Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5505766)

Ray lewis hasnt had 4 sacks since '97.

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5505766)

Ray lewis hasnt had 4 sacks since '97.

Originally Posted by Dark Horse (Post 5505708)

So he's Derrick Johnson part 2.

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5505768)

So Curry is a sure fire Probowl OLB in his 1st two years? He is an immediate impact player that will redefine the position?

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse (Post 5505760)

You saying a guy CANT get a sack is the same thing as you saying a QB CANT learn to play offense. Yet you're the 1st one to jump in and say your boy who has little to no experience will have no problem being the next great QB.

I dont get too hung up in your evaluations. They're pretty self serrving.

I dont understand what big benefit a bench QB has to offer us. I mean, you're not thinking someone with no experience is gonna come out of college and wow us all on an NFL level do you?

Of course you do.

If I had to guess, I'd say you're the one who likes to argue. Since that is what the thread is designed to do. Argue a point saying the same shit you've been saying for the last week 500 times over. Like it's somehow going to make more sense now.

Give it up man. It's really not that ****ing important in the regular scope of life. Take a break. There's more to life than convincing/insulting everyone into your way of felating Sanchez.

You're starting to come off like a fricken kook.

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 5505777)

If Sanchez gets picked at #3 there is no way he sits for long. Thats just simple $$$$ economics more than aything.

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5505768)

So Curry is a sure fire Probowl OLB in his 1st two years? He is an immediate impact player that will redefine the position?

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5505781)

And now we're back to the thing of people not wanting a QB unless he's a perfect prospect.

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5505739)

He's a LB...

You could literally go sign a guy for half the price.

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse (Post 5505783)

That's a little over the top. Simmer down.

He's a top prospect at the single biggest need on defense though. Probably wont be a bench warmer his 1st season.

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5505789)

Who?

Again who do you pick if both QB's are gone? I know you've said CB. OK. How does that have more value to this team?

Curry had 15 tackles behind the line. 3 TD's from int's. over 100 tackles. He's a solid tackler and a big hitter. He is stout against the run. So they didnt rush the passer with him. We cant get everything with one pick or even one draft. Lewis doesnt rush the passer either and he does pretty OK.

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 5505785)

Who said Curry was the perfect prospect...

Its just a mindset in the fanbase... Some want defense and 9-7, others want a QB and a chance to win a superbowl...

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5505801)

Statistically-speaking, DJ had 10.5 sacks (more than curry), 9 INTs (more than curry), 69 tackles for loss (24 more than curry), 9 passes defended (less than curry) and 458 tackles (120+ more than curry).

Size-wise they're almost identical (Curry's reported 5 pounds heavier). DJ ran in the low 4.5s, Curry's expected to run in the low 4.6s.

One played at Texas. One played at Wake Forest.

Look at all of those stats and tell me why Curry's supposedly going top-3 and DJ went 15. Although to be fair, virtually nobody expected DJ to fall that far.