![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Alex smith was gruesome but no-one was thinking "did my teammate just die? They didn't have to think during the game is one of my friends still alive? This is an extreme case. Very extreme and some people are acting like we are in danger of this happening everytime someone stubs their toe. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
If Jerry Jones decides to be a **** just because it probably won't pass.
|
Quote:
Try this... http://www.espn.com/nfl/playoffs/machine |
Quote:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Chiefs could not have made out much better in terms of competitive advantage in this plan.<br><br>(3/3)</p>— Pete Sweeney (@pgsween) <a href="https://twitter.com/pgsween/status/1611208818750373889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Exactly where I was earlier, I just didn't think Cincinnati deserved neutral site if we win Saturday. Now that's resolved, I'm 👍. |
I was curious who was on the competition committee and after reviewing this I guess I don't feel so bad for Bengals\Ravens unless the vote wasn't unanimous. Would be curious to see who voted for what.
Rich McKay (chairman) – president, Atlanta Falcons Katie Blackburn – executive vice president, Cincinnati Bengals Chris Grier – general manager, Miami Dolphins Stephen Jones – executive vice president, Dallas Cowboys John Mara – owner, New York Giants Ozzie Newsome – executive vice president, Baltimore Ravens Frank Reich – head coach, Indianapolis Colts Ron Rivera – head coach, Washington Commanders Mike Tomlin – head coach, Pittsburgh Steelers Mike Vrabel – head coach, Tennessee Titans |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd add one more provision to their proposal. If the Chiefs win out, have to play at a neutral site and lose to the Bills or Bengals, we get an early round compensatory draft pick.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They don't want to have this lingering out there for days because the owners can't agree on it. I think that's just a formality at this stage. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hell Bengals could lose to Ravens this Sunday and still have chance to host wild card with a coin toss. |
Quote:
**** the Bengals |
Quote:
|
The bigger benefit is the first round bye which the Chiefs will keep (assuming they win on Saturday).
The NFL better not do Buffalo any scheduling favors on Wild Card weekend. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I wonder if we could get a 2/3 majority of this board to vote for it
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The team that knocked us out has the hardest road to get past us again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Is there a coalition of 9 teams to block this proposal?
|
Quote:
You do realize that 3 years earlier the same EXACT thing happened to Mahomes and no one outside of KC gave a shit. In fact, KC proposed a rule change so that wouldn’t happen again and you know who voted against it (amongst most others)? That’s right, the Buffalo Bills. The Bills only want the rules changed when it affects them. They’re a bunch of self serving pussies. Guess it’s why their entitled fanbase fits so well with them. And the NFL plays right along with it (honestly have no idea why). It’s pathetic. |
Quote:
|
Indy is half way between KC & Buffalo I bet thats where the game would be or LA
|
Quote:
|
I proposed that Bills be 2 seed and Bengals 3 seed for matchups, but Bengals and Bills in divisional should be at Cincy because of suspended game, and if Bills win divisional, AFC Championship could be played in Buffalo as if Bills won week 17 at Cincy.
I think the proposal is fine, but Bills v. Bengals in divisional should be a neutral site game. I would not be surprised if part of the rationale was they did not want Bills to play at Cincy so no thoughts of revisiting a scene with recent bad memories. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course the rule going forward doesn't necessarily benefit the Bills or anybody else. The problem is the timing. All the whining the media and everybody else did on behalf of the Bills, and the sudden (and convenient) change of heart about something we've seen play out the same way like the Chiefs/Pats. |
Quote:
|
Why didn’t they just play OT rules for one quarter to determine a winner. They’d play a quarter of football Monday night and all this could have been avoided.
|
Quote:
Apparently though you don’t understand that changing that rule during the AFCCG last year would be accommodating the Bills but changing it in the offseason does not. Do you realize that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It’s like everybody decided become complete petegz’sss (you can’t use winning % when you have unequal games, because fish wear tennis shoes”) |
Quote:
They should have (and may have) requested the game be resumed 2-3 days later. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The point is the blatant favoritism, which has now become a pattern. |
Bye week: HUGE
Not having to play Bills AND Bengals in the playoffs: HUGE AFCCG at a neutral site: kinda sucks but nothing compared to those other two People need to stop whining. The Bills could have easily come back and won that game. We could be looking at Cincy in the divisional round and at Buffalo in the AFCCG. |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So we not following the rules no more☕️ <a href="https://t.co/AreAM1xAsp">pic.twitter.com/AreAM1xAsp</a></p>— ⚡️Primetime!!!⚡️ (@Joe_MainMixon) <a href="https://twitter.com/Joe_MainMixon/status/1611212660271374336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Joe Mixon not happy |
Quote:
|
Not to mention the Bengals were going to drop a 50 burger on the Bills Monday night...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
It doesn’t do that for them more than it does for any other NFL team. |
If Reid is cool with it I doubt Clark votes against it. We'll see what happens.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because I think we come out a lot better on average w/o them playing again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can we get ARROW2 and petegeegzz to calculate these odds? |
Neutral site proposal? What a ****ing joke. Play it in Dallas if that’s the case.
|
Quote:
And actually, yeah, I really wanted to watch that Bills/Bengals game too. |
Quote:
You're just getting caught up in the semantics, because you're too busy simping for the Bills. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The shock waves from this devastating turn will be heard for a while. |
So it sounds like the Bengals are now locked in at the 3 seed. They cannot get the 1 seed, which of the three teams, are the only ones with that limit. I don't see a path to the 2 seed for them either. If we lose and they win they still have one less victory so we are still ahead.
For the Bills to get the 1 seed they need us to lose and they win, now no longer having to worry about the Bengals outcome which would have been the case had they lost (and same as forfeiting) which is something I posted about earlier. The Bills actually had better potential outcomes by not playing the game with more to lose by playing it and I believe that motivated them to not try getting the game in. |
Quote:
*I am aware the Chiefs/Patriots playoff game was pretty great too but it wasn’t the same clash of titans and there was Tom Brady |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're such a ****ing simp. It's because it happened to the Bills against the Chiefs. Nobody gave a single **** about it when it happened to the Chiefs. When it happened to the Bills, people acted like it was the first time they even heard of the rule. There was an entire movement through the media and fans to change it. That's why something got done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mike Brown Jerry Jones Those three are definitely on board. Andy has pull in Jacksonville and Philadelphia. Add Shahid Khan and Jeffrey Lurie. Clark is PROBABLY in tight with Janice McNair (Texas ties) and Stephen Ross in Houston and Miami, especially after we dealt them Tyreek. Ross hates Buffalo. So does Woody Johnson in New York with the Jets. That's eight. Who's left? Snyder hates the league, the Hunts and Rooneys go way back. The Bucs, the 49ers? They owe us for 31-9 and...Joe Montana? Dunno. The question is if they WANT to block it. If they want to, they can. |
Quote:
He’s saying the NFL is changing things to accommodate the Bills and points to today’s ruling in conjunction with the change to the OT rules as proof. I’m making that up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They just pissed away any goodwill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is no way those two teams can play each other in the AFCCG if we have the 1 seed. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.