2010 10:53 AM
Sad bump.

But if the only pick I made wrong is Oakland, the Chiefs still win the West so it's all good.

kstater 12-19-2010 04:59 PM
I'm gonna bump this because all the fail makes me smile.

DBOSHO 12-19-2010 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965172)
SF's a win, eh?

If that happened, I'd imagine that Mike Singletary would single-handedly destroy all of the new renovations at Arrowhead himself.

Unless San Francisco suffers a rash of injuries before Week 3, there is no way the Chiefs offense will score enough points to beat that 49er defense, let alone stop Frank Gore, Michael Crabtree and Vernon Davis.
Bump

DBOSHO 12-19-2010 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965298)
Sorry, I don't see and I don't agree. This defense, featuring FOUR number one draft choices, is ****ing awful. AWFUL. They have no legitimate, consistent pass rushers, NO legit NT's, weak DE's and no depth.

Teams like Cleveland, San Diego, San Fran, Houston and Jacksonville will pummel the Chiefs with their running games. Indy won't need to pummel them because the slow defense will be so exhausted by the fourth quarter from trying to get to Peyton Manning all day that it should be an easy win for them.
Bump

beer bacon 12-19-2010 05:07 PM
I'm finally ready to make a prediction of 11-5. What do I win?

DBOSHO 12-19-2010 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6965555)
DJ play to potential, never gonna happen, probably should let go of that pipe dream.
Bump

Lzen 12-20-2010 10:32 AM
Good stuff in this thread.

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-24-2010 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6965018)
1 Sep 13 SD @ KC - WIN
2 Sep 19 KC @ CLE - WIN
3 Sep 26 SF @ KC - LOSS
4 Bye
5 Oct 10 KC @ IND - LOSS
6 Oct 17 KC @ HOU - LOSS
7 Oct 24 JAC @ KC - WIN
8 Oct 31 BUF @ KC - WIN
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK - LOSS
10 Nov 14 KC @ DEN - LOSS
11 Nov 21 ARI @ KC - WIN
12 Nov 28 KC @ SEA - WIN
13 Dec 05 DEN @ KC - WIN
14 Dec 12 KC @ SD - LOSS
15 Dec 19 KC @ STL - WIN
16 Dec 26 TEN @ KC - LOSS
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC - WIN

8-8 although Week 1 is a true homer pick because I'm going to be there. So technically it should be a loss and we'll go 7-9.


Wow ! I hope your next one is wrong ! You said 8-8 but your picks show 9-7

RockChalk 12-24-2010 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great Expectations (Post 6965000)
Best Case Likely Case
W L
W L
W L
L L
L L
W W
W W
L L
L L
W W
W L
W W
L L
W W
W L
W W

11-5 6-10
:eek:

The best case option here is full of WIN. Just two more games and I'll be opening a sports betting account and seeking the wisdom of your crystal ball.

KCrockaholic 12-24-2010 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockChalk (Post 7285695)
:eek:

The best case option here is full of WIN. Just two more games and I'll be opening a sports betting account and seeking the wisdom of your crystal ball.
That dude nailed it! And I was proud that I've only missed two games all year long.

KCrockaholic 12-24-2010 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6965481)
After what I've seen this preseason...4-12 they look exactly the same.
ROFL

Sorry. But that's hilarious.

MIAdragon 12-24-2010 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 7285689)
Wow ! I hope your next one is wrong ! You said 8-8 but your picks show 9-7
there is a lot of add fail in this thread.

KCrockaholic 12-24-2010 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 6965652)
I will bet someone free dental work that the chiefs make the playoffs and matt cassel leads them there
How did this turn out? Does someone give you their free dental work?

Mr. Laz 12-24-2010 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965654)
Let's see them complete long balls against a real defense
:p

-King- 12-24-2010 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 7285705)
How did this turn out? Does someone give you their free dental work?
He's the dentist...
Posted via Mobile Device

Dave Lane 12-24-2010 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965172)
SF's a win, eh?

If that happened, I'd imagine that Mike Singletary would single-handedly destroy all of the new renovations at Arrowhead himself.

Unless San Francisco suffers a rash of injuries before Week 3, there is no way the Chiefs offense will score enough points to beat that 49er defense, let alone stop Frank Gore, Michael Crabtree and Vernon Davis.
Quoted for yucks :)

Dave Lane 12-24-2010 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6965184)
Wk1: SD @ KC - LOSE
Wk2: KC @ CLE - WIN
Wk3: SF @ KC - LOSE
Wk4: BYE
Wk5: KC @ IND - LOSE
Wk6: KC @ HOU - LOSE
Wk7: JAC @ KC - LOSE
Wk8: BUF @ KC - WIN
Wk9: KC @ OAK - LOSE
Wk10: KC @ DEN - LOSE
Wk11: ARI @ KC - LOSE
Wk12: KC @ SEA - WIN
Wk13: DEN @ KC - LOSE
Wk14: KC @ SD - LOSE
Wk15: KC @ STL - WIN
Wk16: TEN @ KC - LOSE
Wk17: OAK @ KC - WIN

Overall Record 5-11
Look Knowmo was right! Oh wait this isn't Denver he's talking about. :)

Dave Lane 12-24-2010 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6965285)
Indeed this team was a franchise NT or QB away from being an 8-8 or 9-7 team this year. Guess we'll have something to hang our hat on :D
LOL

Marcellus 12-24-2010 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7212839)
In fairness, Cleveland and SF would be MUCH tougher matchups now versus when we played them. Both teams were a complete cluster****.

And you know as well as I, the dipshits who said 10-6 or 11-5 never thought for a second it would happen.

Like PGM said, NO ONE honestly thought they'd play this well.
:rolleyes:


I figured this team would be around 8-8 so I am not saying I was correct but to say nobody honestly expected a 10 win season is just BS.

Because you were wrong nobody can be right is basically what it comes down to.

Marcellus 12-24-2010 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965201)
I was skeptical of Singletary's coaching abilities a few years back because he had to beg Brian Billick to become a member of his coaching staff. He followed Mike Nolan to San Francisco but I wasn't sure if that was because of their affiliation or because he was a legitimate NFL coach.

I think that question has now been answered and truly think he'll have San Fran consistently competing in the foreseeable future.

ROFL

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-24-2010 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965110)
Wk1: SD @ KC - LOSE
Wk2: KC @ CLE -LOSE
Wk3: SF @ KC - LOSE
Wk4: BYE
Wk5: KC @ IND - LOSE
Wk6: KC @ HOU - LOSE
Wk7: JAC @ KC - WIN
Wk8: BUF @ KC - WIN
Wk9: KC @ OAK - LOSE
Wk10: KC @ DEN - LOSE
Wk11: ARI @ KC -WIN
Wk12: KC @ SEA - LOSE
Wk13: DEN @ KC - LOSE
Wk14: KC @ SD - LOSE
Wk15: KC @ STL - WIN
Wk16: TEN @ KC - LOSE
Wk17: OAK @ KC - LOSE

4-12

Wow, that's worse than I imagined. Hopefully, they'll sneak in a few more wins, maybe Denver.

3-5 at home and 1-7 on the road.

:LOL:

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-24-2010 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965172)
SF's a win, eh?

If that happened, I'd imagine that Mike Singletary would single-handedly destroy all of the new renovations at Arrowhead himself.

Unless San Francisco suffers a rash of injuries before Week 3, there is no way the Chiefs offense will score enough points to beat that 49er defense, let alone stop Frank Gore, Michael Crabtree and Vernon Davis.

:LOL:

Hog's Gone Fishin 12-24-2010 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6965235)
What has changed for the Chiefs that you expect them to go into Cleveland and beat them?

They were gashed for 300 yards on the ground in Week 16. What do you think has changed for this defense?

:LOL:

boogblaster 12-24-2010 10:58 AM
I've said 10 wins all season long .. hopefully I'm wrong and we go 11-5 .......

Bowser 12-24-2010 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 7230031)
Bump. Still only one game off. That damn 11/7 Oakland game ruined it.
You and I need to make a Vegas run someday.....

The Bad Guy 12-24-2010 12:33 PM
This thread is just a complete blueprint for why people should not put tons of stock what happened the year before in the NFL.

OnTheWarpath15 12-24-2010 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7285744)
:rolleyes:


I figured this team would be around 8-8 so I am not saying I was correct but to say nobody honestly expected a 10 win season is just BS.

Because you were wrong nobody can be right is basically what it comes down to.
100% disagree.

There's a difference between believing something because you have evidence to support that belief, and just throwing something on the wall and hoping it sticks.

I can't think of a single person that claimed we'd win 10+ games that showed any evidence as to WHY they felt that way.

The people who predicted 10+ are the folks that predict 10+ every ****ing year, hoping they're right.

Merry Christmas to you.

OnTheWarpath15 12-24-2010 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 7285939)
This thread is just a complete blueprint for why people should not put tons of stock what happened the year before in the NFL.
I don't know that anyone puts "tons of stock" into the year before, but at the time, people can only go with the information they have.

The Niners, for example, were universally expected to be a good team and win the NFC West easily.

Should everyone - this board, the media - not make predictions at all?

EVERYONE was wrong on the Niners. Shit happens.

Titty Meat 12-24-2010 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Lane (Post 7285736)
LOL
I certainly was right about the Nose Tackle.

stevieray 12-24-2010 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 7286116)
100% disagree.

There's a difference between believing something because you have evidence to support that belief, and just throwing something on the wall and hoping it sticks.

I can't think of a single person that claimed we'd win 10+ games that showed any evidence as to WHY they felt that way.

The people who predicted 10+ are the folks that predict 10+ every ****ing year, hoping they're right.

Merry Christmas to you.
I did. I called 8-8 or 10-6 with a couple of breaks. I expected then to double their wins from 4-12, simply on the long overdue culture change, which Hali confirmed, and coupled with enough talent to build upon. The foundation has been laid, and the results are showing.

stop being such a sourpuss about other's high expectations.

JD10367 12-26-2010 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockChalk (Post 7285695)
:eek:

The best case option here is full of WIN. Just two more games and I'll be opening a sports betting account and seeking the wisdom of your crystal ball.
I'm almost on track with you, if not for those friggin' Raiders earlier.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.