We watched the same game.

He played like Stafford does all year, under pressure and WR's not playing all that great. Difference is Stafford does a better job playing under pressure and doesn't play in the spread offense. Oh he also has the physical tools Bustford doesn't have.

does this have to turn into a bradford vs. stafford debate? Most of us are saying Bradford impressed us tonight, did better than we expected, surprised us. Nothing you or I say will influence our draft pick. Instead, maybe stay on topic and talk about how/why Bradford didn't impress you. Nothing to do with IF he's better than stafford, or anyone else.

For now anyway, just a thought....

That is the dumbest ****ing thing I have seen. You have no clue what he is, no one does. He is my 3rd favorite QB in the draft (if all come out), but just because I like a couple guys before him does not make him a bust. He can make the throws, is a great athlete, and has a good head on his shoulders. Had two picks tonight, that I wouldn't credit to him. Kid has game, don't know if it will translate to the NFL, but either do you.

I was watching at the bar, and thinking the whole time, that this place would probably be giving him some props. Well ****, I should have knew better then that.

This was a hell of a game, if you like someone else better, fine. Come on guys, give credit where credit id due.

I've been blasting Bradford all season. I had watched some of his games, and it always seemed as if he was throwing to a spot on the field. Today he threw some good balls into tight coverage, His receivers let him down a few times, and he still gets flustrated under pressure, but I don't fear us selecting him near as much. The kid has talent, and he did take some snaps from under center. I won't flip if puts on the ketchup, and mustard.

Eerily similar post to mine. I swear I didn't read one response of this thread before making my mine.

EDit: I still prefer Stafford by a wide margin

It's kinda "all or nothing" here. We deal in extremes.

My personal wish list is...

Sanchez
Stafford
Bradford

But to be honest, I'd be excited about any of those 3. It's about time the Chiefs went "balls out" and went after a franchise QB.

:ZZZ:

:LOL::LOL::LOL:

TEbow all the way homie. Duel threat FTW

Exactly, I'm not understanding the whole - I like this guy so that guy ****ing sucks, sure bust.

Maybe we can get Switzer to be the HC. The return of the "Option" in the NFL...we can lead the movement, baby!!!! :cuss:

I don't know if I've seen enough of stafford, I like what I hear about him, certainly wouldn't say I don't want him. I just want a good QB that stays healthy plays good games, has a strong desire to win and is talented enough to make all the throws.

all three could easily end up fitting that bill, IMO. Bradford did well tonight, I was surprised. I tried to put my biases aside and just watch him as neutral as I could too.

Down the stretch, OU did not call a single play where Bradford had to make a read. They were all set plays where the ball was going to one guy. He had happy feet on a lot of his throws. When he's drafted he needs to sit on the bench for a year. The next year you can let him hold a clip board. The next year you might start him, but he'll get his skinny ass broke in two in week 3.

When he rolled out he was a high stepping dandy.

Just didn't look like an NFL QB in the least.

Have you seen Stafford play? He was a mediocre QB for most of his career (until this year) and runs the most un-NFL like offense of the big 3 (Sanchez, Bradford and Stafford).