ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs We need to extend Alex Smith (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280391)

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354831)
Alex is gonna get a Jay Cutler deal.

If he does, the Chiefs are pretty much ****ed.

splatbass 01-08-2014 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354829)
I'm hopeful he can do it. Job #1 is not giving Alex Smith a massive contract.

I'm not confident in anybody, or anything, associated with the Kansas City Chiefs.

At least he spends the money. One of the many frustrating things about Pioli is that we always had tons of cap space and yet he wouldn't spend the money to fill any of the many holes we had.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354842)
If he does, the Chiefs are pretty much ****ed.

Not really.

TheUte 01-08-2014 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354829)
I'm hopeful he can do it. Job #1 is not giving Alex Smith a massive contract.

I'm not confident in anybody, or anything, associated with the Kansas City Chiefs.

I hope the don't extend AS right away. I hope they get some other pieces in place and worry about the extension later.

Hopefully getting someone to explain to Andy Reid about situational football and when to run the ball.

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354849)
Not really.

ROFL

milkman 01-08-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354759)
Unfortunately, I don't share your optimism. The reason for having a QB like Smith is that you get 80% of a Drew Brees for 50% of the price. He needs pieces around him, a lot of pieces.

I am optimistic, but that isn't what is fueling my thought process.

It's all about risk-reward.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354851)
ROFL

You really think a 3 year 54m deal would **** the chiefs?

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10354879)
I am optimistic, but that isn't what is fueling my thought process.

It's all about risk-reward.

If he gets a Cutler-like contract, that's not balanced risk vs. reward.

milkman 01-08-2014 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354831)
Alex is gonna get a Jay Cutler deal.

He will if you wait a year and he blows up.

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354886)
You really think a 3 year 54m deal would **** the chiefs?

Cutler's contract didn't contain a signing bonus. His base salary for next year is 22.5M.

So yeah, I do.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354901)
Cutler's contract didn't contain a signing bonus. His base salary for next year is 22.5M.

So yeah, I do.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/e87300e29...3468o1_400.gif

Old Dog 01-08-2014 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 10353995)
He was 100 percent correct with the rest of his point.

Did you really just essentially post, "He was right except where he was wrong?"

You're a bigger ****ing idiot than I realized. I knew you were a damn troll, but this is bad even for you.

TheUte 01-08-2014 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354901)
Cutler's contract didn't contain a signing bonus. His base salary for next year is 22.5M.

So yeah, I do.

I don't see Cutler and Alex as the same. Alex gave money back to Cryner's.

I think he wants to Win and he wants to win in KC, after all they gave him his big second chance. He is going to demand a huge contract.

He strikes as the guy with something to prove.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354901)
Cutler's contract didn't contain a signing bonus. His base salary for next year is 22.5M.

So yeah, I do.

http://overthecap.com/cap.php?Name=J...QB&Team=Ravens

Just do a deal like this.

Flacco cap number first 3 years of deal

1.6.8M
2.14.8M
3.14.5M


Year 4 the Ravens can get out of the deal and save 2.7m vs the cap.

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 10354928)
I don't see Cutler and Alex as the same. Alex gave money back to Cryner's.

I think he wants to Win and he wants to win in KC, after all they gave him his big second chance. He is going to demand a huge contract.

He strikes as the guy with something to prove.

That's definitely something that gives me hope. I don't think Smith is the kind of guy that will even ask for a contract that will hamstring the rest of the team.

htismaqe 01-08-2014 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354930)
http://overthecap.com/cap.php?Name=J...QB&Team=Ravens

Just do a deal like this.

Flacco cap number first 3 years of deal

1.6.8M
2.14.8M
3.14.5M


Year 4 the Ravens can get out of the deal and save 2.7m vs the cap.

You should have brought this one up first. Cutler's deal is HORRIBLE.

TheUte 01-08-2014 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10354936)
You should have brought this one up first. Cutler's deal is HORRIBLE.

You mean because it's Cutler's deal or the actual deal.

I would go with both. LMAO

htismaqe 01-08-2014 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 10354941)
You mean because it's Cutler's deal or the actual deal.

I would go with both. LMAO

Absolutely both.

I would argue nobody is worth 1/5 of the cap, maybe not even Brady or Manning. Brady has been to the Super Bowl, but hasn't won one, since he signed his 2nd contract, primarily because he doesn't have a good enough supporting cast on defense.

That being said, NO WAY is Cutler worth it. I'd take Alex Smith over Cutler.

Mav 01-08-2014 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10353693)
Warner was never with the Browns, but don't let facts get in the way of your stupidity.

Lets see. The Browns are a BLACK HOLE, and Jeff Garcia was shit with the Browns, shit with the Lions, played really well with the Eagles, and had moderate success with the Buccs.

So again dumbass.

He was 100 percent spot on with his evaluation of the Browns, with the exception of saying Warner played there. And you, always with the ****ing derogatory inflammatory comments.

So eat a bucket of Aids bitch boy.

Mav 01-08-2014 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Dog (Post 10354924)
Did you really just essentially post, "He was right except where he was wrong?"

You're a bigger ****ing idiot than I realized. I knew you were a damn troll, but this is bad even for you.

So, when someone says, with the exception of the obvious error of Warner, when the rest of his POST is 100 percent correct, that makes him an idiot, and you the king of the virtual world?

There is nothing TROLL about me. Its always cute that when I don't take someones side, they get all ass hurt, and go, TROLL TROLL TROLL.

Do you even know what the definition of a ****ing troll is you turd?

mikey23545 01-08-2014 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anyong Bluth (Post 10354725)
The DB also chips him, so he didn't get a free release. Not a major chuck, but it's definitely going to slow him down just a bit- like maybe even a step or 2, and Alex and Gray had never run that play together.

You can argue about the validity of if Gray did or did not slow it down a bit, but if he gets a free release, he probably is in perfect position to catch it.

Also notice how early he starts looking back for the ball. Having his head and shoulders partially turned would also slow him down a bit.

Lastly, he's not a full time receiver- and probably not experienced with laying out for a catch like that. It's not certain he'd come up with it and be able to secure the ball going to the ground, but as a RB, that instinct isn't ingrained in him.

According to Blob Gretz, Gray slowed because he lost the ball looking up into the dome roof lights.

Mav 01-08-2014 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10354831)
Alex is gonna get a Jay Cutler deal.

No hes not.

Not even close.

One, he doesn't deserve it, and let me make clear why.

I don't think really any player deserves that much of a teams salary.

Its a team game. And the teams that have locked up these qbs with these contracts, haven't won shit since they did.

Not Brees, not Brady, not Peyton, not Flacco.

They have to sacrifice too much of the team to do it.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 02:14 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a> will try to extend contract of QB Alex Smith this offseason: <a href="http://t.co/9nFcRRJ954">http://t.co/9nFcRRJ954</a></p>&mdash; Jason Cole (@JasonPhilCole) <a href="https://twitter.com/JasonPhilCole/statuses/421011562745196545">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


He's been money the last 2 off season about the Chiefs

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 02:16 PM

The Kansas City Chiefs will try to extend the contract of quarterback Alex Smith this offseason be-fore he begins the final year of his current deal, a source said Wednesday.

Smith led the Chiefs as they went from 2-14 in 2012 to an 11-5 record and playoff appearance this season. He has one year left on a three-year deal he signed in 2012. The final year is worth $7.5 million, all of that in base salary, making Smith vastly underpaid compared to other quarter-backs of his experience and ability.

For example, Jay Cutler signed a seven-year, $126.7 million contract last week with Chicago. That deal included $54 million guaranteed in the first three years.

Smith finished the season a quarterback rating of 89.1, the third best of his nine-year career. In addition, Smith has helped the Chiefs and San Francisco to a 30-9-1 record in his regular-season starts over the past three years. Those teams have made the playoffs each season, although Smith was replaced by Colin Kaepernick in San Francisco midway through last season.

CaliforniaChief 01-08-2014 02:17 PM

This is good news.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 02:35 PM

I have no doubt they are going to sign him to a big extension, none. In fact, I had no doubt when they traded for him.

Using Chicago as a standard is pretty poor though. Smith is probably as good as we are ever going to get.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 01-08-2014 02:40 PM

I can live with it. At least we're all in to win now. Good for the guys in their prime

TheUte 01-08-2014 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355674)
I have no doubt they are going to sign him to a big extension, none. In fact, I had no doubt when they traded for him.

Using Chicago as a standard is pretty poor though. Smith is probably as good as we are ever going to get.

I have no doubt he is not the best QB in the NFL.
I think he has some potential.

But after this last game how many teams would consider him as an option?

Stad 01-08-2014 02:59 PM

Good news. I'm sold on Alex now.

Carlota69 01-08-2014 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 10355691)
I have no doubt he is not the best QB in the NFL.
I think he has some potential.

But after this last game how many teams would consider him as an option?

Depending on how teams draft this offseason, but right off the top of my head Im thinking, the Vikings, The Browns, The Raiders, JAX, St Louis (depending on Bradfords recovery), WAS if RG3 continues to suck, Houston (Altho Im sure theyll defintely go Qb in draft), Tenn and Im sure a few more.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 03:33 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Well, Jason Cole was guessing, but he said &quot;6 years, 17 or 17.5 million a year&quot; when I asked what contract Alex Smith will sign. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a></p>&mdash; Danny Parkins (@DannyParkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/DannyParkins/statuses/421029198333874176">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BigCatDaddy 01-08-2014 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355793)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Well, Jason Cole was guessing, but he said &quot;6 years, 17 or 17.5 million a year&quot; when I asked what contract Alex Smith will sign. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a></p>&mdash; Danny Parkins (@DannyParkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/DannyParkins/statuses/421029198333874176">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

**** me in the ass with a chainsaw :facepalm: Why did I have to be born near this god damned city and franchise.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 10355808)
**** me in the ass with a chainsaw :facepalm: Why did I have to be born near this god damned city and franchise.

Pick another team then.

Carlota69 01-08-2014 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355793)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Well, Jason Cole was guessing, but he said &quot;6 years, 17 or 17.5 million a year&quot; when I asked what contract Alex Smith will sign. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a></p>&mdash; Danny Parkins (@DannyParkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/DannyParkins/statuses/421029198333874176">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So, 5/75 then?

BigCatDaddy 01-08-2014 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355811)
Pick another team then.

Kiss my ass then, bitch.

BigCatDaddy 01-08-2014 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 10355813)
So, 5/75 then?

Obviously it depends on how it's structured, but that's scary to me regardless.

NinerDoug 01-08-2014 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355793)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Well, Jason Cole was guessing, but he said &quot;6 years, 17 or 17.5 million a year&quot; when I asked what contract Alex Smith will sign. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a></p>&mdash; Danny Parkins (@DannyParkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/DannyParkins/statuses/421029198333874176">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Seems a little steep, doesn't it?

HemiEd 01-08-2014 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 10355818)
Obviously it depends on how it's structured, but that's scary to me regardless.

Well, look at this thing in chunks, or bites, kind of like eating an elephant.

First, do you believe the Chiefs will ever draft a QB with their first round pick?

If you do, then you would be upset with a long term contract for AS. Of course, we all know the length doesn't matter, it is the guaranteed money.

But if you are like me and don't believe they will use a 1st, I think he is about as good as we can expect to have behind center. Granted, he didn't put the team on his back and carry it that last drive, but he did play very well and gave it all he had, he was all in.

Make the best of it, it is Clarks money and surround him with what he needs to succeed.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355838)
Well, look at this thing in chunks, or bites, kind of like eating an elephant.

First, do you believe the Chiefs will ever draft a QB with their first round pick?

If you do, then you would be upset with a long term contract for AS. Of course, we all know the length doesn't matter, it is the guaranteed money.

But if you are like me and don't believe they will use a 1st, I think he is about as good as we can expect to have behind center. Granted, he didn't put the team on his back and carry it that last drive, but he did play very well and gave it all he had, he was all in.

Make the best of it, it is Clarks money and surround him with what he needs to succeed.


It's Smith fault Bowe let a little corner force him to the sideline?

TheUte 01-08-2014 04:00 PM

Man, that is way to much.

For any single player. People have completely forgotten that teams win.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 10355848)
Man, that is way to much.

For any single player. People have completely forgotten that teams win.

That's the going rate for a QB.

TheUte 01-08-2014 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355851)
That's the going rate for a QB.

It's crazy. You can't hamstring a team because one player.

If anything we know that now.

I wonder what the average pay for SB winning QB's is at the time they won.

Not after they won.

CaliforniaChief 01-08-2014 04:07 PM

I would do 5/75 in a heartbeat.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte (Post 10355858)
It's crazy. You can't hamstring a team because one player.

If anything we know that now.

I wonder what the average pay for SB winning QB's is at the time they won.

Not after they won.

No clue but you got guys like Romo Cutler and Ryan getting 100m dollar deal and haven't won shit.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 10355859)
I would do 5/75 in a heartbeat.

Agree

TheUte 01-08-2014 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355860)
No clue but you got guys like Romo Cutler and Ryan getting 100m dollar deal and haven't won shit.

Oh don't get me wrong, I think Romo, Cutler and Flacco deals are BS.

It put teams in such a hole to have one player eat up so much cap room.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355847)
It's Smith fault Bowe let a little corner force him to the sideline?

There is no point in debating this any more, really. We all see things a little differently and I can't bring myself to heap any more praise on Alex Smith than I already have. He gave it his all, busted his ass.

What I saw was Alex Smith erring to the safe side on that pass, pretty much like he has had a tendency to do on that play all season. It is better to be un-catchable than intercepted, it comes natural for him! He didn't need to throw it that far towards the OB, but see it how you wish.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355872)
There is no point in debating this any more, really. We all see things a little differently and I can't bring myself to heap any more praise on Alex Smith than I already have. He gave it his all, busted his ass.

What I saw was Alex Smith erring to the safe side on that pass, pretty much like he has had a tendency to do on that play. He didn't need to throw it that far towards the OB, but see it how you wish.

Well here is Reid on the play

“Dwayne Bowe is one of the best slant runners in the National Football League,” Reid said. “He also is a great fade-ball catcher, (a) back-shoulder, fade-ball catcher. Dwayne’s big and strong. He’s playing fast, but he’s not the fastest receiver.

“Well, he beat this kid clean off the ball, and this kid’s got some speed. And I’m not sure he realized how clean he actually beat him off the ball. So normally, what he’d do is, he’d climb back on top. You go out to practice and see you see those red lines we have drawn on the field? You kind of go back and capture that red line. The red line sits four to five yards off the sideline, and you want to get right back on top that son of a gun if you beat somebody that fast. If not, you just fade it and the quarterback dots you on the back shoulder.

“He didn’t realize quite how clean he got that thing, and he bowed it out just a little bit towards the sideline. And he still had an opportunity — it was close. Half his foot was in, half was out. So if he had to do it all over again, he’d probably get over the top.”

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/01/08...#storylink=cpy

warrior 01-08-2014 04:20 PM

Think I'll wait and see on the contract before going off the deep end , I think it will be less.

CJ5363 01-08-2014 04:25 PM

It depends how much.

Schaub got around 4-62, so 4 years, 70 million makes sense.

If Cutler gets 18 million a year, and 54-56 guaranteed, who knows what Alex may get.

milkman 01-08-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355872)
There is no point in debating this any more, really. We all see things a little differently and I can't bring myself to heap any more praise on Alex Smith than I already have. He gave it his all, busted his ass.

What I saw was Alex Smith erring to the safe side on that pass, pretty much like he has had a tendency to do on that play all season. It is better to be un-catchable than intercepted, it comes natural for him! He didn't need to throw it that far towards the OB, but see it how you wish.

Bowe ran that route too close to the sideline.
Smith threw a perfect ball.

Even too close, Bowe nonchalantly took that step, rather than going limp and dragging that foot.

Bowe simply was not aware of where he was at.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355875)
Well here is Reid on the play

“Dwayne Bowe is one of the best slant runners in the National Football League,” Reid said. “He also is a great fade-ball catcher, (a) back-shoulder, fade-ball catcher. Dwayne’s big and strong. He’s playing fast, but he’s not the fastest receiver.

“Well, he beat this kid clean off the ball, and this kid’s got some speed. And I’m not sure he realized how clean he actually beat him off the ball. So normally, what he’d do is, he’d climb back on top. You go out to practice and see you see those red lines we have drawn on the field? You kind of go back and capture that red line. The red line sits four to five yards off the sideline, and you want to get right back on top that son of a gun if you beat somebody that fast. If not, you just fade it and the quarterback dots you on the back shoulder.

“He didn’t realize quite how clean he got that thing, and he bowed it out just a little bit towards the sideline. And he still had an opportunity — it was close. Half his foot was in, half was out. So if he had to do it all over again, he’d probably get over the top.”

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2014/01/08...#storylink=cpy

Good story. I know what I saw, and have re-watched it a couple of times.
Is Andy going to throw his QB under the bus, especially after the game he had? Nope, it is what is .
Both of those critical sideline passes were missed and they had one player in common.
Bottom line, AS played a hell of a game, had great numbers, but the only time his team didn't have the lead, he didn't get it done.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2014 04:33 PM

Alex Smith threw 27 TD and 7 INT this year.

If he can do that consistently for the team and increase his yardage production ala the playoff game, he's worth 17.5 mil a year.

And before you whine, that's cheaper than Matt Ryan's contract.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10355906)
Bowe ran that route too close to the sideline.
Smith threw a perfect ball.

Even too close, Bowe nonchalantly took that step, rather than going limp and dragging that foot.

Bowe simply was not aware of where he was at.

That is true, he could have saved it.

TheUte 01-08-2014 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 10355906)
Bowe ran that route too close to the sideline.
Smith threw a perfect ball.

Even too close, Bowe nonchalantly took that step, rather than going limp and dragging that foot.

Bowe simply was not aware of where he was at.

Oh so This.

He had know idea where he was. I said it as soon as I was the play, I hated that call in that situation. Great play, wrong time.

TheUte 01-08-2014 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10355911)
Alex Smith threw 27 TD and 7 INT this year.

If he can do that consistently for the team and increase his yardage production ala the playoff game, he's worth 17.5 mil a year.

And before you whine, that's cheaper than Matt Ryan's contract.

It's bizarro world, You are saying yes and I'm saying no way in hell.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10355911)
Alex Smith threw 27 TD and 7 INT this year.

If he can do that consistently for the team and increase his yardage production ala the playoff game, he's worth 17.5 mil a year.

And before you whine, that's cheaper than Matt Ryan's contract.

And that's the million dollar question - can he do it consistently? So far, he's only shown it in spurts.

Someone else we know threw for 27/7 once.

Personally, as long as his deal doesn't restrict us from legitimately filling holes, or doesn't marry us to him for more than 2-3 years - I don't care what they give him.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10355911)
Alex Smith threw 27 TD and 7 INT this year.

If he can do that consistently for the team and increase his yardage production ala the playoff game, he's worth 17.5 mil a year.

And before you whine, that's cheaper than Matt Ryan's contract.

Kind of remind you of 2010? How did they do against the good teams? The NFC East this year was the NFC W in 2010.

Snapplez 01-08-2014 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355924)
Kind of remind you of 2010? How did they do against the good teams? The NFC East this year was the NFC W in 2010.

Except not even as good. 2010 NFC West beat the Saints in the playoffs, the NFC East this year couldn't even manage that.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355924)
Kind of remind you of 2010? How did they do against the good teams? The NFC East this year was the NFC W in 2010.

2010 Chiefs had the number 1 rushing team.
2013 10th

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355930)
2010 Chiefs had the number 1 rushing team.
2013 10th

Yeah, that tends to happen when you just look at yardage. 114 more attempts in 2010.

Meanwhile, we had a 4.7 YPC in 2010 and 2013.

Nice try.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2014 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10355922)
And that's the million dollar question - can he do it consistently? So far, he's only shown it in spurts.

Someone else we know threw for 27/7 once.

Personally, as long as his deal doesn't restrict us from legitimately filling holes, or doesn't marry us to him for more than 2-3 years - I don't care what they give him.

I'd say he can, simply based on his two seasons in SF.

Cassel didn't have that to fall back on.

temper11 01-08-2014 04:46 PM

I tend to agree that Smith isn't going to demand unrealistic numbers. I think he wants to win and knows that if he eats up all the money, they won't be able to fill any gaps that need to be filled in order to win. I really think that's what he cares about most.

His agent, on the other hand, will try to get for Alex every penny he can get, because obviously his commission goes up as well with every penny.

Marcellus 01-08-2014 04:47 PM

Give him 5 years of really good money but no more. You could even front load the first 3 or so.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10355936)
Yeah, that tends to happen when you just look at yardage. 114 more attempts in 2010.

Meanwhile, we had a 4.7 YPC in 2010 and 2013.

Nice try.

Alex Smith has gotten better each of the last 3 years. Cassel not so much

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355930)
2010 Chiefs had the number 1 rushing team.
2013 10th

AS is clearly better at his profession than Cassel, but we also know that an Andy Reid team is never going to lead the NFL in rushing. No way, no how.

This team played the good teams tuff, but couldn't finish sadly.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10355939)
I'd say he can, simply based on his two seasons in SF.

Cassel didn't have that to fall back on.

I would agree that he can keep his TD:INT based on his time in SF.

There's nothing from his time in SF or his year here that leads me to believe that he can consistently increase his yardage production, as you put it.

Red Dawg 01-08-2014 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10355911)
Alex Smith threw 27 TD and 7 INT this year.

If he can do that consistently for the team and increase his yardage production ala the playoff game, he's worth 17.5 mil a year.

And before you whine, that's cheaper than Matt Ryan's contract.

Who stole your log in password? No way you wrote that? I am also with signing him up as long as it's not a rediculous price. We need other players to get better and some FA's but Smith can get it done and we should all want him to stay longer than next year. He is just as good as the so called young studs like Wilson and Kap.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355946)
Alex Smith has gotten better each of the last 3 years. Cassel not so much

Giving up on your last "point" already?

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-08-2014 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10355954)
Giving up on your last "point" already?

Nope Cassel needs a running games. Alex doesn't.

Hammock Parties 01-08-2014 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10355949)
I would agree that he can keep his TD:INT based on his time in SF.

There's nothing from his time in SF or his year here that leads me to believe that he can consistently increase his yardage production, as you put it.

Well, you would hope more WR/TE talent on offense + 2nd year in the system would help him in that regard.

I don't know, I'm just OK with Alex after that playoff game.

Please shoot me.

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10355945)
Give him 5 years of really good money but no more. You could even front load the first 3 or so.

That's exactly what I'm hoping for, I'm just not sure how they can do it and fill the holes they have. We're up against the cap.

I suggested 5/75 the other day as long as we can get out of it cheaply after the 2nd or 3rd year if necessary.

Tombstone RJ 01-08-2014 04:52 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Well, Jason Cole was guessing, but he said &quot;6 years, 17 or 17.5 million a year&quot; when I asked what contract Alex Smith will sign. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Chiefs&amp;src=hash">#Chiefs</a></p>&mdash; Danny Parkins (@DannyParkins) <a href="https://twitter.com/DannyParkins/statuses/421029198333874176">January 8, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

OnTheWarpath15 01-08-2014 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355955)
Nope Cassel needs a running games. Alex doesn't.

LMAO

You're all over the map.

Deberg_1990 01-08-2014 04:53 PM

Haven't the Romo and Cutler contracts sort of set the price here?

Isn't Smith at least on par with those guys? Maybe not purely stats, but wins and production?

RunKC 01-08-2014 04:54 PM

And Alex did this with a struggling OL and below average WR's. The OL came together in the 2nd half and they played much better.

I think Alex could get close to 30 TD's and 4,000 yards next year. Can't wait to see Kelce back and the other weapons they will add.

saphojunkie 01-08-2014 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 10355924)
Kind of remind you of 2010? How did they do against the good teams? The NFC East this year was the NFC W in 2010.

Out of six games against playoff teams (including the Indy loss last week):

YDS - 270/GM
YPA - 6.9
CMP - 60%
TD - 1.83
INT - 0.5
TOT QBR - 48
RAT - 89.1

All of those stats except Total QBR are equal to or better than his regular season averages. So... quality of opponent didn't seem to affect him at all.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 10355967)
Haven't the Romo and Cutler contracts sort of set the price here?

Isn't Smith at least on par with those guys? Maybe not purely stats, but wins and production?

I wouldn't trade him for either of those two, but a couple of others mentioned in this thread I sure would, and a few not mentioned.
He is going to get his money from the Chiefs, hopefully front-loaded in a big signing bonus or cap friendly manner.

TheUte 01-08-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10355955)
Nope Cassel needs a running games. Alex doesn't.

Every QB needs a running game.

HemiEd 01-08-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10355971)
Out of six games against playoff teams (including the Indy loss last week):

YDS - 270/GM
YPA - 6.9
CMP - 60%
TD - 1.83
INT - 0.5
TOT QBR - 48
RAT - 89.1

All of those stats except Total QBR are equal to or better than his regular season averages. So... quality of opponent didn't seem to affect him at all.

Good post, except for the most important stat of all, winning the game.
Some think that is cruel, but that is all that really matters.
2-6 after the bye, with the wins coming against the Raiders and Redskins.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.