ChiefsPlanet
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Brandon Flowers left foot was in a walking boot today at chiefs practice (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262619)

BigMeatballDave 08-23-2012 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Smoke (Post 8844329)
I won't be overly concerned unless it happens September 9th. That being said. I hope to see a good game out of the offense and defense both tomorrow. Is this game in Seattle?
KC

beach tribe 08-23-2012 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 8837020)
Not sure if Q, but I did a little research.


It can take up to one 1 week to 3 months depending on his body, treatment and severity. If he doesn't play in the last preseason game I'd expect him to be out week 1 of regular season if not longer.
This doesn't make sense. I don't expect him to play in the PS at all. Why would they play him if they plan on bringing him back week one? There's just no reason for it.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844251)
What bothers me is how effortlessly the Rams carved up KC's first team D. Everyone was picked on except for Routt.
Routt was covering the guy who burned us deep on the first play.

He also gave up a couple more catches.

Not impressed with Routt this preseason.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 8843490)
Don't want to lose, and hear all of the "see! we suck ass!!"
"Pioli sucks!!" "We should have _ _ _ _!!" "7-9 here we come"
I can ****ing hear it now. Non stop. Good lord.
It will be pretty disappointing to hear those comments if we lose.

If we lose the next two games, however, they would be warranted.

An 0-3 start would be a sure sign of shit team.

Buckweath 08-23-2012 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844725)
Routt was covering the guy who burned us deep on the first play.

He also gave up a couple more catches.

Not impressed with Routt this preseason.
That first pass by Bradford was great, I don't know why someone you would point out at Routt not having done the job on that play. Flowers and every other corner would have given up that pass too. Watch again.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 8844803)
That first pass by Bradford was great, I don't know why someone you would point out at Routt not having done the job on that play. Flowers and every other corner would have given up that pass too. Watch again.
He wasn't close to the ball though.

He couldn't stay with the guy.

Chiefnj2 08-23-2012 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844725)
Routt was covering the guy who burned us deep on the first play.

He also gave up a couple more catches.

Not impressed with Routt this preseason.
I didn't think it was Routt. When the pass was completed weren't Berry and Lewis the only players around?

scho63 08-23-2012 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844820)
I didn't think it was Routt. When the pass was completed weren't Berry and Lewis the only players around?
There were two defenders and the deep defender didn't do his job of containment-Amendola got behind both of them and the tow Chiefs were playing catch up.

I was a very nice pass

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 8844820)
I didn't think it was Routt. When the pass was completed weren't Berry and Lewis the only players around?
It was definitely Routt. The WR ran a deep drag across the field. That's a tough route to cover for a subpar corner like Routt, so I don't blame him.

http://i.imgur.com/zOj3W.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/hBYCW.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/hxSEj.jpg

htismaqe 08-23-2012 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844848)
It was definitely Routt. The WR ran a deep drag across the field. That's a tough route to cover for a subpar corner like Routt, so I don't blame him.
I see what you did there... o:-)

Chiefspants 08-23-2012 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844848)
It was definitely Routt. The WR ran a deep drag across the field. That's a tough route to cover for a subpar corner like Routt, so I don't blame him.
Your determination to be anti-pioli all the time grows tiring.

The Franchise 08-23-2012 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844848)
It was definitely Routt. The WR ran a deep drag across the field. That's a tough route to cover for a subpar corner like Routt, so I don't blame him.

http://i.imgur.com/zOj3W.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/hBYCW.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/hxSEj.jpg
What's sad is that you can look at those pictures and see that as soon as Routt saw Lewis in front of him.....he just gave up.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 8844874)
Your determination to be anti-pioli all the time grows tiring.
You don't need to be "determined," you just have to be objective about what you see going on on the field.

Routt has not been impressive so far.

ChiefRocka 08-23-2012 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844901)
You don't need to be "determined," you just have to be objective about what you see going on on the field.

Routt has not been impressive so far.
Has Cassel been impressive thus far??

Buckweath 08-23-2012 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844901)
You don't need to be "determined," you just have to be objective about what you see going on on the field.

Routt has not been impressive so far.
He's been decent IMO. Do you consider Berry to have looked impressive so far? Or any player at all on our defense?

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 8844909)
Has Cassel been impressive thus far??
He's been OK. Credit to Cassel for not being a horrible abortion this preseason.

Wouldn't call anything he's done impressive, though. He has made a couple of impressive throws, but overall his performance has been "acceptable" or "solid."

Buckweath 08-23-2012 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844922)
He's been OK. Credit to Cassel for not being a horrible abortion this preseason.

Wouldn't call anything he's done impressive, though. He has made a couple of impressive throws, but overall his performance has been "acceptable" or "solid."
By his own standards, Cassell has been good but it's when it counts and there is pressure at the end of games that we will see if really he is improved.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 8844917)
He's been decent IMO. Do you consider Berry to have looked impressive so far? Or any player at all on our defense?
I've been impressed with:

Hali
DJ
Jackson
Toribio kinda/sorta
Poe showed some improvement last game

Berry looks OK but hasn't done anything like he did in 2010.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844901)
You don't need to be "determined," you just have to be objective about what you see going on on the field.

Routt has not been impressive so far.
You think you are objective....and then you pimp shitty, marginal players and marginal teams

Chiefnj2 08-23-2012 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefRocka (Post 8844909)
Has Cassel been impressive thus far??
Yes, for Cassel.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8844988)
You think you are objective....and then you pimp shitty, marginal players and marginal teams
Example?

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 03:09 PM
Ryan Fitzpatrick. Balls deep on the Raiders. Bills Bucs and Bengals emerging power houses. Crap like that.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8845000)
Ryan Fitzpatrick. Balls deep on the Raiders. Bills Bucs and Bengals emerging power houses. Crap like that.
The only thing I ever said about Fitzpatrick was that I thought he was better than Cassel. That's not a stretch.

I never went balls deep on Oakland, they are an 8-8ish team like us. Never said anything more than their offense is gonna be good.

The powerhouse shit is trolling (and I only said that about Cincy, who is a good team anyway).

Chiefs Pantalones 08-23-2012 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8845022)
The only thing I ever said about Fitzpatrick was that I thought he was better than Cassel. That's not a stretch.

I never went balls deep on Oakland, they are an 8-8ish team like us. Never said anything more than their offense is gonna be good.

The powerhouse shit is trolling (and I only said that about Cincy, who is a good team anyway).
LMAO

What's awesome is you admit to trolling and you still have a lot of these dudes by the balls.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 03:26 PM
You can never tell with a Devard Darling supporter

Cincy: NFC West. 1-6 against winning teams. So, the Chiefs are good too then right?

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8845040)
You can never tell with a Devard Darling supporter

Cincy: NFC West. 1-6 against winning teams. So, the Chiefs are good too then right?
Cincy has a QB though.

The Chiefs went 7-9, why are we talking about them?

FYI, when I "pimped" Devard Darling I was a huge homer who was sucking off everything wearing Chiefs red, so you have to consider that.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 03:29 PM
10-6 vs. an NFC West schedule, same as Cincy. They'll likely take a step backwards....and they "may" have a QB. Hopefully he doesn't pull a Josh Freeman and they go 4-12.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 03:30 PM
I doubt it. They have a QB. That's the difference.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 03:31 PM
I'd like to see the ginger beat some decent teams first. We'll see.

Discuss Thrower 08-23-2012 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8845055)
I doubt it. They have a QB. That's the difference.
That has a demonstrable inability to beat good teams.

Teehee.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 03:34 PM
Well, he was a rookie, he gets an excuse.

Dude has looked awesome this preseason.

BossChief 08-23-2012 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8844922)
He's been OK. Credit to Cassel for not being a horrible abortion this preseason.

Wouldn't call anything he's done impressive, though. He has made a couple of impressive throws, but overall his performance has been "acceptable" or "solid."
:spock:

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 04:40 PM
FINE THEN

TLO 08-23-2012 05:30 PM
I'm a too a stoopid to read the name above the avatar so I get confused with who is posting.

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 05:31 PM
It's Cassel chaos!

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 08:27 PM
Andy Dalton 5-17 40 yards. Franchise QB!!!!

Hammock Parties 08-23-2012 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8845874)
Andy Dalton 5-17 40 yards. Franchise QB!!!!
He's no Kyle Orton.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-23-2012 08:38 PM
2.5 YPA ROFL Makes Cassel look like a Mad Bomber


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 AM.
Page 4 of 4 123 4
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.