ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Now Who is the #1 Pick??? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270714)

The Franchise 03-04-2013 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 9464455)
S.F. and Baltimore aren't exactly offensive juggernauts. They were built on Defense.

Ravens - 34
49ers - 31

Dayze 03-04-2013 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 9464455)
S.F. and Baltimore aren't exactly offensive juggernauts. They were built on Defense.

but they were balanced.
if a team spends it's time and resources trying build a kick as D and ignoring the offesne (ahem, Chiefs), then they're going to fail.

I hear what you're saying though. My standpoint ismore along the lines of folks that want to build all-world defenses and have a good running game etc..all that BS; it doesn't work anymore.

Shox 03-04-2013 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9464464)
Ravens - 34
49ers - 31

Oh you are right. Those defenses are horrible.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-04-2013 05:19 PM

Baltimore's defense is not what it was.

Chiefs Pantalones 03-04-2013 05:20 PM

Godiva Smith. The rest aren't sweet enough.

melbar 03-04-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dayze (Post 9464465)
but they were balanced.
if a team spends it's time and resources trying build a kick as D and ignoring the offesne (ahem, Chiefs), then they're going to fail.

I hear what you're saying though. My standpoint ismore along the lines of folks that want to build all-world defenses and have a good running game etc..all that BS; it doesn't work anymore.

Ya absoulutely true. I just think they started with D and that was the heart and soul of those teams.

The Franchise 03-04-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464469)
Oh you are right. Those defenses are horrible.

Horrible? No.

The Ravens defense is pretty average and middle of the pack. It's old.

MagicHef 03-04-2013 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 9464476)
Baltimore's defense is not what it was.

Much as Flacco was pedestrian during the regular season and stellar in the playoffs, Baltimore's defense played much better in the postseason.

Internet Tough Guy 03-04-2013 05:24 PM

trade back 5 times pick up barkley and 10 picks.

mr. tegu 03-04-2013 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464453)
Barkley will be available in the top 10 of the 2nd round.

Not a chance.

melbar 03-04-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9464464)
Ravens - 34
49ers - 31

I know the SB there was a lot of scoring, but c'mon....Those teams didnt exactly get there riding the arms of Smith, Kaepernick, and Flacco.

I'm not even saying I think it has to be D for us. Just saying the talk like Defense is no longer as important is just a little premature.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-04-2013 05:27 PM

Back on track. The Jets would be dumb enough to give up to potential 2nd rounders for Alex Smith. Rape them on draft day!!!

HotCarl 03-04-2013 05:29 PM

Of course we can still take Joeckel as our long term solution at LT. Albert is tagged, and he'll play if he wants that top 5 money. Guard, wherever.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-04-2013 05:30 PM

STFU and STFD

MagicHef 03-04-2013 05:30 PM

I'd take Geno, Milliner, or... Mingo?

No way I'd take a fatty at #1 unless he was the second coming of Sapp.

saphojunkie 03-04-2013 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9464512)
Of course we can still take Joeckel as our long term solution at LT. Albert is tagged, and he'll play if he wants that top 5 money. Guard, wherever.

Branden Albert is 28 years old. He IS the longterm solution at LT.

Why are you people so ****ing stupid about this? My god.

penbrook 03-04-2013 05:31 PM

Dorsey has been doing work.

Now if he drafts Geno OMG it will be the best moment in my life ever.

Gravedigger 03-04-2013 05:31 PM

Doesn't Star have a heart condition as well, or was that disproven? Something about a valve only working at less than half the rate or something.

HotCarl 03-04-2013 05:31 PM

Barkley will go in the top 10 this year.

Internet Tough Guy 03-04-2013 05:32 PM

honestly looking at it id rather our FO just draft Geno that way everyone will shut up and stop crying like little bitches and then if he fails everyone can eat crow and if he suceeds like a hof we can all get wasted and party.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-04-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9464517)
Branden Albert is 28 years old. He IS the longterm solution at LT.

Why are you people so ****ing stupid about this? My god.

Kiper, McShay, etc. have been projecting a LT at #1. Hence forth, Bradly Alberts sucks.

BroncoDork 03-04-2013 05:33 PM

Passing on #1 draft pick . . .
 
ttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfldraft/columnist?id=1545117

ttp://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2011/04/why-did-ravens-pass-on-26th-pick-allow-chiefs-to-leap-them/1

I swear, I'd pass on the 1.1 if I was your FO. Let the time expire, and per NFL rules they could still leap back in before JAX could make their pick. But, they could still make a trade in that small window IF they had all the parties on the phone at the same time.

If your FO doesn't get a deal done before JAX picks, they can keep right on passing and trying to make deals with any other team before Oakland makes their pick, or Philly, etc.

Doing this would induce some panic for other teams to possibly trade up, and KC could still jump right back in at any point to exercise their right over the next team on the board. That's how I read the rules.

Internet Tough Guy 03-04-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shox (Post 9464453)
Barkley will be available in the top 10 of the 2nd round.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9464523)
Barkley will go in the top 10 this year.

i agreee completely QB's come draft time go so quick. Everyone has them projected round 2 etc but just look at players that really needed QB's Miami and Jax. Both jumped on QB's early. Theres no way barkley falls to 2nd round, and if he even gets close im sure someone from 2nd round will trade up to get him.

mr. tegu 03-04-2013 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 9464504)
I know the SB there was a lot of scoring, but c'mon....Those teams didnt exactly get there riding the arms of Smith, Kaepernick, and Flacco.

I'm not even saying I think it has to be D for us. Just saying the talk like Defense is no longer as important is just a little premature.

You haven't been paying attention. Flacco had 11 TDs and 0 INTS in the playoffs. Without that performance they don't overcome the 35 points by Denver and 31 by SF. Baltimore was 13th in points allowed and 17th in yards. Pretty average.

SF in the playoffs gave up 31, 24, and 31 points.

When push comes to shove, the offense wins out.

HotCarl 03-04-2013 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9464517)
Branden Albert is 28 years old. He IS the longterm solution at LT.

Why are you people so ****ing stupid about this? My god.

He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.

If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.

And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT

penbrook 03-04-2013 05:36 PM

Dorsey said he will continue to negotaie with Albert to hopefully grt a long term deal done before the season starts.

If thats not saying **** you joeckel than Idk what is.

mr. tegu 03-04-2013 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9464541)
Dorsey said he will continue to negotaie with Albert to hopefully grt a long term deal done before the season starts.

If thats not saying **** you joeckel than Idk what is.

Um...link?

RealSNR 03-04-2013 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9464535)
He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.

If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.

And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT

Then replace him in the 2014 draft. You can ALWAYS find quality LTs in the draft. Have we ever been in a bad position to draft one? EVER?

If the #1 pick is to be a "for the future" move, we need to go with the QB.

Not that you'll make any sense out of this. You'll just pooh pooh it and keep pounding the same true fan hammer

Hootie 03-04-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BroncoDork (Post 9464528)
ttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfldraft/columnist?id=1545117

ttp://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2011/04/why-did-ravens-pass-on-26th-pick-allow-chiefs-to-leap-them/1

I swear, I'd pass on the 1.1 if I was your FO. Let the time expire, and per NFL rules they could still leap back in before JAX could make their pick. But, they could still make a trade in that small window IF they had all the parties on the phone at the same time.

If your FO doesn't get a deal done before JAX picks, they can keep right on passing and trying to make deals with any other team before Oakland makes their pick, or Philly, etc.

Doing this would induce some panic for other teams to possibly trade up, and KC could still jump right back in at any point to exercise their right over the next team on the board. That's how I read the rules.

I jokingly brought this up a few weeks ago...

we would be the franchise to do something like this

lololol

penbrook 03-04-2013 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 9464547)
Um...link?

Per Aaron Wilson who is a Ravens Insider.

Dorsey announces the franchise tag for Branden Albert: "We will continue to negotiate with Branden and his agent to reach a deal'

saphojunkie 03-04-2013 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9464535)
He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.

If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.

And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT

A) 28 is not old for a left tackle. Period. Dude, you can't say a 28 year old is "almost thirty." He won't be 29 until november. Quit stirring shit up.
B) You don't "find a successor" or "groom a guy for a year" behind your starter at left tackle. When you need one, you draft one. It's not a depth position. Your entire offensive line will only take up eight roster spots, so those backups have to be flexible, like Allen and Stephenson are. Not Joeckel, who couldn't move inside to guard in a pinch. And even if we did want to groom a guy behind Albert, WE ALREADY DRAFTED A LEFT TACKLE. HIS NAME IS DONALD STEPHENSON, SO YOUR POINT IS COMPLETELY MOOT.
C) Emerging back trouble isn't the same as one back injury. Quit stirring shit up.

Drafting Luke Joeckel at 1.1 would be absolutely retartar sauce.

Ace Gunner 03-04-2013 05:44 PM

Geno mother ****ers

follow through

FRCDFED 03-04-2013 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9464160)
You are a mental midget aren't you. Albert is getting paid big bucks and right ****ing tackles don't make Pro Bowls you idiot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9464186)
If they traded down, they could certainly take him.

Imagine if the Chiefs were able to trade down (in the top 10) recoup that 2nd, and take the top QB avail (smith or Barkley).

I know, i know....Big time Dreaming.....but hey, anything is possible with the draft now.

That's the best part about today. Their options are wide open.

I wouldn't rule this scenario out.

Exoter175 03-04-2013 05:54 PM

Geno Smith, just as it always has been even after we heard about dishing out a 2nd for Alex.

BroncoDork 03-04-2013 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9464553)
I jokingly brought this up a few weeks ago...

we would be the franchise to do something like this

lololol

Well, I did start drinking about noon today. Howsomever, in THIS draft it's not the worst idea ever. You sure want to get out of that 1.1 some way.

raboss11 03-04-2013 05:58 PM

I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

Graystoke 03-04-2013 05:59 PM

I think HOPE IS RESTORED.
Chiefs with the Number One Pick Select....GENO!

Dante84 03-04-2013 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

STFU and never post again.

Delete your account, then throw your computer into your bath tub.

KChiefs1 03-04-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9463663)
D. Milliner
S. Floyd
G. Smith
M. Barkely

Trade down & Milliner.

Graystoke 03-04-2013 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

Don't wreck the party.

Micjones 03-04-2013 06:05 PM

Definitely hoping for a trade down at this point.
Can't wait until Free Agency opens up next week.

Fish 03-04-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

This is just stupid. ****ing crazy stupid. Tamba is not a 1 trick pony. If he were, then he wouldn't have the value to get what you're proposing. You can't have it both ways.

Tamba is awesome. Jones is an unknown with serious potential health issues. WTF sense does it make to risk that? Tambi has been consistent and injury free. WTF?

Sorter 03-04-2013 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

You're a ****ing idiot.

RunKC 03-04-2013 06:24 PM

What about Dion Jordan? Assuming we get our DL and CB in FA, we aren't stuck on a certain position.

I'm all about getting some heat on the QB.

B14ckmon 03-04-2013 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9464710)
What about Dion Jordan? Assuming we get our DL and CB in FA, we aren't stuck on a certain position.

I'm all about getting some heat on the QB.

I'd say there is a higher likelihood of that happening than the Chiefs taking Genom, by far.

notorious 03-04-2013 06:29 PM

We drafting Geno, and holding him for ransom.


Rape will follow. (I don't know if we will be giving or receiving, though.)

Ace Gunner 03-04-2013 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.

This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

what is that urine smell

The Poz 03-04-2013 06:41 PM

I think Buffalo could be a trade partner if they believe either Oakland or Arizona want Geno. With the 8th overall pick, the Chiefs take...

Pasta Little Brioni 03-04-2013 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464601)
I'll probably get crushed for saying this but here goes nothing.This may not be my #1 option but IF we can't trade down what about Jarvis Jones at #1 (assuming his neck checks out okay)

We could then put Tamba on the trade block for a late 1st/early 2nd and get a QB or CB or S with that pick.

To me, Tamba is a 1 trick pony (Pass Rush) and he even seemed to take a step back in that last season. For a guy that almost exclusively rushes the passer every down, I want more consistent pressure than what I saw last year. With Jones, you get a potential elite 3-4 OLB to pair with Houston + a chance to trade a player when he might command a lot more than he will in 2 years when he starts sucking. Upgrade at OLB + a pick is WAAAAYYYY better than a LT at #1 and kicking Albert (who is a better pass blocker than run blocker) inside to G.

Alright CP --- let me have it...

Yeah, you are. You are a buffoon.

PRIMETIME211 03-04-2013 06:55 PM

its going to be either joeckl, star, or dee.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-04-2013 06:55 PM

QB is the most important position by far, so investing those kind of resources in the position is an easy sell to me. Take Geno and smile.

Hog's Gone Fishin 03-04-2013 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9464694)
Your and ****ing idiot.

Get your shit right ! Fixed for ya!

Sorter 03-04-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 9464826)
Get your shit right ! Fixed for ya!

LMAO

Most excellent mon frere.

raboss11 03-04-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9464819)
Yeah, you are. You are a buffoon.

Like I said I knew I would get crushed for mentioning this but IMO its better than an OT at the top of the draft. Thats all i was saying. I would much rather take Miliner, or maybe a D lineman (I have given up on QB at #1). But I think Jones is gonna be a stud and I think Tamba (after an elite 2010 year) has declined each of the past 2 seasons.

One trick pony was too strong because he has gotten much better against the run since he came into the league but last year I thought he disappeared for some games and that does have me a little worried as he ages. I thought Houston was a much more complete OLB last year.

MagicHef 03-04-2013 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl (Post 9464535)
He will be 29 during the season. That's an almost 30 year old player with an emerging history of back trouble. They seem to feel good about his back - good enough to make only a one-year commitment to him. But back problems don't usually go away once they begin.

If we don't find a successor, we'll be complaining about the terrible protection and the huge hole we have at the second most important position on offense in 1-2 years.

And as important as QBs are, you can't win the super bowl with a hole at LT

Is this satire? If so, well done. If not, I sincerely hope Dorsey agrees with you. To find a Super Bowl champion with a hole at LT, you have to go all the way back to 2011. Or 2010. Or 2009.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-04-2013 07:16 PM

All I know is Peydaton made Clady alot of money and Brees won a Super Bowl with some slapdick named Bushrod at LT.

Sorter 03-04-2013 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raboss11 (Post 9464879)
Like I said I knew I would get crushed for mentioning this but IMO its better than an OT at the top of the draft. Thats all i was saying. I would much rather take Miliner, or maybe a D lineman (I have given up on QB at #1). But I think Jones is gonna be a stud and I think Tamba (after an elite 2010 year) has declined each of the past 2 seasons.

One trick pony was too strong because he has gotten much better against the run since he came into the league but last year I thought he disappeared for some games and that does have me a little worried as he ages. I thought Houston was a much more complete OLB last year.

1. I don't give a flying **** about if Tamba is elite against the run. The league is based on passing, you want to have guys who can rush the passer.

2. It's truly hard to evaluate a defense that has played with a lead on very few occasions.

3. I don't hate drafting an OLB to groom behind Tamba in the 3rd round. I'm not taking Jarvis Jones, Mingo, or Jordan above Geno or Barkley.

KChiefs1 03-04-2013 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poz (Post 9464773)
I think Buffalo could be a trade partner if they believe either Oakland or Arizona want Geno. With the 8th overall pick, the Chiefs take...

Hard to project...could be anyone at #8.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-04-2013 07:25 PM

Geno is still the only one that makes any kind of sense at 1-1.

BigRedChief 03-04-2013 07:26 PM

If you don't find a trade pardner, even if you don't want Geno, take him and hold him hostage to Jacksonville,Bills, Raiders or whoever wanted him and expected him to drop.

Brock 03-04-2013 07:28 PM

Meh. I see a defensive pick coming.

RunKC 03-04-2013 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9464934)
Geno is still the only one that makes any kind of sense at 1-1.

Dee Milliner and Shariff Floyd make a lot of sense at 1.1 right now.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-04-2013 07:29 PM

A corner and a 5th ridiculous high pick on the 3-4 line....SWEEEEEEET

BossChief 03-04-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRIMETIME211 (Post 9464822)
its going to be either joeckl, star, or dee.

I'd take Geno right now, even over my choice of any two of those guys.

Maybe all three.

Geno has the chance to be really good if given a chance to groom him for a year and a half to two years....that provides the far greatest upside over another defensive linemen or a second corner with one year of starting experience in college or another left tackle.

BossChief 03-04-2013 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9464945)
Dee Milliner and Shariff Floyd make a lot of sense at 1.1 right now.

No, they don't.

Nightfyre 03-04-2013 07:41 PM

I'm all about Geno. That said, if there are merit to the rumors about Tamba being traded, I could see them snagging a mid first and third for him (he is on a three year, fairly club friendly deal.)
If they do make that trade, your choice of passrushers (Mingo would probably be my top-rated 3-4 OLB without doing too much research) would make a whole lot of sense at one.

RunKC 03-04-2013 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9464977)
No, they don't.

Why? At this point we don't have a CB or a DE. Our biggest need right now is at CB.

RyFo18 03-04-2013 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9464998)
Why? At this point we don't have a CB or a DE. Our biggest need right now is at CB.

Why is everyone so ready to give up on Arenas? The dude has started like 7 games are RCB.

I remember when people wanted Brandon Carr out of here. Joke was on those morons.

In58men 03-04-2013 07:44 PM

@ChrisSteuber: I'm told reps from ATL, BUF, CHI, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NE, NO, NYG, NYJ, OAK & SEA are attending #AlabamaState's Pro Day tonight. #NFLDraft



Dee Milliner?

O.city 03-04-2013 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9464998)
Why? At this point we don't have a CB or a DE. Our biggest need right now is at CB.

Wait all offseason when qb was biggest need you said we couldn't draft for need at 1 and had to go bpa, now it's all for need. Which is it?

SAUTO 03-04-2013 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exoter175 (Post 9464590)
Geno Smith, just as it always has been even after we heard about dishing out a 2nd for Alex.

I could swear you said the combine would take Smith out of the picture
Posted via Mobile Device

Sorter 03-04-2013 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 9465007)
@ChrisSteuber: I'm told reps from ATL, BUF, CHI, HOU, IND, KC, MIA, NE, NO, NYG, NYJ, OAK & SEA are attending #AlabamaState's Pro Day tonight. #NFLDraft



Dee Milliner?

Does Dee play for Alabama State?

Nightfyre 03-04-2013 07:48 PM

Not last I saw.

Strongside 03-04-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9465019)
Does Dee play for Alabama State?

ROFL

tecumseh 03-04-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9463672)
It's going to be either Floyd, Smith or Barkley, i highly doubt it's Milliner.

No way it's Barfley.

RunKC 03-04-2013 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9465011)
Wait all offseason when qb was biggest need you said we couldn't draft for need at 1 and had to go bpa, now it's all for need. Which is it?

That's right. Saying that Dee Milliner and Shariff Floyd are in that mix as the best player is pretty reasonable.

They are both projected in the top 5.

O.city 03-04-2013 07:51 PM

Yeah an they're reaches at 1, same as everyone in this draft

tecumseh 03-04-2013 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9464972)
I'd take Geno right now, even over my choice of any two of those guys.

Maybe all three.

Geno has the chance to be really good if given a chance to groom him for a year and a half to two years....that provides the far greatest upside over another defensive linemen or a second corner with one year of starting experience in college or another left tackle.

100% Stamp'd of approvals.

RunKC 03-04-2013 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9465038)
Yeah an they're reaches at 1, same as everyone in this draft

I agree. We won't get a better idea of who the pick will be until 3 or 4 weeks from now when FA is over.

O.city 03-04-2013 07:58 PM

If we lock up a cb and a de in free agency I don't know what the **** we do on draft day. It sucks but with the way this draft sets up we may have to settle for a future type guy at 1 whichever way we go


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.