![]() |
After seeing that you know he hated the position he was in. His hands were tied to say the least. I'm not disagreeing with Haley's dismissal, but any coach in the league would've gotten fired with Cassel/Palko at QB. And I really do believe he was starting Palko to say **** you to Pioli because Haley knew he was gone no matter what. Tonight's program really showed us what thought was just speculation before in a lot of areas.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do know that Haley controlled who played, when meetings were held, when the worked out, and how he answered questions. I don't think that Pioli has handled everything right, but when it comes to their relationship, I believe that Haley was the one who was most responsible for the breakdown. |
Quote:
|
We would have been better off letting Pioli go. Clark moving into a
Jerry Jones type roll. To make the transition seamless he could have waived Matt Cassel. Then come up with some catchy little phrase like "just win baby". Imagine the action on this board then. |
Quote:
The Niners are frauds? |
Is there any place I can watch this online? I missed it and would really like to see it for myself.
|
Quote:
|
God, I can't believe I'm saying this but does anyone else think Todd would have been a better coach under Carl Peterson? King Carl for all his faults seem to let the coaches put their stamp on the team. I'm not saying he is a better GM at all, but I think Haley would have done better.
Marty, Gunther, Vermeil, Herm, each of their teams had the identity of the coach stamped all over it. I don't feel like this was ever a Haley stamped team. In fact the Haley reign was very schizophrenic. I still got the feeling I don't know what kind of coach Haley is and can be. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you "imagine" that it was Pioli who ordered them locked in the first place, then what possible motive could he have for doing a complete 180 immediately after releasing Haley? He's either trying to make it look like it was Haley's fault or he got slapped by Clark and told to shape up or he's gone too. |
Quote:
I bet that the Chiefs will be better than 6-10 next year. |
Quote:
"Hey Dick, you want me to draft some other guy, well shove it. Here's Larry Johnson." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not saying its true but following the logic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Problem with all of you Haley bashers is you refuse to see that it's not that Haley thought he was smarter than Pioli, which he is, it's that Pioli thought he was smarter than Haley. Haley constantly made Pioli look bad to his boss. Haley was right about Tyson Jackson, and probably right about who he wanted to take instead(my guess is either a tackle or Raji). Haley was right about Berry, which we learned Haley basically had to jump on the table to get Pioli to draft him. Everyone was under the impression that Haley "liked" Matt Cassel. Don't think so, just think that he knew Pioli was "tied" to him, so his job was also tied to him. Haley needed to make Cassel work, b/c if he didn't, he would lose his job, b/c Pioli wasn't getting him another one. Haley was upset about some of the guys we let go in FA. (wonder if that was Shaun Smith) and the fact that Pioli wasn't getting him the kind of talent he asked for. He wanted a RT, Pioli got him a LT(Gaither) who either couldn't, or wouldn't play RT. So to spite Pioli, Haley played Richardson instead. I'm sure as soon as Moeaki went down, Haley wanted to bring in some TE's, and that might be why he let O'Connell continue to fail for so long. Sure Haley wanted a new QB, not a rookie, and Pioli brought him Palko. So what did Haley do? Showed Pioli just how good a guy he thought was good enough was. I think Haley is a phenomenal talent evaluator. Pioli just thought he was better. JD is delusional. Haley won't coach again, He looks so bad, blah blah blah. Haley was dealt a crap hand and everyone in the league knows it. Everyone except Clark Hunt. No one will hold this against him. How could they? I wouldn't. If you're done dirty, sometimes you gotta do dirty. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I believe it was Victor Hugo who said, "There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come." Oh, how wrong ol' Vic was ...
Sadly, "an idea that just won't friggin' go away" kicks "idea whose time has come"'s ass. FAX |
Quote:
"Todd, what's with the beard?!" or "Why the old hat?" When they should have been asking "Why do you still insist on going with Matt Cassel when it's obvious he's not an NFL QB?" or "How do you feel about the lack or activity in free agency, not the lack of big moves per say, but the situation it's left the team in with regards to the (safety/QB) position(s) not that (Berry/Cassel) has gone down?" Anything. Any ****ing thing to put some pressure on this organization to succeed. |
Quote:
I don't think Haley was a poor fit for the team. I just think Pioli is so close-minded that he thinks there is only one way to do things. Here's what we do know. In almost every single way, Pioli did things exactly as he did in New England. Closed door policy, coaches saying nothing, secrecy, etc.... Same exact 2-gap defense, same Charlie Weis offense, same focus on role players/leaders/cheapness, and a bunch of players who played for the Patriots (including Cassel, the most important guy on the field). Pioli's the boss. But this entire team model reeks of Pioli. And the biggest mistakes in personnel, apart from Palko, are owned by Pioli. When a guy gets his way all the time, he's the guy most at fault. You can say Haley needed to be tougher in fighting off Pioli, but I think that's a tough battle to win. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Haley couldn't have done a better job with this young roster in terms of uniting them for a common goal. Up until these last few weeks, this was a VERY cohesive team and that almost all had to do with Haley and how he coached them. The asshole and the guy who played bags and went to movies. |
Im glad the mods finally got it right.
SenselessChiefsFan is absolutely spot on. Senseless, please go ahead and redirect yourself to www.chiefscoalition.com for further posts. Your insight will be appreciated over there. |
Quote:
Peterson was the complete opposite of Haley. He was too accommodating of what his coaches wanted (that is, until Herm came into town and he somehow became stubborn). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
FAX |
Quote:
I mean look at the rest of the roster (if healthy) and the improvement Haley got from his players here across the board.... Cassel is gonna get a lot more people fired unless he is cut or traded to some dumbass team willing to give up a 6th or 7th rounder for him. I would LOVED to have seen Haley be able to coach this team with a good quarterback...I dont even think he would have needed a great one, or even top 5...just good. What he got from Cassel in 2010 was as close to magic as Ive seen in quite some time in the NFL. |
I fear there's a lot of pep rally in Mr. SenselessChiefsfud's ancestry.
FAX |
Quote:
And he got stubborn with Herm because Herm wanted to blow things up and go young. It's hard to blow everything up and still put butts in the seats. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact that you acknowledge that you believe when meetings were held and when the team worked out as problems, and insist that Crennel mentioning them weren't shot at Haley is ridiculous. Just duh. You honestly believe Todd had full control of how he answered questions and had no reason to fear any kind of consequences? Honestly? Even after the long history of Pioli talking over Haley. In the initial presser, Pioli talked and talked and talked, and Todd only got a chance when directly addressed. Then of course there was the article by J.Whit about how Pioli talked and talked and talked and didn't even give Haley a chance to answer questions directed at him while at dinner with J.Whit? This guy was no problem whatsoever. None. Haley had no reason to resent Pioli. none. |
Also, do you really think that Haley couldn't get along with HIS coaches? Seems to me that Crennel was "pushed" on him and he was mostly okay with that, but wanted no part of Weis, and that is Haley's fault? Seems to me that Pioli said he was giving Haley complete control of his staff, Scott would just have to sign off on it. Instead though, Pioli decided to call Haley dumb and proceeded to try and show him that the Patriot way is the only way. Then, of course, this offseason, Pioli wanted to force McDaniels on Haley, but Haley would have no part in that. Haley had to hire someone, Pioli wasn't going to let him run his own offense, so Haley promoted Muir.
|
Quote:
In KC, we've never really had both. Coaches got everything they wanted under Peterson, and coaches get nothing they want under Pioli. |
Quote:
Breaston Long Urbhan Jones Brown Palko That's a list that kinda disproves your statement, buddy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Breaston is absolutely one of those guys. I bet he feels ripped off after seeing Haley get fired and after signing here for his "prime years contract" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Matt Cassel/Vrabel? 2nd round pick and $60+M. Romeo Crennel - forced a complete shift in defensive scheme Charlie Weis - dictated the offense Everything about the scheme was Pioli. Haley was allowed to add some supplementary pieces. That's like letting your boss pick your house, but you feel good because you were allowed to buy a sofa. |
Quote:
Whatever. Dude should have had the smarts not to hook up with a shit QB for his prime years. |
In these kinds of ChiefsPlanet discussions, more often than not, somebody takes black and another takes white, or so it seems. Actually, there are many shades of gray. That's just the way it is in real life.
It's unreasonable to assume that Haley and Dr. Evil had a conflict over every, single player or never agreed on anything, ever. Instead, it make far more sense that they occasionally agreed on players. For example, it's perfectly logical that they would both see the need in beefing up the WR corp in order to help Cassel, and this would easily explain Baldwin and Breaston. It also makes sense that they would disagree over other guys and, in cases like that, Dr. Evil would stick it to Haley by giving him the worst player possible without violating league rules and signing a girl or a one-armed Zeta Reticulite who got left behind after leaving the spaceship for just a second to take a pee. However, based on the more dependable sources that are reporting on this deal recently, it appears that Dr. Evil discounted Haley's potential contribution to the franchise and undermined him at every possible turn. And, if that's true, Dr. Evil must be held accountable and that means only one thing; being drowned in a vat of boiling rat urine. FAX |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No qb, no future. Its as simple as that. Keyshawn said it, if you all had a real qb, you wouldnt be sitting next to me.
|
Watched the interview last night at a sports bar during dinner. What was with his shirt hanging out the front of his pants? He looked liked his Mom rushed to dress him for the school bus.
Thought Haley was pretty damn good, took a few subtle and a couple of not so subtle jabs, the guys asked him good questions and showed they thought he got a bum deal, and much of what he said we all pretty much knew: the HC always goes first when a GM makes bad personnel decisions. If Pioli insists on sticking with Cassel we will lose another year waiting and then Pioli will lose his job. That really sucks........... |
Quote:
And, the defense was set in stone the minute they drafted Tyson Jackson, according to you..... so what difference does it make whether it is Clancy or Romeo? I mean, other than the coordinator being effective. To use your analogy, Haley wanted to buy a crack house filled with hookers and a meth lab, but Pioli wanted to buy on a different street. To make up for it, Pioli let Haley bring in a couple of cars on blocks to 'spruce up the place'. Now, as for the merits of your story. #1) Gailey was still here, and Haley couldn't work with him, so he was fired. Kind of disproves the whole things being forced on Haley. #2) Crennel was their first choice as DC, but he wasn't up to it in Haley's first year. Do I think that Weis and Crennel hires were strongly encouraged? Yes. Do I think that they were forced on him? No. Do I think that Haley had any better alternatives that Pioli refused? No. Heck, look at this year. McDaniels was available as OC. Weis had just quit, and the team still had Cassel under center. If you are right, I believe that McDaniels would have come to KC. If Pioli was the control freak that you say, then why wouldn't McDaniels have been forced on Haley? |
LOL he took a shot at KC media
|
Quote:
It MAY have taken a bit longer to go "Boom" but that is it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Multiple sources have confirmed, one of which was allowed in to observe the team for a book, that Weis was in fact a Pioli hire and that Haley wanted nothing to do with it.
Has also been confirmed by multiple sources that Pioli wanted to force McDaniels onto Haley last offseason. I'm guessing that this time, when Haley said no, Clark listened. Especially after what he'd done to the Broncos... |
Senseless is blinded by hopeful homerism right now. He doesn't want to believe that Pioli is the problem, b/c Poili's still here, and that would hurt his faith in the Chiefs.
|
Quote:
Pioli doesn't choose who plays. I have seen too many examples of Haley being stubborn and inflexible. |
Quote:
Oh, and I wonder why McDaniels is rumored to be a possibility if Clark stepped in and said no to him last year after what happened in Denver. The logic is lacking in that argument. |
Quote:
Make sure and remove the stand and go trunk first, too much resistance the other way and the branches will break. |
|
Quote:
Haley's gone this time numb nuts. The only thing potentially holding Pioli back from hiring McDaniels is how Chiefs fans would accept the move. He could very well assume that a year has been enough time to remove some of the stigma attached to McDaniels. Besides that, he's already in hot water, might as well do it his own way, either look like a genius or go out in style. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you are Haley and were just hired to your first coaching job by a guy that had multiple Exec of the Decade awards, are you going to start it off by telling him to tell the owner no? You don't live in the real world. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let's say you get hired as a manager of a store. You go in all excited. Then you find out the store ownership isn't spending enough money to let you hire quality employees, and you're stuck with halfwits and malcontents you have to try to run a business with. Then you find out that the Regional Manager overrides you on all decisions. You find yourself a puppet in between ineffective and miserly Upper Management, and the Regional Manager who micromanages and controls. You realize you're not doing a whole lot creatively except trying to control the minimum-wage employees. So you check out mentally. Can't really blame the guy if that's how it went down. (And if you get fired by said company, but realize that other companies in the same area will probably hire you in time and give you another shot, you'd probably be relieved and well-rested and better-appearing too. In his view, he was freed, not fired.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.