ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Peter King: Chiefs will listen to trade offers for Albert (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271265)

B14ckmon 03-18-2013 04:23 PM

So the Rumor is that the Dolphins might trade a 2nd rounder for Albert. I wonder if they decreases the chances of the Chiefs trading down. They might want to just pick the guy they want.

bevischief 03-18-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9511447)
Minimum.

Then, move down to a team that wants Geno and take a left tackle.

The best would be moving back to 2 so Jacksonville can take Geno and are willing to move next years first to get him...then, flipping the 2 slot with Detroit so they can select the OT they have fallen in love with and we get one of the three LTs. Maybe we take a 2 from the Lions and a pick next year for moving to 5.

That's asking for too much, I understand that, but we simply can't stay at 1 and take a LT.

I would love it if this happened.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9511499)
So he allowed more than one sack last year?

It's disingenuous to use that metric when the man didn't start and play in all 16 games.

-King- 03-18-2013 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511511)
It's disingenuous to use that metric when the man didn't start and play in all 16 games.

If a player allows 1 sack in 12 starts its a pretty safe ****ing bet to think he allows 1 in 16 games.
Posted via Mobile Device

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9511515)
If a player allows 1 sack in 12 starts its a pretty safe ****ing bet to think he allows 1 in 16 games.
Posted via Mobile Device

First off, Albert only started 11 games and he did not complete all of those games.

It's complete speculation to state that he wouldn't have given up a sack in five other contests.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511511)
It's disingenuous to use that metric when the man didn't start and play in all 16 games.

Pass blocking efficiency is a better measure, anyway.

2011 - 5th

2012 - 7th

Both years he was at 96.5%.

League leader was 97.5 and 97.9.

This is a valuable player.

B14ckmon 03-18-2013 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9511510)
I would love it if this happened.

ROFL @ the idea of the Jaguars giving up next years first just to trade up one spot. That's ****ing dumb.

That could be the Clowney pick.

-King- 03-18-2013 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511518)
First off, Albert only started 11 games and he did not complete all of those games.

It's complete speculation to state that he wouldn't have given up a sack in five other contests.

Ok then that makes 2 sacks given up. Still elite.
Posted via Mobile Device

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-18-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9511522)
Pass blocking efficiency is a better measure, anyway.

2011 - 5th

2012 - 7th

Both years he was at 96.5%.

League leader was 97.5 and 97.9.

This is a valuable player.

2011 he was flagged 10 times and Allowed 5 sacks.

-King- 03-18-2013 04:33 PM

Albert over his career averages 1 more sack allowed per year than Joe Thomas and 0.8 more penalties a year.


But no, hes not a good player.
Posted via Mobile Device

michaelj_58 03-18-2013 04:33 PM

linebacker!!!

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9511529)
2011 he was flagged 10 times and Allowed 5 sacks.

Who know who ELSE gave up 5 sacks that year whom idiots have a hard-on for here? Jake Long.

If you only give up 5 sacks in a year as a LT, you've done a fine job.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9511527)
Ok then that makes 2 sacks given up. Still elite.
Posted via Mobile Device

More speculation.

And no one said he wasn't elite.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 04:43 PM

Uh, sorry; no they won't.
Posted via Mobile Device

patteeu 03-18-2013 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9511320)
I'm talking about one for one. In a vacuum. In a moment. Not over four years.

The Chiefs dump Albert and pick Joeckel.

Find one decision ***** made that was worse.

In my opinion, with the benefit of hindsight, hiring Romeo was worse, but I get what you're saying and it's not a ludicrous opinion.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 04:55 PM

I am starting to get concerned.

The Dolphins have shown they will slavishly overpay if the opportunity demands.

With the Chiefs' sights set on Joeckel, and Reid would love additional picks... I just don't know how we make it out of this one with Albert, folks.

penbrook 03-18-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511576)
I am starting to get concerned.

The Dolphins have shown they will slavishly overpay if the opportunity demands.

With the Chiefs' sights set on Joeckel, and Reid would love additional picks... I just don't know how we make it out of this one with Albert, folks.

Just relax. Dorsey hasnt lied to us. HE SAID BRANDEN ALBERT WILL BE THE FUTURE LT OF THE CHIEFS!! Like a week ago.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9511582)
Just relax. Dorsey hasnt lied to us. HE SAID BRANDEN ALBERT WILL BE THE FUTURE LT OF THE CHIEFS!! Like a week ago.

Link?

My understanding is that they "want" Albert to be the LTofF, not that he "will" be.

Big difference.

penbrook 03-18-2013 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511586)
Link?

My understanding is that they "want" Albert to be the LTofF, not that he "will" be.

Big difference.

Want Will Im sure he will be.

Tribal Warfare 03-18-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511576)
With the Chiefs' sights set on Joeckel, and Reid would love additional picks... I just don't know how we make it out of this one with Albert, folks.

From what reports? Thus far Fisher, Ansah, and Dion Jordon are in the running.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook (Post 9511595)
Want Will Im sure he will be.

Your certainty offers me little solace.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 9511599)
From what reports? Thus far Fisher, Ansah, and Dion Jordon are in the running.

Reports from at least two separate sources, including The Bad Guy's.

TBG's exact words: unless something crazy happens, Joeckel will be the pick.

The Franchise 03-18-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511604)
Reports from at least two separate sources, including The Bad Guy's.

TBG's exact words: unless something crazy happens, Joeckel will be the pick.

I thought he just said that if the draft was today....they'd take Ansah?

Nightfyre 03-18-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9511605)
I thought he just said that if the draft was today....they'd take Ansah?

This.

KC native 03-18-2013 05:07 PM

A 2nd rounder for Albert? GTFO

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC native (Post 9511610)
A 2nd rounder for Albert? GTFO

Yeah, because the smart move is to draft Joekel or Fisher and release Albert

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9511605)
I thought he just said that if the draft was today....they'd take Ansah?

Regardless, the pro-Joeckel buzz is there.

The other source I've heard of was the one Walter of WalterFootball.com, who has a source with the Chiefs. That source has said that the Chiefs are targeting Joeckel.

Again, I'm not saying this will happen. But I'm saying the buzz from multiple, independent sources is heavy around Joeckel. You cannot deny that.

Nightfyre 03-18-2013 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511576)
I am starting to get concerned.

The Dolphins have shown they will slavishly overpay if the opportunity demands.

With the Chiefs' sights set on Joeckel, and Reid would love additional picks... I just don't know how we make it out of this one with Albert, folks.

Hey, if they give us something stupid like two firsts or their first and both seconds, we'd be silly not to entertain. However, I just don't see them getting even close to an adequate price point.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9511614)
Regardless, the pro-Joeckel buzz is there.

The other source I've heard of was the one Walter of WalterFootball.com, who has a source with the Chiefs. That source has said that the Chiefs are targeting Joeckel.

Again, I'm not saying this will happen. But I'm saying the buzz from multiple, independent sources are heavy around Joeckel. You cannot deny that.

Walter

ROFL

His source is his ass.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9511605)
I thought he just said that if the draft was today....they'd take Ansah?

I'm sorry, the ansah is incorrect.
Posted via Mobile Device

penbrook 03-18-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9511605)
I thought he just said that if the draft was today....they'd take Ansah?

Exactly. TBG never said anything about us taking Joeckel.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9511615)
Hey, if they give us something stupid like two firsts or their first and both seconds, we'd be silly not to entertain. However, I just don't see them getting even close to an adequate price point.

I'm betting that both of their seconds gets this done.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 9511615)
Hey, if they give us something stupid like two firsts or their first and both seconds, we'd be silly not to entertain. However, I just don't see them getting even close to an adequate price point.

I'm guessing a 2 and 5 will do it.

No one is giving up a first rounder for Albert, especially a team that just allowed Jake Long to walk, for free.

The Franchise 03-18-2013 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511622)
I'm guessing a 2 and 5 will do it.

No one is giving up a first rounder for Albert, especially a team that just allowed Jake Long to walk, for free.

Yeah....well they were reportedly offering Jake Long $6 million a year. You think Albert is going to sign a long term deal there?

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 05:12 PM

OH YEAH; take the third rated DE at one overall! No, this isn't 2009 at all....
Posted via Mobile Device

Mr_Tomahawk 03-18-2013 05:14 PM

...rather draft a top defensive player #1 overall and sign Albert long-term.

Filling a hole with the #1 pick when we have the answer on the roster is just spinning our tires...

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9511624)
Yeah....well they were reportedly offering Jake Long $6 million a year. You think Albert is going to sign a long term deal there?

Who knows? Jeff Ireland is a special kind of idiot.

Mother****erJones 03-18-2013 05:17 PM

Dorsey these 2 trades will be telling. the albert trade and number 1 pick.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9511622)
I'm guessing a 2 and 5 will do it.

No one is giving up a first rounder for Albert, especially a team that just allowed Jake Long to walk, for free.

Sadly, this.

Mav 03-18-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 9511502)
I'm sure it is. If I ran the Chiefs I'd guarantee $10,000,000 to him without checking that out. For sure!

way to think of it that way. God, you hate everything i say so much that you actually speak without THINKING. Franchise left tackles in their prime, get MULTI YEAR contracts. Not franchise tenders when after one year they can let him go, or trade him.... Good call.......

JFC.

meaning, his back might be okay for one year, but not worthy of a 5 year contract. But you keep that hate alive bro!!

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 05:55 PM

We hate Alex Smith, and we hate you. Just so you know...
Posted via Mobile Device

Mav 03-18-2013 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9511758)
We hate Alex Smith, and we hate you. Just so you know...
Posted via Mobile Device

Dude, who is this we? No one likes you from what i can tell lol......

Pasta Little Brioni 03-18-2013 05:58 PM

JFC Can we completely botch the OT situation any more. WE WERE FINE!!!

Mav 03-18-2013 06:03 PM

Question.

If the chiefs did indeed trade albert for a second with Miami, then drafted Joekel/Fisher, and then grabbed a qb in the second round as a developmental qb, what exactly is the big deal in that scenario?

Pasta Little Brioni 03-18-2013 06:05 PM

If you are going to take a QB in an early round why the **** wouldn't you just take one at 1-1. Hooray 5th or 6th best option!!!! Since they aren't taking one at 1-1, I don't want one at all TBH

KC_Lee 03-18-2013 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511779)
Question.

If the chiefs did indeed trade albert for a second with Miami, then drafted Joekel/Fisher, and then grabbed a qb in the second round as a developmental qb, what exactly is the big deal in that scenario?

Then why make the Smith trade?

Keep 1.1 take whatever QB you want and keep Albert at LT.

Mav 03-18-2013 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9511783)
If you are going to take a QB in an early round why the **** wouldn't you just take one at 1-1. Hooray 5th or 6th best option!!!! Since they aren't taking one at 1-1, I don't want one at all TBH

Where was kaepernick taken again?

after cam, after Jake Locker, after Gabbert, after Ponder, after Dalton.....

Draft redo, who would go first? anyone still take mike vick over drew brees?

Mav 03-18-2013 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Lee (Post 9511792)
Then why make the Smith trade?

Keep 1.1 take whatever QB you want and keep Albert at LT.

Shrugs. I dont know. Clearly, either Albert they dont think can stand up physically for another 4 years, or, clearly they dont like geno smith, and figure they can get a qb they like more in the second round that can sit for a while?

Thats the only reason in the world i could of seen them trading for alex smith. If last years draft class, was this year, there is no way they trade for alex smith, they take andrew luck and laugh.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-18-2013 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511793)
Where was kaepernick taken again?

after cam, after Jake Locker, after Gabbert, after Ponder, after Dalton.....

Draft redo, who would go first? anyone still take mike vick over drew brees?

There is no Kaepernick in this draft. After the first couple, they are garbage....and no Manuel will not be Colin 2.0.

OrtonsPiercedTaint 03-18-2013 06:11 PM

I wouldn't be sucking Kaepernick's dick just yet. It could snap off like a skink's tail.

Mav 03-18-2013 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9511802)
There is no Kaepernick in this draft. After the first couple, they are garbage....and no Manuel will not be Colin 2.0.

oh, i completely agree. I dont like ANY of these qbs in this draft other than Glennon, and i only like him as a long term prospect, and a guy who is NOT in an andy reid type system. He needs to be in a norv turner, sean payton type offense.

I am not pretending to know why andy and dorsey are doing what they are doing. Just trying to connect the dots.....

Mav 03-18-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 9511806)
I wouldn't be sucking Kaepernick's dick just yet. It could snap off like a skink's tail.

lol, why do you think i got banned from the 49ers board.........


I spoke against the messiah.

jd1020 03-18-2013 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 9511802)
There is no Kaepernick in this draft. After the first couple, they are garbage....and no Manuel will not be Colin 2.0.

I wouldn't count out guys like Matt Scott.

Kaepernick wasn't exactly a stud coming out of college. All he had was an arm and legs.

Mav 03-18-2013 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9511812)
I wouldn't count out guys like Matt Scott.

Kaepernick wasn't exactly a stud coming out of college. All he had was an arm and legs.

he got placed in the perfect position to get the mentoring he needs.

Matt Scott is interesting. I like the comparisons people are making between Nassib, and Kirk Cousins as well.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-18-2013 06:20 PM

Jags will trade up for Colquitt

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511793)
Where was kaepernick taken again?

after cam, after Jake Locker, after Gabbert, after Ponder, after Dalton.....

Draft redo, who would go first? anyone still take mike vick over drew brees?

Sweet Lord you are the biggest dildo this board has ever seen.
Posted via Mobile Device

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511779)
Question.

If the chiefs did indeed trade albert for a second with Miami, then drafted Joekel/Fisher, and then grabbed a qb in the second round as a developmental qb, what exactly is the big deal in that scenario?

This is equivalent to trading 1.1 for the 4th or 5th best QB in the draft. It's moronic and the only way it happens if we fall in love with one particular player at 1.1, which means we are probably over valuing him. The LT would have to be a first ballot HOFer before I would look back and say, that was a smart trade.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511808)
oh, i completely agree. I dont like ANY of these qbs in this draft other than Glennon, and i only like him as a long term prospect, and a guy who is NOT in an andy reid type system. He needs to be in a norv turner, sean payton type offense.

I am not pretending to know why andy and dorsey are doing what they are doing. Just trying to connect the dots.....

Of course! The Dildo "likes Glennon". I rest my ****ing case. DIF.
Posted via Mobile Device

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9511812)
I wouldn't count out guys like Matt Scott.

Kaepernick wasn't exactly a stud coming out of college. All he had was an arm and legs.

Who was the Kaepernick equivalent in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 etc?

There isn't a diamond in the rough in every draft. It is the exception not the rule.

jd1020 03-18-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512069)
Who was the Kaepernick equivalent in 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 etc?

There isn't a diamond in the rough in every draft. It is the exception not the rule.

So before you mine the rough you are going to say there isn't a diamond?

Chiefs way.

Reason why they never find a Kaepernick or Wilson.

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9512074)
So before you mine the rough you are going to say there isn't a diamond?

Chiefs way.

Reason why they never find a Kaepernick or Wilson.

There is a first round QB worth taking in most years. I'll put my money there.

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9512074)
So before you mine the rough you are going to say there isn't a diamond?

Chiefs way.

Reason why they never find a Kaepernick or Wilson.

Brodie Croyle says "Hi".

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:42 PM

The reason we are screwing with the OT situation is because we committed to Alex Smith and can't figure out what else to do with the 1.1 pick.

Saccopoo 03-18-2013 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511801)
Shrugs. I dont know. Clearly, either Albert they dont think can stand up physically for another 4 years, or, clearly they dont like geno smith, and figure they can get a qb they like more in the second round that can sit for a while?

Thats the only reason in the world i could of seen them trading for alex smith. If last years draft class, was this year, there is no way they trade for alex smith, they take andrew luck and laugh.

They take Alex Smith because there wasn't a single QB on the roster that was worth a damn. As well, the free agency QB's weren't going to get you anything other than middling journeyman types of guys.

Trading for Alex Smith is the exact same thing as signing Dunta Robinson for the free safety position or Shaun Smith for CB. Or franchising Branden Albert. They could have had Dee Milliner in the draft. They could have had Joeckel in the draft. They could have had Geno Smith in the draft. But the proven bird in hand is better than potential when you want to win now.

IMO, there is still a real possibility that Geno Smith is the pick. Alex Smith is 29 years old and coming off a concussion. He's also only put up two respectible seasons in his career. However, he was the best option that Dorsey and Reid had in making sure that they had a decent player at the QB position going into the 2013 season.

However, as stated, Geno Smith is just as likely the pick for the Chiefs as Joeckel/Fisher or a guy like Dion Jordan or Barkevious Mingo. (Tamba Hali is also going to be 29 and there isn't much behind him on the roster in terms of speed rush end.)

The Chiefs have set themselves up so as they've basically filled the roster holes through free agency (other than MLB), and they are now free to take who they feel is the best player available, whether that's Geno or Jordan or Joeckel or whoever.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 9511448)
The Jets cant even get a first for Revis but you think Albert is worth a first?

Well I know revis.blew out his knee and hasn't played a down since
Posted via Mobile Device

Saccopoo 03-18-2013 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9511812)
I wouldn't count out guys like Matt Scott.

Kaepernick wasn't exactly a stud coming out of college. All he had was an arm and legs.

Actually, he was.

The guys numbers were insanity sauce level and he won an absolute metric shit ton of games. Kaepernick was a complete ****ing stud coming out of college. Go watch him beat a very good Wisconsin team his last season in their bowl game. He played at Nevada because no one else was going to give him a scholarship because they all thought he was going to play pro baseball, but he was a destroyer of worlds for the Wolfpack.

bowener 03-18-2013 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9512104)
Well I know revis.blew out his knee and hasn't played a down since
Posted via Mobile Device

On top of the fact you know he will demand a ton of cash and then possibly want more a few years later.

mcaj22 03-18-2013 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9511812)
I wouldn't count out guys like Matt Scott.

Kaepernick wasn't exactly a stud coming out of college. All he had was an arm and legs.

you basically just admitted you dont watch college football besides whatever headlines are on ESPN about the sport

cdcox 03-18-2013 07:55 PM

If money is the reason they haven't inked Albert to a long term deal, I'm just hating on that contract they gave Colquitt. That money should have gone to sign Albert.

Bewbies 03-18-2013 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Smith Fan (Post 9511744)
way to think of it that way. God, you hate everything i say so much that you actually speak without THINKING. Franchise left tackles in their prime, get MULTI YEAR contracts. Not franchise tenders when after one year they can let him go, or trade him.... Good call.......

JFC.

meaning, his back might be okay for one year, but not worthy of a 5 year contract. But you keep that hate alive bro!!

We guaranteed him $10,000,000. Did Miami do that with their "injured" LT?

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9512099)
They take Alex Smith because there wasn't a single QB on the roster that was worth a damn. As well, the free agency QB's weren't going to get you anything other than middling journeyman types of guys.

Trading for Alex Smith is the exact same thing as signing Dunta Robinson for the free safety position or Shaun Smith for CB. Or franchising Branden Albert. They could have had Dee Milliner in the draft. They could have had Joeckel in the draft. They could have had Geno Smith in the draft. But the proven bird in hand is better than potential when you want to win now.

IMO, there is still a real possibility that Geno Smith is the pick. Alex Smith is 29 years old and coming off a concussion. He's also only put up two respectible seasons in his career. However, he was the best option that Dorsey and Reid had in making sure that they had a decent player at the QB position going into the 2013 season.

However, as stated, Geno Smith is just as likely the pick for the Chiefs as Joeckel/Fisher or a guy like Dion Jordan or Barkevious Mingo. (Tamba Hali is also going to be 29 and there isn't much behind him on the roster in terms of speed rush end.)

The Chiefs have set themselves up so as they've basically filled the roster holes through free agency (other than MLB), and they are now free to take who they feel is the best player available, whether that's Geno or Jordan or Joeckel or whoever.

This. Luxury Pick forthcoming, and my muse says Geno/Barkley. WIN.
Posted via Mobile Device

Direckshun 03-18-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 9512110)
Actually, he was.

The guys numbers were insanity sauce level and he won an absolute metric shit ton of games. Kaepernick was a complete ****ing stud coming out of college. Go watch him beat a very good Wisconsin team his last season in their bowl game. He played at Nevada because no one else was going to give him a scholarship because they all thought he was going to play pro baseball, but he was a destroyer of worlds for the Wolfpack.

Yup.

NWTF 03-18-2013 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefMojo (Post 9510452)
This was one of my first thoughts when we tagged Albert. I figured it was a strong possibility we would try to trade him. All signs have been pointing towards us taking a OT at 1.1. By tagging Albert, we controlled his rights for a trade instead of just letting him walk for free.

Bingo!

I said the same thing when I first heard this. This strategy has been used. This is how Cassell got to KC. The Pats knew Pioli was interested so why let him go for nothing. Franchise his ass an make the the interested party pay.

Not saying Albert is gone but I think all options are on the table

tk13 03-18-2013 07:59 PM

Andy Dalton was the QB who beat Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl. Kaepernick's last Nevada team was very good though, they were ranked most of the season. He passed for 3000/rushed for 1000.

But to be fair, if people knew how good Kaepernick was going to be... he wouldn't have went where he did. He did fall into a good place in SF though... he's surrounded by a ton of talent and they allowed him to run an offense he's used to. Sitting for a year may have helped him.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-18-2013 07:59 PM

It's the Chiefs. The worst thing always happens.

DaneMcCloud 03-18-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9512055)
Sweet Lord you are the biggest dildo this board has ever seen.
Posted via Mobile Device

Please point out the error(s) in his statement.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-18-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 9512141)
Andy Dalton was the QB who beat Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl. Kaepernick's last Nevada team was very good though, they were ranked most of the season. He passed for 3000/rushed for 1000.

But to be fair, if people knew how good Kaepernick was going to be... he wouldn't have went where he did. He did fall into a good place in SF though... he's surrounded by a ton of talent and they allowed him to run an offense he's used to.

People are applying revisionist history to Kaepernick. He was incredibly raw coming out and it was surprising he went as high as he did.

Saccopoo always loved him but that was absolutely not consensus, and he has a well-known bias towards college players in and around the Mormon belt.

Direckshun 03-18-2013 08:03 PM

It was not surprising Kaepernick went in the 2nd round. He was a physical wonder that teams always fall in love with, but he came from that goofy ass offense in Nevada.

It was surprising that the 49ers took him, however, since nobody ever pegged Harbaugh as a fan of running QBs.

It was even more surprising that he'd be this good, this fast.

But him going in the 2nd wasn't terribly surprising.

I wonder who drafted him in the CP Mock...

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9512143)
Please point out the error(s) in his statement.

I'd much rather offer him an AIDS-filled Choco-Twinky.
Posted via Mobile Device

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-18-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 9512150)
It was not surprising Kaepernick went in the 2nd round. He was a physical wonder that teams always fall in love with, but he came from that goofy ass offense in Nevada.

It was surprising that the 49ers took him, however, since nobody ever pegged Harbaugh as a fan of running QBs.

It was even more surprising that he'd be this good, this fast.

But him going in the 2nd wasn't terribly surprising.

I wonder who drafted him in the CP Mock...

Scott Wright had him as the #7 QB, behind Stanzi and Mallett
He wasn't in Mayock's top six
Walter had him at the sixth rated QB

Those are quick glances, easily findable on Google. He was largely thought of as a late second-early third rounder, not a high second.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.