![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
They would be better off and so would we. |
Quote:
Sounds like a nice start for your young franchise QB, but no that's to logical. |
Quote:
And yet something tells me you would have traded LJ for ANY of those running backs after the 2007 season. You'll never, ever admit you're wrong about Larry Johnson. He bounced back in a way almost no one expected last year. But yeah, he's not worth a shit. Not at ALL. |
Quote:
I think that would have been great for the Chiefs to have #20, #33 and Backus for the #3 pick. But I agree that they should have done more for the offense. Maybe they are thinking that they can late Culpepper get killed this year and bring in another LT next year when Stafford starts. That is if they wait to start him. |
Quote:
He was wildly inconsistent and hurt last year. He's not great. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's the difference in teams, we keep running our declining pile out there, they replace him. |
Quote:
None of them averaged 4.5 YPC. I'm guessing Larry is REALLY going to make you eat crow this year. Unless he gets hurt. Which of course, is unlikely, because he's as durable as they come. Even after the 400 carry gauntlet. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If LJ had averaged 3.8 YPC like LT I'm sure Mecca would be screaming at the top of his lungs about how washed up LJ is. |
I'm going to guess they all carried significantly more than he did since Johnson missed games and got to play in an where he carried less, so a couple of big runs skew his average..
Lets not bring up the 2nd halves of games when running would have been good and he had 1 yard carries. |
Tomlinson is ****ing old, he has a ton of wear on his body, he's declining just the same.
|
Quote:
Stupid mother****er! Stop skewing your average! What are you going to say when LJ puts up 1300 yards this year? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.