ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs discussing Thuney trade [confirmed] (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357374)

el borracho 03-05-2025 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988459)
I really really doubt they are gonna put a young LT and a young LG side by side, I just don't see that.

They put a rookie Center next to a rookie Right Guard.

Mecca 03-05-2025 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho (Post 17988654)
They put a rookie Center next to a rookie Right Guard.

Yea and those guys were high level prospects that won those jobs, they had signed a vet guard that ended up as a backup. This is not the same.

RunKC 03-05-2025 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988636)
People are gonna be so disappointed because to this point they have shown they do not value DT's at all.

Andy has had 12 drafts with KC. In 10 of the 12 drafts, Andy drafted a lineman on either offense or defense with a 1st or 2nd rd pick. The 2 years he didn’t, he drafted them with a 3rd rd pick.

History says Andy will take a lineman early. Seeing as how this OT class sucks, they just drafted Kingsley and are paying Trey…they’re probably gonna draft a DL in the first rd unless some outlier unexpected Trent McDuffie like fall happens.

DT is very likely at 31

crispystl 03-05-2025 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988601)
I do think if Burden does drop to 32 they should draft him.

The YAC yards between him and Rice combined would be ****ing sick.

ChiliConCarnage 03-05-2025 12:55 PM

Good player but change has to happen. A bit surprised but this makes sense

Wallymo 03-05-2025 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 17988440)
I personally don't think there's much of a difference between Stanley/Robinson and the 2nd tier, especially when you factor in money and injury history.

The 2nd tier guys are also more likely to sign shorter deals, which is what the team may be looking for here.

Mecca 03-05-2025 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17988658)
Andy has had 12 drafts with KC. In 10 of the 12 drafts, Andy drafted a lineman on either offense or defense with a 1st or 2nd rd pick. The 2 years he didn’t, he drafted them with a 3rd rd pick.

History says Andy will take a lineman early. Seeing as how this OT class sucks, they just drafted Kingsley and are paying Trey…they’re probably gonna draft a DL in the first rd unless some outlier unexpected Trent McDuffie like fall happens.

DT is very likely at 31

Yea and lets do this a little deeper...since the Chiefs hired Steve Spagnuolo how many DT's have the Chiefs drafted at all?

Spags is hired in 2019

Khalen Saunders 3
Keondre Coburn 6

Those are literally their only draft picks at DT, they have thrown more picks at every other position. They seem perfectly content to just keep filling with cheap vets. Wouldn't at all be surprised if they think Fabian Lovett can fill a spot after being a UDFA that sat on the PS all year.

YontsRBake 03-05-2025 01:04 PM

Stanley signing incoming.

Mosbonian 03-05-2025 01:06 PM

Wow....the Raiders wanted to make sure that Crosby didn't go anywhere anytime soon.

ROYC75 03-05-2025 01:06 PM

IMHO, I can see them going with LG Kingsley and moving up for a top OT in the draft, resign Humphries LT. Draft another LT later on.

Hicks can work but damn we will lose that Swriss Knife ability Reid brings. I'm all for keeping Reid since the draft is heavy for LB's.

ROYC75 03-05-2025 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YontsRBake (Post 17988671)
Stanley signing incoming.

Too old, too much $$$

staylor26 03-05-2025 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 17988675)
Wow....the Raiders wanted to make sure that Crosby didn't go anywhere anytime soon.

But he was supposed to be a Bill!

Snerd 03-05-2025 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 17988649)
Dane Brugler doesn't have him in his first round

Is he not as good as we think he is, or is there some red flag around him?

Couch-Potato 03-05-2025 01:19 PM

I hate this, but seems obvious in retrospect. Feels like we should of at least got a 2025 4th for Thuney, hoping we use that pick to move around in the draft this year.

Bowser 03-05-2025 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snerd (Post 17988693)
Is he not as good as we think he is, or is there some red flag around him?

All that I've heard on the subject is he was a bit diva-ish at the combine. He's a receiver, they're all divas.

Mecca 03-05-2025 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snerd (Post 17988693)
Is he not as good as we think he is, or is there some red flag around him?

Apparently he has some character concerns and Matt Lane doesn't think he fits the Chiefs offense so they'd pass pissing off the fan base.

Hoover 03-05-2025 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17988698)
I hate this, but seems obvious in retrospect. Feels like we should of at least got a 2025 4th for Thuney, hoping we use that pick to move around in the draft this year.

Chiefs get much needed cap space in 2025, and a mid round pick in 2026.

SAGA45 03-05-2025 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17988705)
Chiefs get much needed cap space in 2025, and a mid round pick in 2026.

For a 33-yr old guard to boot. One would think after 5 SB appearances in 6 years, folks would just sit back, relax and let Veach cook but nope. lol!

Hoover 03-05-2025 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 17988715)
For a 33-yr old guard to boot. One would think after 5 SB appearances in 6 years, folks would just sit back, relax and let Veach cook but nope. lol!

Indeed. But people want an extra pick so to change up how they draft in the simulators!

YontsRBake 03-05-2025 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 17988682)
Too old, too much $$$

I don’t think Veach would trade Thuney for a 4th (not even in this draft) while in win now mode without another player coming in. With Jackson gone, Stanley is what makes sense. Unless there is a team willing to trade a LT.

Woogieman 03-05-2025 01:48 PM

Burden Pros: Great weapon, elite YAC potential, underwhelming production in final year may drop him to 31

Cons: underwhelming production in final year may signal other issues, came out of games WAY too often (mostly dings) for a player of his size. Tempting, but I think a DT is the winning choice this year in the 1st.

YontsRBake 03-05-2025 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 17988715)
For a 33-yr old guard to boot. One would think after 5 SB appearances in 6 years, folks would just sit back, relax and let Veach cook but nope. lol!

He was a 1st team all-pro at 32 lol. Veach has a plan but let’s not cope and pretend he was old and washed now.

Mecca 03-05-2025 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17988740)
Burden Pros: Great weapon, elite YAC potential, underwhelming production in final year may drop him to 31

Cons: underwhelming production in final year may signal other issues, came out of games WAY too often (mostly dings) for a player of his size. Tempting, but I think a DT is the winning choice this year in the 1st.

He also has tiny hands, some teams won't like that.

MahomesMagic 03-05-2025 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988665)
Yea and lets do this a little deeper...since the Chiefs hired Steve Spagnuolo how many DT's have the Chiefs drafted at all?

Spags is hired in 2019

Khalen Saunders 3
Keondre Coburn 6

Those are literally their only draft picks at DT, they have thrown more picks at every other position. They seem perfectly content to just keep filling with cheap vets. Wouldn't at all be surprised if they think Fabian Lovett can fill a spot after being a UDFA that sat on the PS all year.



Yeah, I don't get why people think Spags wants a traditional DT. He would be fine playing 4 DE's on passing downs.

RealSNR 03-05-2025 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17988705)
Chiefs get much needed cap space in 2025, and a mid round pick in 2026.


We couldn’t have gotten a mid round 2025 pick?

Hoover 03-05-2025 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17988755)
We couldn’t have gotten a mid round 2025 pick?

Bears don't have a 4th rounder. I agree it would have been ideal.

Mecca 03-05-2025 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17988755)
We couldn’t have gotten a mid round 2025 pick?

Probably not there's a very select few teams that are going to be willing to give up a pick to take on 16 million dollars.

Bump 03-05-2025 01:56 PM

didn't expect this

Mecca 03-05-2025 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 17988759)
didn't expect this

It was either a trade or a new contract and I doubt they wanted to go new deal to a 33 year old guard.

Dunerdr 03-05-2025 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 17988715)
For a 33-yr old guard to boot. One would think after 5 SB appearances in 6 years, folks would just sit back, relax and let Veach cook but nope. lol!

Only thuney and Spags have more superbowls so people weren’t sure what the balance was here.

-King- 03-05-2025 02:03 PM

Nate Taylor says they're targeting Stanley

Mecca 03-05-2025 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17988775)
Nate Taylor says they're targeting Stanley

Nate is like the most outside "insider" of all time.

duncan_idaho 03-05-2025 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17988740)
Burden Pros: Great weapon, elite YAC potential, underwhelming production in final year may drop him to 31

Cons: underwhelming production in final year may signal other issues, came out of games WAY too often (mostly dings) for a player of his size. Tempting, but I think a DT is the winning choice this year in the 1st.

Production was significantly depressed by his QB being injured and not very good in 2024. QB play was a signficant step down from his sophomore year.

Dunerdr 03-05-2025 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988777)
Nate is like the most outside "insider" of all time.

Beat me to it. Has like an 11% hit rate. Always close but never on target.

wazu 03-05-2025 02:13 PM

Here is the Nate Taylor article. If it's true that he knows and is reporting the Chiefs are targeting Stanley, wouldn't that qualify as tampering?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">New story. Joe Thuney did everything the Chiefs asked of him — &amp; more.<br><br>What’s next for the Chiefs?<br><br>They plan to sign Trey Smith to an extension &amp; acquire a new left tackle, targeting Ronnie Stanley.<a href="https://t.co/1cKzfqMDbu">https://t.co/1cKzfqMDbu</a></p>&mdash; Nate Taylor (@ByNateTaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/ByNateTaylor/status/1897371653988048999?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mosbonian 03-05-2025 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woogieman (Post 17988740)
Burden Pros: Great weapon, elite YAC potential, underwhelming production in final year may drop him to 31

Cons: underwhelming production in final year may signal other issues, came out of games WAY too often (mostly dings) for a player of his size. Tempting, but I think a DT is the winning choice this year in the 1st.

Considering that when Cook was healthy his first and many times only read was to Wease....that was one of my complaints during the season.

suzzer99 03-05-2025 02:43 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One thing I was just reminded of. <br><br>If Thuney had played out his contract at a below market salary and hit free agency in 2026, he’d have a decade of service time and qualify for no higher than a fifth round 2027 comp pick.</p>&mdash; Jared Sapp (@TrumanChief) <a href="https://twitter.com/TrumanChief/status/1897383982960173397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

carcosa 03-05-2025 03:04 PM

Kinda bummed about this tbh but I beleach in Veach

New World Order 03-05-2025 03:05 PM

Feel like it’s going to be a trade now.

staylor26 03-05-2025 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 17988786)
Here is the Nate Taylor article. If it's true that he knows and is reporting the Chiefs are targeting Stanley, wouldn't that qualify as tampering?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">New story. Joe Thuney did everything the Chiefs asked of him — &amp; more.<br><br>What’s next for the Chiefs?<br><br>They plan to sign Trey Smith to an extension &amp; acquire a new left tackle, targeting Ronnie Stanley.<a href="https://t.co/1cKzfqMDbu">https://t.co/1cKzfqMDbu</a></p>&mdash; Nate Taylor (@ByNateTaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/ByNateTaylor/status/1897371653988048999?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 5, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

LMAO

No.

comochiefsfan 03-05-2025 03:07 PM

Luther is a really good player but as someone who watched every game he played in college, I’m not really sure he’s a guy I would be targeting if I were the Chiefs.

He’s got great quickness, but just ok speed at the NFL level. Really not that much of a contested catch guy. Truth be told he wasn’t even our best receiver last year. Theo Wease was.

I just think he’s a little redundant as his role in Andy’s offense would likely be very similar to Rashee’s.

BossChief 03-05-2025 03:30 PM

If we can’t get Stanley, which I’m sure is their top target…I bet they try to swing a trade with Seattle for Cross.

I’d be ok with going crazy and sending our first 2 picks this year for him…or a first this year and a 1or 2 next for a young stud OT that excels in pass pro and run blocking.

Mosbonian 03-05-2025 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 17988868)
Really not that much of a contested catch guy. Truth be told he wasn’t even our best receiver last year. Theo Wease was.
.

Again because Cook focused on throwing to Wease more than Burden.

RunKC 03-05-2025 03:48 PM

From Nate Taylor’s story.

Quote:

As a rookie, Suamataia struggled in pass protection at left tackle. The last time Suamataia was on the field was in Week 18, when the Chiefs played the Denver Broncos, who needed a victory to clinch the AFC’s final playoff berth. Suamataia played all of his 31 snaps at left guard and allowed only one quarterback hit, earning a season-high 63.3 overall grade from Pro Football Focus.

“I think it was a great learning experience for him,” Veach said of Suamataia’s rookie season days before the Super Bowl. “I was surprised when we got to the playoffs and I sat down with Coach, and he goes, ‘Hey, I really think Kingsley is going to turn the corner at guard.’ I’m excited about that.”
Again this was Kingsley’s first game at G. He never played that in college or high school. Allowing 1 QB hit to this guy with zero experience is pretty damn impressive.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Zach Allen among IDL this season:<br><br>🔷 8.5 sacks (T-3rd)<br>🔷 73 pressures (2nd)<br>🔷 27 QB hits (1st)<br>🔷 16 TFLs (1st)<br><br>Pro Bowl snub? <a href="https://t.co/lC0dkdGtr0">pic.twitter.com/lC0dkdGtr0</a></p>&mdash; PFF DEN Broncos (@PFF_Broncos) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_Broncos/status/1874926363557142593?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 2, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

comochiefsfan 03-05-2025 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosbonian (Post 17988936)
Again because Cook focused on throwing to Wease more than Burden.

Brady sucked last year, and didn't do Luther any favors. Any logical Mizzou fan would acknowledge that.

Luther still had a poor year at catching the ball in traffic to my eye. He was a little better at it in 23 but he isn't someone who's going to consistently go up and Moss dudes.

His game is all about YAC.

Theo has a bigger catch radius and stronger hands which made him a little more immune to Cook's inconsistency with accuracy.

RealSNR 03-05-2025 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17988777)
Nate is like the most outside "insider" of all time.


I miss Nick Athan!!!

Shields68 03-05-2025 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YontsRBake (Post 17988736)
I don’t think Veach would trade Thuney for a 4th (not even in this draft) while in win now mode without another player coming in. With Jackson gone, Stanley is what makes sense. Unless there is a team willing to trade a LT.

It could be as simple as we can not afford both Thuney and Smith. He decided Smith and a 4th is worth more long term than a year of Thuney. Kingsley was being moved to guard to replace one of them.

kccrow 03-05-2025 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 17988999)
It could be as simple as we can not afford both Thuney and Smith. He decided Smith and a 4th is worth more long term than a year of Thuney. Kingsley was being moved to guard to replace one of them.

Definitely likely. He probably weighed the trade compensation for either and decided to keep youth and a round lower pick or so than the other way around.

Calcountry 03-05-2025 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 17988166)
Smith + the LT they’re about to sign + Kingsley.

Long and short term solution.

Wanya could be the fix at right tackle after they let Jawaan go.

louie aguiar 03-05-2025 04:46 PM

Nothing but respect for Joe Thuney- that dude was a great player- terrific signing- good luck with the Bears

Rausch 03-05-2025 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louie aguiar (Post 17989018)
Nothing but respect for Joe Thuney- that dude was a great player- terrific signing- good luck with the Bears

This.

Sucks to lose a great guy and great player. You want this guy on your team.

I get it. This is the business. He's old - Kingsly is young. I get it. It happens.

He's that girl that you lie to yourself about though. You tell yourself it'll work out somehow. We'll make it work....

LongSufferingToady 03-05-2025 05:23 PM

I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

Sassy Squatch 03-05-2025 05:27 PM

Lol

Deberg_1990 03-05-2025 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

Playoffs won’t sniff the….

Rausch 03-05-2025 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17989063)
Lol

Thuney was a Ginger Viking Jesus but c'mon guys, he's a guard.

I'm not saying it's the easiest position to replace outside of punter, but it is.

smithandrew051 03-05-2025 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 17988999)
It could be as simple as we can not afford both Thuney and Smith. He decided Smith and a 4th is worth more long term than a year of Thuney. Kingsley was being moved to guard to replace one of them.

The simplest explanation is normally right and this is it.

Having 3 expensive IOL isn’t a great option. 2 is even pushing it a bit.

Smith is younger. He makes more sense to pay.

We should all be a bit relieved. What would it say about Kingsley if Veach felt it was necessary to pay big money to all 3 IOL spots?

Hoover 03-05-2025 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

LOL, whatever.

The NFL is about the salary cap and how well you manage it. It is even more important when you have the responsibility to pay the best QB is the league. Veach has decided to use cap space to secure 2/5s of the offensive line with keep two home grown players who are top players at their positions. It comes at the cost of a 34 year old iron man, but the key is the team actually got something for him in a 4th round pick next year. Yeah it sucks that we have to wait to cash in that chip, but just like the 3rd rounder for Sneed, it's nice when you get to collect.

Veach and the Chiefs have also invested high picks in Morris and Suamataia. Keeping Thuney and paying Smith mean neither has a sure pathway to the playing field which is not ideal. Suamataia now gets the opportunity at LG. Keeping Smith AND Thuney meant your LG is probably Suamataia or DJ Humphries at best, maybe a 1st round draft pick. Trading him, means that they can now sign a FA LT like Stanley or Tyron Smith at LT, meaning that the biggest weakness on the team has vastly been improved.

Suamataia can still develop into a LT while logging time at LG. He lacks confidence more than anything, and this is the best solution for that. While the subtraction of Thuney today makes things look worse, you have to wait and see what the entire picture looks like after free agency and the draft. Today's move shows that Veach is in the midst of a rebuild not a plug and play.

CatfishBob2 03-05-2025 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

Username checks out....

LongSufferingToady 03-05-2025 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17989081)
LOL, whatever.

The NFL is about the salary cap and how well you manage it. It is even more important when you have the responsibility to pay the best QB is the league. Veach has decided to use cap space to secure 2/5s of the offensive line with keep two home grown players who are top players at their positions. It comes at the cost of a 34 year old iron man, but the key is the team actually got something for him in a 4th round pick next year. Yeah it sucks that we have to wait to cash in that chip, but just like the 3rd rounder for Sneed, it's nice when you get to collect.

Veach and the Chiefs have also invested high picks in Morris and Suamataia. Keeping Thuney and paying Smith mean neither has a sure pathway to the playing field which is not ideal. Suamataia now gets the opportunity at LG. Keeping Smith AND Thuney meant your LG is probably Suamataia or DJ Humphries at best, maybe a 1st round draft pick. Trading him, means that they can now sign a FA LT like Stanley or Tyron Smith at LT, meaning that the biggest weakness on the team has vastly been improved.

Suamataia can still develop into a LT while logging time at LG. He lacks confidence more than anything, and this is the best solution for that. While the subtraction of Thuney today makes things look worse, you have to wait and see what the entire picture looks like after free agency and the draft. Today's move shows that Veach is in the midst of a rebuild not a plug and play.

Knew I could always count on a homer to keep his blinders on...

LongSufferingToady 03-05-2025 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CatfishBob2 (Post 17989083)
Username checks out....

Your mother thought so... LMAO

Hoover 03-05-2025 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989087)
Knew I could always count on a homer to keep his blinders on...

The Homer is the guy bitching about a team moving on from a 34 year old guard who was going to count 27M towards the cap.

Wisconsin_Chief 03-05-2025 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17989093)
The Homer is the guy bitching about a team moving on from a 34 year old guard who was going to count 27M towards the cap.

The people complaining about landing a 4th round pick for a 34 year old guard after we just tagged our other guard are the same ones complaining that we franchised a guard. It’s funny.

They are obviously smarter than our current 3-time World Champion leadership group.

rydogg58 03-05-2025 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

What kind of draft pick did you think we would get for a 30 something year old guard? I think a 4th is a pretty goddam good trade.

Bowser 03-05-2025 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rydogg58 (Post 17989192)
What kind of draft pick did you think we would get for a 30 something year old guard? I think a 4th is a pretty goddam good trade.

And the Bears eating a chunk of the salary, too. That's the payoff for THIS year.

tredadda 03-05-2025 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 17988715)
For a 33-yr old guard to boot. One would think after 5 SB appearances in 6 years, folks would just sit back, relax and let Veach cook but nope. lol!

Some hated it when Veach signed him and some hate it that he was traded.

tredadda 03-05-2025 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 17988682)
Too old, too much $$$

Too old? He’s not a RB here.

louie aguiar 03-05-2025 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17989093)
The Homer is the guy bitching about a team moving on from a 34 year old guard who was going to count 27M towards the cap.

FWIW Thuney is 32 not 34

TwistedChief 03-05-2025 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

Hypothetical: if there were some evidence that we could win an AFCCG or a Super Bowl without Thuney, would you feel better? I understand your frustration but want to drill down on the exact source of it.

tredadda 03-05-2025 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 17989076)
Thuney was a Ginger Viking Jesus but c'mon guys, he's a guard.

I'm not saying it's the easiest position to replace outside of punter, but it is.

Their salaries disagree with this.

DJ's left nut 03-05-2025 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17989240)
Their salaries disagree with this.

Do you believe there's an easier position to replace?

Salaries are a product of timing and the market at the moment a deal is reached.

I'm serious - what position is easier to find an adequate replacement at than guard?

rydogg58 03-05-2025 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17989250)
Do you believe there's an easier position to replace?

Salaries are a product of timing and the market at the moment a deal is reached.

I'm serious - what position is easier to find an adequate replacement at than guard?

Long snapper? I don't know if there is one to be honest.

staylor26 03-05-2025 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17989250)
Do you believe there's an easier position to replace?

Salaries are a product of timing and the market at the moment a deal is reached.

I'm serious - what position is easier to find an adequate replacement at than guard?

We won a SB without Thuney last year...

FloridaMan88 03-05-2025 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady (Post 17989057)
I think this is a big mistake for the Chiefs. We are already very weak on the offensive line, and the players who need to step up proved themselves incapable of doing so.

A 2026 4th round pick for Thuney?! Really?

This move tells me that the Chiefs are writing off going to the playoffs and Super Bowl in the coming season. The line is a shambles, and Mahomes is going to be taking a beating physically every game.

Gee, I wonder if the OC guy (Veach's friend) is still getting a pass?

It would have been salary cap suicide to pay both starting guards $20+ million AAV.

The Chiefs are keeping the younger guy, Trey Smith.

GordonGekko 03-05-2025 08:45 PM

100% respect for Thuney, absolute CLASS athlete and he helped us and him get some more rings while here, very sad to see but this is a business $$

YontsRBake 03-05-2025 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 17988999)
It could be as simple as we can not afford both Thuney and Smith. He decided Smith and a 4th is worth more long term than a year of Thuney. Kingsley was being moved to guard to replace one of them.

I’m not seeing how one year with an all-pro guard wouldn’t be more valuable. With the contracts coming up in 2026 & 2027, 2025 can’t just be conceded as a soft rebuild year.

I believe there has to be a 2nd part to this move and someone else is being signed or traded for but we will see.

DJ's left nut 03-05-2025 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17989256)
We won a SB without Thuney last year...

Which gets back to my previous point - I wouldn't extend Smith either.

I'm out of the market for expensive IOL at this point. They really just don't move the needle for me. I've seen this team accomplish too much with rags there or get genuinely good players for minimal investment.

IOL is a sum of its parts - it's not about individual greatness.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-05-2025 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17989329)
Which gets back to my previous point - I wouldn't extend Smith either.

I'm out of the market for expensive IOL at this point. They really just don't move the needle for me. I've seen this team accomplish too much with rags there or get genuinely good players for minimal investment.

IOL is a sum of its parts - it's not about individual greatness.

Doesn’t it get complicated though when you can’t just get fix tackles easily in an offseason? We were so spoiled to get Schwartz on the contract he had. Fish was above average but even that as we know is so hard to find when you’re picking 31-32 every year.

It’d be different if we could sit here and say, “if you let Trey and Thuney both go, you can use the resources to get a great left tackle instead”

And that’s just not all reality. Even with the best talent, Stanley, there’s a chance it backfires in a way that’s at least similar to what we’ve seen with Jawaan. Then you could be looking at an OL that’s vulnerable across the board in some form or fashion.

Just not sure you can over invest in OL and DL, my personal philosophy.

Shields68 03-05-2025 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YontsRBake (Post 17989296)
I’m not seeing how one year with an all-pro guard wouldn’t be more valuable. With the contracts coming up in 2026 & 2027, 2025 can’t just be conceded as a soft rebuild year.

I believe there has to be a 2nd part to this move and someone else is being signed or traded for but we will see.

Unless the thought is Kingsley could play LG but not RG, Smith right now is a bigger cap hit. Long term have to believe Smith is reaching his prime while the Thuney play is going to drop slightly every year. Seems like they know they could keep 1 but not 2 and choose Smith.

YontsRBake 03-05-2025 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shields68 (Post 17989351)
Unless the thought is Kingsley could play LG but not RG, Smith right now is a bigger cap hit. Long term have to believe Smith is reaching his prime while the Thuney play is going to drop slightly every year. Seems like they know they could keep 1 but not 2 and choose Smith.

But long-term could’ve been achieved this year even if they kept Thuney for 2025. Mahomes is likely going to restructure as his contract is designed, so we weren’t that desperate for short-term cap. One year of an all-pro guard is worth way more than a 4th, unless the trade-off is an immediate solution at LT.

KC_Connection 03-05-2025 10:12 PM

Entire offseason’s success or failure hinges on figuring out the LT situation. Will this help with that? Guess we’ll find out soon enough.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.