![]() |
This guy is really an interesting signing. The LB room is pretty flush, so why this guy right now? Was he just a happy accident, or is something else going on?
|
Harris was out there a lot, they needed to replace him. They also have limited options behind Bolton and Gay.
People are trying to connect dots that aren’t there. Gay trade, 3-4, Chenal to DE, etc. They’ve upgraded the 3rd/4th LB spot left behind by Harris, that is all. |
Quote:
|
Paul Harvey’s– “The Rest of the Story” (For you old farts)
As a senior in Fort Wayne, Indiana in 2013, Drue Tranquill ran for 1,420 yards, 28 touchdowns on 114 carries. He also had 16 receptions for 348 yards and five touchdowns. Last year’s Kansas City Chiefs fullback, Michael Burton is gone, having signed with the Denver Broncos. Several people on here have commented that the Chiefs use of a fullback is a waste as he really is a special teams player that plays a few times on offense. Andy Reid likes fullbacks. As a head coach since 1999, he has always had a fullback on his team. Linebackers can wear a 40s series number. Fullbacks can wear a 40s series number. Drue wore #49 while with the Chargers. When offered the job to play offense, defense, and special teams, Drue said, “Hell yes! Sign me up!" This last part I just made up, but why let facts get in the way of a good story. |
This guy could also play the third Safety roll that Spags like to deploy but disguise it to the offense!
Keep em guessing... |
Quote:
|
This guy is a very good football player.
|
He can really cover at the lb spot too so that’s nice
|
Well, if you can't lock Travis Kelce down in 1-on-1 coverage and are basically tired of him beating you like a redheaded stepchild twice a season, go ahead and sign with his team at a ridiculously discounted price and reap the rewards.
|
Quote:
|
This guy is a great LB, very versatile. Good get by Garth Geech.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To me, the surprising part is NOT bringing back Harris. Wonder what the story is there. |
Quote:
I agree on Tranquill. In the little bit that I've seen of him, he's always been very impressive. I'm a big fan of this signing. |
He looks like a big upgrade over Harris, imo. Much better in coverage, and I think he's more athletic, in the little film I've seen of the guy. He's in a couple of the DHop highlight reels. Obviously, he's not covering Nuk, but he shows up at the tackle or incoming. He looks pretty fast.
|
Quote:
The simplest answer is they simply wanted a better cover backer, but who knows? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Back in the day coverage wasn’t really a problem for a linebacker all Willie Lanier had to do was grab a guy and pull his arms off so he couldn’t catch the ball
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Harris coverage grades were horrible. Hell of a tackler and smart, but able to be targeted in coverage.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It just seems to be a position of little value to teams unless you are a real difference maker and an athlete. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) Between the guaranteed deal for a molester and the Kirk deal, I suspect there may have been some owner collusion to cool the market. 2) Chargers/Bills/Eagles/etc. went all in last year and couldn’t beat the Chiefs. Fewer teams are opting to sell out for a ring. 3) FA class is weak generally. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Several teams did it last year and are now paying the price for it...Cincy? They're to cheap to sell out for anything. |
Quote:
There's a ceiling and a floor and teams WILL spend between those 2 figures. As you noted, a lot of teams made deals last season coming off the COVID flat-cap that pushed money into this season expecting a strong rise in the cap. They essentially used this year's cap as a credit card to pay for players they signed LAST offseason and now the bill is coming due. Last year's spending was never realistic going forward. And it was SO unrealistic that it suppressed spending this season. It'll probably happen around the time the new tv rights deals throws a shitload of money into the system as well. Collusion is damn near impossible under the CBA and to whatever extent it is possible, the juice definitely does not justify the squeeze. There's just very little to be gained by collusion with the spending floors in place. What you're seeing is a market correction, Juan. Teams can't mash the accelerator every off-season in a cap league - it don't work that way. |
Quote:
Can Willie Gay, who's never had a season like the one Tranquill just had, really walk into Veach's office and say "Yeah, Imma need $15 million/season..."? I mean I guess the potential downside would be that this could chill extension talks entirely because Tranquill is just so damn cheap. But what it could also do is take some stars out of Willie's eyes and maybe facilitate a deal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just be glad that we're paying a really, really good one. |
Oh, and I completely forgive you for not signing KYZIR last season, Burt.
Shit I love this move. Just an outstanding signing. Get good players on good contracts and figure out how to make the pieces fit together later. Or better still - "I'm the GM - I sign guys and when I see a good value play I'm gonna make it. You're the coaches - I'll defer to you on getting this to work..." This is just a really good organization right now. CBA scorecard be damned. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The cap is absolutely NOT a myth. You can tapdance around it and finesse it for a long while, but eventually you do have to deal with it. The one thing that might be a myth is the duration of 'cap hell'. For a long while I was nervous about kicking cans down the road out of fear that it could trigger some hellish 3-5 year roster purge/rebuild. Nah. You can spend like a drunken sailor and by and large you're only ever 1 year of absolutely eating shit away from getting yourself back in decent shape. Now it may be a REAL un-fun year, but it can be done. But you have to be smarter than the Saints who just keep using credit cards to pay off credit cards. |
Quote:
Like I truly don't understand what the **** is going on there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because yes, that's absolutely how he'll approach it. And Veach will have to point out that Edmunds is a coverage backer in a market that really appreciates coverage backers. So 'better' doesn't really work here; he's the S of the LB group with Edmunds being the CB. And CBs get paid more than S even if the S is better at playing S than the CB is at playing CB. But Oluokun's deal is going to be the real problem. His deal was 2/$30 or 3/$45 depending on how the Jags play it. And he DOES play the same style of game as Bolton with Bolton being able to argue that he might play that style at a higher level. The market for off-ball backers got real weird for a bit. That CJ Mosley contract deserves to at least be in the same chapter if not on the same page as the Watson contract in the eventual "Big Book of What The **** Were They Thinking?" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
People will see how much of a myth the cap is when the bengals lose Tee Higgins and Tyler Boyd. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This guy is an obvious upgrade. I mean, he looks pretty good in coverage, and when's the last time we could say that about one of our LBs? Hopefully it really hasn't been since DJ, but it feels like it's been about that long. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Okay, ending rant now before my blood pressure spikes. **** Hitchens. Glad he did what he could tohelp us win LIV, but so glad he's gone.:) And **** you for reminding me that Hitchens existed.:D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Basically said bigger names are moving teams vis trades than free agency. |
Good thing I didn't buy that Joshua Williams jersey.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Defense is on the menu * <br><br>Let's officially welcome LB <a href="https://twitter.com/DTranquill?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DTranquill</a> to Chiefs Kingdom! <a href="https://t.co/3aU5Ia2Yqd">pic.twitter.com/3aU5Ia2Yqd</a></p>— Kansas City Chiefs (@Chiefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs/status/1638254151355232291?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Joshua Williams making cash this offseason
|
LMAO watch dumb **** QBs check into a run thinking the Chiefs are in nickel
|
That seems strange. Williams may have picked a new number so #23 is available.
Tranquill was #23 at Notre Dame. From Chiefs.com - Quote:
|
Quote:
If it's from Billay, I'll pass;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sign me up. |
If you don’t think we needed this guy, I’d advise you to watch the Bengals game in Cincy. That was very ugly. Burrow just killed us in the middle of the field.
So glad we got this guy |
LB Drue Tranquill – 2003 $1,010,000 Base, $1,440,000 Signing Bonus, $510,000 Roster Bonus, $40,000 Workout Bonus, $3,000,000 Cap Hit, $2,450,000 Guaranteed
|
bitter
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Drew* really wants that post Chargers Weddle treatment, hey? <a href="https://t.co/VGgM1wEQNI">https://t.co/VGgM1wEQNI</a> <a href="https://t.co/CDIcdGBI87">pic.twitter.com/CDIcdGBI87</a></p>— Bolts Brigade (@Jamey_Messina) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jamey_Messina/status/1640085600744411137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
LMAO
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Drue taking nothing but jabs at our organization and yet we have fans who continue to defend him. That man can kick rocks for all I care. **** him and whoever tries to defend him <a href="https://t.co/Q05EBFoXIk">https://t.co/Q05EBFoXIk</a></p>— REJ⚡️ (@BoltUpREJ) <a href="https://twitter.com/BoltUpREJ/status/1640104119192125441?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
This organization literally owns the souls of our divisional fans. It’s just marvelous. |
Is there a better linebacker corps in the league?
|
This is payback for the Chargers claiming Donnie Edwards. Karma bitch!
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.