The Big Ten should get 7 in this year, unless Wisconsin completely tanks the rest of the season because their roster is down to 8 players. The MVC should get 4 teams in this year - Wichita State, Creighton, Northern Iowa and Southern Illinois. The MVC will take spots usually taken by teams from the SEC, PAC 10 and Big 12 due to those conferences being down this year. Plus, last time I checked the MVC's conference RPI was fourth in the nation behind the Big 10, Big East and ACC.

It'll be great to see WSU in the tournament.

Seriously dude, just come out and say it.

"I don't care about facts. I just don't like Iowa."

You know that's what it is, you just want to appear to be impartial.

I never said he WOULDN'T be back. I said the way UK has been playing it wouldn't surprise me if he wasn't back the following year. Follow me here.


KU also had a good win @ CU.

UK's win against Louisville was not a good win. That's all there is to that. Again, the way things are shaping up UK is going to have to play lights out the rest of the year or win their conference tournament, which they do 90% of the time.

What am I not following :rolleyes:

And by the way, any win over a rival as big as ours is a big win.

Big game in the MVC tonight which could make a big difference come selection Sunday.

WSU @ Northern Iowa...If the shocks could pull this one out on the road it would be a big confidence booster.

What facts? I'm the one who's been giving all the facts. :|

I honestly do like Iowa. I think they're a good team and they can be dangerous. I just think LSU is a better team. Is there any way I can say that without not liking Iowa? :rolleyes:

That plus it could likely push them into the top 25 at last.

Yeah, there's a way you can say that. Exactly like you just said it.

You THINK LSU is a better team.

So far you've really not proven your case though.

a) I don't have to prove shit to you.

b) I did say it as my opinion in the first post. "I don't think they're better than any of the 3 seeds."

c) I made the case that I thought LSU would fare better in the NCAA tourney because of how each team played on the road. That claim was countered with ridiculous arguments like "they're both .500 on the road!!!". I'm the one actually stating facts relevant to the game of basketball. All anyone's been able to come back with is "well, Iowa's ranked higher".

Iowa has a higher RPI.

Arizona has an RPI of like 18.

Again, I never argued that LSU had a better resume. They don't. Iowa has a better resume. All I've said is that I think LSU is a better team.

1) Then why do you keep spewing out "facts" that don't mean shit?

2) And when your opinion got disagreed with, you started in with the "facts".

3) Ridiculous arguments? You best read you own. Your case for LSU is WEAK.

What facts did I spew out that don't mean shit? I made the case that LSU was a much better road team than Iowa. Are you going to argue against that? If so, let me hear it.