ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Agree with Harris (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=159336)

Mecca 03-06-2007 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Best thing for this team to do is sign Donnie Edwards to play MLB.

Yes.....putting a 227lb man in at MLB on a team with no DT's is brilliant, I can't wait to see him get obliterated by guards. Edwards is not a MLB in a 4-3.

Eleazar 03-06-2007 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Best thing for this team to do is sign Donnie Edwards to play MLB.

No 34 year old long term solutions please.

crazycoffey 03-06-2007 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
He's an OK acquisition, but it will continue to not matter who is there until we install some DTs.


second that.


Are we keeping anyone from last year? reed or edwards - I thought edwards did pretty well, and I'm not sure I like the idea of two rookies. I hope we hear something in this area.

CupidStunt 03-06-2007 12:49 PM

Harris simply won't play OLB. PERIOD.

He may need work in coverage. He'll work. But he can stuff the run and we NEED that.

There's no way in hell we move him to OLB where he'll have to cover just as much (if not more) and may also be less effective against the run (he's a good upfield player, not so much laterally although he has the speed to).

RedThat 03-06-2007 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
Yes.....putting a 227lb man in at MLB on a team with no DT's is brilliant, I can't wait to see him get obliterated by guards. Edwards is not a MLB in a 4-3.

He is a good fit for a cover 2 defense. That's the reason why i said they should sign him, and put him there. In cover 2, you need a MLB that can drop back and play coverage. Like Laz said, we do that ton. And I agree. If Harris is weak at coverage, then that's like just signing somebody that neglects the team need, and asking him to do something he is not good at. It'll be like the Kendrell Bell situation all over again.

Phobia 03-06-2007 12:51 PM

Dirty Raider Scum.

CupidStunt 03-06-2007 12:51 PM

If we have a LB lineup of DJ-Edwards-Harris, we are going to fucking blow against the run.

Stopping the run > stopping the pass.

Mr. Laz 03-06-2007 12:52 PM

signing a less talent guy can work out IF you put him him a system that specifically targets his strengths.

(see the patriots)


but putting a guy into a system that doesn't fit him is a bad thing.

signing a lesser talent and then putting that lesser talent into a system that emphasizes his weaknesses is simply "retarted"

Chiefs Pantalones 03-06-2007 12:53 PM

Would Mitchell be good in Bell's place or should be sign someone else?

Lzen 03-06-2007 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
I can't believe how much they overspent for this guy.

Is it safe to assume you are being a smartass as usual? Or do you have some financial terms you would like to share?

RedThat 03-06-2007 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp
If we have a LB lineup of DJ-Edwards-Harris, we are going to fucking blow against the run.

Stopping the run > stopping the pass.

And we are going to blow against the run if we don't address the DT positions. No matter who we have lining up at LB.

nychief 03-06-2007 12:54 PM

I can't believe the amount of bitching already.

Sure-Oz 03-06-2007 12:54 PM

Harris>Kavvvvveka

RedThat 03-06-2007 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise
No 34 year old long term solutions please.

LOL...But he is the best fit for the defense we are trying to run.

Mr. Laz 03-06-2007 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief
I can't believe the amount of bitching already.

oh hush ...... people are discussing



or can't you tell the difference?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.