ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270480)

jd1020 09-15-2013 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9980738)
It's funny how the bar is being raised for Smith. First, it was he's Cassel 2.0, now it's he sucks because isn't a top 10 QB in the league.

No doubt SF and GB with Rodgers and Kaep, respectively, have a much better chance of winning the SB than the Chiefs, but exactly, WTF were we supposed to do? Draft Geno Smith 1.1?

How does one go about getting a QB like Rodgers or Kaepernick? Does it begin with taking a chance on a kid coming out of college?

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9980738)
It's funny how the bar is being raised for Smith. First, it was he's Cassel 2.0, now it's he sucks because isn't a top 10 QB in the league.

No.

I still believe he is below average, and roughly in the same stratosphere as Cassel.

I am for damn sure positive the end result is the same: tears.

I know that 14 points is a lot of points, though.

Iconic 09-15-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9980746)
How does one go about getting a QB like Rodgers or Kaepernick? Does it begin with taking a chance on a kid coming out of college?

Keyword being College and not the 49ers recycling bin.

Deberg_1990 09-15-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9980746)
How does one go about getting a QB like Rodgers or Kaepernick?

Funny you mention these two QB. You said a few posts back that Smith would keep us drafting in the 15-20 range. Rodgers was drafted 20th, and Kaep in the 2nd round.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-15-2013 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9980738)
It's funny how the bar is being raised for Smith. First, it was he's Cassel 2.0, now it's he sucks because isn't a top 10 QB in the league.

No doubt SF and GB with Rodgers and Kaep, respectively, have a much better chance of winning the SB than the Chiefs, but exactly, WTF were we supposed to do? Draft Geno Smith 1.1?

Im fine with no Geno Smith for now. Bray is nice, and drafting a first round QB would be lovely as well. Let Alex Smith do his thing, say thank you, and let him be on his way.

jd1020 09-15-2013 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 9980756)
Funny you mention these two QB. You said a few posts back that Smith would keep us drafting in the 15-20 range. Rodgers was drafted 20th, and Kaep in the 2nd round.

I mentioned those QB's because those are the 2 QBs that were mentioned in the post I was responding to.

Remind me though... When did the Chiefs last draft a QB in that range?

DeezNutz 09-15-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9980728)
Who is he supposed to throw down the field to?

Avery is a midget, Bowe doesn't have top end speed, Fasano is slow, after looking good last week, I don't recall seeing Hemmingway at all. Aj Jenkins is pretty much the only deep threat, but what has he proven?

How are we defining "down the field"?

FringeNC 09-15-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980751)
No.

I still believe he is below average, and roughly in the same stratosphere as Cassel.

I am for damn sure positive the end result is the same: tears.

I know that 14 points is a lot of points, though.

Yeah, it sucks we don't have Brees, Rodgers, or Kaep. But that's ****ing life. Get over it. They weren't available.

Mav 09-15-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 9980740)
Jacksonville Jaguars and a overrated under preforming Dallas team say hi.

The Chiefs had the FIRST PICK IN THE DRAFT LAST YEAR, WON TWO GAMES ALL OF LAST YEAR.

And you can only BEAT who is on your schedule. The same dallas team, that went toe to toe with the Giants last week, and won.

Sugar coat it all you want. What they are doing, no one expected them to do.

Sure, beat the jags, but DALLAS?

No.....Check the predict the SCHEDULE THREAD.

Bearcat 09-15-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9980677)
1. It staggers me that such a large contingent of Chiefs fans are now arguably the least deserving of success.

2. It's hilarious projecting how far into the future the anti-Smiths will continue to push Armageddon. He'll never win, he'll never beat a good team, he'll lose to a good team on the road, he'll cost us in the playoffs, he's sure to botch an AFC championship game, no way he does shit in a SB, OK, 1 SB, but that's it. ROFL ROFL ROFL. Of course the first miscue will the very apex of 'I'VE BEEN TELLING YOU ALL ALONG!!! YAY ME!!!!'

You really think the past two games are enough evidence to wipe out 8 years of mediocre play? Do I even have to point out a two game stretch of any number of mediocre QBs that have played for the Chiefs in the past 4 decades?

This place is full reerun when it comes to picking sides on stuff.

Deberg_1990 09-15-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 9980767)
I mentioned those QB's because those are the 2 QBs that were mentioned in the post I was responding to.

Remind me though... When did the Chiefs last draft a QB in that range?

I don't remember? 92and 89 maybe? Blundin and Elkins?

Iconic 09-15-2013 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9980771)
How are we defining "down the field"?

In Alex Smith terms that might be anything beyond the line of scrimmage.

NinerDoug 09-15-2013 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9980677)
1. It staggers me that such a large contingent of Chiefs fans are now arguably the least deserving of success.

2. It's hilarious projecting how far into the future the anti-Smiths will continue to push Armageddon. He'll never win, he'll never beat a good team, he'll lose to a good team on the road, he'll cost us in the playoffs, he's sure to botch an AFC championship game, no way he does shit in a SB, OK, 1 SB, but that's it. ROFL ROFL ROFL. Of course the first miscue will the very apex of 'I'VE BEEN TELLING YOU ALL ALONG!!! YAY ME!!!!'

Lol. Sounds familiar.

DeezNutz 09-15-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 9980783)
In Alex Smith terms that might be anything beyond the line of scrimmage.

In terms of Smith, I'm going with "beyond 10 yards."

Mav 09-15-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980751)
No.

I still believe he is below average, and roughly in the same stratosphere as Cassel.

I am for damn sure positive the end result is the same: tears.

I know that 14 points is a lot of points, though.

the better offense, only scored 16 themselves.

And don't even say about the defense. You yourself thought until today that the Dallas defense was better than the Chiefs....

But, the Dallas defense isn't TRASH. Their front 7 is very good.

RunKC 09-15-2013 04:16 PM

Clay you said there was no way in hell Alex Smith throws 25 TD passes.

Well, he has 4 after 2 games.

SanDiego49er 09-15-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliceSmith (Post 9980635)
OMG...8-9 WINS PLAYOFFS BABY.

So you're saying Alice Smith is a good enough QB to make your team average?

Well I definitely agree with you that he's an average QB LMAO

Well how good were you last year? Well below average I think....STFU

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980514)
As are the fans. "we're winning, all is fine!"

I'm not going to dwell on it this week because I enjoyed the win too much.

But this offense is not going to be a sustainable path to playoff football. Smith is not making good presnap reads. He's also clearly afraid to place a throw to the outside receivers. He has to be able to test the edges and not just rely on guys being open out of cuts. Defenses have 8 quarters worth of reasons to stack the box and crowd the middle of the field. They will continue to blitz with impunity if Alex is incapable of burning them for it.

Smith is a better QB than Cassel by miles, but what our offense is doing is not going to be a sustainable recipe for winning.

Great post.

SanDiego49er 09-15-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JF08 (Post 9980693)
Alex Smith: 280 total yards, 2 TD's, no turnovers, and a victory.

And people are complaining.

Idiots.

I agree.

Iconic 09-15-2013 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9980792)
In terms of Smith, I'm going with "beyond 10 yards."

Meet him half way, make it 5 yards. LMAO

Bearcat 09-15-2013 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9980719)
I don't believe that Alex Smith will be the qb when and if the Chiefs win another super bowl.

I do believe however that Alex Smith will help groom that guy that eventually could get them there.

Ie, someone like Bray.....

When they picked up Smith, this was my most optimistic, yet realistic view... maybe this time, this regime has a master plan and knows Smith will only get them so far until they find a QB they really believe is the guy who can take them deep into the playoffs.

Of course, it hasn't happened in the past 4 decades... :shrug:

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-15-2013 04:19 PM

If you are ok with Alex starting for 2013/2014, that's fine. Two years of average play isn't a complete killer for his compensation. If you are ok with extending Alex for 2015 and not drafting a QB in the next two years... then **** off.

ViperVisor 09-15-2013 04:22 PM

Did I dream the penalties and non existent running backs for 55 min.

Beating yourself and no running game. You typically are not gonna score 3 TDs.

duncan_idaho 09-15-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980514)
As are the fans. "we're winning, all is fine!"

I'm not going to dwell on it this week because I enjoyed the win too much.

But this offense is not going to be a sustainable path to playoff football. Smith is not making good presnap reads. He's also clearly afraid to place a throw to the outside receivers. He has to be able to test the edges and not just rely on guys being open out of cuts. Defenses have 8 quarters worth of reasons to stack the box and crowd the middle of the field. They will continue to blitz with impunity if Alex is incapable of burning them for it.

Smith is a better QB than Cassel by miles, but what our offense is doing is not going to be a sustainable recipe for winning.

This is a brilliant post.

Remaining wary of the flaws in Alex Smith's game and the limited upside that results from those flaws is not bitching. It's just having eyes open.

I thought when they acquired Smith that he was a solid NFL starter in the 15-20 range, who could win a decent number of regular season games with a good defense and running game around him. That would need a GREAT defense and GREAT running game around him to win at a playoff level.

I have thought from the beginning that was not good enough for long-term plans, and that the price was too high. I continue to hope I'm wrong about that. I keep hoping we're going to see what Andy Reid saw that made Alex Smith his dreamboat QB. That Andy Reid can unlock that ability he sees.

Just haven't seen it. So far, Alex Smith has been exactly what detractors thought he was. It's an upgrade. It makes the team better. It puts it in position to win 8-10 games.

That's just not enough for me, long-term. It's fine as long as they're actively trying to replace Smith this offseason (unless he starts playing at a higher level than he has so far) and don't "sit" at the QB position with Smith, Daniel and Bray.

ViperVisor 09-15-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980514)
As are the fans. "we're winning, all is fine!"

I'm not going to dwell on it this week because I enjoyed the win too much.

But this offense is not going to be a sustainable path to playoff football. Smith is not making good presnap reads. He's also clearly afraid to place a throw to the outside receivers. He has to be able to test the edges and not just rely on guys being open out of cuts. Defenses have 8 quarters worth of reasons to stack the box and crowd the middle of the field. They will continue to blitz with impunity if Alex is incapable of burning them for it.

Smith is a better QB than Cassel by miles, but what our offense is doing is not going to be a sustainable recipe for winning.

http://abload.de/img/bf0gqnjcmaexwselcq0y.jpg
https://twitter.com/PFF/status/31444...531008/photo/1

Mav 09-15-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9980801)
When they picked up Smith, this was my most optimistic, yet realistic view... maybe this time, this regime has a master plan and knows Smith will only get them so far until they find a QB they really believe is the guy who can take them deep into the playoffs.

Of course, it hasn't happened in the past 4 decades... :shrug:

Now, I wont pretend to know everything about the Chiefs history. But, what I do know.

Andy Reid, and John Dorsey have traditions coming from franchises that prides itself on finding and developing qbs.

Brett Favre, Aaron Rodgers, Donovan McNabb.

It speaks a ton to the fact that they didn't overdraft a qb this year, nor extend Alex Smith. Those two moves spoke volumes to me. If Alex Smith indeed was their long term solution, he would of been extended. If even a couple of years.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9980794)
Clay you said there was no way in hell Alex Smith throws 25 TD passes.

Well, he has 4 after 2 games.

I'm thinking he gets hurt pretty soon as much as he's running.

He's not too bright.

jspchief 09-15-2013 04:26 PM

It's not just about completing a pass against the blitz. It's about making the risk bigger than the reward for the defense.

You posted a hollow statistic.

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 04:27 PM

Cool info, thanks! Happily BUMPED. :p

BigCatDaddy 09-15-2013 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 9980639)
Another madden type fan.

Yes, Madden. Where guys like Brady, Brees, Rodgers, and Manning put up those damn Fantasy type numbers. That's all they will ever be. FF QB's.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:30 PM

I mean it's great that we're winning, but the Chargers won today because their QB threw for 419 yards and 3 TD.

That's what it took. To beat the Eagles. Whom we play in 4 days.

Gives you pause, no?

FringeNC 09-15-2013 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980834)
It's not just about completing a pass against the blitz. It's about making the risk bigger than the reward for the defense.

You posted a hollow statistic.

How many of the QB pressures on Smith were blitzes vs. complete O-line breakdown?

AlexSmithDynasty 09-15-2013 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy Was Offsides (Post 9980758)
Im fine with no Geno Smith for now. Bray is nice, and drafting a first round QB would be lovely as well. Let Alex Smith do his thing, say thank you, and let him be on his way.

You guys are in for a rude awakening if you think Smith is going anywhere anytime soon. He's Reid's guy and you don't give up 2 2nd round picks for a 2 year rental. I expect to see him in KC for at least 5-7 years.

SanDiego49er 09-15-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9980794)
Clay you said there was no way in hell Alex Smith throws 25 TD passes.

Well, he has 4 after 2 games.

He can throw that many. And he probably will.

mikey23545 09-15-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9980677)
1. It staggers me that such a large contingent of Chiefs fans are now arguably the least deserving of success.

2. It's hilarious projecting how far into the future the anti-Smiths will continue to push Armageddon. He'll never win, he'll never beat a good team, he'll lose to a good team on the road, he'll cost us in the playoffs, he's sure to botch an AFC championship game, no way he does shit in a SB, OK, 1 SB, but that's it. ROFL ROFL ROFL. Of course the first miscue will the very apex of 'I'VE BEEN TELLING YOU ALL ALONG!!! YAY ME!!!!'


You would think it would take a force 4 tornado to move goalposts that much.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 09-15-2013 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexSmithDynasty (Post 9980856)
You guys are in for a rude awakening if you think Smith is going anywhere anytime soon. He's Reid's guy and you don't give up 2 2nd round picks for a 2 year rental. I expect to see him in KC for at least 5-7 years.

I have hope.

QuitWhining 09-15-2013 04:41 PM

2-0 YAY!!!

QuitWhining 09-15-2013 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980845)
I mean it's great that we're winning, but the Chargers won today because their QB threw for 419 yards and 3 TD.

That's what it took. To beat the Eagles. Whom we play in 4 days.

Gives you pause, no?

Watch Alex beat the worthless farters ROLF

KC native 09-15-2013 04:42 PM

I had flashbacks of castle today when Alex kept looking at the pass rush. Jussayin'

QuitWhining 09-15-2013 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiego49er (Post 9980861)
He can throw that many. And he probably will.

Exactly lol

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:43 PM

Alex can win and beat plenty of good teams as long as the defense plays at a high level.

I've never said otherwise.

QuitWhining 09-15-2013 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperVisor (Post 9980821)
abload.de/img/bf0gqnjcmaexwselcq0y.jpg
twitter.com/PFF/status/314443018847531008/photo/1

Pro-Bowl ROFL

QuitWhining 09-15-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980894)
Alex can win and beat plenty of good teams as long as the defense plays at a high level.

I've never said otherwise.

You have no credit cause ALL YOU DO IS WHINE ABOUT ALEX SMITH and nothing else. :LOL:

jspchief 09-15-2013 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9980852)
How many of the QB pressures on Smith were blitzes vs. complete O-line breakdown?

I don't know. I didn't keep track.

That doesn't really address the point I was trying to make anyway. Just like the pff stat doesn't.


If all this offense does is throw short and run, defenses won't be afraid to stack the box and blitz/run blitz. They will crowd the short field and leave their corners 1 on 1. It makes what the KC offense is currently doing that much harder. The defenses will be more than happy to put 9 in the box and stuff runs and pressure the QB knowing that Smith's counter is only a short pass.

Start putting some back shoulder throws on our receivers for big gains, and suddenly the safeties are forced to pick their poison. Hell, Dallas forced us to change our scheme doing just that.

And don't give me excuses about not having the receivers. You don't need Calvin Johnson with a 5 yard lead to put a scare in the defense. Testing a 1 on 1 matchup can net you a big catch, a PI, or just enough threat to make those safeties back up or slide outside.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuitWhining (Post 9980900)
You have no credit cause ALL YOU DO IS WHINE ABOUT ALEX SMITH and nothing else. :LOL:

Any fan of this franchise SHOULD whine about QB. We haven't had one in going on 10 years.

If this is the best game Alex can play I want no part of him.

SAUTO 09-15-2013 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980906)
I don't know. I didn't keep track.

That doesn't really address the point I was trying to make anyway. Just like the pff stat doesn't.


If all this offense does is throw short and run, defenses won't be afraid to stack the box and blitz/run blitz. They will crowd the short field and leave their corners 1 on 1. It makes what the KC offense is currently doing that much harder. The defenses will be more than happy to put 9 in the box and stuff runs and pressure the QB knowing that Smith's counter is only a short pass.

Start putting some back shoulder throws on our receivers for big gains, and suddenly the safeties are forced to pick their poison. Hell, Dallas forced us to change our scheme doing just that.

And don't give me excuses about not having the receivers. You don't need Calvin Johnson with a 5 yard lead to put a scare in the defense. Testing a 1 on 1 matchup can net you a big catch, a PI, or just enough threat to make those safeties back up or slide outside.

this, for sure.

Bearcat 09-15-2013 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980906)
I don't know. I didn't keep track.

That doesn't really address the point I was trying to make anyway. Just like the pff stat doesn't.


If all this offense does is throw short and run, defenses won't be afraid to stack the box and blitz/run blitz. They will crowd the short field and leave their corners 1 on 1. It makes what the KC offense is currently doing that much harder. The defenses will be more than happy to put 9 in the box and stuff runs and pressure the QB knowing that Smith's counter is only a short pass.

Start putting some back shoulder throws on our receivers for big gains, and suddenly the safeties are forced to pick their poison. Hell, Dallas forced us to change our scheme doing just that.

And don't give me excuses about not having the receivers. You don't need Calvin Johnson with a 5 yard lead to put a scare in the defense. Testing a 1 on 1 matchup can net you a big catch, a PI, or just enough threat to make those safeties back up or slide outside.

Yeah, that's the flip side to not turning it over in 2 games... it's one thing to not throw any Cassel-like picks to a wide open defender, but I'd rather see an offense that completes a some 20+ yard passes but throws a pick than see one that keeps everything under 10 yards but never throws picks.

Jakemall 09-15-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980834)
It's not just about completing a pass against the blitz. It's about making the risk bigger than the reward for the defense.

You posted a hollow statistic.

There's more there than just %

The average ypc in that situation is 12.21 yards. That's a nice chunk..and he has a 50% conversion ratio..which is better than all but RG3 on that list.

RunKC 09-15-2013 04:56 PM

I'm wondering why we aren't dialing up more downfield passes?

I'd like to see some downfield passes to Bowe. Over the shoulder or up high. He's gonna get those most of the time.

GoChargers 09-15-2013 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuitWhining (Post 9980900)
You have no credit cause ALL YOU DO IS WHINE ABOUT ALEX SMITH and nothing else. :LOL:

Obvious Monolith mult.

jspchief 09-15-2013 04:58 PM

On that subject, I hope we get a gif of that play where Charles trucks that defender. I'd like a 2nd look at the WR on that play.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9980949)
I'm wondering why we aren't dialing up more downfield passes?

Alex Smith isn't good at that kind of thing.

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:01 PM

look at the yardage, though. hitting a checkdown when your blitzed is nothing to toot your horn at. Make a team pay for blitzing. There's a reason why he's terrible on 3rd down.

ViperVisor 09-15-2013 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980978)
Alex Smith isn't good at that kind of thing.

http://i.imgur.com/ChEgfZ0.png

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980906)
I don't know. I didn't keep track.

That doesn't really address the point I was trying to make anyway. Just like the pff stat doesn't.


If all this offense does is throw short and run, defenses won't be afraid to stack the box and blitz/run blitz. They will crowd the short field and leave their corners 1 on 1. It makes what the KC offense is currently doing that much harder. The defenses will be more than happy to put 9 in the box and stuff runs and pressure the QB knowing that Smith's counter is only a short pass.

Start putting some back shoulder throws on our receivers for big gains, and suddenly the safeties are forced to pick their poison. Hell, Dallas forced us to change our scheme doing just that.

And don't give me excuses about not having the receivers. You don't need Calvin Johnson with a 5 yard lead to put a scare in the defense. Testing a 1 on 1 matchup can net you a big catch, a PI, or just enough threat to make those safeties back up or slide outside.

This!

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperVisor (Post 9981005)

31 attempts vs 17 ...which one lost his job and which won a SB?

OnTheWarpath15 09-15-2013 05:07 PM

Better to win a game ugly than to lose it pretty.

With that said, JSP is spot on. This isn't going to cut it week after week.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-15-2013 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiego49er (Post 9980522)
What's wrong with being 2 - 0? You are winning because of Alex Smith....:)

He's not hurting or helping. Non factor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 9980658)
Yeah, with enough time and film watching- maybe Alex will even figure out how to snap the ball on time as well.

:LOL:

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViperVisor (Post 9981005)

so he's 47% and the average is 31%... let's see who can connect the dots here... :p

RunKC 09-15-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9980978)
Alex Smith isn't good at that kind of thing.

Funny because he completed a great pass like that today.

BigMeatballDave 09-15-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981020)
31 attempts vs 17 ...which one lost his job and which won a SB?

Neither of them won a SB. LOL

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9981036)
Better to win a game ugly than to lose it pretty.

With that said, JSP is spot on. This isn't going to cut it week after week.

It will if we win

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:11 PM

Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 9981058)
Neither of them won a SB. LOL

He doesnt know that

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981020)
31 attempts vs 17 ...which one lost his job and which won a SB?

Neither???

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 05:12 PM

... and the great stafford chokes this game away vs Cards by throwing a dink-dunk when they needed more on 4th down... ooops.

Bearcat 09-15-2013 05:16 PM

For starters, to say Kaepernick was the best in the NFL and Smith wasn't far behind, you're comparing 31 attempts and 17 attempts to guys like Brady and Manning who had 60+ last season... so, that's going to skew it in favor of those who didn't attempt nearly as many.

And that goes back to risk/reward... Manning was 42% and had 9 TDs/5 INTs, and Smith had 3 TDs / 1 INT. If you're afraid to take that risk, you'll beat a lot of mediocre teams because you don't turnover the ball, but you won't beat the big boys.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9981057)
Funny because he completed a great pass like that today.

Yep he does it about once a game. Not enough. Was a poor throw, too.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981097)
Yep he does it about once a game. Not enough. Was a poor throw, too.

What up fraud?

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 05:20 PM

... and Eli throws up a deep one!!!! for an INT!!! ****, I hate the Broncos.

Bearcat 09-15-2013 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9981057)
Funny because he completed a great pass like that today.

LMAO

Not being good at something doesn't necessarily mean you can't ever do it.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981100)
What up fraud?

Congrats to Alex Smith for surfing on the tidal wave that is our defense. Cowabunga, dude!

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9981126)
LMAO

Not being good at something doesn't necessarily mean you can't ever do it.

Kind of like trolling Alex Smith.

Baby Lee 09-15-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981123)
... and Eli throws up a deep one!!!! for an INT!!! ****, I hate the Broncos.

150!!

JimNasium 09-15-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981097)
Yep he does it about once a game. Not enough. Was a poor throw, too.

http://hopewearsheels.files.wordpres...7/eeyore-1.gif

OnTheWarpath15 09-15-2013 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981067)
It will if we win

You're missing the point.

They won't win like this week after week, for all the reasons JSP has already laid out.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981128)
Congrats to Alex Smith for surfing on the tidal wave that is our defense. Cowabunga, dude!

LMAO like our offense was worse than Flowers.

Chiefspants 09-15-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981147)
LMAO like our offense was worse than Flowers.

The Cowboys were held to one offensive touchdown.

With the scheme we have in place, Flowers gave an acceptable performance.

O.city 09-15-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9981142)
You're missing the point.

They won't win like this week after week, for all the reasons JSP has already laid out.

Exactly.

The offense is still learning its way. Offensively it's taking time to get gelled and rolling, which we all figured it would.

It's good that were winning while that's happening, but it's eventually gonna have to get rollingo

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9981142)
You're missing the point.

They won't win like this week after week, for all the reasons JSP has already laid out.

Im not missing anything. Not saying jsp, but a lot of the people crying have been crying since we traded for Smith and right now, right now we are 2-0. If you listened to some of them we would believe Cassel is Smith, Smith is Cassel. Brand new offense, new QB....2-0.

Jakemall 09-15-2013 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981020)
31 attempts vs 17 ...which one lost his job and which won a SB?

Neither won a superbowl...just saying.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.