![]() |
KU > MU. It's like this every single season. In the end, KU will have a better regular season record, finish higher in the B12, and go farther in the tourney. What's newsworthy about this?
The MU fanbase is as bitter as they should be. They've never really won anything of worth so they live and die off of KU's successes and failures while clinging on to their win at home like a crusty turd on an ass hair. As they should. The better KU does, the better their win looks. |
Quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, because I don't watch every Missouri game, but it seems to me like the biggest issue for Missouri is that they have to force turnovers, because they take some stupid shots on offense and they don't rebound. So, they can easily get into trouble if they aren't forcing turnovers, and they're SOL if they aren't forcing turnovers and the easy shots aren't falling (yesterday). OTOH, Kansas can turn the ball over 15-17 times a game (20+ in the win @Lincoln) and still win the game, because they lead the league in defensive FG%, and they have an inside/outside threat on offense. They have a true inside threat, and they have a guard who can take over a game. One of their biggest faults is focus, along with turnovers. Please add stuff as you see fit, but from this perspective, I can objectively see why someone would think Kansas is the better team (and the "scoreboard" argument only goes so far). That's not to say Kansas is better than everyone else in the nation or that they'll make the FF while Missouri loses in the first round. I just think Kansas has more things working for them. Missouri's thing is forcing turnovers, and from what I've seen they have to do that to be successful... Kansas has a better 3pt%, better FT%, better rebounding/inside presence, and they only have 1 conference loss despite leading the Big 12 in turnovers/game. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Hey Pete, I found a pic of you. |
Hey Zach,
when were you going to post a video of the MU fans at a bar at the end of the KU/MU football game? |
Yes, the rankings are fair. Mizzou is right about where they should be, and KU is where they should be.
That being said, KU is still a better team than Mizzou. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and it wasn't an attempt at smack..just stating the facts, Sir. Just stating the facts. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Go Hokies and Go Heels
|
When MU won the first meeting I congratulated them on not giving up when they were way behind. I said no excuses MU won KU lost. This time it outcome was quite different. Obviously yesterday KU was the better team. Not much else needs to be said.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kansas's win over Mizzou at AFH was impressive. MU is not ready to play on that stage, luckily we have some important games left to get some of the experience we will need to play in the NCAA tourney. As a Mizzou fan, I'm just happy to see Mizzou anywhere near the top 25. A 4 seed in the tourney is far more than even the most optimistic Mizzou fan could have dreamed of coming into this season. Kansas is young and inexperienced, but they are performing very well down the strecth in some hostile environments to boot. You guys are going to be a force to be reckoned with next year, and no slouch this year either. May KU crash and burn in an epic fashion in the tourney though :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was hoping to get some decent responses from the Mizzou crowd, but unfortunately logic and reason are anchors in the sea of pointless smack talk. And I don't know about an epic crash and burn... at the beginning of the season the vast majority of Jayhawks fans were expecting to finish 3rd or 4th in the conference and get a seed around 5+... and 5 might have been high. I'm still in denial about the whole thing, so while I obviously want them to get into the second weekend, and earlier exit isn't going to be a huge disappointment or surprise. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.