thats probably more realistic... But aside from the jags game, we have been in every game this year...Who knows what could have happened if we would have just opened it up?

We didn't need 30 points yesterday. We needed one more touchdown. We had two chances, after just having scored one, and we deferred to the Colts both times.

I guess I'm a ****ing moron, but I don't think his primary objective on those two drives was to score points. His primary concern was to not turn the ball over, and was to make the Colts drive the length of the field in hopes of getting a turnover so we could kick a field goal. If we happened to break a screen or dive and get into field goal range on offense, it would have been even better. After all, he basically said that in his postgame.

We would have been better off if the Colts had scored early in the 4th, because that's when we want to score. His job, in his eyes, is to give the team a chance to win at the end. If we're losing, he wants to get the score close again. If we're tied or winning, he wants the offense to give the defense the best chance to win, with no turnovers and field position.