ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs guard Geoff Schwartz will not return to KC (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282101)

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480196)
Schwartz was pretty good last year as a starter. Let's see who he gets this time before we judge.

This is a free flowing discussion. Of course, things will change as they make moves. There's no "judgement".

htismaqe 03-11-2014 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 10480201)
O line was the weakest link on the team besides Kendrick Lewis. Why resign these guys to huge contracts when they never really got it together last year and played as a unit?

Because you can't line up 3 guys and not get an illegal formation penalty?

RunKC 03-11-2014 12:12 PM

What happens when we need $ to lock down Justin Houston? What happens when Charles wants to renegotiate his contract that he rightfully deserves to do? What happens when We need $ to lock down Berry? What happens when we need $ to lock down Alex?

This isn't just planning for now. We're planning the long term as well.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480294)
What happens when we need $ to lock down Justin Houston? What happens when Charles wants to renegotiate his contract that he rightfully deserves to do? What happens when We need $ to lock down Berry? What happens when we need $ to lock down Alex?

This isn't just planning for now. We're planning the long term as well.

Actually, this is about planning for the long term at the expense of the short term (or so it seems right now).

That's great for Justin Houston but who are we going to pair him with because Hali isn't going to last much longer...

OldSchool 03-11-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480305)
Actually, this is about planning for the long term at the expense of the short term (or so it seems right now).

That's great for Justin Houston but who are we going to pair him with because Hali isn't going to last much longer...

Hopefully we can draft his replacement in this or next year's draft.

Dee Ford, Attaochu, Gayle, Smith, etc.

RunKC 03-11-2014 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480305)
Actually, this is about planning for the long term at the expense of the short term (or so it seems right now).

That's great for Justin Houston but who are we going to pair him with because Hali isn't going to last much longer...

I agree, but I think people are putting Dorsey under a microscope.

How about Hudson, Allen and Stephenson? Two top 50 picks and a 3rd rd pick with 2 or more years in. It's time for these guys to step up.
Fisher and Kush are going through their first real nfl offseason so I expect them to be better next year as well just like Poe.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480321)
Hopefully we can draft his replacement in this or next year's draft.

Dee Ford, Attaochu, Gayle, Smith, etc.

This is why the Schwartz thing (or the o-line as a whole really) is so frustrating.

This team suddenly has a TON of holes where they didn't exist a month ago.

We're already short on picks.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480324)
I agree, but I think people are putting Dorsey under a microscope.

How about Hudson, Allen and Stephenson? Two top 50 picks and a 3rd rd pick with 2 or more years in. It's time for these guys to step up.
Fisher and Kush are going through their first real nfl offseason so I expect them to be better next year as well just like Poe.

After watching Asamoah the last couple of years, do you any faith that Allen or Hudson are going to make a huge leap? I think it's a better bet to assume that Pioli had no idea what he was doing when it came to offensive linemen...

OldSchool 03-11-2014 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480334)
This is why the Schwartz thing (or the o-line as a whole really) is so frustrating.

This team suddenly has a TON of holes where they didn't exist a month ago.

We're already short on picks.

It's why I hope we can get Daryn Colledge in here to lessen the blow.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10480351)
It's why I hope we can get Daryn Colledge in here to lessen the blow.

The problem is that he plays LG, doesn't he?

So we're going to move Allen?

All of this potential shuffling is a little disconcerting.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480359)
The problem is that he plays LG, doesn't he?

So we're going to move Allen?

All of this potential shuffling is a little disconcerting.

Colledge is versatile. He can kick out to OT as well. Pretty much the same versatility as Schwartz, just older.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 12:40 PM

We need a vet guy anyways, would not be a good idea to make one of the youngest starting OLs in the league even younger next season.

RunKC 03-11-2014 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480336)
After watching Asamoah the last couple of years, do you any faith that Allen or Hudson are going to make a huge leap? I think it's a better bet to assume that Pioli had no idea what he was doing when it came to offensive linemen...

This isn't fair to Pioli or Dorsey.

Dorsey didn't draft these guys and pioli's picks were meant for a completely different scheme.

htismaqe 03-11-2014 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480373)
This isn't fair to Pioli or Dorsey.

Dorsey didn't draft these guys and pioli's picks were meant for a completely different scheme.

It might not be fair to Dorsey.

EVERYTHING is fair game with that ****tard Pioli.

RunKC 03-11-2014 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480383)
It might not be fair to Dorsey.

EVERYTHING is fair game with that ****tard Pioli.

Yes but not with how the OL are doing in a completely different scheme. He made some good picks, but ****ed up a lot of later picks. His demise was ultimately the draft pick, trade and coach he hired when he started.

TEX 03-11-2014 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480156)
Who are you starting in his place without having a drop off?

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10480416)
Yes but not with how the OL are doing in a completely different scheme. He made some good picks, but ****ed up a lot of later picks. His demise was ultimately the draft pick, trade and coach he hired when he started.

In addition to the fact that Pioli thought that he was smarter then everyone else and did stupid shit to prove it.

BossChief 03-11-2014 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10480334)
This is why the Schwartz thing (or the o-line as a whole really) is so frustrating.

This team suddenly has a TON of holes where they didn't exist a month ago.

We're already short on picks.

I think it's clear that they aren't gonna spend a dime until they get guys like Alex Smith and Justin Houston locked up.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2014 02:25 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hearing Geoff Schwartz to Giants is likely. Not done yet but close. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Giants&amp;src=hash">#Giants</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NFL&amp;src=hash">#NFL</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NFLFreeAgency&amp;src=hash">#NFLFreeAgency</a></p>&mdash; Jordan Raanan (@JordanRaanan) <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanRaanan/statuses/443481932840857600">March 11, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2014 02:48 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>The Giants have scheduled a visit with free agent guard Geoff Schwartz, according to Adam Schefter. Rams also interested.</p>&mdash; Dan Graziano (@DanGrazianoESPN) <a href="https://twitter.com/DanGrazianoESPN/statuses/443488293356044289">March 11, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2014 02:59 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>RT <a href="https://twitter.com/KimJonesSports">@KimJonesSports</a>: Source familiar with negotiations: NYG &amp; G Geoff Schwartz have agreed to terms. Expected to sign tomorrow</p>&mdash; Art Stapleton (@art_stapleton) <a href="https://twitter.com/art_stapleton/statuses/443491051207401472">March 11, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Franchise 03-11-2014 03:01 PM

Well....let's see what you got Reid/Dorsey. I'm fully prepared to take an offensive linemen in the 1st round.

-King- 03-11-2014 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480813)
Well....let's see what you got Reid/Dorsey. I'm fully prepared to take an offensive linemen in the 1st round.

I'd bet any amount of money that they go after a WR in the first.
Posted via Mobile Device

CaliforniaChief 03-11-2014 03:03 PM

Disappointing. I really wanted to keep him. But that clearly wasn't in the cards.

-King- 03-11-2014 03:26 PM

The success of Schwartz really should be an indication that we shouldn't go after a high priced guard or draft one in the 1st. If an undrafted career backup can do what he did, I'd be surprised if Dorsey and Reid really invest a lot of resources to get another one. That's why I'm positive that they'll likely draft a WR in the 1st. It's the biggest need other than safety and getting a great is more important than getting a great safety.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10480922)
The success of Schwartz really should be an indication that we shouldn't go after a high priced guard or draft one in the 1st. If an undrafted career backup can do what he did, I'd be surprised if Dorsey and Reid really invest a lot of resources to get another one. That's why I'm positive that they'll likely draft a WR in the 1st. It's the biggest need other than safety and getting a great is more important than getting a great safety.

Schwartz was drafted by the Carolina Panthers in the seventh round of the 2008 NFL Draft.

-King- 03-11-2014 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10480931)
Schwartz was drafted by the Carolina Panthers in the seventh round of the 2008 NFL Draft.

Heh, don't know why I thought he was undrafted.

The Franchise 03-11-2014 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 10480970)
Heh, don't know why I thought he was undrafted.

Because the 7th round basically is. LMAO

I'm over it now. He's gone. It's whatever.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-11-2014 03:48 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Otw to the Big Apple tonight! Can&#39;t wait to officially sign w/the <a href="https://twitter.com/Giants">@Giants</a> tomorrow! So pumped.</p>&mdash; Geoff Schwartz (@geoffschwartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/geoffschwartz/statuses/443502828150341632">March 11, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BossChief 03-11-2014 04:56 PM

Wonder how much he's gonna get.

OldSchool 03-11-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10481031)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Otw to the Big Apple tonight! Can't wait to officially sign w/the <a href="https://twitter.com/Giants">@Giants</a> tomorrow! So pumped.</p>&mdash; Geoff Schwartz (@geoffschwartz) <a href="https://twitter.com/geoffschwartz/statuses/443502828150341632">March 11, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Good for him though. He's worked hard to get this pay day and he deserves it. Bounced around the league a lot and finally getting a decent contract to set him up for the future.

ShowtimeSBMVP 03-12-2014 12:20 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>G/T Geoff Schwartz&#39;s deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Giants&amp;src=hash">#Giants</a> is for 4 years worth $16.8 million, $6.2 million guaranteed (via <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin">@Rand_Getlin</a>). <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NYG&amp;src=hash">#NYG</a></p>&mdash; Art Stapleton (@art_stapleton) <a href="https://twitter.com/art_stapleton/statuses/443812920146022400">March 12, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chiefnj2 03-12-2014 12:23 PM

Not bad for the Giants with only a little over 6 guaranteed

RealSNR 03-12-2014 12:23 PM

He's getting paid like a top 12-16ish starting guard.

I hope Dorsey has a plan, because I'd INSTANTLY throw that money at him if it meant not burning a 1st round pick on his replacement.

The Franchise 03-12-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10484147)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>G/T Geoff Schwartz's deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Giants&amp;src=hash">#Giants</a> is for 4 years worth $16.8 million, $6.2 million guaranteed (via <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin">@Rand_Getlin</a>). <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NYG&amp;src=hash">#NYG</a></p>&mdash; Art Stapleton (@art_stapleton) <a href="https://twitter.com/art_stapleton/statuses/443812920146022400">March 12, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's ****ing it? Bullshit that we didn't sign him.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10484147)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>G/T Geoff Schwartz's deal with <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Giants&amp;src=hash">#Giants</a> is for 4 years worth $16.8 million, $6.2 million guaranteed (via <a href="https://twitter.com/Rand_Getlin">@Rand_Getlin</a>). <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NYG&amp;src=hash">#NYG</a></p>&mdash; Art Stapleton (@art_stapleton) <a href="https://twitter.com/art_stapleton/statuses/443812920146022400">March 12, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's it? I was speculating that he'd get more than Asomoah but I guess I forgot about the Pioli factor.

I think our FO believes that they could improve at his position and that's the real reason why they let him go. They want an OG that can pass protect as well, not just a run blocker like Schwartz was. Eli Manning is still going to get killed.

The Franchise 03-12-2014 12:25 PM

Schwartz is playing RT for the Giants.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10484174)
Schwartz is playing RT for the Giants.

Ok, so Manning is truly going to die next season, lol. Schwartz couldn't handle interior speed rushers, how the hell is he going to do outside?

BossChief 03-12-2014 12:36 PM

That's NOTHING for a guy that can play multiple positions on the OL at a high level.

NOTHING.

I just hope the reason they let him walk was because of the faith they have in our OL depth and not because they want to burn a high pick on a ****ing guard.

DTLB58 03-12-2014 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10484164)
That's ****ing it? Bullshit that we didn't sign him.

I know, I just read that too.

One thing I saw last night reading Bob Gretz articles was that he got the feeling that Geoff saw himself as no longer a Chief as soon as the playoff game was over. So maybe he wasn't staying no matter.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10484214)
That's NOTHING for a guy that can play multiple positions on the OL at a high level.

NOTHING.

I just hope the reason they let him walk was because of the faith they have in our OL depth and not because they want to burn a high pick on a ****ing guard.

Zach Martin, lol. Just be ready for it.

Iconic 03-12-2014 12:44 PM

I bet money we are drafting O line in the first round. Besides Beadles, the FA market is thin at guard and Andy loves his fat guys.... Unless we make a move on a center and decide to move Hudson to his natural position- it's looking more and more like Swanson or Mathews might be a Chief

RealSNR 03-12-2014 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 10484227)
I know, I just read that too.

One thing I saw last night reading Bob Gretz articles was that he got the feeling that Geoff saw himself as no longer a Chief as soon as the playoff game was over. So maybe he wasn't staying no matter.

It's just always been his dream to play for the New York Giants. There was no possibility whatsoever that the Chiefs could have re-signed Brandon Carr Geoff Schwartz

ct 03-12-2014 12:46 PM

shit...well that's disappointing.

I admit thought when I saw the RT plan it was gonna be more than that. I'd have paid him that easy to play start at RG or LG, plus emergency RT in a pinch.

RealSNR 03-12-2014 12:47 PM

Always look on the bright side of life, I guess.

Zack Martin isn't 28 or however old Danny Watkins was.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 01:03 PM

The only reasons I can think of as to why we weren't able to re-sign Schwartz are:

1. He didn't want to play here and wanted to play for NY.

2. Our FO and coaches want a dominant OL, not just a passable one and were prepared to let Schwartz go in favor of drafting a better prospect this year in a draft that is very strong along the OL. They may also think that we might already have an answer in-house.

Only things I can come up with for not getting a deal done with Schwartz.

mcaj22 03-12-2014 01:06 PM

man does Fat Scott overpay for players or what. Asamoah got way more than that lol

htismaqe 03-12-2014 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10484236)
Zach Martin, lol. Just be ready for it.

Yep.

-King- 03-12-2014 01:26 PM

I'd rather have paid the 4.5 mil a year to Asamoah.
Posted via Mobile Device

RunKC 03-12-2014 01:28 PM

Dorsey's trust with the fans is going to be put to the test this year. We're going to find out if Dorsey is as good as his reputation.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 10484401)
Dorsey's trust with the fans is going to be put to the test this year. We're going to find out if Dorsey is as good as his reputation.

Yep. It's a huge gamble.

I don't like it, but I'd gladly accept being proven wrong.

I just don't see it.

It would be one thing if you were counting on Fisher, and Kelce, and Commings to all take a big step forward.

But they appear to be expecting Fisher, and Johnson, and Cooper, AND Commings, AND Kelce...

Well, you get my point.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10484404)
Yep. It's a huge gamble.

I don't like it, but I'd gladly accept being proven wrong.

I just don't see it.

It would be one thing if you were counting on Fisher, and Kelce, and Commings to all take a big step forward.

But they appear to be expecting Fisher, and Johnson, and Cooper, AND Commings, AND Kelce...

Well, you get my point.

And Kush, Johnson, Watkins, Jenkins . . .

htismaqe 03-12-2014 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10484411)
And Kush, Johnson, Watkins, Jenkins . . .

That's what I meant. There's so many of them it's a ****ing chore just to type them all.

It's a real gamble, one that I don't understand at all.

OldSchool 03-12-2014 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10484424)
That's what I meant. There's so many of them it's a ****ing chore just to type them all.

It's a real gamble, one that I don't understand at all.

He is also setting himself up for the draft. Where is the draft the strongest?

WR, OL, CBs, DL/LBs

You can bet that our top 4 picks will look something like that.

htismaqe 03-12-2014 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldSchool (Post 10484440)
He is also setting himself up for the draft. Where is the draft the strongest?

WR, OL, CBs, DL/LBs

You can bet that our top 4 picks will look something like that.

So add 4 rookies to that list. That makes it worse, you realize that, right?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.