![]() |
I don't buy the sacrificial year. They tried, it didn't work, and now they spin. Just like every other team does. Same goes for talking up the draft picks, every team does it. Just the way it is.
|
Quote:
IMO, he should have been thrown out the door with the old regime. |
Quote:
He was a former first-DAY pick. :D |
Quote:
As for the rest of your post, I see your point. |
Quote:
But what's the point of going into next season thinking that we can't win as long as he's here? I might as well root for another team if that's the case. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I love the Hali pick. But reality tells me, (a) Hicks (who is a Gunther favorite) is still going to get playing time, (b) rookie impact is always limited, (c) Hali's impact is going to be further limited by the sub-par performance of KC's DT's. and (d) Gun and Herm have already discussed moving Hali into a DT spot in some situations even further limiting, IMHO, Hali's impact. As for Pollard, I'm coming around to liking the pick more than I did a week ago, but I don't see him unseating Knight, the defensive leader and brains of the team. I also agree with what Coogs has already posted. First it was "I can win with the existing players, they just need a new scheme." Then it was "I really need this shopping list of players." The shopping list is obtained and then it is "I still need more." |
Quote:
You are NOT alone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And again, I don't disagree with you at all. I just can't see what product purpose is served by poo-pooing the upcoming season because of something like this. I didn't want him retained, but he was. Might as well give him what he wants. The worst thing that could happen is that he fails and we start over. However, the upside is that he's FINALLY right. |
Quote:
The only two posts above you were htismaqe's thread starter (which had everything to do with Gun, and el borracho's which was at least about our 'D' and therefore indirectly about our DC. Both were more relevant than yours. My reaction was mostly because I thought you were replying to htismaqe. Apparently he thought so to (post #6). Next time may I suggest to quote the post you want to reply to? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Side note: Nothing will make me happier than the sight of Battle as a stud CB. If nothing else, for the cool name he has. Seems like the Chiefs stopped filling the roster with cool names (Lanier, Hill, Otis Taylor, etc) after the Stram era and now are more into forgetable common names (Johnson, Wilson, Williams, etc.) |
Quote:
He missed the smilie, or he was looking for some reason to bitch at me. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.