ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Two 1st round picks for Russell Wilson in '16 and '17 or '17 and '18 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=293050)

OnTheWarpath15 06-23-2015 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11562681)
Team stat propping up qb play. Do not pass go

Those same people who don't think Wilson is worth two 1st don't seem to mind referencing all of our QB's "wins" in an effort to prop him up.

Can't have it both ways.

O.city 06-23-2015 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11562686)
Those same people who don't think Wilson is worth two 1st don't seem to mind referencing all of our QB's "wins" in an effort to prop him up.

Can't have it both ways.

I dont.

BigMeatballDave 06-23-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 11562686)
Those same people who don't think Wilson is worth two 1st don't seem to mind referencing all of our QB's "wins" in an effort to prop him up.

Can't have it both ways.

You won't hear that from me. My argument is Wilson vs elite QBs. Wilson is not elite, no matter how much you want him to be.

OnTheWarpath15 06-23-2015 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11562692)
You won't hear that from me. My argument is Wilson vs elite QBs. Wilson is not elite, no matter how much you want him to be.

A lot of this argument is people digging their heels in against Hootie, but some of it comes from the differences in how people view "elite" or "franchise" QB's.

Personally, when I think of elite I'm thinking of a guy that can carry his team when needed, make the clutch play when needed and makes his teammates better.

If Wilson isn't elite, he's as close as you can get without being elite. If I had to pick one QB to win a game, he'd probably be damn high on the list.

I just find it hilarious that this fanbase has no problems using any stat imaginable to discredit guys like Wilson and Luck while they make ridiculous excuses for our current QB.

RunKC 06-23-2015 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11562692)
You won't hear that from me. My argument is Wilson vs elite QBs. Wilson is not elite, no matter how much you want him to be.

Same here

L.A. Chieffan 06-23-2015 01:11 PM

We have our guy. Next.

Hootie 06-23-2015 01:12 PM

I think it's hilarious that Peyton and Tony suck because they choke! Stats don't matter. Duh! But Russell sucks because stats matter, even though he generally plays his best ball in clutch moments.

Saul Good 06-23-2015 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11562681)
Team stat propping up qb play. Do not pass go

We've had plenty of teams that were stacked other than at QB. We have 0 playoff wins to show for it. Wilson has 6.

The Chiefs have 8 postseason wins, 2 conference championships, and 1 Superbowl championship in our history (going back to the merger 49 years ago).

Russell Wilson has 6 postseason wins, 2 conference championships, and 1 Superbowl win in his 3 year career.

Hootie 06-23-2015 01:15 PM

Guys!

The only way to win in the NFL is to have a franchise QB!

/ChiefsPlanet the past 10 years

...unless you're Seattle

Saul Good 06-23-2015 01:17 PM

You don't want to miss out on the next Trezelle Jenkins and Glen Dorsey in order to get Russell Wilson. Too high a price...

Mother****erJones 06-23-2015 01:18 PM

Threw 4 INTs and they still came back and won.

Saul Good 06-23-2015 01:19 PM

You can go back to 1998, and I'll give you any 5 of our first round picks for Wilson.

OnTheWarpath15 06-23-2015 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11562717)
You don't want to miss out on the next Trezelle Jenkins and Glen Dorsey in order to get Russell Wilson. Too high a price...

Way too high a price.

I'd much rather have an OT that can't block, or a OLB that runs from ball carriers.

You can pool all of Dorsey's picks, and I can't think of a combo I wouldn't trade for Wilson. I can't think of a group of 4-5 I wouldn't trade for Luck.

Most important position on the field, and we're bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Hootie 06-23-2015 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 11562717)
You don't want to miss out on the next Trezelle Jenkins and Glen Dorsey in order to get Russell Wilson. Too high a price...

but let's assume we're talking about 2 HOF 1st rounders ...

would you really not trade Tony Gonzalez and Derrick Thomas for Russell Wilson? I'm sorry, but I would. I'm sure you would, too.

Amnorix 06-23-2015 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 11562585)
New England / Seattle play on a neutral field 10 times and NE wins 8 of them. No doubt. Russell getting that game to 14-14 at half was HUGE, and totally changed the game. Then, before you knew it, he had two more great drives and it was 24-14.


I kind of like how you give Russell full credit for getting the game to 14-14 at halftime based on very aggressive playcalling, but then lay all blame on Carroll and the offensive coordinator (whoever he is, is that Quinn?) for the bad playcall at the end, and in so doing completely exonerate Russell for throwing the actual ball right to the Patriots player.

I haven't said that Wilson made a horrible play there, because it's a pretty tough one either way, but you CANNOT credit Wilson for the tie at the end of the first half, and then exonerate him for the pick at the end.

The same aggressive play-calling is what resulted in both plays, the good at the end of the first half and the bad at the end of the game.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.