ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.**** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=255691)

DeezNutz 06-01-2012 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 8652685)
Still not sure why most SEC schools would want to have the tournament in KC. Especially seeing that the schools that would have to travel the farthest are some of the ones with the most pull.

Overall, I agree. I think the tournament will get into STL at some point.

qabbaan 06-01-2012 03:33 PM

It would have been interesting to see the Big 12 tourney this year if Missouri had left last year. With KU crashing out early, the final would have been played before a mostly empty arena.

ChiefsCountry 06-01-2012 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8652692)
Overall, I agree. I think the tournament will get into STL at some point.

MVC, Big 12 and SEC tournaments all in Missouri would be a gold mine for the state. Hope they get it done.

Looking at the numbers, Missouri would host 3 of the top 8 conference basketball tournaments in attendance if they can the get the SEC to come in.

Messier 06-01-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qabbaan (Post 8652699)
It would have been interesting to see the Big 12 tourney this year if Missouri had left last year. With KU crashing out early, the final would have been played before a mostly empty arena.

I guess it'd be like the SEC with any other school besides MU and UK.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-01-2012 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652503)
Sounds like a stand on principle over money.

Bahaha

mnchiefsguy 06-01-2012 04:50 PM

If the Big XII decides to play in Dallas in 2017, it has exercised its right of first refusal, by refusing to play its tourney in KC in 2017. At that point, Sprint Center would be free to obtain another event for that weekend.

Do you think AEG and Sprint would enter into a deal that would allow an entity to be able to leave Sprint Center empty? Does AEG like setting money on fire?

Pasta Little Brioni 06-01-2012 05:15 PM

It's up to the Texahoma liege lords. They'll call the banners and tell em where it'll be and that's that.

Bambi 06-01-2012 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8652821)
It's up to the Texahoma liege lords. They'll call the banners and tell em where it'll be and that's that.

Kinda like lord Auburbama shoved Mizzou into the east and took their Texas A&M game away knocking down their Texas recruiting advantage.

Sucks.

Saul Good 06-01-2012 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652838)
Kinda like lord Auburbama shoved Mizzou into the east and took their Texas A&M game away knocking down their Texas recruiting advantage.

Sucks.

Sure sucks not being in the division with LSU or Alabama.

Bambi 06-01-2012 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8652848)
Sure sucks not being in the division with LSU or Alabama.

I can't believe MU would take it from Auburbama like this.

I thought they were the tough guy school.

Guess I was wrong.

Al Bundy 06-01-2012 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652838)
Kinda like lord Auburbama shoved Mizzou into the east and took their Texas A&M game away knocking down their Texas recruiting advantage.

Sucks.

You sure are full of fail.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-01-2012 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652865)
I'm a troll. I fling poo. It's what I gotta do!!

FYP

Bambi 06-01-2012 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8652878)
FYP

Big 12 North schools desire Big 12 Tourney be in KC. Big 12 signs deal to play tourney in KC.

Texas is an OVERLORD!

I'd double check who be troll'n my man.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-01-2012 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652908)
Big 12 North schools desire Big 12 Tourney be in KC. Big 12 signs deal to play tourney in KC.

Texas is an OVERLORD!

I'd double check who be troll'n my man.

I stole it from one of your fellow Beakers ROFL

|Zach| 06-01-2012 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8652865)
I can't believe MU would take it from Auburbama like this.

I thought they were the tough guy school.

Guess I was wrong.

You are always wrong. Always.

Reaper16 06-01-2012 09:37 PM

Lord Auburbama? Auburn ain't shit. Lord Alabama, however, pretty much is behind Missouri going to the East, as they didn't want to sacrifice their cross-division game with Tennessee. I say sacrifice because MU to the SEC West would have meant that Auburn would move to the East. Auburn WANTED to move to the East, Wickedson, you ****ing imbecile. They didn't get what they want because they're just Auburn.

Al Bundy 06-01-2012 09:40 PM

As an outsider, KU should be thanking their lucky stars that the Pac-12 told Texas and Oklahoma no, KU would be on the outside looking in because of football. KU would never move to the SEC, they would always finish behind UK in everything.

Messier 06-01-2012 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 8653461)
As an outsider, KU should be thanking their lucky stars that the Pac-12 told Texas and Oklahoma no, KU would be on the outside looking in because of football. KU would never move to the SEC, they would always finish behind UK in everything.

As a KU fan, I am thankful.

KcMizzou 06-01-2012 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 8653461)
As an outsider, KU should be thanking their lucky stars that the Pac-12 told Texas and Oklahoma no, KU would be on the outside looking in because of football. KU would never move to the SEC, they would always finish behind UK in everything.

The SEC would never consider adding KU in the first place.

But honestly, it looks like the Big 12 is going to survive and thrive. I'm happy for 'em. Shit looked sketchy there for a while.

Messier 06-01-2012 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 8653566)
The SEC would never consider adding KU in the first place.

But honestly, it looks like the Big 12 is going to survive and thrive. I'm happy for 'em. Shit looked sketchy there for a while.

No, they wouldn't, it wouldn't have made sense, but things are good now.

mnchiefsguy 06-02-2012 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8653450)
Lord Auburbama? Auburn ain't shit. Lord Alabama, however, pretty much is behind Missouri going to the East, as they didn't want to sacrifice their cross-division game with Tennessee. I say sacrifice because MU to the SEC West would have meant that Auburn would move to the East. Auburn WANTED to move to the East, Wickedson, you ****ing imbecile. They didn't get what they want because they're just Auburn.

Alabama wanted to insure that they play both Auburn and TN. Their pushing for MU to be in the East had more to do with screwing Auburn, and really had nothing to do with Mizzou at all. It probably did not matter to Alabama if it was A & M or Mizzou in the East, as long they kept Auburn from going. That was the important factor.

Bambi 06-02-2012 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer| (Post 8653027)
You are always wrong. Always.

I was told that about the whole rights of refusal and well...we all saw how that turned out.

Pasta Little Brioni 06-02-2012 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 8653461)
As an outsider, KU should be thanking their lucky stars that the Pac-12 told Texas and Oklahoma no, KU would be on the outside looking in because of football. KU would never move to the SEC, they would always finish behind UK in everything.

They would have made a nice addition to the Missouri Valley though.

Bambi 06-02-2012 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8653815)
They would have made a nice addition to the Missouri Valley though.

Any BCS winning football program would be a fine addition to the missouri valley conference. All the Final Fours would just be gravy.

Bambi 06-02-2012 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8653450)
Lord Auburbama? Auburn ain't shit. Lord Alabama, however, pretty much is behind Missouri going to the East, as they didn't want to sacrifice their cross-division game with Tennessee. I say sacrifice because MU to the SEC West would have meant that Auburn would move to the East. Auburn WANTED to move to the East, Wickedson, you ****ing imbecile. They didn't get what they want because they're just Auburn.

So Alabama running the S.E.C. Is just the way it is and Texas running the Big 12 is them being an overlord.

Got it.

HolyHandgernade 06-02-2012 10:00 AM

Bag 'o Rumors here! Got your Big Bag 'o Rumors here! From the West Virginia Board:

Quote:

First off, just repeating what I was told here. I was given permission to post this. I'm not saying this is a done deal or anything like that. This comes from ACC country with connections to both the NCST and GT Athletic Departments. From what I can tell, legit connections. I'm just passing this along for discussion purposely only, not claiming this is happening.

Word out of GT is that it's "common knowledge" (their choice of word) in some high ACC circles that FSU and Clemson are leaving for the Big 12. They used the word "lock". This is apparently also known in the NCST AD. GT is currently talking to both the Big 12 and B1G, and their fate, I was told, rests with Notre Dame. I was told that Notre Dame has "shot down" (again, their choice of words) the B1G and isn't going to the ACC. So apparently it's the Big 12. Notre Dame, so I was told, wants to work it out with NBC so they can join the Big 12 sooner than 2015. The thinking is that way they (ND) could join the Big 12 next year (that what I was told; I'm assuming Olympic sports at first, but didn't get that confirmed) and use the NBC contract for their Tier 3 part of the TV contracts.

So the perceived "delays" (as we see them) in regards to moving on FSU and Clemson are because ND is exploring some options with NBC regarding their current deal and what can be done, or so I was told.

Regarding NCST. they are talking with the SEC along with VT, which we pretty much figured. I was given nothing about possible UNC talks in relation to the SEC, only that NCST is actively talking with them. This information comes (supposedly) from an NCST AD employee who didn't believe all the realignment talk and when he looked into it, found out it was all real.

I say again, I make not claims on any of this information. The folks I have spoken with have every appearance of being legit, so I have no reason to just dismiss this information out of hand. I don't necessarily believe it (anything with ND is hard to believe), but let's discuss the possibilities here and agree that no one believes this and that I get no internet fame points for posting this. Again, I was given permission to post this from the folks who contacted me.

It could all be garbage or it could be gold. I'm not making any judgment nor asking anyone else to believe or disbelieve it. It's just another bit of information, coming from other places that seems to tie into some other things we've heard/seen/posted.

But there is an awful lot of smoke to the Notre Dame fire. I honestly believe if they go anywhere, it will be the Big 12.

But that's what I have. As usual, I won't divulge who I got it from, but it was a complete surprise to me and leads me to believe we have a lot of prying eyes here on this board. Let's just say that Higher Education is a funny place sometimes.
and...

Quote:

Okay, here's everything I have been told from four separate and reliable sources. Information is current up to about 8:30 am this morning. This will be my final word on this round of expansion until it actually comes to pass and FSU and Clemson are welcomed to the growing Big 12 family. I'm taking a break, because as was pointed out by a poster here, I'm starting to lose it a bit, and frankly talking about this all the time is starting to wear on me. Bolded points have been given to me by all four sources I regularly speak with within the past few days/weeks (all unconnected to one another)

FSU and Clemson are playing Big 12 football in 2013
Representatives (not necessarily "employees") of both FSU and Clemson were present at the meetings yesterday, both via video conference. (two sources; was told that others have heard about Clemson as well)
I was told that anything official that comes out of the Big 12 meetings will be misinformation and misdirection. (two sources)
A lot of talk yesterday about divisional alignments.FSU is keen on a "North/South" setup, with them sharing a division with Clemson and the Texas schools. OU, OSU, KU, KSU, ISU, and WVU prefer an "East/West" setup, because it easily allows for future expansion in the South, Atlantic, and Midwest. (one source)
The only way the Big 12 goes to 14-16 at this time is with Notre Dame. There is no disagreement on who 11 and 12 are. Texas is very adamant about not moving beyond 12 without Notre Dame. (three sources)
We are siding with the SEC in regards to the BCS playoff "debate" (three sources).
Big 4 conferences are within "a few years" of breaking away entirely from the NCAA (two sources).
Everything coming out of Dodds mouth is intentional. He's leading the misinformation, because he's the clear lightning rod. No one (especially in a court of law cool) could possibly think that the Big 12 has any desire to be proactive in terms of expansion after hearing him talk. MHVer3 once posted "Let them come to us". There is a lot of truth in that (and not only for #13 and beyond)... (two sources)
Leaks will begin to emerge from both FSU and Clemson sometime after the Big 12 meetings (could be weeks, though). They will both take the lead in this, and the Big 12 will "be very happy" that they have "become available". (three sources)
Look for things to really break and invitations to be issued sometime after June 15. I've been told July is most likely for this to go down.
Georgia Tech was told "Thanks, but not right now". (one source)
Miami called shortly before their statement of support for the ACC and was told they weren't a candidate. Despite what has been reported, they did come around and wanted to explore options.
The 13-year GOR (with the signing of the new TV contract) is one of the things that appealed most to FSU in regards to Big 12 membership (three sources)
The TV contract may actually drag on a bit more, deeper into the summer. Depends on expansion, i.e. NOTRE DAME. (two sources)
All signs point to $24-$26 million per team with FSU/Clemson and a Big 12 CCG in the mix. This doesn't include the Champions Bowl payouts.
The ACC is looking at ways to complicate things when it starts to go down with FSU/Clemson, and generally be pricks to everyone. They are deceitful, tricky bastards. (paraphrased from two sources)
Expect the ACC to make one last full push to land Notre Dame. (two sources)
Options are being explored in regards to the CCG (as in having it or not), but no one really believes there won't be one. Too much money to not have one.
BYU & Best Kentucky are out of contention; Best Kentucky just doesn't bring enough revenue and BYU won't play on Sundays (if they would play on Sunday, they would've already been in)
When Clemson and FSU join, TCU and WVU will move to full shares



That's everything I've been told. It's not collected from others posts here, although much of it matches up with what others have posted. I've been told this stuff from four different, unconnected "sources" both inside and outside of WV. I'm not saying it's true, certain, or a "done deal", it's just what I've been told.

I'm not going to defend any of this. I'm not going to post any clarifications or addendums. This is everything I've got from people I trust. In the interest of full disclosure, I do talk with MHVer3 via PMs here. He has connections, I'm 100% certain of it. It's up to each of you how much credibility to give it. If you don't believe any of this, nobody cares. If you believe every word of it, nobody cares. Just don't make this thread a freaking joke. I'm guilty of that enough on my own!

I'm not leaving, I'm not upset, and this isn't some good-bye post. I just wanted to lay out everything I know and be done with it. The next few weeks are going to be interesting (and probably pretty quiet), and things are going to get really stupid on here. I only know what I posted above.

Take all of this with a grain of salt, but it's everything I've got. The war chest is empty.

I won't talk expansion again until we're discussing who ND would want to add @ #14 in football.

Reaper16 06-02-2012 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8653863)
So Alabama running the S.E.C. Is just the way it is and Texas running the Big 12 is them being an overlord.

Got it.

Alabama has all the clout they could ever hope for, but the difference is that they believe as in institution in the fairness of the SEC as a whole. Alabama could act like Texas and warp everything to their will, but instead there's a true institutional culture in the SEC of "what's good for everyone is good for us."

mnchiefsguy 06-02-2012 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8653812)
I was told that about the whole rights of refusal and well...we all saw how that turned out.

Yeah, you looked like a complete idiot as you usually do.

ArrowheadHawk 06-02-2012 04:59 PM

So I guess we wait till July now.

Sassy Squatch 06-02-2012 05:57 PM

Theres going to be so much shit thrown on the wall its not even funny.

BryanBusby 06-02-2012 06:12 PM

The couch burners aren't even trying anymore by this point.

Bambi 06-02-2012 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8654374)
Yeah, you looked like a complete idiot as you usually do.

How was I wrong?

Mr. Plow 06-05-2012 11:49 AM

Some of you may find this humorous.....


http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17m1...g/original.jpg



http://deadspin.com/5908758/mike-lea...kers-reference

big nasty kcnut 06-05-2012 11:51 AM

lol nice!

Saul Good 06-05-2012 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8660142)

Where did that originate?

Setsuna 06-05-2012 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8653978)
Alabama has all the clout they could ever hope for, but the difference is that they believe as in institution in the fairness of the SEC as a whole. Alabama could act like Texas and warp everything to their will, but instead there's a true institutional culture in the SEC of "what's good for everyone is good for us."

Wrong. Bama is corrupt as shit. They prevented Auburn from coming to the East because they wanted to keep that Iron Bowl shit. Auburn was in the East to begin with, but nooo. **** that man.

Saul Good 06-05-2012 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8660142)

Seeing Mike Leach referencing Craig James killing hookers makes me like Leach more. Actually, it makes me like Craig James more, too.

Let's face it; killing hookers is pretty great.

Reaper16 06-05-2012 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8660204)
Wrong. Bama is corrupt as shit. They prevented Auburn from coming to the East because they wanted to keep that Iron Bowl shit. Auburn was in the East to begin with, but nooo. **** that man.

I already said that Bama used their pull to keep Auburn in the East (so as to preserve both the Iron Bowl and the Third Saturday in October). I'm not sure that's evidence of corruption or a significant abuse of power. And you're incorrect about Auburn beginning in the East; the SEC has only had divisions since the '91 expansion that brought in Arkansas and South Carolina, and Auburn was placed in the West division from the start.

ArrowheadHawk 06-05-2012 12:32 PM

https://p.twimg.com/AupUZFrCIAAcmWM.jpg:large

Saul Good 06-05-2012 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 8660231)

Any truth to the rumor that the Cavaliers have put up billboards all over the state saying "This Is West VIRGINIA" in an awkward attempt to win the favor of the locals?

Pasta Little Brioni 06-05-2012 12:41 PM

Being good little bannermen already I see. I assume the fanbase has pledged fealty at the Shaggy Bevo forums.

Bambi 06-05-2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8660239)
Any truth to the rumor that the Cavaliers have put up billboards all over the state saying "This Is West VIRGINIA" in an awkward attempt to win the favor of the locals?

What's awkward about it?

It worked.

Bambi 06-05-2012 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 8660231)

nice. Can't wait to see what Geno and his boys bring to the league.

Actually planning on heading to Morgantown for the KU visit December 1.

This expansion does have some benefits for us east coast Hawks after all. :clap:

Saul Good 06-05-2012 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660342)
nice. Can't wait to see what Geno and his boys bring to the league.

Actually planning on heading to Morgantown for the KU visit December 1.

This expansion does have some benefits for us east coast Hawks after all. :clap:

Are you driving or flying? It's a 13 hour round trip from New Jersey to Morgantown.

Bambi 06-05-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8660411)
Are you driving or flying? It's a 13 hour round trip from New Jersey to Morgantown.

More like 6 1/2. Less than Kansas City to pretty much anywhere in the SEC not counting Fayetteville.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou...66AGrxI0m&pw=2

Saulbadguy 06-05-2012 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660585)
More like 6 1/2. Less than Kansas City to pretty much anywhere in the SEC not counting Fayetteville.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou...66AGrxI0m&pw=2

heh

Saul Good 06-05-2012 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660585)
More like 6 1/2. Less than Kansas City to pretty much anywhere in the SEC not counting Fayetteville.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou...66AGrxI0m&pw=2

I'm comforted to know that your amazing ability to post links proving me right and yourself wrong extends beyond sports.

Frazod 06-05-2012 04:12 PM

I guess Wickeddumb thinks a round trip is running around in circles in his living room. ROFL

Saul Good 06-05-2012 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 8660642)
I guess Wickeddumb thinks a round trip is running around in circles in his living room. ROFL

13 hour round trip? Ha! More like six and a half hours each way, idiot.

Frazod 06-05-2012 04:22 PM

http://www.jonathanrosenbaum.com/wp-...mp-feather.jpg

|Zach| 06-05-2012 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660585)
More like 6 1/2. Less than Kansas City to pretty much anywhere in the SEC not counting Fayetteville.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou...66AGrxI0m&pw=2

You are always wrong. Always.

ghak99 06-05-2012 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660585)
More like 6 1/2. Less than Kansas City to pretty much anywhere in the SEC not counting Fayetteville.

https://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sou...66AGrxI0m&pw=2

ROFL

DeezNutz 06-05-2012 04:32 PM

Hate. Venus.

Bambi 06-05-2012 04:49 PM

Driving 13 hours "round trip" doesn't bother me at all.

That's one way for your SEC trips.

Like I said. Some nice benefits for us East Coasters. Can't wait

Bambi 06-05-2012 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer| (Post 8660684)
You are always wrong. Always.

I grant you rights of first refusal for your statement.

Saul Good 06-05-2012 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8660716)
I grant you rights of first refusal for your statement.

Your original statement was that the Big XII had the right of refusal for games at the Sprint Center. Reality is that they have an option to extend their contract.

Sully 06-05-2012 07:51 PM

"You dumb bastard! That's not a schooner, it's a sailboat!"

Setsuna 06-05-2012 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8660221)
I already said that Bama used their pull to keep Auburn in the East (so as to preserve both the Iron Bowl and the Third Saturday in October). I'm not sure that's evidence of corruption or a significant abuse of power. And you're incorrect about Auburn beginning in the East; the SEC has only had divisions since the '91 expansion that brought in Arkansas and South Carolina, and Auburn was placed in the West division from the start.

No my friend. No, you are 100% wrong. Auburn was in the East. Don't even try to start that bullshit with me. You'll lose every time.

Bambi 06-05-2012 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8660734)
Your original statement was that the Big XII had the right of refusal for games at the Sprint Center. Reality is that they have an option to extend their contract.

Yea nice try dude. Its not me saying Kansas City wants nothing to do with MU-Columbia.

Kansas City is saying it.

Saul Good 06-05-2012 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8661535)
Yea nice try dude. Its not me saying Kansas City wants nothing to do with MU-Columbia.

Kansas City is saying it.

MU tried to sign a deal with the Sprint Center? Link?

I thought the Big XII had been playing their tournament in the Sprint Center, extended the contract, and have a contractual option to extend it further.

One of us is wrong here. Given that you are wrong more than any poster I've ever encountered, I like my chances.

Bambi 06-05-2012 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 8661549)
MU tried to sign a deal with the Sprint Center? Link?

I thought the Big XII had been playing their tournament in the Sprint Center, extended the contract, and have a contractual option to extend it further.

One of us is wrong here. Given that you are wrong more than any poster I've ever encountered, I like my chances.

You can take your hypotheticals.

I'll take championships and a city that loves my school.

Better warm up the car.

I hear Gainesville is a 13 hour drive.






















...One way

Al Bundy 06-05-2012 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8661558)
You can take your hypotheticals.

I'll take championships and a city that loves my school.

Better warm up the car.

I hear Gainesville is a 13 hour drive.






















...One way

Yep.. Lawrence loves your school.

ArrowheadHawk 06-05-2012 09:48 PM

So about this realignment stuff.....

Reaper16 06-05-2012 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8661529)
No my friend. No, you are 100% wrong. Auburn was in the East. Don't even try to start that bullshit with me. You'll lose every time.

When did they switch to the West?

eazyb81 06-06-2012 08:49 AM

I hope our SEC and Big 12 brothers can lay our swords down briefly to point and laugh at Nebraska, who received only $14 million in TV revenue from the Big Ten last year (everyone else in the conference got $24 million).

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/...llion-to-teams

Oh yeah, and they agreed to this junior payout until 2017, so schools like Iowa State and Mississippi State will earn SUBSTANTIALLY more than them for the foreseeable future.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! What bitches for taking such a desperate deal.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2012 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna (Post 8661529)
No my friend. No, you are 100% wrong. Auburn was in the East. Don't even try to start that bullshit with me. You'll lose every time.

Auburn has been in the SEC West since the SEC split into two divisions. What are you talking about?

It WANTED to join the East (for recruiting advantages), but that didn't happen.

Setsuna 06-06-2012 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 8661679)
When did they switch to the West?

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 8662244)
Auburn has been in the SEC West since the SEC split into two divisions. What are you talking about?

It WANTED to join the East (for recruiting advantages), but that didn't happen.

I'm always right! Rawwwwwr! 4321

Pasta Little Brioni 06-06-2012 09:36 AM

More whack-a-troll on Stalkerson. I like it.

mnchiefsguy 06-06-2012 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 8662332)
More whack-a-troll on Stalkerson. I like it.

Hypocritson is in fine form today.

Somehow he has translated the fact that the Big XII has decided to play its bball tourney in KC as meaning that KC has somehow rejected Mizzou. Mizzou could call tomorrow and schedule a game at an available date at Sprint.

Somehow, according to Hypocritson, KC making money=rejection of MU.

Go figure.

Mr. Plow 06-06-2012 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8662533)
Hypocritson is in fine form today.

Somehow he has translated the fact that the Big XII has decided to play its bball tourney in KC as meaning that KC has somehow rejected Mizzou. Mizzou could call tomorrow and schedule a game at an available date at Sprint.

Somehow, according to Hypocritson, KC making money=rejection of MU.

Go figure.

I'm not defending Wickedson, but wasn't the talk about the SEC Bball tourney, not just a random game?

Bambi 06-06-2012 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 8662556)
I'm not defending Wickedson, but wasn't the talk about the SEC Bball tourney, not just a random game?

Yep.

Bambi 06-06-2012 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8662533)
Hypocritson is in fine form today.

Somehow he has translated the fact that the Big XII has decided to play its bball tourney in KC as meaning that KC has somehow rejected Mizzou. Mizzou could call tomorrow and schedule a game at an available date at Sprint.

Somehow, according to Hypocritson, KC making money=rejection of MU.

Go figure.

Sprint Center granted the Big 12 the right of refusal for the conference tourney. I suppose the S.E.C. Could change the weekend they play their conf tourney and then they could petition Kansas City to play the tourney here.

But I don't think anyone sees that happening.

duncan_idaho 06-06-2012 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 8662596)
Sprint Center granted the Big 12 the right of refusal for the conference tourney. I suppose the S.E.C. Could change the weekend they play their conf tourney and then they could petition Kansas City to play the tourney here.

But I don't think anyone sees that happening.

You realize the difference between right of first refusal and right of refusal, right?

If the Big 12 has two options years at the end of its contract with the Sprint Center for the Big 12 tourney. It has first rights to that weekend.

If the Big 12 chooses to play those tourneys in Dallas or OKC, it loses that right of refusal. Pretty basic scheduling concept.

SEC tourney much more likely to be in St. Louis in those years, anyway. But I'd be fine with my state hosting basketball tournaments on both sides of the state the same weekend. More money for us.

Bambi 06-06-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 8662674)
You realize the difference between right of first refusal and right of refusal, right?

If the Big 12 has two options years at the end of its contract with the Sprint Center for the Big 12 tourney. It has first rights to that weekend.

If the Big 12 chooses to play those tourneys in Dallas or OKC, it loses that right of refusal. Pretty basic scheduling concept.

SEC tourney much more likely to be in St. Louis in those years, anyway. But I'd be fine with my state hosting basketball tournaments on both sides of the state the same weekend. More money for us.

Exactly.

Saul Good 06-06-2012 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 8662533)
Hypocritson is in fine form today.

Somehow he has translated the fact that the Big XII has decided to play its bball tourney in KC as meaning that KC has somehow rejected Mizzou. Mizzou could call tomorrow and schedule a game at an available date at Sprint.

Somehow, according to Hypocritson, KC making money=rejection of MU.

Go figure.

Kansas City hates KU as evidenced by the fact that I have first right of refusal to eat the sandwich I just bought.

Pitt Gorilla 06-06-2012 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8662238)
I hope our SEC and Big 12 brothers can lay our swords down briefly to point and laugh at Nebraska, who received only $14 million in TV revenue from the Big Ten last year (everyone else in the conference got $24 million).

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/...llion-to-teams

Oh yeah, and they agreed to this junior payout until 2017, so schools like Iowa State and Mississippi State will earn SUBSTANTIALLY more than them for the foreseeable future.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! What bitches for taking such a desperate deal.

The junior membership is why Missouri balked at the Big 10 offer.

Mr. Plow 06-06-2012 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 8662726)
The junior membership is why Missouri balked at the Big 10 offer.


I'm probably remembering this incorrectly, but I didn't think MU had an offer from the Big 10.

Titty Meat 06-06-2012 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 8662726)
The junior membership is why Missouri balked at the Big 10 offer.

Link?

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Titty Meat 06-06-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 8662238)
I hope our SEC and Big 12 brothers can lay our swords down briefly to point and laugh at Nebraska, who received only $14 million in TV revenue from the Big Ten last year (everyone else in the conference got $24 million).

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/...llion-to-teams

Oh yeah, and they agreed to this junior payout until 2017, so schools like Iowa State and Mississippi State will earn SUBSTANTIALLY more than them for the foreseeable future.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! What bitches for taking such a desperate deal.

Desperate attempt at an insult. Can you tell me how this has had any affect?

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Bambi 06-06-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 8662726)
The junior membership is why Missouri balked at the Big 10 offer.

nice. I like posts such as this.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.