ChiefsPlanet
Page 45 of 133 « First 3541424344 45 464748495595 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270480)

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9981155)
The Cowboys were held to one offensive touchdown.

With the scheme we have in place, Flowers gave an acceptable performance.
LMAO, Flowers was acceptable and Smith with no OL wasn't?

CP is full reerun.

I can even express at this point how ****ing stupid this place is.

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981123)
... and Eli throws up a deep one!!!! for an INT!!! ****, I hate the Broncos.
See what happens when you can't ride your defense?

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981165)
LMAO, Flowers was acceptable and Smith with no OL wasn't?

CP is full reerun.

I can even express at this point how ****ing stupid this place is.
You know, he could help out his line by actually like you know....throw the ball downfield?

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Smiff (Post 9981172)
You know, he could help out his line by actually like you know....throw the ball downfield?
Yea the one step drop pass is all the rage in the NFL idiot.

Brock 09-15-2013 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981067)
It will if we win
That will not be good enough in philadelphia.

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Smiff (Post 9981172)
You know, he could help out his line by actually like you know....throw the ball downfield?
Yeah because his stat line is what it's all about

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981077)
... and the great stafford chokes this game away vs Cards by throwing a dink-dunk when they needed more on 4th down... ooops.
Most QBs can't ride their defense and running game to wins in this league.

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock (Post 9981176)
That will not be good enough in philadelphia.
We would have said the same about Dallas as well.........

OnTheWarpath15 09-15-2013 05:32 PM
Why is the line being blamed?

Alex sucked today at reading the blitz and coverages, and held the ball too long.

Event the broadcast mentioned it several times.

Hopefully he can get it cleaned up on a short week, because we're going to need a lot of points on Thursday.

Jakemall 09-15-2013 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Smiff (Post 9981172)
You know, he could help out his line by actually like you know....throw the ball downfield?
http://abload.de/img/bf0gqnjcmaexwselcq0y.jpg

If you bother to break it down, you'd see that Alex gets about as many yards per completion as Brady, P. Manning and Rogers...not horrible company. It looks even better when you go by per attempt.

That's about 12 yards just for the record.

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981165)
LMAO, Flowers was acceptable and Smith with no OL wasn't?

CP is full reerun.

I can even express at this point how ****ing stupid this place is.
IMO, the way the team defended Bryant in the first qtr was not ok. The defensive scheme has to react quicker when one our CBs needs help.

See how that works? You can recognize things that need improvement even after a win.

Brock 09-15-2013 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981184)
We would have said the same about Dallas as well.........
The chiefs will have to keep pace with that offense. I don't think 200/2 tds will cut it in this game.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9981198)
If you bother to break it down, you'd see that Alex gets about as many yards per completion as Brady, P. Manning and Rogers...
Cherry picking, much? Look at all of his attempts.

He's near the bottom of the league in yards per completion every year.

Something like 24th with the 49ers the last two seasons.

This year just about dead last so far.

O.city 09-15-2013 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9981192)
Why is the line being blamed?

Alex sucked today at reading the blitz and coverages, and held the ball too long.

Event the broadcast mentioned it several times.

Hopefully he can get it cleaned up on a short week, because we're going to need a lot of points on Thursday.
Seeing it live, the ol wasn't good in the first half. Whether that was I. Smith for not movin protection or the ol getting beat, I dunno.

But I didn't feel he held the ball to long

Jakemall 09-15-2013 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981208)
Cherry picking, much? Look at all of his attempts.

He's near the bottom of the league in yards per completion every year.

Something like 24th with the 49ers the last two seasons.

This year just about dead last so far.
Not cherry picking...people were talking about performance under pressure.

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981174)
Yea the one step drop pass is all the rage in the NFL idiot.
If you don't understand just say you don't understand.

O.city 09-15-2013 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981208)
Cherry picking, much? Look at all of his attempts.

He's near the bottom of the league in yards per completion every year.

Something like 24th with the 49ers the last two seasons.

This year just about dead last so far.
Cherry picking.

From you, this is lulz

Planetman 09-15-2013 05:35 PM
http://s10.postimg.org/amrpenfmf/Smith2_Avery.gif

Looks like a throw and catch to me. Any scrutiny beyond that requires an agenda.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981147)
LMAO like our offense was worse than Flowers.
Dude.

We held a potent offense to 16 points, AND forced a turnover that set up the offense for a long 9-yard drive to what turned out to be a game-winning field goal.

Defense ****ing rocked my socks off.

ViperVisor 09-15-2013 05:36 PM
29% of the time teams still manage to lose when the defense has a good day like today.


http://i.imgur.com/XaeHB1c.jpg

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9981192)
Why is the line being blamed?

Alex sucked today at reading the blitz and coverages, and held the ball too long.

Event the broadcast mentioned it several times.

Hopefully he can get it cleaned up on a short week, because we're going to need a lot of points on Thursday.
Why is the OL being blamed for playing like shit?

I suppose it has something to do with playing like shit. But thats just me.

Jakemall 09-15-2013 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9981216)
Cherry picking.

From you, this is lulz
Not to mention that it was appropriate to pick out plays under pressure, when we're talking about how Alex needs to burn people when he's getting pressure. Duh.

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9981216)
Cherry picking.

From you, this is lulz
No. I look at all the attempts.

And the entirety of Alex's career. Not just his two "good" seasons where he threw for like 17 whopping TDs.

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981208)
Cherry picking, much? Look at all of his attempts.

He's near the bottom of the league in yards per completion every year.

Something like 24th with the 49ers the last two seasons.

This year just about dead last so far.
Says the King Cherry Picker

Bearcat 09-15-2013 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981161)
Im not missing anything. Not saying jsp, but a lot of the people crying have been crying since we traded for Smith and right now, right now we are 2-0. If you listened to some of them we would believe Cassel is Smith, Smith is Cassel. Brand new offense, new QB....2-0.
A game against the worst team in the league and against a mediocre team isn't really relevant. Smith isn't 2012 Cassel... he's not throwing to wide open defenders, he doesn't curl up into the fetal position when there's a blitz... but, he had good games against bad-mediocre teams... probably consecutively a few times, too.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981225)
No. I look at all the attempts.

And the entirety of Alex's career. Not just his two "good" seasons where he threw for like 17 whopping TDs.
So he is on track for 32 now right?

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981239)
So he is on track for 32 now right?
Sure. I remember when Cassel was on pace to throw for 4,000 yards.

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9981238)
A game against the worst team in the league and against a mediocre team isn't really relevant. Smith isn't 2012 Cassel... he's not throwing to wide open defenders, he doesn't curl up into the fetal position when there's a blitz... but, he had good games against bad-mediocre teams... probably consecutively a few times, too.
The nfl made the schedule, we are 2-0 with 0 turnovers and 100% in the red zone, i do believe

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9981213)
...people were talking about performance under pressure.
No they weren't.

They were talking about how the fact that Smith very rarely threatens deep allows teams to stack the box and blitz with little risk.

Chiefspants 09-15-2013 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981165)
LMAO, Flowers was acceptable and Smith with no OL wasn't?

CP is full reerun.

I can even express at this point how ****ing stupid this place is.
Look, when you have an attacking defense, there are going to be breakdowns and big games when you're relying on 1 on 1 coverage.

Flowers had a lot of shut down games in Crennel's scheme. Heck, remember when we held Wes Welker to two catches when he was with the high flying Patriot offense?

Hard to praise that effort when we lost that game 31-3, huh?

If we're going to have to give up a few of these big games to have a better defensive performance as a whole, so be it. It's nice to be on the attack for a change.

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981246)
Sure. I remember when Cassel was on pace to throw for 4,000 yards.
Dude just quit qith Cassel. You look like an idiot.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981246)
Sure. I remember when Cassel was on pace to throw for 4,000 yards.
I remember when you were sucking Damon Huard's cock while licking Davard Darling's ballsack.

Like you are some football genious.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9981250)
Look, when you have an attacking defense, there are going to be breakdowns and big games when you're relying on 1 on 1 coverage.

Flowers had a lot of shut down games in Crennel's scheme. Heck, remember when we held Wes Welker to two catches when he was with the high flying Patriot offense?

Hard to praise that effort when we lost that game 31-3, huh?

If we're going to have to give up a few of these big games to have a better defensive performance as a whole, so be it. It's nice to us attacking for a change.
Watch out, something just flew over your head.

Chiefspants 09-15-2013 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981262)
Watch out, something just flew over your head.
ROFL

Whatever gets you through the night.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-15-2013 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981222)
Why is the OL being blamed for playing like shit?

I suppose it has something to do with playing like shit. But thats just me.
We'd better draft some more fatties then.

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 05:46 PM
LMAO ... Eli with a 53 passer rating... but... but he threw 360 yards! :thumb:

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 9981250)
Look, when you have an attacking defense, there are going to be breakdowns and big games when you're relying on 1 on 1 coverage.

Flowers had a lot of shut down games in Crennel's scheme. Heck, remember when we held Wes Welker to two catches when he was with the high flying Patriot offense?

Hard to praise that effort when we lost that game 31-3, huh?

If we're going to have to give up a few of these big games to have a better defensive performance as a whole, so be it. It's nice to be on the attack for a change.
Now apply that to our offfense. It's nice to see us not turn the ball over and actually score TD's when we get in the red zone, for a change.

BigMeatballDave 09-15-2013 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981246)
Sure. I remember when Cassel was on pace to throw for 4,000 yards.
What are you going to do with all that spare time you're about to have? :D

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981277)
LMAO ... Eli with a 53 passer rating... but... but he threw 360 yards! :thumb:
Let's ignore context

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981286)
Let's ignore context
What was his excuse for his other 3 picks?

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981286)
Let's ignore context
The loss?

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981286)
Let's ignore context
Oh, then do share with us your Elijexcuses... :)

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:50 PM
We are 2-0 our QB has 4 TD's and 0 turnovers and the collective CP vagina hurts.

LMAO

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCD (Post 9981284)
What are you going to do with all that spare time you're about to have? :D
My life isn't Chiefsplanet.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981300)
My life isn't Chiefsplanet.
Thats because you dont have a life.

BigMeatballDave 09-15-2013 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981300)
My life isn't Chiefsplanet.
156,000 posts say otherwise...

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981290)
What was his excuse for his other 3 picks?
Did you watch the game? If you did, you saw that it was close until Denver scored 21 points in 5 minutes through no fault of Eli.

Suddenly down by 4 scores, with a little over 1 qtr to play, you have to take some risks. CONTEXT

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981298)
We are 2-0 our QB has 4 TD's and 0 turnovers and the collective CP vagina hurts.

LMAO
It's rather psychotic when you get down to it. I don't think any of us are saying Smith = Payeton but it's like unless we win 30-0 against the Packers with 400 passing yards and 200 running yards, it's not good enough

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:53 PM
Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981306)
Did you watch the game? If you did, you saw that it was close until Denver scored 21 points in 5 minutes through no fault of Eli.

Suddenly down by 4 scores, with a little over 1 qtr to play, you have to take some risks. CONTEXT
Dude, he had 4 picks. The team has 10 turnovers in 2 games. CONTEXT He also threw a pick at the end of the 1st half that would have put them ahead. CONTEXT

Rausch 09-15-2013 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981298)
We are 2-0 our QB has 4 TD's and 0 turnovers and the collective CP vagina hurts.

LMAO
This team reminds me a lot of DV's 2nd year.

There's a ton of talent here and the new boss just doesn't know how to use it yet...

jspchief 09-15-2013 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981310)
Dude, he had 4 picks. The team has 10 turnovers in 2 games. CONTEXT He also threw a pick at the end of the 1st half that would have put them ahead. CONTEXT
Oh, he played poorly. Particularly after the Denver scoring burst.

But its intellectually dishonest to try and use that game as a defense for Alex Smith's checkdown love affair.

Pasta Little Brioni 09-15-2013 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCD (Post 9981284)
What are you going to do with all that spare time you're about to have? :D
He will get laid more I bet.

Bearcat 09-15-2013 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9981298)
We are 2-0 and the collective CP vagina hurts.

LMAO
Those who aren't excited over beating two teams that probably won't see the post season are just looking at the big picture. It's just kind of amazing how many times this happens & the outcome is always failure, yet people still get fooled..... 2003, let's ignore that lack of defense thing.... 2006, let's ignore that lack of offense thing... 2010, let's ignore the fact they didn't really beat anyone and that QB thing... 2013, OMG THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN LAST TIME!!!

petegz28 09-15-2013 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981321)
Oh, he played poorly. Particularly after the Denver scoring burst.

But its intellectually dishonest to try and use that game as a defense for Alex Smith's checkdown love affair.
Is it? Is it really? 0 turnovers....2-0. 10 turnovers...0-2, including a loss to a team we beat today. When you turn the ball over, you lose.

GordonGekko 09-15-2013 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981219)
Dude.

We held a potent offense to 16 points, AND forced a turnover that set up the offense for a long 9-yard drive to what turned out to be a game-winning field goal.

Defense ****ing rocked my socks off.
This.

The offense did just enough, but the defense won this one.

I give credit to AS and the Chiefs offense where it is due, and getting Bowe a TD (finally) was great.

The running game did not look good this week, and this gives me serious concerns.

But still, a W is a ****ing W!

Bearcat 09-15-2013 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981306)
Did you watch the game? If you did, you saw that it was close until Denver scored 21 points in 5 minutes through no fault of Eli.

Suddenly down by 4 scores, with a little over 1 qtr to play, you have to take some risks. CONTEXT
We should continue comparing a QB who had one lousy game and has also won 2 SBs, so maybe he knows what it takes to win in the NFL to someone who's won one playoff game in his career but had a couple of good games against inferior competition... and with no turnovers! ALLCAPS

Cannibal 09-15-2013 06:00 PM
Considering how the line blocked, Smith had a great game, IMO. He was a major reason w won the game. He made chicken salad out of chickenshit several times.

FringeNC 09-15-2013 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9980906)
I don't know. I didn't keep track.

That doesn't really address the point I was trying to make anyway. Just like the pff stat doesn't.


If all this offense does is throw short and run, defenses won't be afraid to stack the box and blitz/run blitz. They will crowd the short field and leave their corners 1 on 1. It makes what the KC offense is currently doing that much harder. The defenses will be more than happy to put 9 in the box and stuff runs and pressure the QB knowing that Smith's counter is only a short pass.

Start putting some back shoulder throws on our receivers for big gains, and suddenly the safeties are forced to pick their poison. Hell, Dallas forced us to change our scheme doing just that.

And don't give me excuses about not having the receivers. You don't need Calvin Johnson with a 5 yard lead to put a scare in the defense. Testing a 1 on 1 matchup can net you a big catch, a PI, or just enough threat to make those safeties back up or slide outside.
Is it a 1-1 matchup if there is pressure without a blitz?

GordonGekko 09-15-2013 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannibal (Post 9981345)
Considering how the line blocked, Smith had a great game, IMO. He was a major reason w won the game. He made chicken salad out of chickenshit several times.
I disagree.

Had our D played anything but great, this game easily could have been 2 td's in favor in Dallas, and you know it.

Dallas had 37 total yards rushing, and still only lost by one. Our defense played HUGE today, and deserve any and all credit.

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 06:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9981341)
We should continue comparing a QB who had one lousy game and has also won 2 SBs, so maybe he knows what it takes to win in the NFL to someone who's won one playoff game in his career but had a couple of good games against inferior competition... and with no turnovers! ALLCAPS
Read back to see who if anyone is even comparing them. Just saying, he threw for lots of yards and lost.. again.

Quote:
OMG THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN LAST TIME!!!
... and yeah, for shame to the KC fans showing excitement after winning their first two games. They should always remember years past with different personnel and coaching that has disappointed them and transfer that negativity to the present and future. Awesome! :doh!:

jspchief 09-15-2013 06:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 9981362)
Is it a 1-1 matchup if there is pressure without a blitz?
Yes. Often.

That's my point. Teams are leaving their CBs on an island with our wideouts because they know its unlikely Smith will test that matchup.

Marcellus 09-15-2013 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9981326)
Those who aren't excited over beating two teams that probably won't see the post season are just looking at the big picture. It's just kind of amazing how many times this happens & the outcome is always failure, yet people still get fooled..... 2003, let's ignore that lack of defense thing.... 2006, let's ignore that lack of offense thing... 2010, let's ignore the fact they didn't really beat anyone and that QB thing... 2013, OMG THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN LAST TIME!!!
You think Dallas is bad team?

You think going 2-0 is easy?

Guess what, we still have another 15 weeks to get better. We aren't restricted to what we are right this minute.

Sorry if you just want to look for the shit in life. I have enough stress at work etc...dont need to inject undo stress into my football watching hobby.

Rausch 09-15-2013 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981370)
Yes. Often.

That's my point. Teams are leaving their CBs on an island with our wideouts because they know its unlikely Smith will test that matchup beyond 10 yards.
FYP...

Baby Lee 09-15-2013 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 9981326)
Those who aren't excited over beating two teams that probably won't see the post season are just looking at the big picture. It's just kind of amazing how many times this happens & the outcome is always failure, yet people still get fooled..... 2003, let's ignore that lack of defense thing.... 2006, let's ignore that lack of offense thing... 2010, let's ignore the fact they didn't really beat anyone and that QB thing... 2013, OMG THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN LAST TIME!!!
WHO said that? WHO?!?!

Those problems were clearly identified AT THE TIME by PLENTY of people.

GordonGekko 09-15-2013 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981367)
... and yeah, for shame to the KC fans showing excitement after winning their first two games. They should always remember years past with different personnel and coaching that has disappointed them and transfer that negativity to the present and future. Awesome! :doh!:
Umm actually yes.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

petegz28 09-15-2013 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9981377)
FYP...
He completed 9 passes for 10+ yards

Marcellus 09-15-2013 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9981392)
Umm actually yes.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Not much on this team tied to the past other than a few players and the name.

Its pretty ironic because this fan base is stuck in the past, good or bad, they are fully and completely stuck in the past.

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9981392)
Umm actually yes.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
"those who choose to wallow in misery and expect failure are cowards with no heart."

Rausch 09-15-2013 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981402)
He completed 9 passes for 10+ yards
Attempted at or beyond or completions?...

Alex Smiff 09-15-2013 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981306)
Did you watch the game? If you did, you saw that it was close until Denver scored 21 points in 5 minutes through no fault of Eli.

Suddenly down by 4 scores, with a little over 1 qtr to play, you have to take some risks. CONTEXT
They expected checkdowns while being down 3 scores.

petegz28 09-15-2013 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9981408)
Attempted at or beyond or completions?...
completed, I said...as in they were complete passes

jspchief 09-15-2013 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 9981381)
WHO said that? WHO?!?!

Those problems were clearly identified AT THE TIME by PLENTY of people.
There were a handful of people critical of Cassels play in 2010, that were routinely dismissed in the same way criticisms of Smith are being dismissed today.

We're winning!
TD:INT ratio!

Marcellus 09-15-2013 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981422)
There were a handful of people critical of Cassels play in 2010, that were routinely dismissed in the same way criticisms of Smith are being dismissed today.

We're winning!
TD:INT ratio!
Anyone who cant watch the games and see the difference is a ****ing fool.

Rausch 09-15-2013 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 9981413)
completed, I said...as in they were complete passes
Passes thrown beyond 10 yards.

Not passes that became 10 yard gains...

Hammock Parties 09-15-2013 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jspchief (Post 9981422)
There were a handful of people critical of Cassels play in 2010, that were routinely dismissed in the same way criticisms of Smith are being dismissed today.

We're winning!
TD:INT ratio!
Yep. Who could forget the fraud debates...

petegz28 09-15-2013 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9981427)
Passes thrown beyond 10 yards.

Not passes that became 10 yard gains...
JFC, dude you need help.

GordonGekko 09-15-2013 06:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981405)
"those who choose to wallow in misery and expect failure are cowards with no heart."
I suppose you are talking about yourself?

Sandy Vagina 09-15-2013 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonGekko (Post 9981435)
I suppose you are talking about yourself?
Uhm... that is your conclusion? I am happy and expecting success.. and THAT is your conclusion? Oh my... we have a special kind of stupid from you here. :thumb:

Marcellus 09-15-2013 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 9981429)
Yep. Who could forget the fraud debates...
Explain how the beginning of the 2010 season and QB performance is similar.

Through 2 games in 2010 Cassel had 1 TD 2 INT's and 244 yards passing.

Keep on keeping on.

GordonGekko 09-15-2013 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9981443)
Uhm... that is your conclusion? I am happy and expecting success.. and THAT is your conclusion? Oh my... we have a special kind of stupid from you here. :thumb:
Lol, you are not even a fan of the Chiefs. Kindly go fist and **** yourself sir.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.
Page 45 of 133 « First 3541424344 45 464748495595 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.