Oh sorry I almost forgot...........let alone they were playing the softest prevent defense since the 2002 Chiefs.

That score a scant 56 minutes into the game is meaningful.
Please don't insult Tyler Thigpen.

The six interceptions he could've thrown aside.

I am with you on this: I really don't care about the fan's negativity surrounding Thigpen. The guy deserves the start. He played at a small school and didn't see the highest level of competition in college yet he drove the Chiefs down for a touchdown score last Sunday and he improved during the game. He may not win games for the Chiefs this year but any experience he gets this year will help him out in the future. And regardless of what some people think, it's way, way, way early to just "Cut him" after one game.

JFC.

This is going to be an incredibly difficult season as it is without the constant "Fire Herm, Fire Carl, Cut Croyle, Cut Thigpen, Cut Huard" crap for the next 15 weeks.

Play you who've got and head into the offseason with a better understanding of where help is required.

Really?

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=224

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=228

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=244

The game is still 60 minutes long, correct? Or did I miss a rule change?

Didn't know that points scored in the last 4 minutes don't count. That's going to change the recordbook quite a bit...

QTF.

[QUOTE=OnTheWarpath58;5031832]Who said that?

Our offense is DESIGNED to get the QB out of the pocket.

DESIGNED.

The difference between Huard and Thigpen is that Huard cannot do what the offense is DESIGNED to do.

QUOTE]

Where was that DESIGN in week one when Croyle was getting clobbered behind center?

Cute.

Doesn't change my point. That was a garbage TD thrown against a defense that had softened.

Sure the points count. But if I'm not mistaken... We still lost.

[QUOTE=Chiefnj2;5031870]Cool.

You've not only shown your ignorance, you've shown you don't bother to read posts.

I've only mentioned, oh, say 10 times, that the bootleg is mostly ineffective against a 3-4 defense.

It would be even MORE ineffective when your QB rolls to the right, and meets Mike Vrabel in the backfield before your RT is even out of his stance.

That only means the offense can be adjusted.
Which is the point we were trying to make.
Huard doesn't have to run bootlegs to help this offense produce.

You never had a point. It was just more Clayton-like windbagging.

Refresh my memory, did Huard score late against a defense playing prevent?

Or did we "still lose?"

I look forward to your excuses.

Let's see...

Adjust the gameplan for your STARTING QB against a bad matchup...

Or give up the advantage rollouts and bootlegs give you against a 4-3 defense, just to play a statue at QB.

Spoken like a true fan...

:banghead:

Isn't it great being a Chiefs fan right now ?

Let's face it. No matter who anyone of us thinks should be the starting QB the common demoninator being used as support by any of us is 'My guy doesn't suck as bad as your guy'.ROFL


:deevee:

I look forward to seeing Thigpen roll out and horribly miss Devard Darling again.

whatever tools. thigpen will win us a game before croyle will.