![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Keeping both Green and Huard on the roster will be bad for the Chiefs. And not just in terms of money.
Regardless of who wins that starting job, he's bound to have bad game at some point, which will instanly result in a QB controversy. It also takes practice snaps away from the QB we spent a 3rd rnd pick on in hopes of developing. I'm not neccessarily an advocate for Huard or Green either one, but I feel that keeping both of them is going to create more bad then good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Starting Huard or Green is yet ANOTHER stop-gap, "let's go 9-7 and fill the seats" move. There's very little chance that Croyle is 3 or 4 full losses worse than Huard or Green this season, but there's a very good chance that as soon as NEXT YEAR, Green is worth ZERO wins because he's RETIRED. And Huard isn't that far behind him. It's time to think about the future for a change. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
from Rotoworld ... Dallas picks Brad Johnson to back up Romo Cowboys signed QB Brad Johnson to a three-year, $7.5 million contract. Johnson had been drawing interest from Denver, but felt "a strong comfort level" with Dallas offensive coordinator Jason Garrett, his former teammate. He should be a good mentor for Tony Romo to fall back on and if Romo gets hurt, a better in-game option than Drew Bledsoe. Mar. 5 - 7:03 pm et edit: parker beat me to it, must be a mod conspiracy... |
Quote:
|
Start Croyle!!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I don't see any way Green AND Huard are on the roster.
The Chiefs retain rights to Huard and a reasonable contract, and if they choose Green(restructured) then they have some leverage to get a pick for Huard.....or Green if he's willing to play ball. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.