BigRock |
11-17-2008 12:18 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan
(Post 5225805)
Come on. There's no way Herm would have allowed that. Imagine this conversation.
|
That's true, but the conversation assumes Gailey recognized the need for any of those changes. What I'm saying is that I'm aware of nothing to support that idea.
The guy was on the job for 9 months before the first game of the season. Is there any point where it looked like he thought the offensive line wasn't cut out to run the offense he designed? He was running the same offense before Croyle got hurt, after Croyle got hurt, and after Croyle came back. Even if he secretly knew it would be a disaster and was waiting to have the evidence to convince Herm that they needed to change, wouldn't he have been able to make a pretty good case by week 2 or 3?
Let's also not forget that Gailey and his opinions on offensive linemen were a big part of the offseason decision making. Every time talk would rise up about a FA lineman, we'd hear how he didn't fit Gailey's "profile" or whatever. By not saying "Holy Christ, Carl, get me anybody but these bunch of stiffs", he was tacitly endorsing the group of guys we had here.
Gailey has done a great job of designing an offense to fit Thigpen's talents. And it also fits the offensive line's talent (or lack thereof). But it took half the season for him to do that, when that very issue... designing an offense around the players, not forcing players to fit into an offense... was one of the main items he talked about when he got the job. An offense is as only good as the offensive line, and he spent half the season having the line playing in a scheme they could hardly execute.
|