ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs How about our young CB's (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192905)

Hammock Parties 09-29-2008 05:29 PM

You've been nothing but a complete douche in this thread, Laz. You literally came in, told me I was wrong, and told me to die.

Asshole.

beach tribe 09-29-2008 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5067574)
Yeah, I should go out of my way to prove I'm right on a meaningless point. I'll get right on that.

Chill bro it was just a thought that would help your credibility. Lord knows you've done enough to destroy it.

I mean hell I believe you.

RustShack 09-29-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5067540)
bullshite ...... a safety in cover 2 must be as deep as the deepest.

he wasn't


he 5-8 too shallow and that cause him to have to close on the pass at a angle. If he was deeper he would of been able to come straight across and he could of broken up that pass.

just shut up or better yet die.

We don't run a pure cover two every play you douche. If Page is where you wanted him then someone else would have been open since we were blitzing and the LB's weren't all back in coverage like they should be in the cover two.

Mr. Laz 09-29-2008 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5067676)
You've been nothing but a complete douche in this thread, Laz. You literally came in, told me I was wrong, and told me to die.

Asshole.

omg ..... goatboy playing the victim ROFL


how many times have you told people to "just die"?


everytime they suggest trading LJ?


omg .. you're so full of shite

Hootie 09-29-2008 05:45 PM

well for everyone that hates LJ...he is 7 yards behind the NFL lead in rushing yards...

Hammock Parties 09-29-2008 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 5067718)
well for everyone that hates LJ...he is 7 yards behind the NFL lead in rushing yards...

Washed up bum.

Red Dawg 09-29-2008 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5067293)
I have the game taped. I haven't seen it yet. I was just wondering, I see that Cutler threw for 350+ yards, yet people are saying the corners played well. Where did all the yardage come from?

That came from our DE's being non existant in the pass rush department.. Our were fantastic considerin the time Cutler had.

tmax63 09-29-2008 06:49 PM

People can bitch and moan about small stuff but the D as a unit held an excellent offensive football team to 1 TD and 4 FG's. Overall, I see this as a step in the right direction. It's hard to find a better trio of receivers than Marshall, Royal, and Stokely or a quartet if you throw in Shefler the TE on 1 team. For the Chiefs to hold the Donko's to 75 yds rushing and force them to throw the ball and only have 1 TD pass vs 2 INT's is amazing. Package in that 8 of 11 starters have 3 yrs or less experience multiplies it. If any 1 of us had posted before the game that it would happen like that he would have been verbally drawn and quartered for being a homer.

SAUTO 09-29-2008 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmax63 (Post 5067885)
People can bitch and moan about small stuff but the D as a unit held an excellent offensive football team to 1 TD and 4 FG's. Overall, I see this as a step in the right direction. It's hard to find a better trio of receivers than Marshall, Royal, and Stokely or a quartet if you throw in Shefler the TE on 1 team. For the Chiefs to hold the Donko's to 75 yds rushing and force them to throw the ball and only have 1 TD pass vs 2 INT's is amazing. If any 1 of us had posted before the game that it would happen like that he would have been verbally drawn and quartered for being a homer.

QFT

FAX 09-29-2008 07:24 PM

Considering the fact that we struggled at times getting pressure on Cutler, they did a very good job. I don't know how much of that was scheme, but if we were okay (scheme-wise) with allowing the billions of 10 yard completions, they did a great job.

It's heartening to think that we might have CB sewn up for many years with a couple of quality guys. That's a huge step forward. If it works out that way, you have to give Herm credit.

FAX

beach tribe 09-29-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5068013)
Considering the fact that we struggled at times getting pressure on Cutler, they did a very good job. I don't know how much of that was scheme, but if we were okay (scheme-wise) with allowing the billions of 10 yard completions, they did a great job.

It's heartening to think that we might have CB sewn up for many years with a couple of quality guys. That's a huge step forward. If it works out that way, you have to give Herm credit.

FAX

I guess you could say someone should get some credit for the Carr pick, as I see him turning into a solid corner, but the Flowers pick was a no brainer IMO BPA.

FAX 09-29-2008 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5068087)
I guess you could say someone should get some credit for the Carr pick, as I see him turning into a solid corner, but the Flowers pick was a no brainer IMO BPA.

Well, there was the "pick" part, Mr. beach tribe. There's also the "preparation" part and the "playing the guy" part. If these two guys turn out to be solid CBs in this league, I don't see how you can avoid giving Herm some credit for it.

FAX

beach tribe 09-29-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FAX (Post 5068099)
Well, there was the "pick" part, Mr. beach tribe. There's also the "preparation" part and the "playing the guy" part. If these two guys turn out to be solid CBs in this league, I don't see how you can avoid giving Herm some credit for it.

FAX

Agreed.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.