Its not an issue, I'm just talking shit. Bored, sucking up some a.c. on the last day of a REALLY ****ing good week of work.

Its more of a pointing and laughing at the monkeys thing.

ROFL but you knew exactly where it came from immediately.

And you typed the exact same words they said in the exact same order.

But hey, you do you. Or you do them, whatever works.

Lebron's 1st Cavs team was literally nothing but scrappy defensive players. Their supposed big push to get Lebron some scoring help was Mo ****ing Williams.

Lue is way out of his element as an NBA coach, but let's not pretend mean ol' Lebron told the next Phil Jackson to go **** himself

Mcmenamin reads CP!!

That's all he's ever ****ing done. Doesn't matter the sport. Football, baseball... he finds information and just spouts it without providing a source or a link

I literally give you a source! I.E. (Per whoever)

Of course I did. I had and have nothing to hide.

Again....unless they talked about trading LeBron in the context that I talked about (which you have since admitted they didn't), I didn't type what they said.

Again....them saying the Cavs could/should trade LeBron to keep Kyrie had no bearing on why I thought it would be favourable to him. Why would it? You have yet to answer this.

So the defense didn't get a lot worse when he left? Did he not prefer defensive scrappy players to play alongside LeBron?

Simple yes or no questions.
Posted via Mobile Device

Let's look at my post piece by piece:

They did not discuss the optics for LeBron of a potential LeBron move to LA.

They did not discuss whether a LeBron trade would be favourable for LeBron or what the "best case scenario" for LeBron was. Their "trade LeBron" discussion was entirely from a Cavs/asset management perspective.

You are lying if you suggest otherwise, Jason.

If only the Cavs still had miracle worker Blatt and Delley, Durant might not have mattered at all...

What I said was you typed the words they said in the same order.

ROFL. You didROFL you are an awful squirrelly ****er.

Cavs should just go for broke with this trade. Screw trying to pre-emptively restock the farm before Lebron leaves. All that's going to do is make you not terrible enough to tank properly.

Melo and Bledsoe look great, and I've seen ideas out there where Tyson Chandler is also involved. They should try to secure that instead of the one with the 1st round pick.

Watching Melo and Lebron play together would re-ignite the NBA. People would be interested to see what it will take for them to play well together.

It also would make next year interesting. Melo and Lebron want to join CP3 in LA? Well, Lebron and Melo are already on the same team. Why build that juggernaut in LA when you can trade Love or Thompson and do it in Cleveland, where you can continue to enjoy free passes to the NBA Finals every year?

These are the exact same words they said.

Now you never really specifically said who it was the best case scenario for either.

Parrot.

A lie. You have already admitted they weren't discussing LeBron in the same context of my post.

You have also not answered the above yet. I wonder why. ROFL.

A lie. They did not discuss whether a LeBron trade would be favourable for LeBron or what the "best case scenario" for LeBron was. Their "trade LeBron" discussion was entirely from a Cavs/asset management perspective. You know this and have admitted as much.

Given the previous sentence in that post for context and my LeBron fanship, that was obvious. You also accepted this fact in post 577 of this thread.

Liar.