Haley punches him in the face when he gets angry

I would have rather had the guys you listed too.

But they didn't pick them and I can't change that.

Mark Sanchez would have been terrible with us. He wouldn't have a check down that an inexperienced QB would love to rely on (I guess if Tony never went he would have). But he also wouldn't have the veteran leadership to boost him along. Unless you count Tyler Thigpen or Ingle Martin...

I'm not going to get into this with you.

Mark Sanchez is MY choice. If he were a Chief, there would have been no reason to rush him onto the field. Depending on his weekly development, he wouldn't have needed to start until 2010, unless the offensive line was completely repaired AND he showed progress in practice.

The Chiefs aren't winning jackshit this year (and probably not next year either) and Sanchez WILL be a franchise QB.

FYP

Not anyone with any sense.

I'm not saying I agree, but people around here are so quick to throw somebody under the bus (Dorsey).

I think a big reason they reached for Jackson was due to all the talk of how other teams were also going to the 3-4. They figured they got the best player for that scheme ahead of any other team. Wasn't Pioli's fault we had #3 and not #12.

It's nice to know that someone else had watched LSU's BCS championship game, and noticed who had complemented Dorsey, to the extent that Dorsey became our no-brainer pick, afterward. As much as I was asking "Why?" Saturday nite, the answer came from the memory of that game.

I can't fault Pioli and crew for which picks they made, yet in some respects, I'd like to have a "Play Season" button on the remote, and just get into next year's draft. 2009-2010: 7-9.

It's almost like we're sticking with the 4-3...

Oh, wait.