![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dee Ford's biggest asset is speed, but no speed a pass rusher can muster matters if the QB gets the ball out of his hands less than three and a half seconds. |
Quote:
Peters/Nelson/Gaines >>> Peters/Gaines/Flemming |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We should beat SD, but if we don't get pressure on a good QB like Rivers, it could result in a loss. Gates, Allen, Woodhead and Benjamin are a good stable of weapons. If Rivers has time to throw then it won't matter what our secondary does. Andy always has these cluster **** games every year at home that we should win, but lose. In year 1 it was SD. Year 2 it was TEN. Year 3 it was CHI. |
Quote:
The Chargers are an AWFUL football team. They don't have a running game, they have one receiver that's worth a shit (when he's healthy), they lost their future TE to Pittsburgh and their offensive line is shit. Their starting center is out indefinitely, their secondary sucks and their overall defense is crap. They're a 4-12, 5-11 team at best. Oh, and their #3 overall (soon to be bust) draft choice isn't even signed. But they're going to come into Arrowhead on opening day and beat the Chiefs. Said no one with a brain, ever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Poe is in a contract year and I fully expect him to have his most productive year yet as a pass rusher. |
Quote:
If that happens in game one of the 2016 season, not only will I be shocked but it means their season is already in jeopardy. |
Quote:
14-3 lead vs SD 2013. Houston hurt. Result: 41-38 L 28 point lead vs IND 2013. Houston can't play hardly any snaps 2nd half. Result: 44-45 L Brady not even touched and completes 3rd and long after 3rd and long. No Houston. Result: L Barely beat SD last year without Houston. We need Dee Ford to break out. I'm sure as hell not counting solely on the DL and an old LB with knee problems to put the heat on Rivers consistently. |
Quote:
It's a very, very different team. |
Quote:
But Dee Ford is going to make or break our week 1 home game against the ****ing Chargers. I think people are really underestimating our offense potentially stepping up and winning some games for us this year, especially early on. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We didn't barely beat them because Houston was out. We barely beat them because we put up 10 ****ing pts. The Broncos barely beat the Chargers in week 17 with their SB defense and the division on the line. It's a division rivalry game. Shit happens. :facepalm: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://arrowheadaddict.com/2016/07/2...hings-i-think/
Like I said and was then insulted Houston probably won't play until November. 8:30 mark on the pod cast. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-video" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/tkelce">@tkelce</a> isn't too happy that Peyton Manning retired.<br><br>Check out our interview w/ the <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs">@Chiefs</a> TE on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SINow?src=hash">#SINow</a> at 1pm ET <a href="https://t.co/JgVeod1bb5">pic.twitter.com/JgVeod1bb5</a></p>— SI Now (@SInowLIVE) <a href="https://twitter.com/SInowLIVE/status/758319927086440448">July 27, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Tweets from BJ Kissel today:
"Top pass of the day at #ChiefsCamp went from Alex Smith to Tyreek Hill deep down the right sideline on a hitch-n-go. Result was 80-yard TD." "Moments later, Hill ran similar route but cut it off, which created about 10 yards of separation as DB bailed to protect deep. 15-yard gain." ""I've never seen somebody that fast." @Keivarae1 on Tyreek Hill. Russell then apologized to college teammate Will Fuller." |
Houston or no Houston, Rivers isn't going to have it easy at Arrowhead and he knows it.
We saw that last year when Houston was again out for the game. Dee Ford, bruh. |
Quote:
Cut that route off like his girlfriend's windpipe. /CP |
To be fair that girls baby came out white AF of course he would be pissed.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Also, fast speedy guys always do particularly well in practices without pads and no tackling.
Not saying Hill won't be a valuable player, only that our expectations shouldn't exactly go through the roof just yet. If he can be DeAnthony Thomas without the AIDS, that will be damn remarkable, and more than likely he won't quite reach that level. |
Quote:
They uncharacteristically took a shot at this guy despite all that baggage for a reason. |
Quote:
|
Is it too early too start cussin' at Poe, telling him to pack his shit and GTFO?
CBS' Jason La Canfora reports long-term talks between the Chiefs and contract-year NT Dontari Poe "haven't really gone anywhere." The sides had preliminary talks early in the offseason, but evidently haven't made any progress. Going on 26, Poe isn't going to be in the mood for a hometown discount as he positions for what's going to be the best chance of his career to cash in. |
**** YOU POE! How dare you not position yourself for the best possible contract!!!
|
Quote:
|
Poe's gonna want to be paid pretty handsomely.
|
Quote:
Unless you're an 8+ sacks a year guy, you aren't getting top dollar as a DL. |
Any guesses why we selected Chris Jones this year?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Poe is a NT. Jones is a DE. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they had drafted for need, they would have chosen a CB or safety. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, I think Jones is going to be dynamic. I believe Our Lads referred to Jones as potentially the second coming of Richard Seymour. Anyway, I really the potential of Jones -- could be a stud. |
Quote:
My guess: Because Dorsey knows that back issues can be troublesome and that it'd be wise to not throw a bunch of money at Poe, for these back issues could be lingering. Most people I know who have had herniated discs, have had other various lingering back ailments following it. I assume that when we drafted Jones, Poe was likely at least a component that influenced their decision to select him. |
I'd imagine Poe's rep is gonna say "he'd be an 8 sack guy if he didn't play the nose in a 34 and could play DT and rush the passer more".
I'm guessing he's your tag next year |
Quote:
As I've said all offseason, unless he has an 8+ sacks, he'll get somewhere between $8-9 million. That's not chump change and it's more than either Bailey or Howard are paid but there is virtually no one outside of KC that views Poe as elite. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
IMO, it should have happened already. The only reason I have to think that it hasn't happened is because the Chiefs shelled out dough for Kelce and expected to shell out dough for Berry. The signing bonuses come out of the Clark's pockets. |
Quote:
The tag will be somewhere around $13 million, which is way too much for a guy that isn't getting 8+ sacks a year. Plus, as tight as the 2017 cap appears to be, I doubt they can fit $13 million for an NT. |
Quote:
Last summer, I suggested signing Howard to the same deal as Bailey, which was 4 years, $25 million. That was met with disdain. Two years, $12 million is far less for Howard. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
4 years vs. two years. He'll be 29 years old when the deal ends as opposed to 31 years old. Duh, Stud. |
Chris Jones was drafted for future need.
Poe-FA 2017 Howard-FA 2018 Bailey FA 2019 I think they want to have him replace Howard in 2018, but he could play NT if he bulks puts on 20-25 lbs (he has a very good tall frame for that). It wouldn't surprise me at all if they go DL again in the first rd next year should Poe want insane $$ or has continued back problems. OLB (if Ford doesn't show progress) or a S (Berry replacement) wouldn't surprise me either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think a team will overpay for Poe, much like the Raiders overpaid for Hudson. Some team with a need and too much cap space.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Draft and develop. Draft and develop. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Berry and Poe want Cleveland Browns money...they can go get it elsewhere. Both are overrated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Miller faced some terrible RT's in the Broncos playoff run. Mack got a huge chunk of his sacks against Denver's shit RT. Also, Ford was on the right side the majority of the time going up against LT's fyi. |
Poe is more valuable than you guys are thinking. We lose him you will see a decline in our defense. He's in his prime and we need to keep him. He will make a statement this year after fully recovering from back surgery plus being a contract year.
|
I agree hogfarmer. Everyone here seems to have forgotten how much our defense struggled before we got Poe. Everyone was clamoring for a nose tackle every off season. Remember the guy that the draftubators wanted in the 2nd round, then we got him in the 6th? Then we found out he couldn't read. His name escapes me. But the point t is, Poe took a while to find. He won't be easily replaced.
|
Quote:
|
We would still have a good DL without Poe.
Bailey and Jones at the ends and Howard at NT. Plus Williams, Taamu and a couple others have a chance to shine, too. I'd give Poe 10/yr and I'm not so sure even that much is getting max bang for the buck. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wouldn't doubt it if Howard wanted that. Gives him another opportunity to get that big contract on the right side of 30. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
SackIntosh is still burned into my brain |
Quote:
There's no guarantee that Howard stay healthy enough or plays well enough to sign another contract in 2018. Take the money and run. Unfortunately for him, he didn't even generate that type of interest in the NFL. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.