When did I say that?

It's the same story it's been all year:

Chiefs blow 'em out and go into cruise control, rival team makes some shit comeback late in teh game and then the Chiefs stomp em out to finish the job. Rival fans go, "Moral victory, we kept it close!" and the media says, "wow, they only WON by a single score".

Meanwhile the Chiefs roll on as the undisputed #1 team in the league while the media jerks off other teams just to make it interesting.

You got caught in a lie.

It's OK.

Jus don't keep doing it.

20+ years of mediocrity, they win 1 Super Bowl, and this is the arrogance that engulfs them.

Sad...

Wrong.

You must have already forgotten your second post in this thread...

I like confidence.

Confidence is fine.

Mocking other teams is not confidence.

It's arrogance.

Only a fool thinks 34 seconds is anything meaningful.

No lie at all, it's called rounding. No one gives a shit about your 34 seconds. It changes nothing about the context of the argument.

You were dominated in every way. The game was nowhere near as close as the score indicated (that you seem to keep priding yourself on) and if not for a late TD, you lose by 16pts.

Apparently YOU forgot what you said.

You said:

"This from a fan who is talking smack about how his team poses a supposed threat to the defending Super Bowl champions"

Except I never said that.

And you then quote me saying the Chiefs should still be favored and would probably win. I have never said the Bills would "threat" or beat the Chiefs. Ever (this year).

Describing yourself again. LMAO

Oh hell, their coming out of the woodwork again. Has Steeler Dane been back as well? Somebody get the antifreeze.

ROFL

Just keep posting. You're awful.

It's not arrogance. It's fact.

Remember, you came HERE and now you wanna cry about arrogance.

Arrogance is coming to another team's forum to brag about your first decent season since the Jim Kelly era.

Again, we're not mocking the Bills. We're mocking YOU.

Hill and Watkins were dinged. If Watkins had been healthy, with a healthy Hill to take the double, Andy would've certainly dialed up far more passing plays. And part of the reason to run it that much, besides the weather, is to protect both Mahomes from the pass rush and the receivers from taking possibly awkward and unnecessary hits.

It also saved Andy from showing a ton of his playbook, if you believe that sort of long-con is part of Andy's character. I don't put a lot of stock in that type of thinking, but it was certainly a result of how he called the game.

But it's laughable in the extreme to think that Andy will come out with a gameplan to run the ball 37 times, especially because he did it before. He did it before to see if he could, period. But if you think he's going to plan on running 40 times in a rematch, you're completely deluded. Over his career you can count the number of games he's run the ball more than passed it on one hand. The team is built around the idea of passing 65% of the time.

Andy Reid will most definitely come out passing like it's going out of style if there's a rematch.

Buffalo fans are fugs.

Nah, he's the only realist here.

Shit changes in the post-season...right now, Allen and the Bills are playing loose and care-free. That ends when it's an elimination contest...

Allen has to prove he can handle his shit in those situations...he made some pressure mistakes against the Texans.

Mahomes is battle-tested...3 straight come-from-behind wins on the biggest stage.

So your stated agreement with an article with the headline that reads: "The Bills are the team no one, including the Chiefs wants to see in the playoffs" is not you expressing your belief that the Bills are a threat to the Chiefs?

LMAO

We're the arrogant ones, though.

Are you talking about the Chiefs here? The same team that has won 5 straight division titles and made the playoffs 7 times last decade? If that is mediocrity, what do we call the Bills of the past two decades? Laughing stock? Your record versus New England is good material for Comedy Central.

FYP

Missing your top 2 corners and talking about watkins...chiefs should have had no problems passing against old Josh Norman and a practice squad cb

I'm surprised, but he's actually right.

Chiefs had the 3rd lowest SOS in the AFC.

Mahomes said most plays were RPO's. The reason we ran so much is Buffalo was backing up their safeties way back and daring us to run. So we took it. I can tell Reid was annoyed though because he ended up screaming at a ref on the sidelines. In a rematch the ball will be in Mahomes hands to win the game.

And if Buffalo has their LB's crowding the LOS like they have been doing the last few week things will get ugly fast for Buffalo because the RPO is pass to Tyreek or Mecole wide open past the LB's and they are going to be running in wide open space.

chiefs have been getting wins by the skins of their teeth...including relying on a dropped int and a missed fg against the falcons!....yea but cruise control

Wrong.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2020/

Did you miss the game? We barely threw the ball because your coach was so scared of our passing offense.

You get to see the Chiefs actual passing offense in playoff mode soon enough. Hint: we can score more than one TD against the Texans...


:D

Yes, I don't think the Chiefs would want to play the Bills.

If they could PICK, i'm sure they'd rather play the Dolphins or Browns or some other weaker team.

That doesn't mean they can't beat the Bills.

That doesn't mean they're not better than the Bills.

That doens't mean they're not going to the Super Bowl.

It just means, they would rather play someone else to get there, because it would be an easier path.

I can get to work by driving through 5 tolls. But I can also get there by driving through 3 tolls.

Either way, i'll get there.

Nothing is stopping me.

But I'td be easier to go through 3 tolls.

This is not a hard concept.

No.

Pro-Football-Reference doesn't use Strength of Schedule. They use the Simple Rating System. it literally says it right in the glossary.

As for true SOS, the Chiefs .465 is the 3rd easiest in the conference.

https://www.espn.com.au/nfl/table/_/view/playoff

They already beat the Bills.

With their B game.

The Chiefs are a terrible matchup for the Bills.

Indy is a much worse matchup for the Chiefs.

For the new fans here.

Just ignore MahomesMagic.

He "became" a Chiefs fan 2 years ago.

SRS is an actual qualitative measurement, not a a quantitative one.

It takes into account matchups.

Which of course, you don't care about because you only read box scores.

What about the Indi matchup worries you most?

Maybe you should worry about your Bills team's path to even have a chance to play the Chiefs... i.e. winning two playoff games, before offering your thoughts on a potential Chiefs-Bills match-up.

Winning two playoff games is a steep mountain to climb for a franchise whose last playoff win was against Don Shula 26 years ago (and spoiler alert... Don Shula is dead).

Yes, but it's not actual SOS.

SOS is calculated and determined by the NFL.

It's an actual stat and determines playoff seedings in the even of ties.

You cant just use any willy-nilly alternative stat you want and claim he is wrong.

He was right - although it surprised me - that the Chiefs had the 3rd lowest SOS in the AFC.

It's so funny how these Bills dorks are saying the exact same shit Titans and 49ers fans were saying last year right before getting beat and disappearing forever lmao

In other words: Crap I was wrong, but I'm too prideful to admit it.

Disruptive in the middle of the defensive line, ability to rush 4 and play coverage without getting gouged by the running game, decent running game, efficient passing.

The only wildcard is Rivers.

The Bills either have to blitz or they have to play coverage. They can't stop the run in their base package, let alone dropping 6 or 7 on every play.

There's nothing the Bills can do scheme wise to make up for that. It's the same issue the Ravens have and that's why they're 0-3 against Mahomes.

You really have a problem with any thinking beyond raw numbers, don't you?

There's more to football than box scores.

In other words your arrogance was exposed and you tried to spin and run from it.

I hope you don't go into hiding again for nine years after the Bills inevitable flame out in the playoffs.

Lol Mahomes completed over 80 percent of his passes with an 88 QBR and a 128 Rating. He had absolutely no issues passing in that game, even considering the conditions.

Mahomes only had 26 attempts though (his second lowest total of the season, second only to a game with 2 return TDs which took away possessions against Denver), because the Chiefs were absolutely gashing the Bills on the ground.

Every KC RB averaged over 4 yards per carry (CEH averaged over 6 yards per carry) while neither Buffalo RB averaged even 3.5 yards per carry.

What a stupid ****ing comment from a stupid ****ing idiot.

What do you think of the Browns? I think they could be a sneaky tough matchup for KC. Browns have similar power running game to the Raiders, and they have the play action passing game to get into a pretty good shootout like the Raiders did with KC.

why do these ****ing trolls come here?

It's tiresome.

Go talk on your own board.

This board is for fans of the World Champion Kansas City Chiefs.

They didn't have any problem. Mahomes was 21/26 For 225, 2 TD's and 0 Ints in a game in game in which they just ran it down your throats.

You wanna talk about Allen vs the Chiefs banged up defense though?

You do understand the key issue with SOS right?

Yeah I don't share your concern for Indi.

In fact, using Pro-Football-Reference's simple rating system, Indi has the lowest SOS.

Which is what I said earlier -they got to the playoffs by beating garbage teams like the Jags, Bengals, Jets, Bears, etc.

Their run game is good, but their pass game - 24 TD's all season - not too worried about.

I know it's limitations. I didn't bring up SOS. Someone else did. I just confirmed the statistic.

The Browns don't have the horses for a shootout and they don't have the defense to keep the score down.

Considering Josh Allen's stat line was 14/27, 122 yards and 4.5 yards per pass, I am guessing he doesn't.

It's the sign of a fan who's in way over his head.

He needs Google to generate his arguments for him.

It's really going to hurt when they beat your Bills then, isn't it?

Sad.

Repeat after me.

"Sorry man, I guess I misread it."

Were we missing out two starting corners? I don't recall that. Not sure how that helps the argument though.

My point about Hill and Watkins was that both our WR1 and WR2 were injured for that game. Watkins didn't even play i think, and Hill played sparingly. Essentially you saw D. Robinson (WR3), Byron Pringle (WR5), and Kelce.

And I didn't say that the Chiefs had trouble throwing the ball, because they didn't. Patrick still threw 21/26 (80% completion%), 225 yds, a pair of TDs, no INTs, an 88.0 QBR, and a 128.4 P-RTG.

What did Allen do? Oh yeah, about a 50% completion%, 122 yds, a 4.5yds/att average, and a 73.4 P-RTG.

Insert our WR1 and WR2 and you could reasonably expect Mahomes would've added another 75-100 yds and at least another TD or two to those numbers.

So you're right about one thing: the game didn't go as well as the Chiefs would've expected. They should've scored 35+ that day.

That would definitely hurt.

Don't see it happening though.

I'll be surprised if the Bills don't win by double digits.

Their own fans think Buffalo is going to blow them out.

Indy did handily beat the same Tennessee team that smacked down your Bills team.

Your dismissal of Indy as a threat seems... what's the word... arrogant.

Bills are going to beat everybody by double digits!

I’m happy for the Bills to finally make it back to the playoffs.

If I didn’t have a playoff victory in over 15 years I wouldn’t be talking smack about a potential AFC championship victory. You will have your hands full with the Colts.

It’s bullshit they didn’t get the prime time slot.

Other poster: Chiefs have one of the lowest SOS

htismaqe: No they don't

daquix: Surprisingly, they do

htismaqe: No they don't

daquix: yeah they do, here's the proof

htismaq: You really have a problem thinkin beyond raw numbers, dont you?

uh.... all I did was confirm something that you were denying. If you had a problem with the stat, just say that in the first place. Don't deny that it exists lol

I mean, they have been for over a month now...

Past results don't indicate future performance.

They don't have the receivers to punish the Chiefs for selling out to stop the run.

Oakland is problematic because they have a freak athlete at TE that's a matchup nightmare and they have a speedster in Ruggs who can punish you over the top here and there.

Teams like the Browns and Titans etc NEED the running game to work to open the passing game. Kill the head (the ground game) and the body will die (the pass game) with teams like the Browns.

Bills destroyed the Raiders team that beat the Chiefs...

Oh wait, that doesn't help your argument.

See how it doesnt work?

These Bills fans. LMAO

Just like the 49'ers fans. And the Titans fans before them. And the Texans fans. And the Ravens fans.

The very fact that you're here is funny. Even more will be your absence after you lose.

Kansas City isn't afraid of anyone. If they take care of their business, they'll be World Champions AGAIN.

The only thing that stops the Chiefs is the Chiefs. Injuries maybe. That's it.

We don't give a shit about your team.

.

True.

ROFL

darn, I was hoping you would just be man enough to admit it.

Oh well.

Did you copy/paste this from a Patriot's forum?

Sounds just like a Pats fan.

What's most funny about these Butt-fingers is that they don't even realize that they're not unique. At all.

They're a dime a dozen. They're just more fans in a long line of fans who've come here, said the same exact shit only to never be seen again.

They're just another in a long line before them: Texans, Titans, 49ers, Steelers, Patriots, Raiders etc.

They're acting like this is our first rodeo or something. ****ing noobs. They'll soon be another body in the KC graveyard.

Guys like you tend to disappear after certain games...Reminds me of a certain Raven fan who showed up here last year, then he was gone. LMAO

Win 1 Super Bowl in 30 years and this is what happens. Sad.

Winning by 7 points is your definition of "destroying the Raiders"?

Seems like an "arrogant" interpretation to me.

Yet you claim the Chiefs 9 point victory over the Bills was close.

I would say a better example of a team destroying another team is Tennessee 42 Buffalo 16.

I've been here for a decade. I'll be here even if the Bills lose.

Make the playoffs for the first time in (**** who knows, no one cares about the Bills) and you're over here posting fluff.

Haven't even won a playoff game yet.

SAD.

Raiders scored a TD with 1 minute and some seconds left to make it look close.

Arrogance is so sad.

Bisquick: "Siri, did I express a belief that the Bills were a threat to the Chiefs?"

Siri: "See post #1 and #3 in this thread".

Bills fans call Chiefs cocky because they're the #1 team in the league and reigning SB champions, and current SB favorites.

Meanwhile, Bills fan is over on another forum bragging and they haven't even won a playoff game since '95.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA