ChiefsPlanet
Page 43 of 50 « First 3339404142 43 44454647 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs listing McCluster as a WR (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227117)

Titty Meat 04-24-2010 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708436)
Is not the ****er we drafted also a project?
The guy we drafted sucks. He was a highly touted player coming out of high school though.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2010 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6708430)
you loved Campbell, and you loved Clausen!

I was with you on Clausen...

but apparently you (and probably me too) don't know shit!

you took the 48th pick at #1 and took another guy in the 1st round who has yet to be drafted through 3 rounds...

you took Gholston over Matt Ryan...

dude...

come on

you don't know SHIT and it is EVIDENCED on this site every year...

so shut the **** up for once! :LOL:
Must be why that list of players I drafted in 2009 had over a half dozen guys that went multiple rounds ahead of where I took them in the mock.

Again, all you have is Gholston. You say it over and over again.

Keep tapping your heels together and wishing that I was even as infinitesimally stupid as you.

It ain't gonna happen.

And Clausen will be the best QB from this class.

KC kid 04-24-2010 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708436)
Is not the ****er we drafted also a project?
Statwise, yes. Scouts tell you otherwise though. Ferentz said he was better than dallas clark in college. I like that pick, and I HATE tight ends. KC has overrated that position for years.

KC kid 04-24-2010 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708439)
Must be why that list of players I drafted in 2009 had over a half dozen guys that went multiple rounds ahead of where I took them in the mock.

Again, all you have is Gholston. You say it over and over again.

Keep tapping your heels together and wishing that I was even as infinitesimally stupid as you.

It ain't gonna happen.

And Clausen will be the best QB from this class.
I agree with you on Clausen. Gholston was a huge blunder though. We got Dorsey though LOL. Year three is my make or break year for d linemen actually. Lets hope dorsey steps it up

Miles 04-24-2010 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708420)
But maybe they did. That was kind of my point.

Hamas says Chocolate Welker isn't a gamebreaker.

Certainly Welker himself is no gamebreaker.
Chocolate Welker is easily more of a gamebreaker but who knows if he has the ability to adapt to that and become the polished WR that Welker is. Mostly I remember him ripping up LSU last year.

Hootie 04-24-2010 02:45 AM
I have zero doubt Clausen will be a great QB...congrats to him for finding the perfect situation...

If Aaron Rodgers went the the 49ers he would have been a bust.

KC kid 04-24-2010 02:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6708443)
Chocolate Welker is easily more of a gamebreaker but who knows if he has the ability to adapt to that and become the polished WR that Welker is. Mostly I remember him ripping up LSU last year.
He ran all over Dan Williams and Eric Berry too, but that does not translate to the NFL. :)

I am just kidding. As a rb, he is worthless. He has to be a slot receiver and dual threat to be a true game changer.

Hammock Parties 04-24-2010 02:46 AM
Welker scored eight punt return TDs in college. Gamebreaker.

In the pros...0.

Titty Meat 04-24-2010 02:46 AM
The Welker/McCluster comparison is silly.

chiefzilla1501 04-24-2010 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708436)
Is not the ****er we drafted also a project?
No. Just an injury liability. He's a good blocker. We at least have that. And frankly, I think Weis values versatility in his tight ends.

KC kid 04-24-2010 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6708448)
The Welker/McCluster comparison is silly.
I am just glad he is not white and we are comparing him to welker.

I remember when the patriots gave up a 2nd? for Welker. I thought they were so dumb.

Hammock Parties 04-24-2010 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by billay (Post 6708448)
The Welker/McCluster comparison is silly.
And yet that is what he needs to be.

Miles 04-24-2010 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC kid (Post 6708446)
He ran all over Dan Williams and Eric Berry too, but that does not translate to the NFL. :)

I am just kidding. As a rb, he is worthless. He has to be a slot receiver and dual threat to be a true game changer.
Yep. Still he could do so damage with the occasional snap at RB.

Titty Meat 04-24-2010 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708451)
And yet that is what he needs to be.
Whys he got to be Welker? Why can't he be a mix of Jackson/Harvin?

KC kid 04-24-2010 02:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6708451)
And yet that is what he needs to be.
Why? he can be something better or different and still be fantastic.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:21 AM.
Page 43 of 50 « First 3339404142 43 44454647 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.